![[Antara Haldar] Why global governance is failing](/_next/image?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwimg.heraldcorp.com%2Fnews%2Fcms%2F2025%2F03%2F16%2Fnews-p.v1.20250316.b00eaa0ea4e74ff3b5004a4588876044_T1.jpg&w=3840&q=100)
[Antara Haldar] Why global governance is failing
The United Nations was established in 1945, succeeding the failed League of Nations, to pull humanity back from the brink of self-destruction. It was a bold experiment in collective security, designed to prevent another world war and manage conflicts through diplomacy rather than violence.
Yet, 80 years later, we find ourselves back on the precipice of disaster. Global temperatures have breached the 1.5 degrees Celsius threshold that scientists see as a Rubicon for reining in climate change over the long term. Public trust in institutions -- and in democracy -- is critically low, and geopolitical tensions are rising. What happened?
The UN has, justifiably, drawn criticism for a variety of reasons. The composition of the Security Council is antiquated. Violent conflict, and even genocide, still occur with alarming frequency. And the organization has proven to be generally ineffectual, overly bureaucratic, and unfair in its treatment of the Global South.
But the inadequately diagnosed problem is that the UN is bringing a 20th-century logic to bear on the 21st century's fundamentally planetary problems. Today's most urgent challenges -- climate change, pandemics, AI regulation, financial contagion, supply-chain disruptions -- do not respect national borders, yet UN institutions remain stuck in a framework of nation-states jealously guarding their sovereignty. Our international institutions simply were not designed to address essentially systemic issues indifferent to national borders. The UN is not just slow; it is structurally incapable of tackling such problems at scale.
With even conventional governance structures faltering in the face of heightened tribalism and nationalism, any proposed new paradigm of planetary governance runs the risk of sounding utopian. Fortunately, the world already has a serviceable blueprint: The European Union, for all its flaws, has demonstrated that a supranational federation can work, allowing previously warring countries to pool sovereignty in exchange for economic and political stability. Nor is this such a radical idea. In a 1946 Gallup poll, 54 percent of Americans believed that 'the UN should be strengthened to make it a world government with power to control the armed forces of all nations, including the United States.'
In 2024, by contrast, 58 percent of Americans thought the UN was doing a 'poor job.' This suggests that the UN needs to take a bolder approach. Big, planetary issues like global warming are what philosopher Timothy Morton calls 'hyperobjects.' They are 'entities of such vast temporal and spatial dimension' as to require a fundamentally different kind of human reasoning. To change how we think about such problems calls for both an intellectual and a psychological shift -- beyond the nation-state, or what Benedict Anderson famously called 'imagined communities.'
Intellectually, planetary thinking requires its own theoretical framework. This demand is not new. In the 20th century, John Maynard Keynes saw a need for a global currency and proposed the 'bancor' to replace the dollar-focused Bretton Woods institutions; Hannah Arendt advanced her own vision of planetary politics; and Pierre Teilhard de Chardin developed his concept of the 'noosphere' (collective human consciousness). In more recent scholarship -- from Johan Rockström's work on 'planetary boundaries' to Bruno Latour's description of our ecological age -- the intellectual elements of a new planetary paradigm are beginning to come together.
Psychologically, we need a new narrative. The historian Yuval Noah Harari argues that human civilization is built on shared myths: nationalism, religion, capitalism. If planetary governance is to succeed, it needs to tell a compelling new story, one that moves beyond outdated ideas about sovereign nation-states to acknowledge humanity's interconnectedness.
Rigorous planetary thinking must be accompanied by stronger local thinking. Improvements to our governance structures must look both 'up' and 'down,' as the Berggruen Institute's Jonathan Blake and Nils Gilman have put it. Global governance cannot succeed without resilient, empowered local structures. The nation-state would remain one element, but cities, regions and local networks would be given more attention and integrated into planetary decision-making. This kind of nested approach could offer an alternative to the outdated system of nation-states without requiring its wholesale dismantling.
