Disposable vapes ban: What you need to know as single-use vapes are pulled from shelves
A ban on disposable vapes has come into force in the UK as the government attempts to crack down on youth nicotine addiction as well as the litter the single-use devices create.
The crackdown makes it illegal for any retailer – ranging from corner shops to supermarkets – to sell them.
The ban follows the soaring use of disposable vapes in schools and a flood of plastic rubbish from the discarding of the devices.
5.6 million adults were vaping in Great Britain in 2024, according to charity Action on Smoking Health (ASH).
Here, The Independent looks at the reasons behind the ban and what it means for you:
What vapes are being banned?
The government is banning the sale of single-use disposable vapes in England, Scotland and Northern Ireland.
A vape is single-use if it either has a battery that cannot be recharged or is not refillable.
To be reusable, a vape must have a rechargeable battery and a refillable container that holds the vaping e-liquid.
Why are they being banned?
The government has provided two main reasons for the disposable vape ban.
Firstly, to protect the environment.
Nearly five million disposable vapes were littered or discarded every week in 2024, according to Material Focus.
Most end up in general waste or as litter rather than being recycled.
These vapes are hazardous during disposal, with built-in batteries posing a fire risk in bin lorries and recycling centres.
They must be dismantled by hand to recycle, and if littered, can leak harmful chemicals into soil and waterways.
Secondly, to reduce the number of young people vaping.
The introduction of a new generation of disposable vapes in 2021 coincided with a significant increase in youth vaping.
The new single-use vapes are relatively cheap, have bright and attractive packaging, are easy to use and are widely promoted.
Although the rise in youth vaping has levelled off, disposables continue to be the most popular product among young people who vape, according to ASH.
Can I keep using disposable vapes?
The ban only applies to businesses selling disposable vapes, not to those who use them.
However, the Local Government Association urged people to think twice before hoarding disposable vapes, warning that stockpiling them could pose life-threatening risks.
There are concerns that some people are stocking up on single-use vapes, with research by online nicotine retailer Haypp finding 82 per cent of disposable vape users are planning to stockpile.
The LGA has warned that the lithium batteries contained inside disposable vapes could cause fires and pose a risk to life if not stored correctly.
Lithium batteries present a serious risk of fire, as there is the potential for them to enter into thermal runaway.
Thermal runaway occurs when a battery reaches up to 600C, releasing toxic gases and creating a fire, according to charity Electrical Safety First.
The ban applies to both online and in-store sales across England, Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland, and all disposable vapes whether or not they contain nicotine.
It applies to all businesses and organisations that sell or supply single-use vapes in the UK.
This includes:
Retailers – such as convenience stores, market stalls, petrol stations, specialist vape shops and supermarkets
Manufacturers
Wholesalers
Importers
Healthcare settings and stop smoking services
Retailers are still allowed to sell reusable vapes.
Rogue traders who continue to sell them risk a fine of £200 in the first instance, followed by an unlimited fine or jail time for repeat offending.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Telegraph
26 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Tough talk won't be sufficient to defend Britain from her enemies
SIR – Nothing sums up the failings of this Government better than the Prime Minister's grandiose statements on the necessity of effective defence, accompanied by a refusal to pledge the necessary budget. Even the absurdity of the promise to spend 3 per cent of GDP on defence in nine years' time – a figure plainly inadequate now, never mind in 2034 – was rendered the more so for being hastily qualified as an 'ambition'. In the meantime, the eternal truth remains: compromise on defence, and nothing else is secure. Philip J Ashe Garforth, West Yorkshire SIR – Thank goodness our enemies will wait until 2034 before attacking us. Nicholas Block Sturminster Newton, Dorset SIR – The PM has pledged to build 12 new attack submarines – one every 18 months. This will require a significant improvement on past performance. The Astute programme began in 1986, almost 40 years ago, and the seventh and final boat in the class is not due to be delivered until 2026, seven years after being laid down. By then the first, HMS Astute, will have been in service for 16 years. Astute was laid down in 2001, and since then build delays and cost overruns have been lamentable. Considering that we previously had experience of building several classes of such submarines for far less cost and in less time, this is not encouraging. Neil Russell Portsmouth, Hampshire SIR –There's no point in planning to build 12 new attack submarines unless the Navy has a credible strategy to recruit a sufficient number of officers to command them. In the past 10 years, only half the number required to sustain the submarine force have passed the gruelling command qualification course, creating a vicious circle of decline, which will soon be unrecoverable. The extent of the problem was illustrated last year, when the Navy was ridiculed for having advertised on LinkedIn to find a retired rear-admiral to lead the submarine service. Rear Admiral Philip Mathias (retd) Southsea, Hampshire SIR – One wonders whether, as a nation, we are willing to pay the price financially, politically and culturally, as we did during the Cold War, when the threat felt real and collective resilience was part of the national psyche. At recent VE Day events, we were reminded of a time when Britain understood the value of shared sacrifice and national preparedness. Defence is not merely a line in the budget; it is a reflection of our willingness to protect what we hold dear, and our capacity to act together with resolve when history demands it. John O'Brien Ukraine holds firm SIR – Ukraine's audacious and meticulously planned attack on military aviation assets across Russia has astounded the world (report, June 2). That the operation was kept secret for 18 months was itself an extraordinary achievement. Withholding the information from Donald Trump was a wise decision for two reasons: he might have sought to dissuade President Zelensky from going through with the plan; and operational security would have been placed at unnecessary risk. Mr Zelensky has proved himself to be a worthy, courageous and charismatic leader of a beleaguered yet defiant nation, which has held Russia at bay for more than three brutal years. The will of Ukraine's people to fight for their survival, and resist the illegal subjugation of