logo
Undercover RTE documentary highlights shocking treatment in Irish nursing homes

Undercover RTE documentary highlights shocking treatment in Irish nursing homes

A shocking RTÉ documentary that goes undercover in two nursing homes shows residents crying out for help, left in soiled clothes and being incorrectly handled.
Over the past eight weeks, the public broadcaster has been investigating care at two nursing homes run by Emeis Ireland, formerly Orpea.
The largest private nursing home provider in the country, it has 27 homes across the country with capacity for 2,400 residents.
Following concerns raised by several whistleblowers, RTÉ had two undercover researchers and healthcare workers apply for and secure jobs at separate Emeis nursing homes.
The researchers got extensive footage from The Residence Portlaoise, Co Laois, and Beneavin Manor in Glasnevin, Dublin.
In Portlaoise, a woman was left stranded on a toilet by a new carer who had gone on her break.
Harrowing footage shows the woman saying "Don't leave me now, oh my God," as she has a broken call bell.
A nurse then comes to her help, as the terrified resident tells her she was "ringing and ringing and ringing". Later, speaking about the carer, she says: "She never came back. I'm here on me own. It was terrible. It is a fright when the other yoke won't work."
The nurse then told her "don't worry" but proceeded to clean the woman's hands with her own skirt.
In another incident, a man was left waiting for 25 minutes to use the bathroom, as he said he was "in terrible pain" and "very full".
Consultant Geriatrician Prof Rónán Collins, who took part in the documentary, said: "I don't want to be melodramatic and say that it amounts to institutional abuse of people but clearly if people are suffering because they want to go to the toilet and they're faced with the choice of being incontinent in the chair not being taken to the toilet due to staffing levels, that is very, very poor care of people."
Prof David Robinson added: "What we're looking at I suppose is largely institutional abuse and this is neglect at, we're seeing a lot of it, in a setting which is supposed to be caring."
Footage in Portlaoise showed a serious staffing issue, as the undercover healthcare worker was just one of three staff looking after 30 residents on Easter Saturday.
Much of the inadequate care appears to be down to staffing issues, however, the documentary also exposes a lack of proper equipment.
At a staff meeting in Portlaoise, the home ran out of incontinence pads, with a nurse saying that the next supply wouldn't arrive for 10 days.
A senior nurse then tells staff that management might restrict their access to pads.
She said: "'You were told this at the meeting, if ye run out of pads this month, you're going have to use what's there. You'll have to go and use sticky pads and use underwear and sticky pads for the next 10 days'."
A nurse then said that some residents were found "double padded" and "that is a form of abuse".
Commenting on this, Prof Robinson said: "Rationing incontinence wear when you're trying to make sure that people are clean and dry and also promote toileting. It's almost like a restriction."
The Emeis policy on correct manual handling techniques states its nursing homes should operate a "minimal manual handling approach".
However, during her time at The Residence in Portlaoise, the undercover assistant frequently saw staff flout basic manual handling skills.
A shocking scene shows a frail older woman being lifted under her arms by one male carer, despite her care plan outlining she needs two workers and a full body hoist.
The resident distressingly shouts "no" as the staff member tells her "no you're fine, you're fine".
At Beneavin Manor in Glasnevin, footage also showed staff improperly handling residents and leaving them to soil themselves.
While going down a corridor, a man using a walking frame was shown being guided by two staff in a very quick manner.
One assistant was hoisting him by the back of his waist, and he became visibly uncomfortable and upset.
Despite protesting, they forced him into his room and very abruptly pulled his trousers down and yanked his pad off before being pushed into a chair.
The elderly man could be heard saying: "Stop that! Stop that, get out of my room."
Prof Collins said: "That's unacceptable. You can clearly see that he's being roughly handled, inappropriately handled, that he's not understanding what's going on and being slightly frightened by as well as being grabbed by the back of his pants and pushed forward, pushed back into the chair. That's very inappropriate handling."
At the nursing home, the undercover reporter was also shown by a more senior assistant how to transfer a patient to bed "quickly".
Despite protocol being to use a hoist, she showed her how to lift the patient under her arms. She then informed her: "We aren't allowed to do this, it's speedy Gonzales".
At nighttime in Beanevin, footage showed a resident being refused the toilet, and told to go on his incontinence pad.
A nurse then gets agitated and tells him not to go on his sheets as they don't have any more.
The man was then heard calling for help multiple times but no one responded.
On another occasion, the same elderly man was found by the undercover reporter lying on a soaking wet bare mattress without any bedsheets.
Speaking at the end of the documentary, Professor Robinson said the footage shows "systemic and institutional lack of consideration for the older person.
"This is going to shorten people's lives and their lives will be more miserable."
RTÉ Investigates said findings have been reported by RTÉ researchers to HIQA, and the local nursing home management where applicable. It also said the findings of the investigation have been shared with the private nursing home group and RTÉ has offered them due right of reply.
In a statement, Emeis Ireland said: 'It is not, nor will it ever be our policy to understaff any of our nursing homes.
"Staff should only be released for in service training when sufficient staff remains in place to meet resident needs.
"The allocation and utilisation of staff resources across both nursing homes is also the subject of this review.
"It is not acceptable for residents to wait for care or to be dismissed when requesting assistance. We take these matters very seriously and we do not tolerate such practices...
"We acknowledge and sincerely apologise to residents and their families for the distress caused by the failings identified. This is not the standard we expect and not the standards that residents or their families deserve."
RTÉ Investigates: Inside Ireland's Nursing Homes airs this Wednesday night at 9.35pm on RTÉ One and RTE Player

