logo
Trump declared war on fentanyl traffickers. Is it what parents of overdose victims want?

Trump declared war on fentanyl traffickers. Is it what parents of overdose victims want?

The first time Harold Noriega voted for Donald Trump in 2016, it was from a business standpoint.
But when he cast his ballot again in 2024 — two years after his 19-year-old son, Cooper Noriega, took a fentanyl-laced pill and died — his primary motivation had changed.
'I truly believe this in my heart, that if the president of our country in the previous four years would have secured the border,' Noriega said, 'our son probably would be alive.'
President Trump has pledged in his second term to tighten national security, beginning with an immigration crackdown that launched within hours of his January inauguration. Since then, he's rebranded cartels as foreign terrorist groups and used tariffs as leverage to push Mexico to block the flow of illicit drugs into the U.S.
'We've launched an all-out war on fentanyl traffickers, and it's a war that we're going to win,' Trump said in a March 14 address to the Justice Department. The presidential administration is also pushing for fentanyl trafficking to be designated as a 'weapon of mass destruction,' unleashing more federal resources and stricter enforcement, according to the Department of Defense.
Trump's tactics are encouraging to many parents of drug victims, including Noriega, who noted that even though signs point toward overdoses being on the decline, fentanyl is still killing about 70,000 Americans annually.
'If Trump doesn't do what he says he's going to do, I'll be the first person to be shouting, 'I was wrong. I was wrong about that — that guy's a fraud,'' Noriega said. 'But so far, it doesn't seem to be that way.'
California officials for several years have similarly doubled down on supply-side interventions such as specialized task forces and aggressive prosecution to fight the opioid crisis.
Los Angeles County Dist. Atty. Nathan Hochman and California Atty. Gen. Rob Bonta this month announced a 50-pound fentanyl seizure in Downey that Bonta called the 'biggest bust yet' from a new state effort.
'We're hoping that the message goes out from this enforcement effort today to the fentanyl poisoners out there, that we're coming for you,' Hochman said.
The term 'fentanyl poisoning' is one that parents of fentanyl victims have advocated should replace 'overdose' in the discourse around drug fatalities — contending that the latter term unfairly assigns blame to victims and is inaccurate given that many ingest the drug unknowingly.
It's just one of the ways they've continued to influence the conversation around the opioid epidemic. But their impact has also gone far beyond semantics.
In Riverside County, Temecula resident Matt Capelouto completely changed local management of drug cases when he challenged the ruling of his daughter Alexandra Capelouto's 2019 fentanyl death as 'non-criminal.'
Alexandra, a 20-year-old college student, died after taking a fentanyl-laced pill she believed to be prescription medication.
Frustrated by the county's refusal to treat his daughter's death as a crime, Capelouto resolved to hold her dealer accountable. The case eventually made its way to Riverside County Dist. Atty. Mike Hestrin.
'He asked me a question, 'Why isn't it murder?'' Hestrin said, recalling an early meeting with Capelouto.
The district attorney said his inability to provide an answer was 'the pulling of the proverbial thread,' which eventually led the county to overhaul its treatment of overdose cases.
To date, Hestrin said, he has charged 38 suspected fentanyl dealers with murder, three cases have gone to trial, and 16 suspects have pleaded guilty to a lesser offense. In 2023, his office became the first in California to secure a guilty verdict by jury in a fentanyl-related homicide trial.
Critics of Hestrin's hard-line approach contend that pursuing murder charges against dealers does nothing to reduce demand for drugs and tends to give the stiffest punishments to people at the lowest rungs of the supply chain. Plus, new dealers will always crop up.
But Capelouto said people hardly think this way about other crimes.
'We wouldn't say, 'Well, you know, why bother arresting a bank robber? There's just going to be more bank robbers,'' Capelouto said.
Capelouto added that just weeks after his daughter's dealer found out she was dead, evidence showed he was requesting more pills from his supplier.
'You cannot tell me that locking him up has not saved lives,' he said of the dealer, who was sentenced to nine years in prison in 2023.
The Riverside County district attorney also stood by his approach.
'I'm not naive. I don't think that we are going to stop the drug trade because we're prosecuting it,' Hestrin said.
Nevertheless, he said, 'we still have to keep the pressure on these drug trafficking organizations and on these drug dealers, even though we know that we're not likely to see the end of fentanyl or the drug trade anytime soon.'
Los Angeles authorities have also pursued several homicide cases against suppliers in drug deaths, though not all of the defendants are dealers in the conventional sense. The mother and grandfather of a 17-month-old boy who died after being exposed to fentanyl face murder charges, brought by county prosecutors with support from the child's father.
