The ugliest things Trump and Musk just said about one another
By
Aaron Blake
, CNN
Photo:
AFP
Analysis
- About 10 minutes into his bilateral meeting with German Chancellor Friedrich Merz on Thursday, President Donald Trump was finally asked about the domestic elephant in the room: Elon Musk and his
sharp criticisms
this week of Trump's agenda bill.
"He hasn't said anything about me that's bad," Trump said. "I'd rather have him criticize me than the bill."
Trump certainly got his wish. By the end of the meeting, he and Musk had quickly moved from what had been a legislative difference of opinion into the
realm of personal attacks
. Musk effectively live-tweeted his responses to Trump's comments on his social media platform X, getting progressively more personal. And Trump ultimately hit back hard on his own platform, Truth Social.
It was the kind of clash many predicted would eventually arrive when the two powerful, outspoken and unwieldy billionaires formed their alliance of convenience last year. And it's now arrived in a big way.
Late Thursday afternoon, Musk responded to an X user who chose Musk over Trump and called for the president's impeachment by simply saying, "Yes".
It's increasingly hard to see how this spat gets resolved without getting even uglier given what's being said.
Shortly before the Oval Office event, Musk specifically invoked Trump's flip-flops on the national debt, citing years-old tweets from when Trump was much more of a professed spending hawk. ("Where is the man who wrote these words?" Musk asked. "Was he replaced by a body double!?")
But Trump has never been particularly sensitive about his rhetorical consistency or fiscal conservatism.
And as the minutes wore on, things got much more personal.
Here are the comments (so far) that really stick out - and will seemingly be hard to move past.
Musk really went there, accusing the Trump administration of withholding information about disgraced financier and convicted pedophile Jeffrey Epstein because it invokes Trump himself.
"Time to drop the really big bomb: @realDonaldTrump is in the Epstein files. That is the real reason they have not been made public," Musk wrote on X. "Have a nice day, DJT!"
He later added: "Mark this post for the future. The truth will come out."
Musk did not detail how he would have gained access to unreleased files. And the inclusion of a person's name in files related to the case does not by itself indicate they have been accused of any wrongdoing.
CNN has reached out to the White House for a response.
Trump's proximity to Epstein in the past is not exactly news; he's been photographed with Epstein. But Musk's allegation - made without providing any evidence of where it came from - feeds into concern in some right-wing circles about the lack of transparency about Epstein, who died by suicide in 2019 while awaiting trial on federal sex-trafficking charges.
After Trump talked during the campaign about potentially releasing more government files about Epstein, Attorney General Pam Bondi released an initial tranche of files in February that largely duplicated information that had already been made public.
Exactly what Musk is getting at isn't clear or substantiated. But it's really going nuclear, given the subject matter.
The most sacred of topics in Trump's eyes: his election wins.
Trump claimed he would have won the crucial state of Pennsylvania even without Musk's help. But Musk, who spent hundreds of millions of dollars and campaigned for Trump, shot back that he was in fact the reason Trump won the presidency.
"Without me, Trump would have lost the election, Dems would control the House and the Republicans would be 51-49 in the Senate," Musk said.
Musk then added in another post: "Such ingratitude."
There are few topics Trump takes as seriously as his reputation as a winner. He often talks about how his endorsements help Republicans and has endlessly exaggerated the size of his electoral victories and mandate.
It's clearly a point of emphasis, and Musk just went there.
Trump, like other Republicans in recent days, suggested Musk's criticism of his "Big Beautiful Bill" wasn't really about excessive spending - as Musk has said it is - but instead about one of his personal businesses, Tesla.
"Elon's upset because we took the [electric vehicle] mandate and - you know, which was a lot of money for electric vehicles," Trump said in the Oval Office.
"He only developed a problem when he found out I would cut the EV mandate," Trump added.
Trump later posted on Truth Social that Musk "went CRAZY" over the EV changes.
Musk sought to call Trump's bluff, encouraging lawmakers to keep the EV subsidies cuts but trim spending.
"Whatever," Musk said. "Keep the EV/solar incentive cuts in the bill, even though no oil & gas subsidies are touched (very unfair!!), but ditch the MOUNTAIN of DISGUSTING PORK in the bill."
Musk pointed to past comments in which he actually discouraged lawmakers from enacting EV tax credits. He also pointed to a clip in which Trump himself said that Musk had "never asked me for a thing".
