logo
Bodies of two Israeli-American hostages recovered from Gaza in Israeli military operation

Bodies of two Israeli-American hostages recovered from Gaza in Israeli military operation

India Todaya day ago

Israel has recovered the bodies of two Israeli-American hostages, Judih Weinstein and Gad Haggai, killed during Hamas' October 7, 2023, attack that sparked the ongoing war in Gaza. The Israeli military, in coordination with the Shin Bet security agency, retrieved the remains from Khan Younis during a special overnight operation. Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu offered condolences, calling it "a most terrible loss."advertisementThe couple, residents of Kibbutz Nir Oz near the Gaza border, were ambushed while on a morning walk. Weinstein, 70, a teacher born in New York, and Haggai, 72, a retired chef and jazz musician, were both dual Israeli-American citizens. Weinstein also held Canadian citizenship. The kibbutz confirmed their deaths in December 2023.Their daughter, Iris Haggai Liniado, confirmed the recovery on social media, expressing gratitude to the Israeli and U.S. authorities and calling for the release of the remaining hostages. The couple is survived by four children and seven grandchildren.
Meanwhile, Israeli airstrikes across Gaza killed at least 22 people, including 10 in Khan Younis and nine in Gaza City. Three local journalists were also killed in a strike on al-Ahli Hospital's courtyard, where Israel said it targeted an Islamic Jihad militant. The incident raised further concerns, as over 180 journalists have reportedly died in the conflict.advertisementEfforts to deliver humanitarian aid suffered another setback when a driver was killed and three wounded in an attack on a 60-truck convoy headed to Deir al-Balah. The Palestinian transport organization has suspended operations, citing repeated attacks. The U.N. continues to face major challenges distributing aid due to military restrictions, unsafe roads, and lawlessness.Since October 7, more than 54,000 Palestinians—many of them women and children—have been killed in Israel's offensive, according to Gaza's Health Ministry. Israel maintains its targets are militants embedded in civilian areas. Hamas-led militants killed 1,200 people and abducted 251 hostages in the initial attack. As of now, 56 hostages remain in captivity, with about a third believed to be alive.Must Watch

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

‘It's saving lives': Israel admits to supporting anti-Hamas armed group in Gaza
‘It's saving lives': Israel admits to supporting anti-Hamas armed group in Gaza

Hindustan Times

time22 minutes ago

  • Hindustan Times

‘It's saving lives': Israel admits to supporting anti-Hamas armed group in Gaza

Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu admitted that Israel is supporting an armed group in Gaza that opposes the militant group Hamas, following comments by a former minister that Israel had transferred weapons to it. Israeli and Palestinian media have reported that the group Israel has been working with is part of a local Bedouin tribe led by Yasser Abu Shabab. The European Council on Foreign Relations (EFCR) think tank describes Abu Shabab as the leader of a "criminal gang operating in the Rafah area that is widely accused of looting aid trucks". Knesset member and ex-defence minister Avigdor Lieberman had told the Kan public broadcaster that the government, at Netanyahu's direction, was "giving weapons to a group of criminals and felons". "What did Lieberman leak? ... That on the advice of security officials, we activated clans in Gaza that oppose Hamas. What is bad about that?" Netanyahu said in a video posted to social media on Thursday. "It is only good, it is saving lives of Israeli soldiers." Michael Milshtein, an expert on Palestinian affairs at the Moshe Dayan Center in Tel Aviv, told AFP that the Abu Shabab clan was part of a Bedouin tribe that spans across the border between Gaza and Egypt's Sinai peninsula. Some of the tribe's members, he said, were involved in "all kinds of criminal activities, drug smuggling, and things like that". Army spokesman Brigadier General Effie Defrin on Friday confirmed the military supported arming local militias in Gaza but remained tight-lipped on the details. "I can say that we are operating in various ways against Hamas governance," Defrin said during a televised press conference when questioned on the subject, without elaborating further. Milshtein said that Abu Shabab had spent time in prison in Gaza and that his clan chiefs had recently denounced him as an Israeli "collaborator and a gangster". "It seems that actually the Shabak (Israeli security agency) or the (military) thought it was a wonderful idea to turn this militia, gang actually, into a proxy, to give them weapons and money and shelter" from army operations, Milshtein said. He added that Hamas killed four members of the gang days ago. The ECFR said Abu Shabab was "reported to have been previously jailed by Hamas for drug smuggling. His brother is said to have been killed by Hamas during a crackdown against the group's attacks on UN aid convoys." Israel regularly accuses Hamas, with which it has been at war for nearly 20 months, of looting aid convoys in Gaza. Hamas said the group had "chosen betrayal and theft as their path" and called on civilians to oppose them. Hamas, which has ruled Gaza for nearly two decades, said it had evidence of "clear coordination between these looting gangs, collaborators with the occupation (Israel), and the enemy army itself in the looting of aid and the fabrication of humanitarian crises that deepen the suffering of" Palestinians. The Popular Forces, as Abu Shabab's group calls itself, said on Facebook it had "never been, and will never be, a tool of the occupation". "Our weapons are simple, outdated and came through the support of our own people," it added. Milshtein called Israel's decision to arm a group such as Abu Shabab "a fantasy, not something that you can really describe as a strategy". "I really hope it will not end with catastrophe," he said.