their sovereign nation, remains strong and unyielding. Ukraine deserves all the support that its allies can provide – and Donald Trump must now acknowledge that he is indeed being 'tapped along' by Vladimir Putin. David Platts Newark, Nottinghamshire Rebuilding Gaza SIR – Since the October 7 2023 attacks by Hamas, Israel has had to defend itself, leading to charges of committing genocide; intentionally targeting civilians, schools, and hospitals; starving Gazans; and violating prisoners' rights. Whether one believes that Israel is guilty of these charges or that it has every right to do what's necessary to protect its citizens, many crucial questions remain. At some point, there will be a lasting ceasefire. Which countries will risk the lives of their soldiers to serve as peacekeepers? Which will finance the rebuilding of Gaza? How many years of rebuilding will it take to bring Gazans to the same level of existence they had on October 6 2023? Will Gazans ever be permitted to work inside Israel, as many did before the war began? I don't pretend to have any of these answers, but with America getting diplomatically and militarily closer to multiple countries in the region, it's incumbent on Donald Trump's administration to formulate an acceptable framework among Israel, its neighbouring countries, and global powers in Europe and Asia to end the suffering of Gazans. Paul L Newman Merion Station, Pennsylvania, USA Hare loss SIR – We have a thriving hare population (Letters, June 2), but hare coursers know this and visit frequently to practise their illegal sport. The police show no interest in apprehending them, even when the hare coursers have their vehicle stuck in a ditch and don't need chasing. Jonathan Yardley Wolverhampton Brown beer mix SIR – Your feature (May 31) on the demise of the term 'bitter' in favour of 'amber ales' reminded me of my time as a student in the Clarks company town of Street in Somerset in the early 1970s. As it was Quaker-dominated, finding a pub, let alone a decent ale, was a challenge. Instead, the tipple of choice for myself and my fellow students was a 'brown split'. This was created by mixing a half of the local keg beer (generally the ubiquitous Watney's Red Barrel) with a bottle of brown ale, ideally one from Newcastle. This satisfied my needs until the welcome arrival of real ales later in the decade. Geoff Pringle Long Sutton, Somerset Conservative betrayal SIR – The Conservative Party is dead. The only ones who haven't realised it yet are the party itself and the dwindling loyalists clinging to the wreckage. They're staggering around like political zombies – no soul, no direction, no credibility, kept alive only by inertia and blind tribal loyalty. The Conservatives have betrayed their voters on every major issue: immigration, national sovereignty, economic stability and freedom of speech. They promised conservative values and delivered managed decline, globalist appeasement and spineless governance. Their base is abandoning them in droves – and rightly so. The public have had enough of the lies, the empty slogans and the broken promises. What's left is a hollowed-out shell of a party that exists only to cling to power, not to serve the nation. It's time to stop pretending that reform can come from within. The only path forward is to tear down the failed establishment – and that means rejecting both the Conservatives and Labour. Anyone who wants to see real change in Britain needs to vote for Reform UK, and help drive a stake through the heart of this walking corpse once and for all. HMRC incompetence SIR – Being a UK resident, I had to complete an Irish form for the recovery of tax from the Irish Commissioners. This form has to be countersigned by HMRC. On August 23 2024, I sent the form with a covering letter to HMRC for its endorsement. I heard nothing, and sent a chaser letter in November, and still heard nothing. Last week, nine months later, I received a letter from HMRC with the form duly endorsed. Unfortunately, it was not the original form, but a copy. Its letter says that the 'copy has been authorised by one of our officers' and 'if Ireland does not accept this, please fill in and send us a new form'. Words fail me. Anne Preece Caldy, Wirral Duke as chancellor SIR – Prince Philip held the office of Chancellor of the University of Cambridge (Letters, June 2) with great dignity and distinction from 1976 to 2011. I can think of no better person to fill the current vacancy than the present Duke of Edinburgh. Derek Wellman Lincoln Put wild camping on a sustainable footing SIR – Ben East (Features, June 2) gives a useful summary of the dilemma facing the Government as to how to handle the demand for more wild camping provision in England. Living in an Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty, we often see tents in pleasant spots, usually owned by young campers, who are probably of limited means. However, there is good provision locally of regulated sites in nice locations, and I'd oppose any moves by the Government to introduce wild camping rights in this area similar to those enjoyed in Scotland. Perhaps a compromise would be to make more wild camping areas available in selected National Parks and AONBs, for a maximum of six tents, to be controlled by permits issued by the local ranger office. Owners of any private land used would be entitled to an annual fee to be paid by the taxpayer. This is not an ideal solution, but at least when arriving at your favourite Lake District tarn, you would be unlikely to find too many other campers. Ian Graham Carlisle, Cumbria Benefits for foreign staff working in the NHS SIR – While it may be statistically true that 'benefits claims by households with at least one foreign national have doubled to nearly £1 billion a month' (report, May 31), your article did not consider the advantages that many of these foreigners bring to this country. I was in an NHS hospital last week with a family member who received fantastic care from a consultant from Hong Kong, a doctor from eastern Europe, nurses from the Philippines, care workers from Portugal and Nigeria, and a porter from Portugal. Most such workers pay more in tax than they claim in benefits. I do not begrudge them claiming child benefit if they have children, or similar benefits that others in this country are able to claim. Philip Thomas Pudsey, West Yorkshire SIR – The news that foreign nationals are being paid nearly £1 billion a month in benefits is truly shocking, but hardly surprising given that illegal migrants continue to arrive in increasing numbers, safe in the knowledge that once they have landed on our shores and entered the asylum system, there is very little chance of them being returned to their country of origin or elsewhere. There is absolutely no deterrent. A string of absurd decisions by immigration tribunals has allowed claimants leave to remain in the UK on the basis of increasingly ludicrous evidence. This is not what the British public voted for, and their growing anger and frustration with this situation is understandable.