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Letters to the Editor, June 7th: on nursing home revelations, Trump versus Musk and bird droppings
Letters to the Editor, June 7th: on nursing home revelations, Trump versus Musk and bird droppings

Irish Times

time4 hours ago

  • Irish Times

Letters to the Editor, June 7th: on nursing home revelations, Trump versus Musk and bird droppings

Sir, – It is 20 years, almost to the day, since RTÉ broadcast the Prime Time Investigates documentary which revealed the horrors of Leas Cross nursing home in Dublin. On Wednesday, further outstanding investigative journalism by RTÉ revealed yet more horror stories in Ireland's private nursing home sector. I have no words to adequately describe the anger, profound sadness and deep frustration I felt as I watched frail, vulnerable, elderly people being denied the most basic care. As I listened to frightened residents begging and pleading for help, I also felt an overwhelming sense of the deepest fear. READ MORE My mother lived with dementia for 20 years. She has a strong family history of dementia and all her siblings have either succumbed to, or are living with, Alzheimer's disease. I cared for my mother at home for many years. I am forever thankful that she received excellent quality care, and extended care, in both our acute and voluntary hospitals. Developing dementia is one of my greatest fears. I have no family. There will be nobody to fight for good care for me, or to advocate for me, should I also succumb to dementia. When I watched frail elderly residents with dementia being treated so horrifically on the RTÉ Investigates documentary this week, I despaired. Those residents were the victims of blatant abuse. Residents with advanced dementia would most likely be unable to accurately explain their experiences to anybody, or to identify their abusers. That also makes them easy targets for such abuse. I concluded that, should I ever be diagnosed with dementia and reach that stage of illness and dependency, I would rather not be alive than be at the mercy of such so-called 'care providers'. Twenty years after Leas Cross such horrors are still happening. What does it take to make this stop? Or will this latest horror simply result in more transient outrage, more eloquent statements and yet more empty promises, until the next time? Is there always going to be a next time? – Yours, etc, BERNADETTE BRADY (PHD), Rathfarnham, Dublin. Sir, – The RTÉ Investigates programme, Inside Ireland's Nursing Homes, was truly disturbing. RTÉ and all who contributed to the making of the programme, both to camera and undercover, deserve our thanks. It does however raise some important questions which a follow-on programme might wish to address. Twenty-five years after the Leas Cross scandal, and the follow-on establishment of the Health Information and Quality Authority (Hiqa), how come care in congregated settings is increasingly provided in large for profit facilities (a worrying trend to which Hiqa has drawn attention) and what difference would it make if the Health Service Executive (HSE) were to build and run more such facilities? How come private and voluntary (non-HSE) nursing homes are not part of the overall planning process for integrated services in the six new regional HSE organisations, despite a clearly identified need to improve clinical governance across the sector as suggested by the expert group on nursing homes which reported during the Covid pandemic? Where is the evidence of follow through on all the recommendations for the development of a wider range of alternatives to nursing homes, including the development of small scale 'Household / Teaghleach'models of nursing home and congregated care? Why is the National Treatment Purchase Fund (NTPF), essentially a medical procedures agency, still involved in 'purchasing' care for older people through a nursing home support scheme (Fair Deal) administered by the HSE across all nursing homes (most of which it does not control) while the regulator, Hiqa, has no role in regulating the payment levels to those nursing homes? Why is the Law Reform Commission report on adult safeguarding, published in April 2024, not being progressed with urgency by the Oireachtas given that the report included draft legislation? The RTÉ programme concerned two nursing homes owned by Emeis, formerly Orpea. There is plenty of information available concerning Orpea, particularly in France (where it was partially nationalised), to have at least raised concerns. There must have been some awareness of this and consideration of the possible consequences for older people in Ireland when they were allowed operate in the Irish market. It is interesting to note that the group's facility in Portlaoise is described as a nursing home but with a capacity for 101 residents it is not far off the size of Portlaoise hospital. To describe such a facility as a 'home from home' is seriously mistaken. The images of abusive and cruel