US SC gives Trump admin's DOGE dept full authorisation to access social security data
US SC gives Trump admin's DOGE dept full authorisation to access social security data

United News of India

time28 minutes ago

  • United News of India

US SC gives Trump admin's DOGE dept full authorisation to access social security data

Washington, June 7 (UNI) The US Supreme Court on Friday authorised officials from the Trump administration's Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) to access Social Security Administration data, giving it complete access to all sensitive private data of American citizens. The Supreme Court issued the authorisation after allowing an emergency petition filed by the administration of President Donald Trump to ask for a lifting of an injunction issued by a district judge in Maryland, who stated that privacy must be safeguarded, reports said. 'Under the present circumstances, SSA may proceed to afford members of the SSA DOGE Team access to the agency records in question in order for those members to do their work,' the court said in a three-paragraph order. The order didn't, however, give the reasoning behind its ruling, which has become a very controversial issue. The order was also challenged by the court's three liberals — Justices Elena Kagan, Sonia Sotomayor and Ketanji Brown Jackson — all of whom dissented. In an opinion joined by Sotomayor, Jackson said the court was 'creating grave privacy risks for millions of Americans.' In the SSA case, US Solicitor General D. John Sauer told the Supreme Court that 'the government cannot eliminate waste and fraud if district courts bar the very agency personnel with expertise and the designated mission of curtailing such waste and fraud from performing their jobs.' The DOGE department, which was created by the Trump administration and was until recently headed by SpaceX CEO Elon Musk, before his resignation following his spat with the POTUS, while not an official government department, was designed specifically to monitor data fraud and misinformation. The disputed data includes Social Security numbers, addresses, birth and marriage certificates, tax and earnings records, employment history, and bank and credit card information. The lawsuit challenging DOGE's actions alleged that allowing broader access to personal information would violate a federal law called the Privacy Act, as well as the Administrative Procedure Act. U.S. District Judge Ellen Hollander had ruled that DOGE had no legitimate need to access the specific data in question, according to Xinhua. The 4th circuit court of appeals, based in Richmond, Virginia, declined to block Judge Hollander's decision, prompting the Trump administration to file an emergency request with the Supreme Court. In a separate order issued Friday in another case involving DOGE, the Supreme Court granted an additional request filed by the Trump administration, allowing it to shield DOGE from Freedom of Information Act requests for the time being. UNI ANV PRS

'Racist, hostile and against global law': Iran slams Trump's travel ban
'Racist, hostile and against global law': Iran slams Trump's travel ban

Business Standard

time31 minutes ago

  • Business Standard

'Racist, hostile and against global law': Iran slams Trump's travel ban

Iran has lashed out at the United States (US) over a sweeping travel ban that targets Iranian nationals and citizens from 11 other countries, mostly Middle Eastern and African. The move, Tehran says, is rooted in a "supremacist and racist mentality" and reflects Washington's enduring animosity toward Muslims, reported The Guardian. The criticism follows a fresh executive order signed on Wednesday by US President Donald Trump, reviving controversial travel restrictions that echo his first-term policy. The decision, according to US officials, was based on national security concerns—coming just days after a firebomb attack at a pro-Israel rally in Colorado that left over a dozen injured. The suspect was later identified as an Egyptian man who had overstayed his US tourist visa. But Iran isn't buying the justification. Alireza Hashemi-Raja, director General for the Affairs of Iranians Abroad at Iran's Foreign Ministry, issued a statement on Saturday, calling the measure 'a clear sign of the dominance of a supremacist and racist mentality among American policymakers.' Describing the order as 'discriminatory,' Hashemi-Raja said the travel restrictions undermine basic human rights and violate fundamental principles of international law. 'The decision indicates the deep hostility of American decision makers towards the Iranian and Muslim people,' he said, warning that such policies could trigger international legal consequences for the US government. The new restrictions, which will come into effect on June 9, also apply to nationals of Iran, Afghanistan, Myanmar, Chad, Congo-Brazzaville, Equatorial Guinea, Eritrea, Haiti, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, and Yemen. A partial ban has also been placed on travellers from seven additional countries, although their names have not been publicly disclosed. Relations between Iran and the US have remained frosty for decades, especially since diplomatic ties were severed following the 1979 Islamic Revolution. While political tensions have persisted, the human connection remains significant—the US is home to the largest Iranian community outside of Iran. According to Iran's foreign ministry, around 1.5 million Iranians lived in the US as of 2020.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store