Will Germany's Strict Immigration Rules Impact Indians? Citizenship Criteria To Curbs Explained
Last Updated:
The government has abolished the fast-track route to citizenship that previously allowed well-integrated migrants to apply for citizenship after three years of residency
German Chancellor Friedrich Merz's cabinet on May 28 approved sweeping changes to the country's immigration rules.
Among the major changes is a temporary two-year suspension of family reunification rights for those with subsidiary protection — refugees not granted full refugee status, such as many Syrians. During this period, these migrants are not allowed to bring their spouses or children to Germany.
Interior Minister Alexander Dobrindt said that Germany's urban systems have reached their 'breaking point" and cannot handle the inflow without causing challenges for public services.
Migration is among German voters' biggest concerns and Merz won the election in February pledging a crackdown on migration.
NO FAST TRACK
The government also abolished the fast-track route to citizenship that previously allowed well-integrated migrants to apply for citizenship after three years of residency.
The new rules now require a minimum of five years of residency for German citizenship.
However, foreigners married to German citizens can still apply after three years, provided they have been married for at least two years.
WHAT IT MEANS FOR INDIANS
Most of the Indian professionals and students in Germany are not under subsidiary protection.
The changes, however, may impact vulnerable migrants and delay long-term settlement plans.
India remains a key contributor to Germany's skilled labor pool, with initiatives such as the ' Opportunity Card ' being expanded to address labour shortages.
Merz recently said that a court ruling against the expulsion by border police of three Somali asylum seekers could restrict his government's migration crackdown but would not stop it. People would continue to be turned away at the German border, he said.
A Berlin administrative court last week said the expulsion of the three unnamed Somalis, who were sent back to Poland after arriving at a train station in eastern Germany, was 'unlawful".
It said that under the European Union's Dublin Regulation, Germany should have determined which country was responsible for processing their claim before sending them back, in a ruling that Merz's interior minister contested.
That marks a big shift since Germany's 'Refugees Welcome" culture during Europe's migrant crisis in 2015 under Merz's conservative predecessor, Angela Merkel.
Merz's government issued an order in May to reject undocumented migrants, including asylum seekers, at Germany's borders. Dobrindt defended the expulsions, saying he would provide justifications for banning entry and portraying the ruling as an isolated case. 'I have made it clear several times that this is about being overwhelmed, and I see this overburdening," he told reporters.
With Agency Inputs
First Published:
June 08, 2025, 16:45 IST
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
32 minutes ago
- Time of India
Is Elon Musk's feud with Donald Trump a teaser for his political ambitions? Rumors spiral as 'Muskians' weigh in
In an unexpected twist that's rippling through political and tech circles alike, Elon Musk and Donald Trump—once perceived as two towering allies of influence—are now locked in a public spat that's as volatile as their personalities. The feud , which has evolved from sharp remarks to veiled accusations, is fueling whispers of a deeper political pivot for the Tesla and SpaceX boss. Could this be Musk's unofficial campaign trailer for a future role in politics ? From Compliments to Cold Wars The dramatic fallout began when Trump, speaking alongside German Chancellor Friedrich Merz, commented coolly on his past rapport with Musk: 'Elon and I had a great relationship… I don't know if we will anymore.' The remark came after Musk voiced criticism of Trump's Big Beautiful Bill (BBB)—a sweeping debt-cutting proposal. Trump quickly countered, accusing Musk of attacking the bill to safeguard Tesla's electric vehicle subsidies. Musk didn't hold back. In a stunning escalation, he suggested on social media that Trump may be implicated in the "Epstein files," sending speculation into overdrive. The insinuation lit up the internet, while Trump fired back with threats to strip Musk of his multi-billion-dollar government contracts, suggesting this would be a quick way to 'save billions' in the federal budget. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like War Thunder - Register now for free and play against over 75 Million real Players War Thunder Play Now Undo Political Chess or Genuine Rift? As the drama unfolded, Republican Congressman Thomas Massie stepped in with a striking perspective. Massie dismissed the idea that Musk was ever driven by tax incentives, claiming the billionaire's involvement with political figures had cost him more than it gained. 'So many politicians get into politics for personal benefit,' Massie said while talking with Fox News . 'Elon's motivations go beyond that.' According to Radar Online, t his clash has left the Republican base visibly shaken. Trump loyalists are reeling, struggling to reconcile their admiration for both men. Some online users, affectionately dubbed "Muskians," appear to be navigating what commentators are calling the 'seven stages of political grief.' And with Musk increasingly weighing in on legislative matters and electoral dynamics, some believe he's testing the waters for a deeper dive into the political arena. You Might Also Like: Donald Trump vs Elon Musk feud sparks meme fest online: From WrestleMania edits to Simpsons spoofs A New Kind of Candidate? Massie's suggestion that Musk should engage more with primary elections than general contests is telling. Not all Republicans are cut from the same cloth, and Musk's vocal criticism of Trump-era policies—paired with his ever-growing influence—could position him as a disruptive force within the GOP, or even beyond it. Critics argue that Musk's interventions highlight a broader shift in conservative politics, where tech moguls and billionaire capitalists wield growing influence over party ideology and public discourse. But the tension also exposes a deeper fear: that Musk, with his staggering wealth, massive online following , and visionary allure, could reshape political engagement altogether—perhaps as a candidate, or at least as a kingmaker. — RepThomasMassie (@RepThomasMassie) From Boardroom to Ballot? For now, Musk hasn't made any formal moves toward a political office. But the ferocity of his feud with Trump, paired with his increasing interest in legislative decisions, is leaving many to wonder: is this more than a battle of egos? Is it a preview of a seismic shift in American political leadership? Whatever the truth may be, one thing is clear—the Musk-Trump rift is more than just personal. It's political, it's public, and it might just be the start of Elon Musk's most uncharted journey yet. You Might Also Like: Elon Musk's estranged daughter Vivian revels in his rift with US President Donald Trump: 'Love being right' You Might Also Like: Trump vs Elon Musk: Why are they fighting? Tesla CEO makes explosive claim about US President's Epstein files connection