The growing urgency of planetary crises -- from the 2008 financial crash to pandemics and climate change -- graphically illustrate the inadequacies of the UN in its current form. The UN itself emerged from the shell of the League of Nations, and now it is time to build anew. Governance must pivot from the nation-state-based logic of the Bretton Woods system to the planetary sensibilities of the bancor. Even if the United Nations had succeeded in uniting the world's nations, its current design would be unequal to a moment defined by inherently planetary challenges. It's time to imagine new communities centered on our planetary realities.
Antara Haldar
Antara Haldar, associate professor of empirical legal studies at the University of Cambridge, is a visiting faculty member at Harvard University and the principal investigator on a European Research Council grant on law and cognition. The views expressed here are the writer's own. -- Ed.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Korea Herald
14 hours ago
- Korea Herald
Lee taps next-gen officials for foreign policy team ahead of G7 trip
Former vice foreign minister under Moon reportedly set for top post President Lee Jae-myung's foreign policy team is taking shape ahead of his diplomatic debut at the G7 summit, with the surprising appointment of relatively young vice ministers in a break with Korea's long-established system of seniority. At the same time, veteran diplomat Cho Hyun, who previously served as both first and second vice minister, as well as UN ambassador, under the liberal Moon Jae-in government, concurrent with the first Trump administration, has all but secured his place as the leading candidate for foreign minister. The Foreign Ministry appeared to find the presidential office's announcement on Tuesday unexpected, as Park Yoon-joo — appointed first vice foreign minister — had a shorter career in the civil service than several officials who would now report to him. Park passed the 29th foreign service exam in 1995, making him 11 years junior to his predecessor, Kim Hong-kyun, who passed the 18th foreign service exam. In terms of years of service since passing the foreign service exam, Park is also the junior of the current deputy ministers for political affairs, protocol affairs, and planning and coordination — all of whom he now directly oversees. At the Foreign Ministry in Seoul, where a rigid seniority-based culture prevails, it is considered virtually unprecedented for someone so junior in years of service to be appointed as first vice foreign minister, overseeing bilateral affairs and personnel management. However, Park is not the youngest person to serve as first vice minister; the previous Moon Jae-in administration appointed Choi Jong-kun to the post in 2020 when he was just 46 years old. Park reportedly has a long-standing relationship with National Security Adviser Wi Sung-lac, dating back to their time working together at the presidential office. When Wi was dispatched from the Foreign Ministry to the transition committee during the Roh Moo-hyun administration in 2002 and 2003, Park was serving at Cheong Wa Dae, the presidential office and residence also known as the Blue House. In 2004, when Wi was posted to Washington as minister at the South Korean Embassy, Park also served alongside him as first secretary at the same embassy. Park's most recent position was minister at South Korea's mission to the Association of Southeast Asian Nations, but most of his career has been devoted to diplomacy vis-a-vis the US. Park has served as first secretary at the Embassy in Washington, director of North American Affairs, deputy consul general at the Korean Consulate General in Boston, deputy director-general at the Bureau of North American Affairs, and consul general in Atlanta. Kim: From academia Kim Jina, a professor in the Department of Language and Diplomacy at Hankuk University of Foreign Studies, was appointed second vice foreign minister, overseeing multilateral and economic affairs. Born in 1979, Kim is also younger than most director-general-level officials who head the bureaus, serving as the ministry's backbone. Her predecessor, Kang In-sun, was born in 1964. Kim played an active role in the 'Responsible Global Power Committee,' which helped shape Lee Jae-myung's foreign, security and unification policies during his presidential campaign, serving as vice chair of the committee's Practical Diplomacy Subcommittee. The committee was co-chaired by Lee Jong-seok, the current nominee for director of the National Intelligence Service and former unification minister under the Roh Moo-hyun administration, as well as Rep. Cho Jeong-sik of the Democratic Party of Korea. "The international community hopes that Korea, as a responsible member, will be more involved in and contribute further to resolving global issues," Kim said in her inauguration speech Wednesday. "The reason the new administration set forth pragmatic diplomacy with the aim of becoming a globally responsible power is precisely to meet these demands of the times." Cho: Trade veteran Cho Hyun, a career diplomat with extensive experience in multilateral diplomacy and trade, has been tipped as the Lee administration's first foreign minister, according to multiple sources. Cho was active in the Responsible Global Power Committee as well as the Special Committee on Northeast Asian Peace and Cooperation, chaired by Wi, which serves as the Democratic Party's main body overseeing security affairs and North Korea issues. Cho's diplomatic career includes ambassador to India in 2015, as well as ambassador to Austria and permanent representative to international organizations in Vienna in 2011. Cho also held the post of deputy permanent representative to the UN in New York in 2006. Within the Foreign Ministry, Cho has held numerous high-level positions, including deputy minister for multilateral and global affairs, ambassador for energy and resources, and director-general of the Ministry's International Economic Affairs Bureau. Cho was involved in negotiations for a Korea-Japan free trade agreement and served as chief negotiator for the Korea-Mexico FTA. As ambassador to India — a major emerging market — in 2015, he worked to strengthen economic cooperation between the two countries.