The rise in aggressive prosecution tactics has made Kyara Mascolo, whose 37-year-old son, Ray Mascolo, died in 2020 after taking a fentanyl-laced pill, the most optimistic she's been since she lost him.
In early March, Ray's dealer was convicted of eight drug charges including distributing fentanyl that caused three near-fatal overdoses. After the guilty verdict in Los Angeles federal court, Kyara Mascolo released a statement thanking the federal prosecutors and gave a shout-out to Trump for designating drug cartels as 'terrorist organizations.'
'It's a huge problem that hasn't gone away, and it's finally being dealt with,' Mascolo said in an interview with The Times. 'So at least it's, I hope, the beginning of the end.'
But experts in harm reduction, a public health approach that focuses on promoting safe drug use practices rather than enforcing abstinence, warned that hyperaggressive prosecution is little more than political performance, designed to pacify constituents and distract them from the underlying causes of the drug epidemic without actually solving the problem.
'The parent paradigm of pushing for tougher sentencing and tougher approaches in many ways reflects this theater that prosecutors and lawmakers are engaged in,' said Leo Beletsky, a drug policy researcher at Northeastern University and UC San Diego. 'This is the narrative that they have been telling the public for a long time.'
Beletsky pointed to years of research indicating that prosecutions do not effectively deter drug use or distribution, and that harm reduction services — Medicaid expansion, increased access to Narcan and affordable substance abuse treatment — are the true cause of declining drug fatalities.
Many parent-led advocacy groups push for these approaches, Beletsky said, but their voices are typically ignored because they don't suit politicians' agendas — or they're drowned out by the often louder cries of parents demanding justice.
'Even if those other parents wanted to be loud, there's just not a microphone,' said Lindsay LaSalle, managing director of policy at the Drug Policy Alliance, a New York-based nonprofit that aims to decriminalize drug use and supports harm reduction.
'People aren't interested in profiling [parents] that are like, 'My child died, and I think we need good healthcare!'' LaSalle said.
But the perceived indifference hasn't deterred Susan Ousterman, whose 24-year-old son, Tyler Cordeiro, died in 2020 from an overdose of fentanyl, heroin and xylazine, a veterinary tranquilizer increasingly common in illicit drugs.
Ousterman has long advocated for the replacement of punitive measures that perpetuate stigma around drug use with healthcare and treatment interventions that promote recovery for addicts.
'We're not going to get the resources that people need to them as long as they're viewed as criminals,' Ousterman said. 'These are just people trying to find relief in some way.'
Ousterman said she reached out to the person her son took drugs with on the day he died. That person was so terrified of being prosecuted, Ousterman said, he took nine months to respond.
The two of them eventually became very close. He was a very bright kid, Ousterman said, who'd lost both his parents at a young age.
'What would that have done if I had sent him to jail, and then, 40% more chance of him dying?' she said, citing statistics that show recently incarcerated people have an elevated risk of overdose. 'If his mother was alive, I wouldn't want to meet her in a grief support group.'
The difficulty with harm reduction interventions is that they can take time to yield tangible results, said Jaime Arredondo, a substance use researcher who works on overdose prevention at the U.S.-Mexico border.
Politicians don't want to wait, Arredondo said. They want a 'magic bullet.'
Some parents of fentanyl victims agree with that perspective.
Amy Neville, whose 14-year-old son, Alexander, died in 2020 after taking a fentanyl-laced pill he bought on Snapchat, is among those skeptical of the rhetoric around shutting down the border and throwing away the keys when locking up dealers.
'Even if we closed everything up and drugs couldn't get in or out tomorrow,' Neville said, homegrown operations would pop up to meet user demand.
The yoga instructor-turned-activist instead favors a public health approach to the opioid crisis that is grounded in educating young people about drugs in the digital era — and pressing tech companies to create better safeguards for young users.
Neville is the lead plaintiff in one of several lawsuits filed on behalf of more than 60 families of fentanyl victims — including the Capeloutos — against Snap, Snapchat's parent company. The families argue the social media giant's 'defective and dangerous' product facilitated deadly drug sales.
Snap has said it has no duty to 'protect users from the acts of third-party criminals,' court documents said. The case remains pending in Los Angeles County Superior Court.
Apart from the litigation, Neville said, she's committed to fighting the stigma around substance abuse disorder. Even hard-liners such as Noriega agree that is part of a long-term solution.
Recycling tactics from a failed war on drugs will only make that stigma worse, Neville said.
'We have to come up with better plans,' she said.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