behaviour and of residents corralled into one room are more suggestive of a human warehouse than a home. Finally, for all those many staff currently providing care in nursing homes to the highest standard they possibly can, in the often difficult circumstances in which they find themselves, it would be helpful if they could rely on a public system of support and guidance, including clinical support and governance, to deal with issues and concerns at short notice rather than having to await an occasional inspection from the regulator followed by a report some while later. Regulation and inspection are important but they are no longer enough. Practical supports to encourage quality care are far more likely to pick up on issues and have them addressed as they arise. – Yours ,etc. MERVYN TAYLOR, Stillorgan, Dublin. Sir, – The RTÉ Investigates programme laid bare the inhumane treatment of vulnerable residents in private nursing homes – many of whom are paying exorbitant fees of €1,400 per week. At such a staggering cost, these individuals could instead receive dignified, high-quality home care in the comfort of their own communities. That these abuses persist is a damning indictment of systemic failure. Hiqa, tasked with safeguarding standards, has clearly failed residents, families, and the State. Paper-based inspections and sporadic visits are not enough to prevent cruelty behind closed doors. If we are serious about accountability, Hiqa must have a permanent, on-the-ground presence in every facility, with 24/7 monitoring via live video feeds covering all areas – excluding only private bathrooms for dignity. Modern technology makes this feasible; what's lacking is political will. Why not implement this? If prisons and childcare centres can adopt stringent oversight, why not nursing homes, where our most fragile citizens reside? Until real-time transparency is enforced, families will never trust that their loved ones are safe. This isn't just about regulation – it's about basic humanity. – Yours, etc, PETER MALBASHA, Co Dublin. Sir, – This nursing care scandal has scared many people. My 80-year-old mother has just told me how, as she was lighting her candles for her grandchildren sitting their Leaving Certificate, she also lit one for herself. Her prayer is that she doesn't fall, break her hip and end up in a nursing home like that. Calling for help, with no one answering. I hope our Minister for Older People is listening, because this is a loud voting issue. – Yours, etc, CARMEL DOYLE, Beaumont Woods, Dublin 9. Trade union dues Sir, – Do I get a hint of disdain in Barry Walsh's letter (June 5th) about unions suggesting all should pay dues whether a union member or not ? He wonders why the general secretary of Fórsa earns three times the average pay. Does he suggest they earn the same as a shop-floor worker? I have been lucky to have been a union member most of my working life especially having been made redundant once. I do think it unfair that some colleagues refuse to join a union but at the same time are more than happy to accept the pay and benefits that a union has negotiated or earned, often by its members having to strike. – Yours, etc, ENDA SCANLON, Ennis, Co Clare. Trinity College and Israel Sir, – In deciding to boycott and divest from Israel, Trinity College Dublin has, in my view, abandoned the key principle of institutional neutrality which should underpin the actions of a serious university. In 1967, the University of Chicago led the way on this fundamental issue during the white heat of the campus riots across America during the Vietnam War and apartheid in South Africa. The faculty debated how a university should respond to the burning political and social issues of the day. When passions are running high, what should a university say or do when activists demand it choose sides and take action? Chicago's conclusion was straightforward: the university must remain neutral in order to meet its long-term core mission of the 'discovery, improvement, and dissemination of knowledge'. This did not mean ignoring difficult issues. Faculty and students must have full freedom of criticism, dissent and open inquiry, but the university itself 'is the home and sponsor of critics; it is not itself the critic'. Bizarrely, the board's chairman noted explicitly in a message to the college community that while Trinity is engaged in a number of EU-funded research consortia which include Israeli partners 'here is no evidence to associate any of these with breaches of international humanitarian law or human rights violations.' So what is Trinity's problem with individual Israeli academics and universities who are often eloquent critics of their governments' actions and policies? Is it not overreach to insist that the 'college should seek to align itself with like-minded universities and bodies in an effort to influence EU policy concerning Israel's participation in such collaborations?' So many questions remain unanswered. Can Trinity's