NDTV
36 minutes ago
- NDTV
'Harvard Is Starting To Behave': Donald Trump On Student Visa Row
Quick Read Summary is AI generated, newsroom reviewed. Education Secretary Linda McMahon noted progress in universities addressing Trump's demands for transparency on international students. She emphasised the need for vetting to combat antisemitism and advocated for merit-based admissions over DEI programs. Education Secretary Linda McMahon said that she is seeing "progress" from institutions regarding the Trump administration's demands. Trump in an Oval Office meeting with German Chancellor Friedrich Merz had said that, 'We want to have foreign students come. We're very honoured by it, but we want to see their list." She echoed the same sentiments. 'Harvard didn't want to give us the list. They're going to be giving us the list now. I think they're starting to behave, actually, if you want to know the truth,' the president added. In May, the Trump administration sent a letter to Harvard University, stating that if Harvard wants the opportunity of regaining Student and Exchange Visitor Program certification before the upcoming academic school year back, they should provide the "information required" within "72 hours". The information included the list of students who had participated in pro-Palestine protests. McMahon defended the attacks on universities such as Harvard and Columbia and said, 'I have seen progress. And you know why I think we're seeing progress? Because we are putting these measures in place, and we're saying we're putting teeth behind what we're looking at,' in an interview to NBC News. She added that there still is a long way to go to eradicate antisemitism on campus and vet international students. 'It's very important that we are making sure that the students who are coming in and being on these campuses aren't activists, that they're not causing these activities,' McMahon said. The Education Secretary said that students who come on campus should not be afraid to be there and should not feel unsafe. 'I'm really happy to see what Harvard did, but I wonder if maybe they didn't get a little spur from our action, because they talk a lot about it, but I think we really started to see a lot of their actions once we were taking action,' she acknowledged. She gave Trump the credit for pushing the universities to take steps to combat antisemitism on campus. This comes after Trump signed a proclamation that aims to deny foreign students from studying at Harvard. In May, a federal judge had blocked Trump's ability to enrol foreign students. Answering if international students will have to leave Harvard, if already enrolled, she said, 'Well, that's actually more up to the State Department than it is to Department of Education", and added, "we have to do more careful vetting.' Amid accusations on Harvard and Columbia of fomenting antisemitism, Trump had cancelled $2 billion in grants to Harvard and $400 million in grants to Columbia. McMahon added that there was an imbalance in diversity on Campus because, 'only 3% of [Harvard's] faculty were conservatives.' 'Do you think that's a diversity of viewpoint on campus? Because those — you can't possibly believe that,' she added. 'And I do think that that's one of the things that Harvard and Columbia and other universities are taking a serious look at, is, what is that balance?' She said that Harvard and other universities "need to do a better job" in that. McMahon also defended Trump's efforts to eliminate DEI programs on college campuses and said that she favoured merit-based admissions instead. 'What we found when we admit students through merit and meritocracy and, and their studies, that diversity comes on campuses by itself,' McMahon said. 'You don't need to have a particular program that says we have to have diversity, equity, inclusion.'
Economic Times
an hour ago
- Economic Times
I-STAR: India's eyes in the sky? IAF set to get Rs 10,000 crore indigenous spy planes
IAF to get Rs 10,000 crore indigenous I-STAR spy planes to help in precision strikes against enemy ground targets India's Defence Ministry is set to review a Rs 10,000 crore project. This project aims to acquire three advanced spy planes. These planes will enhance the Indian Air Force's surveillance capabilities. They will provide detailed air-to-ground intelligence. This will enable precision strikes on enemy targets. The ISTAR system will be indigenously developed by DRDO. Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads High-tech eyes in the sky with indigenous systems Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Precision strikes from afar, round-the-clock The Indian Air Force is set to receive a major capability boost with the government preparing to clear a Rs 10,000 crore project to acquire cutting-edge I-STAR (Intelligence, Surveillance, Target Acquisition and Reconnaissance) high-altitude spy planes will allow the IAF to conduct pinpoint strikes on critical enemy targets such as radar sites, mobile air defence units, and command posts — even from stand-off told ANI that the Defence Ministry is expected to take up the proposal later this month at a high-level meeting, amid the Indian military's ongoing Operation Sindoor against I-STAR project involves procuring three advanced aircraft — likely from international aviation giants like Boeing or Bombardier — which will then be fitted with fully indigenous sensor and electronic systems. These onboard surveillance and targeting systems have already been developed and tested by DRDO's Centre for Airborne Systems (CABS).The Indian-built systems will provide multi-spectral surveillance, enabling forces to detect, locate and track enemy assets with precision — day or night, even in complex terrain. Officials said the integration work would be swift since the tech has already been operational, the aircraft will offer a dynamic, real-time picture of the battlefield, making India one of the few countries in the world with such strategic air-to-ground surveillance and strike coordination capabilities. Only a handful of nations — including the United States, United Kingdom, and Israel — currently operate such I-STAR system combines both airborne and ground-based components, and is designed to operate from stand-off ranges at high altitudes. Its job is to assist the IAF in identifying and engaging high-value ground targets without crossing into hostile airspace — an increasingly critical requirement in modern the ability to carry out intelligence gathering, real-time surveillance, targeting, and reconnaissance (ISR), the aircraft will allow India to limit the scale of conflict while neutralizing threats with surgical said this system will not only strengthen India's deterrence capability, but also help in swift retaliation in conflict scenarios, enhancing national security preparedness across borders.
