Winnipeg company ‘will never forget' history making Hudson's Bay striped items
For four generations, the family behind Winnipeg garment maker Freed & Freed International has worked with the fabric of our nation, crafting police regalia like the scarlet tunics worn by the RCMP and uniforms for Canada's Olympic teams.
But there's another sliver of Canadiana the family considers itself lucky to have handled: the Hudson's Bay stripes.
Freed & Freed is one of a few companies that has made products bearing the Bay's iconic green, red, yellow and indigo motif that dates back to 1779. Its creations include full-length wool coats, puffer mittens and sleeping bags.
'It's a prideful moment to be able to say that we got to be a part of true Canadian history because that's what we consider it to be,' said Marissa Freed, president of the company her great grandfather started in 1921.
'They've just been around forever and we got to touch that and be part of it and it's a huge feather on our hats that we will never forget.'
Freed has been thinking about her family's journey with Hudson's Bay a lot since the 355-year-old retailer announced in March that its finances had become so strained it had to file for creditor protection. The liquidation of all 80 Bay stores and 16 run under its Saks banners followed as did a search for buyers to keep some semblance of the business alive.
With often broken escalators, quiet stores and a succession of staffing cuts, the moves were not entirely unexpected but Freed was still 'shocked' when the news broke because her company's dealings with Hudson's Bay seemed to be moving along as they usually did.
She had even received purchasing orders from the business for Stripes products she designed for this upcoming fall.
'On their side, their team was told to continue to move forward, so they were really pretty much left in the dark as much as we were,' Freed said. 'When someone is going to file (for creditor protection), they don't go around telling everybody.'
Freed imagines her business will take 'a bit of a hit' because of the Bay. Court records show the company is owed $12,295 from the retailer.
But Freed & Freed has plenty of other contracts to tide it over. It makes many government uniforms and produces items for 'a lot of the well-known high-end outerwear brands that you'd be familiar with,' Freed said, declining to name them.
The company first brokered ties with Hudson's Bay in the '70s, when Freed & Freed was making London Fog apparel sold by the retailer.
When Freed took the helm of the company about 16 years ago, she started cold calling clients, including Hudson's Bay, to find ways to drum up business.
'Shockingly, I got an email back,' she recalled.
'I think they had just got the first Olympic contract and if I'm not mistaken, at that point in time, they were looking for somebody to domestically produce their wool jacket that they were giving ... the athletes. I, obviously, was very interested.'
Despite Hudson's Bay losing the Olympic contract in 2021 to Lululemon Athletica Inc., Freed & Freed's relationship with the department store blossomed and it started making striped merchandise.
There were striped mittens, snowsuits and even baby bunting bags. Many of the items were designed by Freed & Freed, others came with direction from the Bay. Most took more than a year to make it to shelves.
While the Hudson's Bay wool point blankets produced by A.W. Hainsworth & Sons Ltd. subsidiary John Atkinson in England remained the most famed products, many of Freed & Freed's creations sold out or made the pages of fashion magazines.
Even with Hudson's Bay collapsing, Marissa Freed is hopeful this won't be the end of her family's connection to the brand.
She wants to see Hudson's Bay find a buyer for the stripes amid the 17 bids for assets it recently received. If a new custodian for the motif is secured, she's willing to help return the stripes to shelves.
'I don't know if that's wishful thinking ... In a dream world, somebody does intervene and somebody realizes the stripes could be sort of this diamond in the rough, if you will,' she said.
'It's a real loss in history if we don't see it through.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

CTV News
28 minutes ago
- CTV News
CTV National News: How Ottawa bungles the awarding of federal contracts
Watch The auditor general found that federal workers ignored rules for nearly a decade when awarding contracts the company behind ArriveCan. Judy Trinh reports.


