Illinois picks new-ish state flag
Illinois Secretary of State Alexi Giannoulias announced the winning design of the state's new flag contest.
Except, well, it's not new.
Flashback: Last year, the Illinois Flag Commission released 10 designs for the public to vote on.
Driving the news: Giannoulias said Thursday that 385,000 votes were cast in the contest.
165,000, or 43%, selected the current flag that features an eagle on a rock with a red ribbon coming from its beak, emblazoned with the words "State Sovereignty, National Union."
Zoom in: More than 5,400 Axios Chicago readers voted on the best design and the option with a simple navy background with a bust of Lincoln, squeaked by as the winner.
Second place? The current flag.
What's next: The decision to *checks notes* use the current state flag as the new state flag goes to the General Assembly. Lawmakers could also decide to pick a new design or revert back to an old one.
The bottom line: Do we hate change?
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
7 hours ago
- Yahoo
World Environment Day: Coastal Virginia's plastic pollution problem
NORFOLK, Va. (WAVY) — Today is World Environment Day, an observance that's been drawing attention to many issues affecting our ecosystems since 1973. Each year, a theme is presented with 2025 focusing on solutions for global plastic pollution. In Virginia, plastic debris is a major concern and clogging many bodies of water. According to Clean Virginia Waterways, 80% of what's detected on the beaches and bodies of water is plastic. 80% of the plastic waste stems from land-based sources. Data from the International Coastal Clean-up shows that cigarette butts are the most commonly found item in waterways. Balloons and construction materials are also infiltrating seashores. 'Even in a neighborhood that might be miles inland if the trash gets into the storm drain, all storm drains lead to water, which eventually will lead in this area to Chesapeake Bay or the Atlantic Ocean,' said Christina Trapani, Clean Virginia Waterways Program Director. Fishery products are also taking a hit. A recent study by CWV found 99% percent of the fish samples contained plastic. Ingesting seafood is another concern. 'Even the smallest plankton are eating microfibers and microplastics,' said Trapani. 'And then as they go up into the food chain, you know, they're either ingesting the plastic themselves or they're ingesting another fish that's eating plastic. So, if we're eating fish, you know, there's a pretty good chance that it's in there.' The Commonwealth currently has a Marine Debris Reduction Plan in effect. It's the first of its kind on the east coast. It was created by Clean Virginia Waterways and the Virginia Coastal Zone Management program. More than 75 partners, organizations, educational institutions and governmental agencies are working on the plastic issues within the plan. 'We managed to get balloon releases banned in Virginia,' says Trapani. 'You know, since that time, we've managed to get a law passed in the General Assembly that allows localities to put a five-cent fee or tax on plastic bags. Richmond just passed that a few days ago.' The Virginia Coastal Zone Management program funds the implementation of Clean Virginia's Waterways' Virginia Marine Debris Reduction Plan through a grant from NOAA, which is federal funding. Trapani says there's a risk they could lose almost half their budget over the Trump Administration's rollout of funding cuts. 'As of right now, we're still kind of in a wait-and-see stage,' she said. 'But yeah, we're aware that it could easily go away and are working on looking at other possible sources of funding. You know, the Virginia Coastal Zone Management Program has been an amazing partner with us for a very long time.' The next Virginia Marine Debris Reduction Plan is set to go into effect in 2026 and run through 2030. Under that plan, they hope to eliminate plastic use entirely in the Commonwealth. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Yahoo
11 hours ago
- Yahoo
Conn. Gov. Ned Lamont ‘more inclined' to seek 3rd term in 2026
Connecticut Gov. Ned Lamont describes his current thinking on seeking a third term. (Photo by Mark Pazniokas/CT Mirror) Gov. Ned Lamont said Thursday that the challenges of navigating the economic uncertainties and political chaos generated by President Donald J. Trump only increase the chances he will seek a third term as governor of Connecticut in 2026. 'If you had asked me a year ago, I would have said, 'No, I think the state's on a good trajectory. We've stabilized things. We're growing again. Time to pass the mantle,'' Lamont said. He said he no longer is so eager to step aside. 'It's also an incredibly complicated time right now, starting with all the uncertainty of Washington, the increased possibility of a recession,' Lamont said. 'So, maybe a time where experience makes a difference. That's a way of saying I'm thinking about it seriously.' Lamont, 71, a self-described centrist Democrat, stopped well short of declaring his candidacy, but he gave his strongest indication to date of an inclination to seek another four-year term with Lt. Gov. Susan Bysiewicz. 'I love the job,' he said. 'I think we've had extraordinary progress compared to where we were, say, 10 years ago. I think Susan and I are a pretty good team.' Lamont met with reporters in his Capitol office at midday, just 12 hours after the General Assembly reached its constitutional adjournment deadline of midnight Wednesday. 'We got some extraordinary folks and Democrats, and I work very closely with each and every one of them,' he said. But sees himself with an edge. 