But perhaps most strikingly, Musk promoted a post from the chief GOP critic of the bill in the House, Rep. Thomas Massie of Kentucky.
"Some politicians get into politics to enrich themselves," Massie said. "Maybe that's why they can't imagine someone would judge a bill based on what's good for the country instead of what's good for their wallet."
That seems a pretty sharp dig at Trump, who has intermingled his personal business with his role as president plenty in his second term.
Trump's comments have, to this point, been largely suggestive about Musk's motives. But Musk has clearly taken offense.
Despite the White House claiming this week that it had been previously aware of Musk's opposition to the package, Trump on Thursday claimed that he was in fact surprised.
"I'm very disappointed, because Elon knew the inner workings of this bill better than almost anybody sitting here, better than you people," Trump said in the Oval Office. "He knew everything about it. He had no problem with it. All of a sudden, he had a problem."
"But he knew every aspect of this bill. He knew it better than almost anybody, and he never had a problem until right after he left."
Musk responded that Trump's version of events was "false."
He wrote that "this bill was never shown to me even once and was passed in the dead of night so fast that almost no one in Congress could even read it!"
Musk seemed to put to rest any illusions that this somehow isn't devolving into a power struggle.
Responding to an X user who noted lawmakers are feeling pressured to pick a side, Musk made a case for them picking him.
"Oh and some food for thought as they ponder this question: Trump has 3.5 years left as President, but I will be around for 40+ years," Musk wrote.
In other words: Tread carefully. I have lots of money - and time.
Trump later posted on Truth Social that, if lawmakers wanted to really save money, they should "terminate Elon's Governmental Subsidies and Contracts."
When a user claimed Trump's idea would mean effectively abandoning the International Space Station, Musk promoted the post and dared Trump. "Go ahead, make my day," he wrote on X.
Musk later said he would "begin decommissioning" a key spacecraft.
It remains to be seen where things go from here. Trump often reconciles with allies, even after ugly things are said.
But rarely is the other figure someone as powerful and outspoken as Musk. The power dynamics are usually such that the other party feels pressured to cave to Trump.
Musks suggests he's ready for that power struggle. If he is, buckle up.
-
CNN
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

RNZ News
an hour ago
- RNZ News
New push in Europe to curb children's social media use
By Raziye Akkoc , AFP Photo: Unsplash / Getty Images From dangerous diet tips to disinformation, cyberbullying to hate speech, the glut of online content harmful to children grows every day. But several European countries have had enough and agree the European Union (EU) should do more to prevent minors' access to social media. The EU already has some of the world's most stringent digital rules to rein in Big Tech, with multiple probes ongoing into how platforms protect children - or fail to do so. Backed by France and Spain, Greece spearheaded a proposal for how the EU should limit children's use of online platforms as a rising body of evidence shows the negative effects of social media on children's mental and physical health. They discussed the plan Friday with EU counterparts in Luxembourg to push the idea of setting an age of digital adulthood across the 27-country bloc, meaning children would not be able to access social media without parental consent. France, Greece and Denmark believe there should be a ban on social media for under-15s, while Spain has suggested a ban for under-16s. Australia has banned social media for under-16s, taking effect later this year, while New Zealand and Norway are considering a similar prohibition. After the day's talks in Luxembourg, it appeared there was no real appetite at this stage for an EU-wide ban on children under a specific age. But Danish Digital Minister Caroline Stage Olsen indicated there would be no let-up. "It's going to be something we're pushing for," she said. Top EU digital official Henna Virkkunen admitted specific age limits would be "challenging" for multiple reasons, including cultural differences in member states and how it would work in practice. But the European Commission, the EU's digital watchdog, still intends to launch an age-verification app next month, insisting it can be done without disclosing personal details. The EU last month published non-binding draft guidelines for platforms to protect minors, to be finalised once a public consultation ends this month, including setting children's accounts to private by default, and making it easier to block and mute users. French Digital Minister Clara Chappaz said it would be "a very big step" if the EU made platforms check the real age of their users, as theoretically required under current regulation. The worry is that children as young as seven or eight can easily create an account on social media platforms despite a minimum age of 13, by giving a false date of birth. "If we all agree as Europeans to say this needs to stop, there needs to be a proper age verification scheme, then it means that children below 13 won't be able to access the platform," Chappaz said. France has led the way in cracking down on platforms, passing