Vancouver Sun
44 minutes ago
- Vancouver Sun
Court rules Trump's tariffs can stay in effect while appeal proceeds
WASHINGTON — A federal appeals court agreed on Tuesday that U.S. President Donald Trump's sweeping global tariffs will remain in place while a case is heard — extending an emergency stay granted after a lower court found the devastating duties unlawful. The United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit found 'a stay is warranted under the circumstances.' It provides a temporary victory for the Trump administration as it hits its first legal barriers for realigning global trade. The U.S. Court of International Trade last month said Trump does not have the authority to wield tariffs on nearly every country through the use of the International Economic Emergency Powers Act of 1977. Start your day with a roundup of B.C.-focused news and opinion. By signing up you consent to receive the above newsletter from Postmedia Network Inc. A welcome email is on its way. If you don't see it, please check your junk folder. The next issue of Sunrise will soon be in your inbox. Please try again Interested in more newsletters? Browse here. The act, usually referred to by the acronym IEEPA, is a national security statute that gives the U.S. president authority to control economic transactions after declaring an emergency. The ruling from the three-judge panel at the New York-based federal court in May said 'any interpretation of IEEPA that delegates unlimited tariff authority is unconstitutional.' It said 'the challenged tariff orders will be vacated,' representing a nationwide injunction against any further imposition of the duties. Trump administration quickly was granted an emergency motion, essentially freezing the decision by the trade court that blocked the so-called 'Liberation Day' and fentanyl-related tariffs. The appeals court upheld that stay but noted the need for an expedited hearing, saying 'these cases present issues of exceptional importance warranting expedited en banc consideration.' A proposed schedule says arguments are expected in court by July 31. That means that countries will continue to be hit by those duties, for now. Stock markets have been in turmoil and supply chains have been upended as Trump used unprecedented presidential power to enact his tariffs. Up until Trump's return to the White House, IEEPA had never been used by a president to impose tariffs. Trump hit Canada with economywide duties in March after he declared an emergency at the northern border related to the flow of fentanyl. He partially paused levies a few days later for imports that comply with the Canada-U.S.-Mexico Agreement on trade. U.S. government data shows a minuscule volume of fentanyl is seized at the northern border. Trump took his trade war to the world in April with duties on nearly every country saying America's trade deficits amounted to a national emergency. The president walked back the most devastating duties a few hours later but left a 10 per cent universal tariff in place for most countries. Trump said the 90-day pause would give countries time to negotiate a deal. The president said if countries didn't comply he would simply set tariff rates himself. White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt has said that the Supreme Court should 'put an end to this' and called the lower court's decision 'judicial overreach.' The appeal ruling will consider two different cases that were pushing against Trump's tariffs. One included five American small businesses against Trump's worldwide tariffs, and the other stemmed from 12 states arguing against both the 'Liberation Day' duties and the fentanyl-related tariffs. At least seven lawsuits are challenging the tariffs. Lawyers for the businesses say IEEPA does not mention tariffs and the U.S. Constitution gives power over taxes and tariffs to Congress. They say Trump is misusing the statute. Lawyers for Arizona, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, Illinois, Maine, Minnesota, Nevada, New Mexico, New York, Oregon and Vermont argued that tariffs make U.S. trade policy dependent on Trump's whims. Thirty-three senators also filed an amicus brief — a legal submission from a group that's not party to the action — in the case, saying the duties would cause harm to small- and medium-sized businesses while also grabbing powers that should be assigned to Congress. 'Small businesses do not have cash-on-hand or capital reserves to pay the increased tariffs, nor can they quickly adapt to them by modifying supply chains,' it said. 'If they cannot pass on the tariff costs to consumers — which would create additional harms for… constituents — many face letting employees go or filing for bankruptcy. Even a few weeks of additional tariffs means small businesses will suffer irreparable harm.' Canada is also being hit with tariffs on steel, aluminum and automobiles. Trump used different powers under the Trade Expansion Act of 1962 to enact those duties.


CTV News
an hour ago
- CTV News
Ben's Meats and Deli opens in new location in west Edmonton
Edmonton News Ben's Meats and Deli opens in new location in west Edmonton Longtime Edmonton business Ben's Meats and Deli has a new home in west Edmonton.