decades long partnerships with Intel continue when the tech firm is thought to be Ireland's biggest importer of Israeli goods, most from its sister factory in Kiryat Gat? Are Trinity's teaching hospitals, St James's and Tallaght, now prohibited from accessing Israeli medical products and pharmaceuticals? Can Trinity's partnerships with American universities and companies continue given stringent US anti-boycott legislation? What now for Trinity's Herzog Centre, the only institution in Ireland offering Jewish studies, when your university has decided to boycott the world's only Jewish state? In singling out Israel alone for boycott and divestment while maintaining ties with other countries with well-documented human rights violations, Trinity has opened itself to the charge of institutional anti-Semitism and racism. I am ashamed of my alma mater. – Yours, etc, DR JANE MAHONY, BA (Mod), PhD, Trinity College, Dublin. Birds dropping Sir, – Reading Frank McNally's column on the provenance of James 'Skin the Goat' Fitzharris's reflection on informers , I wonder if it may come from the belief held in many places that being shat on by a bird is a sign of good luck? Personally I have never held much store in this, having been the victim many years ago on Brighton seafront of a seagull who had had a very large lunch, resulting in my repair to the nearest boutique to purchase a fresh T-shirt. That said, perhaps the informer never overflown will never again have the gift of good luck? – Yours, etc. JOHN F MCELHONE, Co Donegal. Critical climate omission Sir, – That there is a report by the Environmental Protection Agency about global warming´s effect on Ireland is welcome. ( 'Communications, transport and health of older people at increased risk from global warming, says EPA,' June 3rd). Frightening as it is in its current form, the report has a critical omission. It is has not addressed the dramatic effects of the weakening of the Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation (Amoc). In lay man's terms, this ocean current keeps Ireland habitable. Otherwise it would have the climatic conditions of southern Alaska and Canada's Hudson Bay. The weakening or ending of the Amoc is probable. It is certainly an existential threat to Ireland. Ireland is not geared for an average winter temperature of –18 degrees. It is presently comfortably above 0 degrees. It is very surprising that the EPA has decided not to include this essential element. Policymakers need all the information to get to comprehend the scale of the challenge. The Irish Government, regardless of its political hue, needs to understand the new business as usual will involve planning and action to protect the State and its citizens. I don't believe that the timescale is as long as many politicians assume. One of the stand-out facts from my Earth Science education (1992) was the speed of climate change. The Younger Dryas climatic period ended over less than 50 years, so starting our current phase. Climate systems are stable until they are not. – Yours, etc, RICHARD HERRIOTT, Aarhus, Denmark. Trumping Trump v Musk Sir, – We can all now relax and enjoy watching the world's two biggest egos burn themselves out in front of a potential audience of billions. Could this be the template for settling all global disputes in the future? Yours, etc, NIALL GINTY, Killester, Dublin. Sir, – The very serious online and very public spat between the world's most powerful man and the world's richest man is a 'big beautiful example' of how reciprocity works in real time. – Yours, etc, NOIRIN HEALY, Goatstown, Dublin. Sir, – In the very public, very dirty divorce between Trump and Musk who will get custody of JD Vance? – Yours, etc, BRID MILLER, Athlone Road, Roscommon. Sir, – I wonder did Elon Musk realise how his social media platform X would become really so apt! – Yours, etc, AIDAN RODDY, Cabinteely, Dublin 18. Funding and the arts Sir, – The tenor of Yvonne O'Reilly's letter about funding the arts in yesterday's letters page chimed with the findings of a research project I recently undertook with colleagues from Queen's University, Belfast, and Liverpool University into a wide range of 'Arts for Peace' projects in Northern Ireland. Too often what passes for evaluation is really about accountability with funded organisations wanting to assure funders they have achieved their set goals. Funders for their part tend to see it as a purely administrative process, with vasts amount of data going largely unanalysed. But the value of this data must be questionable given the limited scope for acknowledging what is learnt from unsuccessful aspects of funded projects and outcomes that were not envisaged at the time of application. I can reassure your correspondent, however, that there are examples of good practice out there that will hopefully in due course inform a more productive evaluation culture. – Yours, etc. DAVID GRANT, School of Arts, English, and Languages, Queen's University, Belfast.