Korea Herald
16 hours ago
- Korea Herald
Trump 'receptive' to correspondence with NK leader Kim: White House
US President Donald Trump is "receptive" to correspondence with North Korean leader Kim Jong-un and wants to see the progress that was made during their first summit in 2018, a White House spokesperson said Wednesday. Karoline Leavitt, the spokesperson, made the remarks after NK News reported, citing an "informed high-level source," that North Korean diplomats in New York had refused to accept a letter from Trump, which was aimed at reestablishing communication channels between Washington and Pyongyang. "The president remains receptive to correspondence with Kim Jong-un, and he'd like to see the progress that was made at that summit in Singapore, which I know you covered in 2018 during his first term," Leavitt told a press briefing. "As for specific correspondence, I'll leave that to the president to answer," she added. The news report emerged amid expectations that Trump might seek to resume his personal diplomacy with the North Korean leader, which led to three in-person meetings between them -- the first in Singapore in 2018, the second in Hanoi in February 2019 and the third at the inter-Korean truce village of Panmunjom in June 2019. At the Singapore summit, Trump and Kim agreed on joint efforts to pursue the "complete denuclearization" of the Korean Peninsula and establish new bilateral relations in a deal that petered out amid deepening distrust between the two sides, and Pyongyang's unceasing push to sharpen its nuclear and missile capabilities. The NK News report said that Trump drafted the letter to Kim with the aim of resuming dialogue, and that despite multiple attempts to deliver the letter in person, North Korean diplomats at their UN mission in New York have "bluntly" refused to accept it. Asked about the report, a State Department spokesperson told Yonhap News Agency that the department "does not comment on any potential diplomatic communications." While Trump's willingness to reengage with Kim has raised cautious optimism for the resumption of dialogue, concerns have lingered that Kim might have little appetite for talks with Washington given the North's reliance on Russia for food, fuel, military assistance and other types of support. The president has said he will reach out to Kim again, claiming that he continues to maintain a "good" relationship with Kim, while calling the reclusive leader a "smart guy" and North Korea a "nuclear power." The second Trump administration has reiterated its commitment to pursuing the "complete" denuclearization of North Korea. New South Korean President Lee Jae-myung's administration is expected to seek policy coordination with Washington on an approach to address Pyongyang's nuclear quandary. In a conciliatory gesture to ease cross-border tensions, the Lee administration on Wednesday suspended loudspeaker propaganda broadcasts against North Korea along the border, raising cautious hope for improvement in frosty inter-Korean relations. (Yonhap)


Korea Herald
a day ago
- Korea Herald
N. Korean leader Kim sends message congratulating Putin on Russia Day
North Korean leader Kim Jong-un sent a message congratulating Russian President Vladimir Putin on Russia Day, the North's state media reported Wednesday. North Korean Ambassador to Russia Sin Hong-chol "respectfully" conveyed Kim's message to the relevant official at the Russian foreign ministry, the Korean Central News Agency (KCNA) said. Russia Day, which falls in June 12, is a national holiday that marks the 1990 adoption by the Russian parliament of the declaration of state sovereignty of the present-day Russian Federation. Details of Kim's letter were not disclosed, but the message likely reaffirmed the North's commitment to advancing their bilateral relations based on the treaty signed by the two leaders in June last year. In his previous message to Putin on Russia Day last year, Kim called their bilateral ties "a strategic asset" for both countries, reaffirming the North's steadfast commitment to advancing the relationship "in line with the demands of the new era." (Yonhap)