The legal issues raised by Trump sending the National Guard to L.A.
The legal issues raised by Trump sending the National Guard to L.A.

Los Angeles Times

time13 minutes ago

  • Los Angeles Times

The legal issues raised by Trump sending the National Guard to L.A.

The Trump administration announced Saturday that National Guard troops were being sent to Los Angeles — an action Gov. Gavin Newsom said he opposed. President Trump is activating the Guard by using powers that have been invoked only rarely. Trump said in a memo to the Defense and Homeland Security departments that he was calling the National Guard into federal service under a provision called Title 10 to 'temporarily protect ICE and other United States Government personnel who are performing Federal functions.' Title 10 provides for activating National Guard troops for federal service. Such Title 10 orders can be used for deploying National Guard members in the United States or abroad. Erwin Chemerinsky, one of the nation's leading constitutional law scholars, said 'for the federal government to take over the California National Guard, without the request of the governor, to put down protests is truly chilling.' 'It is using the military domestically to stop dissent,' said Chemerinsky, dean of the UC Berkeley School of Law. 'It certainly sends a message as to how this administration is going to respond to protests. It is very frightening to see this done.' Tom Homan, the Trump administration's 'border czar,' announced the plan to send the National Guard in an interview on Fox News on Saturday as protesters continued confronting immigration agents during raids. 'This is about enforcing the law,' Homan said. 'We're not going to apologize for doing it. We're stepping up.' 'We're already ahead of the game. We were already mobilizing,' he added. 'We're gonna bring the National Guard in tonight. We're gonna continue doing our job. We're gonna push back on these people.' Newsom criticized the federal action, saying that local law enforcement was already mobilized and that sending in troops was a move that was 'purposefully inflammatory' and would 'only escalate tensions.' The governor called the president and they spoke for about 40 minutes, according to the governor's office. Critics have raised concerns that Trump also might try to invoke the Insurrection Act of 1807 to activate troops as part of his campaign to deport large numbers of undocumented immigrants. The president has the authority under the Insurrection Act to federalize the National Guard units of states to suppress 'any insurrection, domestic violence, unlawful combination, or conspiracy' that 'so hinders the execution of the laws' that any portion of the state's inhabitants are deprived of a constitutional right and state authorities are unable or unwilling to protect that right. The American Civil Liberties Union has warned that Trump's use of the military domestically would be misguided and dangerous. According to the ACLU, Title 10 activation of National Guard troops has historically been rare and Congress has prohibited troops deployed under the law from providing 'direct assistance' to civilian law enforcement — under both a separate provision of Title 10 as well as the Posse Comitatus Act. The Insurrection Act, however, is viewed as an exception to the prohibitions under the Posse Comitatus Act. In 1958, President Eisenhower invoked the Insurrection Act to deploy troops to Arkansas to enforce the Supreme Court's decision ending racial segregation in schools, and to defend Black students against a violent mob. Hina Shamsi, director of the ACLU's National Security Project, wrote in a recent article that if Trump were to invoke the Insurrection Act 'to activate federalized troops for mass deportation — whether at the border or somewhere else in the country — it would be unprecedented, unnecessary, and wrong.' Chemerinsky said invoking the Insurrection Act and nationalizing a state's National Guard has been reserved for extreme circumstances where there are no other alternatives to maintain the peace. Chemerinsky said he feared that in this case the Trump administration was seeking 'to send a message to protesters of the willingness of the federal government to use federal troops to quell protests.' In 1992, California Gov. Pete Wilson requested that President George H.W. Bush use the National Guard to quell the unrest in Los Angeles after police officers were acquitted in the beating of Rodney King. That was under a different provision of federal law that allows the president to use military force in the United States. That provision applies if a state governor or legislature requests it. California politics editor Phil Willon contributed to this report.