Gareth O'Callaghan: A woman's house should be a home – not a place of fear and fatal control
Gareth O'Callaghan: A woman's house should be a home – not a place of fear and fatal control

Irish Examiner

time4 hours ago

  • Irish Examiner

Gareth O'Callaghan: A woman's house should be a home – not a place of fear and fatal control

A wise man in criminal law once told me that a defendant who has pleaded not guilty to a crime he knows he committed fears nothing more during his trial than the eyes of the judge. Perhaps that explains why Richard Satchwell rarely looked up at the bench during the trial that found him guilty of the murder of his wife. A chilling silence descended on the packed courtroom at the Central Criminal Court last Wednesday morning just as Mr Justice Paul McDermott handed down the mandatory life sentence to the former lorry driver. I wondered what Satchwell must have been thinking as he kept his head bowed – if he felt remorse; then I realised that a man who had hidden his wife's body for six years in a secret grave he dug under the stairs of their home, while courting national publicity in an attempt to convince people he loved her, and would give anything to welcome her home, was emotionally stunted. His only regret was that he got caught. Did he love his wife? It's possible. Love is just one ingredient that feeds into a narcissistic relationship, and the coercive control he exerted on their marriage. Richard Satchwell leaving the District Court in Cashel, Co Tipperary, in October 2023. Did he love his wife? It's possible. Love is just one ingredient that feeds into a narcissistic relationship, and the coercive control he exerted on their marriage. File picture It's not the type of love most decent people understand. It's a love perverted that stems from slavish ownership, with terms and conditions that become more brutal as time passes. Sexual jealousy, anger and control are a deadly cocktail. Self-absorbed and selfish, Satchwell now takes his place in that rogues' gallery of notorious wife killers who include, among others, Joe O'Reilly, Brian Kearney, and Eamonn Lillis. O'Reilly murdered his wife Rachel in 2004 by bludgeoning her to death with a dumbbell, while staging it to look like she had disturbed a burglar who panicked and killed her. His appearance on The Late Late Show, sitting beside Rachel's mother, as he suggested 'theories' to an incredulous Pat Kenny on who could have murdered his wife, was a jaw-dropping moment in television history. Joe O'Reilly's (right) appearance on The Late Late Show, sitting beside Rachel's mother (left), as he suggested 'theories' to an incredulous Pat Kenny on who could have murdered his wife, was a jaw-dropping moment in television history. File picture: RTÉ/Rose Callaly He even showed journalists down the dimly-lit hallway to the bedroom in their home where he had murdered his wife barely three weeks earlier, as though it was a magical mystery tour. Her murder was meticulously planned, or so he thought. Siobhán McLaughlin was murdered by her husband Brian Kearney in 2006, while her three-year-old son played downstairs. Kearney strangled his wife in her bedroom with the flex of a vacuum cleaner, before trying to hoist her over the en-suite door in an attempt to make it look like suicide. He then locked the bedroom door, slipped the key under it, and left, leaving the three-year-old alone in the house. Siobhán was in the process of 'trying to leave a very unhappy marriage' when Kearney murdered her, her sister Brighid told Newstalk. She had even taken to hiding money in the hot press so that she could eventually escape from her husband's abuse. Kearney was refused parole last year. Eamonn Lillis beat his wife, Celine Cawley, to death with a brick in 2008, making it appear – like O'Reilly – as though she had disturbed a burglar. Following his release in 2015, Lillis picked up more than €1 million from his share of business and property assets owned by the couple. He served barely five years for the manslaughter of his wife. He now lives abroad. What's equally damning is that the attacker in each of these killings could have stopped his vicious assault and called for immediate help while his victim was alive, but didn't. In Lillis's case, he delayed calling an ambulance by almost 15 minutes to give him time to change out of