a 2023 law requiring them to obtain parental consent for users under the age of 15. But the measure has not received the EU green light it needs to come into force. France also gradually introduced requirements this year for all adult websites to have users confirm their age to prevent children accessing porn - with three major platforms going dark this week in anger over the move. TikTok, also under pressure from the French government, on Sunday banned the "#SkinnyTok" hashtag, part of a trend promoting extreme thinness on the platform. France, Greece and Spain expressed concern about the algorithmic design of digital platforms increasing children's exposure to addictive and harmful content - with the risk of worsening anxiety, depression and self-esteem issues. Their proposal - also supported by Cyprus and Slovenia - blames excessive screen time at a young age for hindering the development of minors' critical and relationship skills. They demand "an EU-wide application that supports parental control mechanisms, allows for proper age verification and limits the use of certain applications by minors". The goal would be for devices such as smartphones to have in-built age verification. The EU is clamping down in other ways as well. It is currently investigating Meta's Facebook and Instagram, and TikTok under its mammoth content moderation law, the Digital Services Act (DSA), fearing the platforms are failing to do enough to prevent children accessing harmful content. And last week, it launched an investigation into four pornographic platforms over suspicions they are failing to stop children accessing adult content. - AFP

RNZ News
an hour ago
- RNZ News
Riot police, anti-ICE protesters square off in Los Angeles after raids
By Jane Ross and Steve Gorman , Reuters Helmeted police in riot gear turned out in a tense confrontation with protesters in downtown Los Angeles, after a day of federal immigration raids in which dozens of people across the city were reported to be taken into custody. Live Reuters video showed Los Angeles Police Department officers on Friday evening (local time) lined up on a downtown street wielding batons and what appeared to be tear gas rifles, facing off with demonstrators after authorities had ordered crowds of protesters to disperse around nightfall. Early in the standoff, some protesters hurled chunks of broken concrete toward officers, and police responded by firing volleys of tear gas and pepper spray. Police also fired "flash-bang" concussion rounds. It was not clear whether there were any immediate arrests. An LAPD spokesperson, Drake Madison, told Reuters that police on the scene had declared an unlawful assembly, meaning that those who failed to leave the area were subject to arrest. Television news footage earlier in the day showed caravans of unmarked military-style vehicles and vans loaded with uniformed federal agents streaming through Los Angeles streets as part of the immigration enforcement operation. US Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents targeted several locations, including a Home Depot in the city's Wetlake District, an apparel store in the Fashion District and a clothing warehouse in South Los Angeles, according to the Los Angeles City News Service (CNS). CNS and other local media reported dozens of people were taken into custody during the raids, the latest in a series of such sweeps conducted in a number of cities as part of President Donald Trump's extensive crackdown on illegal immigration. Television news footage earlier in the day showed caravans of unmarked military-style vehicles and vans loaded with uniformed federal agents streaming through Los Angeles streets as part of the immigration enforcement operation. Photo: KENA BETANCUR / AFP The Republican president has vowed to arrest and deport undocumented migrants in record numbers. The LAPD did not take part in the immigration enforcement action. It was deployed to quell civil unrest after crowds protesting the deportation raids spray-painted anti-ICE slogans on the walls of a federal court building and massed outside a nearby jail where some of the detainees were believed to be held. Impromptu demonstrations had also erupted at some of the raid locations earlier in the day. One organised labour executive, David Huerta, president of the Service Employees International Union of California, was injured and detained by ICE at one site, according to an SEIU statement. The union said Huerta was arrested "while exercising his First Amendment right to observe and document law enforcement activity." No details about the nature or severity of Huerta's injury were given. It was not clear whether he was charged with a crime. ICE did not immediately respond to a request from Reuters for information about its enforcement actions or Huerta's detention. Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass issued a statement condemning the immigration raids, saying, "These tactics sow terror in our communities and disrupt basic principles of safety in our city." - Reuters


NZ Herald
3 hours ago
- NZ Herald
Salvadoran migrant returned to US, charged with human smuggling
The Salvadoran migrant at the heart of a row over US President Donald Trump's hardline deportation policies was returned to the United States on Saturday and arrested on human smuggling charges. Kilmar Armando Abrego Garcia was brought back to the US from El Salvador and charged with trafficking undocumented migrants,