Trump attends UFC championship fight in NJ, taking a break from politics, Musk feud

time17 minutes ago

Trump attends UFC championship fight in NJ, taking a break from politics, Musk feud

NEWARK, N.J. -- President Donald Trump walked out to a thunderous standing ovation just ahead of the start of the UFC pay-per-view card at the Prudential Center on Saturday night, putting his public feud with tech billionaire Elon Musk on hold to instead watch the fierce battles inside the cage. Trump was accompanied by UFC President Dana White and the pair headed to their cageside seats to Kid Rock's 'American Bad Ass.' Trump and White did the same for UFC's card last November at Madison Square Garden, only then they were joined by Musk. Trump shook hands with fans and supporters — a heavyweight lineup that included retired boxing champion Mike Tyson — on his way to the cage. Trump was joined by his daughter Ivanka Trump and her husband, Jared Kushner, along with son Eric Trump and Secretary of State Marco Rubio. Trump shook hands with the UFC broadcast team that included Joe Rogan. Rogan hosted Trump on his podcast for hours in the final stages of the campaign last year. UFC fans went wild for Trump and held mobile devices in their outstretched arms to snap pictures of him. Trump arrived in time for the start of a card set to include two championship fights. Julianna Peña and Merab Dvalishvili were scheduled to each defend their 135-pound championships. UFC fighter Kevin Holland won the first fight with Trump in the building, scaled the cage and briefly chatted with the President before his post-fight interview.

LA immigration protests live updates: Trump deploys 2,000 National Guard members
LA immigration protests live updates: Trump deploys 2,000 National Guard members

Yahoo

time21 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

LA immigration protests live updates: Trump deploys 2,000 National Guard members

The Trump administration is deploying the California National Guard in response to protests in Los Angeles that begin Friday evening over immigration enforcement operations that have resulted in some clashes between demonstrators and authorities, the White House said in a statement. President Donald Trump signed a memorandum "deploying 2,000 National Guardsmen to address the lawlessness" in California as demonstrations opposing Immigration and Customs Enforcement operations continue in the state, White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt said in a statement Saturday evening. Earlier Saturday, California Gov. Gavin Newsom said the federal government was moving to "take over the California National Guard," calling the move "purposefully inflammatory" and saying it will "only escalate tensions."Jun 7, 11:07 PMHegseth says National Guard being mobilized immediately, active-duty Marines on 'high alert' Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth said the Defense Department is "mobilizing the National Guard IMMEDIATELY to support federal law enforcement in Los Angeles."Hegseth said if violence continues, "active duty Marines at Camp Pendleton will also be mobilized — they are on high alert." Jun 7, 11:07 PMTrump memo deploying National Guard calls LA protests 'rebellion' The memo that President Donald Trump signed Saturday night directing the National Guard to California said that the current protests "constitute a form of rebellion against the authority of the Government of the United States."Trump utilized his authority under "10 U.S.C. 12406 to temporarily protect ICE and other United States Government personnel," according to the presidential memorandum also said that the 2,000 service members could be deployed for 60 days or "at the discretion" of the defense memo adds that the secretary of defense "may employ any other members of the regular Armed Forces as necessary to augment and support the protection of Federal functions and property in any number determined appropriate in his discretion."-ABC News' Michelle Stoddart Click here to read the rest of the blog.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store