The Guardian
38 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Mongolia PM resigns after losing confidence vote that followed weeks of protests
Mongolia's prime minister has resigned after he failed to receive enough support in a vote of confidence in parliament, Mongolian media has reported. The country's embassy in Washington confirmed it. Prime minister Oyun-Erdene Luvsannamsrai received 44 votes, well short of the 64 needed, according to news site The vote early on Tuesday followed weeks of protests sparked by reports of lavish spending by the prime minister's son. Some called for the prime minister to step down. Before the vote, Oyun-Erdene warned the vote could lead to instability and shake Mongolia's fledgling democracy. 'If governance becomes unstable, the economic situation deteriorates, and political parties cannot come to consensus, it could lead the public to lose faith in parliamentary rule and potentially put our democratic parliamentary system at risk of collapse,' he said. He defended his integrity but acknowledged a mistake: 'dedicating too much time to major projects while paying insufficient attention to social and internal political matters.' Oyun-Erdene had held the post for four years and survived previous calls to step down. Last year, parliament was enlarged from 76 seats to 126 after electoral reforms. It resulted in a coalition government. Landlocked between Russia and China, Mongolia has struggled to become more democratic after its party-state era. A communist state during the cold war, it has been transforming into a democracy since the collapse of the Soviet Union. Protesters have said the country's mineral riches have benefited business interests and the wealthy, while many Mongolians still live in poverty. 'It's very difficult to build that foundation for democracy' at a time that Mongolia also must tackle economic problems, which are a major source of people's frustration, said Erin Murphy, deputy director and senior fellow of India and emerging Asian economics at the Center for Strategic and International Studies. 'We still have to see what happens next and how the new government plans to tackle these issues,' she said. While democracy is yet to thrive in Mongolia, 'it is taking root,' Murphy said.
Western Telegraph
42 minutes ago
- Western Telegraph
Vital routes to be protected as part of buses overhaul
Councils in England will put strict requirements in place before 'socially necessary' routes can be changed or cancelled, the department said. This is aimed at services to locations such as hospitals and schools. The measure is part of the Government's Bus Services Bill, which reached its second reading in the House of Commons on Monday. This will lead to an overhaul of buses, such as by giving all local transport authorities new powers to run their own services. The Government will also reduce some of the red tape involved in bus franchising, including reducing the minimum period between local areas taking control of services and being allowed to start operations. Transport Secretary Heidi Alexander said: 'We're committed to giving local leaders the power to shape the bus services their communities rely on. 'Our Bus Services Bill is a big step forward, protecting vital services that people depend on to get to work, school or essential appointments. 'We have taken a decisive step towards better buses, building on our £1 billion investment to improve and maintain bus services, keeping people connected, driving up living standards and growing the economy.' Ben Plowden, of lobby group the Campaign for Better Transport, said: 'Buses are the most-used form of public transport. 'Preserving vital bus services has long been central to our campaigning, so the new protections in the Bus Services Bill are very welcome indeed. 'Protecting existing services, and identifying and filling gaps in the network, is the way to ensure everyone can access opportunities and stay connected.' Conservative shadow transport secretary Gareth Bacon attacked the Bus Services Bill as 'an ideological move that threatens essential services'. He said: 'They scrapped the £2 fare cap, slashed support for routes, and now want to strip away safeguards so councils can seize control of networks they aren't capable of operating. 'This is about Labour clinging to a fantasy of municipal socialism, whatever the cost to those who rely on local transport. Without the requirement to prove any benefit to passengers, Labour-run councils will be free to run yet another public service into the ground. 'We're not opposed to local decision-making. But this Bill offers no real investment, no credible delivery model, and no route to better services.'