his bloodied clothes and hide them. Following his release in 2015, Eamonn Lillis picked up more than €1 million from his share of business and property assets owned by the couple. Photo: Julien Behal/PA So if they loved them, then why did they kill them? Why not just call it quits and walk away? Why would a husband kill his wife when the chances of avoiding a conviction and prison sentence are massively stacked against him? According to recent statistics from Women's Aid, 275 women have died violently in Ireland at the hands of men since 1996 – an average of nine women every year. 87% were killed by a man they knew. 179 of them were killed in their own homes. Lucy Freeman, the American writer best known for her articles on psychiatry and mental health in The New York Times, once wrote: 'Murder is the apex of megalomania, the ultimate in control.' Her words resonate with relationships that are hinged on coercive control, where the man demands to know his female partner's whereabouts at all times, where social connections to family and friends are discouraged, where freedom of movement is restricted. Years of research has shown that it's mostly inadequate men with fragile egos who kill women. They hate their own vulnerability, which can only be overcome by the subordination of others – mostly their wives and female partners. Sarah, the partner of a close friend, agreed to talk to me recently about her former husband who she eventually left after years of physical and emotional abuse, including a threat to her life that finally made her realise he might kill her. 'It was only in hindsight, when I'd left him and it was all over, I realised I'd lost contact with everyone. If my mother asked us over, he'd always find an excuse. "'We're not going,' he'd tell me. He wouldn't allow me socialise with them. He refused to give me money, even though I paid all the bills out of my own wages. If I walked the dog, he'd follow me. 'Anytime I disagreed with him, or if I tried to defend myself, I'd get the silent treatment for days. Then he'd force me to say sorry. Whenever he hit me or kicked me, he'd pretend to be upset and apologise. 'Why don't you hit me back? You'll feel better,' he'd say. "Some days I came home from work to find he'd emptied the fridge of the little treats I liked; then he'd tell me I'd eaten them – 'because you're a fat pig,' he'd say laughing. 'One day I overheard him saying to someone on the phone that he'd kill me, if only he could get away with it. I packed what I could and went back home to my mother.' Richard Satchwell now takes his place in Ireland's rogues' gallery of notorious wife killers. File picture I asked Sarah if she had ever told him she would leave him. 'It was all I thought about but I was terrified to tell him. I actually thought he'd kill me on the spot. I left in the middle of the night when I knew he was asleep.' Research shows the time of highest risk for a potential victim is during the period where she has made it known she plans to end the marriage. That's almost always the trigger for the abuser because the person they have so successfully controlled for years is now choosing to leave them. Richard Satchwell told gardaí his wife had 'mentioned 200 or 300 times over the previous 15 years' that she was going to leave him, but, as with the rest of this tragic story, we only have his word for this. Even after leaving her abuser, a woman is still not safe – as the tragic case of Australian Hannah Clarke showed in 2020. Clarke was stalked by her former partner Rowan Baxter, who doused her and their three children in petrol and burnt them to death in the family car before killing himself. It's hard to believe that the family home is the most dangerous place in the world for women (and children), when it should be the safest. It's far more effective to disrupt violent male partners than it is to change them. That disruption can only come from family or friends who detect a shift in behaviour. If you're being shut out by someone you love, you have a duty to them to know why. A strong indicator that all's not well in the life of your daughter – or your sister or friend – is that persistent feeling you get that something is just not right. Act on it. At least you'll always know you asked. If you don't, it could be the cross you'll bear for the rest of your life.

‘Increased vigilance' needed from Hiqa's regulatory approach to nursing homes, Taoiseach says
‘Increased vigilance' needed from Hiqa's regulatory approach to nursing homes, Taoiseach says

Irish Times

time9 hours ago

  • Irish Times

‘Increased vigilance' needed from Hiqa's regulatory approach to nursing homes, Taoiseach says

There are issues that should be examined in the regulatory approach of the Health Information and Quality Authority (Hiqa) to ensure the welfare of elderly people in nursing homes , Taoiseach Micheál Martin has said. He was speaking in reaction to allegations of elder abuse and neglect in nursing homes Beneavin House, in Glasnevin, Dublin, and The Residence, Portlaoise, Co Laois, which were shown in an RTÉ Investigates programme aired Wednesday night. Mr Martin described the content of the programme as 'absolutely unacceptable' and said 'there will have to be increased vigilance from the regulatory approach, and that is something that Government will be looking at'. The documentary shared scenes of older people allegedly being 'manhandled', ignored when asking for help to go to the toilet, and 'being left in incontinence pads for so long their clothes were soaked'. READ MORE Emeis Ireland, which operates both nursing homes at the centre of the scandal, has apologised 'unequivocally to all residents and their families for the suffering and distress' caused. [ Staff in nursing home at centre of neglect claims 'did not show a shred of empathy' for woman (92) Opens in new window ] Mr Martin said Government policy on safeguarding elders' welfare 'isn't the issue'. 'It will be an additional help but fundamentally it's behaviour on a day-to-day basis,' he said. 'It is how homes are operated and it's the regulation then of that that ultimately will still have to be the first response, and the key, to situations like this.' Hiqa is 'effective and impactful in many areas', however 'the regulatory framework didn't catch very horrific and shocking behaviour towards people in nursing homes. That has to be taken on board', Mr Martin said. [ Review of all nursing homes operated by Emeis Ireland requested by Department of Health Opens in new window ] There is 'a lack of a clear ethos and ethical framework' in the governance and ownership of the nursing homes in question which impacts 'respecting the dignity of every human being', Mr Martin said. He pledged 'additional investment in public facilities into the future', which he said 'tend to deal with more acute patients'. 'We have invested very strongly in the public system, which people may not realise, through the refurbishment of existing community district hospitals across the country over the last four to five years,' he said. A review of the 27 Emeis-owned nursing homes in the State was initiated Thursday morning after Minister of State with Responsibility for Older People Kieran O'Donnell met Hiqa representatives. Safeguarding teams have since been brought in to Beneavin House and The Residence, Portlaoise, by the Health and Safety Authority , The Irish Times understands. A demonstration has been planned for next week by Care Champions Ireland, an advocacy group for families with relatives in care facilities, outside Leinster House to 'demand safeguarding legislation' and 'reform all care provisions'. [ What is Emeis and where are its Irish care homes located? Opens in new window ] In a statement on Friday evening Emeis said the RTÉ footage was 'both shocking and unacceptable and unquestionably equated to poor and abusive practice. 'Emeis Ireland has taken appropriate safeguarding actions in relation to residents and specific actions in relation to staff and a full organisational review is under way. These incidents were not representative of the professionalism and commitment of our employees in Ireland, nor of the everyday life in our facilities.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store