'I think it's executive experience, having sat in this chair for the last six and a half years, having been through the Trump administration, having been through COVID, having worked closely with the leadership on both sides of the aisle,' Lamont said. He defended the granular details of the recently adopted budget and the broad strokes of his record as a governor overseeing a remarkable series of budget surpluses that have filled the state's budget reserves and allowed the state to pay down unfunded pension debt. With those surpluses has come pressure from the political left to address unmet needs, including low Medicaid reimbursement rates for medical providers. Lamont, they say, is too concerned with keeping spending within the state's fiscal guardrails. The criticism is not discouraging him as he finalizes a decision whether to run, he said. 'I'm a lot more inclined and interested in keeping going, keep this positive momentum going, than I was, say, six months or a year ago. That said, I still have some conversations to make. I put everything on hold during this last four or five months. We had a pretty tricky budget session to get through.' The 'tricky' part was finding ways to satisfy Democrats lawmakers within the constraints of spending caps. 'I think it's an honestly balanced budget,' Lamont said, adding it's based upon 'a pretty conservative set of assumptions.' The budget assumes that household income will grow about 4% annually over the next two years. But it also stretches Connecticut's budget controls without breaking them legally. The largest initiative, a new $220 million endowment to grow early education and child care services dramatically over the next decade, will be established outside of the formal budget and spending cap. In doing so, the leaders of the Republican legislative minorities say Lamont is losing his credibility as a fiscal centrist, a theme the GOP will try to develop if Lamont runs. 'Fiscal moderation has officially left the state Capitol,' Senate Minority Leader Stephen Harding, R-Brookfield, proclaimed recently. House Minority Leader Vincent J. Candelora, R-North Branford, said, 'This budget eviscerates all of our fiscal guardrails.' House Speaker Matt Ritter, D-Hartford, smiled Wednesday when asked about the GOP efforts to define Lamont as a born-again, tax-and-spend liberal. 'The governor is being attacked by the left and the right, and so he's probably here,' Ritter said, pointing to the center of the table. 'And the answer is, always here.' On Thursday, Lamont concurred: the political center is his comfort zone. He noted that Republicans regularly have claimed his two-year budgets were built on shaky foundations. ''You're going to be in deficit within two years. You're going to be raising taxes.' Well, at six years later, stop crying wolf,' Lamont said. Despite the off-budget spending on early childhood education, the governor estimated that at least $1.2 billion of this fiscal year's $2.4 billion projected surplus still would be used to cover more unfunded pension liabilities He reiterated his intention to veto a bill that would give jobless benefits to strikers, a source of tension with the Connecticut AFL-CIO. He also announced an intention to veto a bill sought by Republicans — and opposed both by the building trades unions and the Connecticut Business and Industry Association. The measure, House Bill 7004, is intended to give Plainfield, a small town in eastern Connecticut, the ability to hold a referendum over a proposed trash-to-energy plant and possibly influence the state Siting Council to block the project. He briefly deferred a question about the bill to a senior staff, who confirmed it indeed would be vetoed. 'I'm vetoing that,' Lamont said, laughing. 'I just made that strong decision by myself.' Lamont said he welcomed passage of a bill encouraging housing construction, though he had yet to finish reviewing it. 'We're never going to get economic growth [and] keep it going if we don't have a place for people to live, young people to live, workforce housing, getting our cities growing again,' he said. Opponents in Fairfield County have urged him to veto the bill. 'I think there's some red flags in it, and I know why it makes people nervous,' he said. 'But it's basically gross misrepresentation from the anti-growth people down there that are stirring people up. They're saying it's a big mandate. You're gonna forcing me to build housing, you know, in my backyard, which is not what the strategy is at all. It's trying to tell towns, you take the lead, you show us where you want that housing to go. It's important for your community.' CT Mirror reporter Keith M. Phaneuf contributed to this story. This article first appeared on CT Mirror and is republished here under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License. SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX
Boston Globe
12 hours ago
- Boston Globe
Proposed health care cuts threaten thousands of Rhode Islanders. We must protect their coverage.
Advertisement These tax credits go to 40,000 working class Rhode Islanders who earn just a little bit too much to qualify for Medicaid, do not get health insurance through work, and do not earn nearly enough to afford good health insurance in the marketplace. When the enhanced tax credits expire, these former recipients will see their premiums jump by an average of 85 percent — but some will face even bigger rate hikes. Advertisement For example, a 45-year-old working 30 hours a week making minimum wage would see her monthly premium increase by 387 percent. A couple, both age 64, making $85,000 combined would see their monthly premium jump from $602 to $1,992 — meaning they would be paying 28 percent of their income just to enroll in coverage. When health insurance becomes this expensive, people drop it. They skip preventive care, delay treatment, and risk financial ruin from unexpected medical bills. The Congressional Budget Office predicts that That's why we've introduced the We know this won't solve every challenge in our health care system. But at a time when dysfunction in Washington threatens to undermine hard-won progress, Rhode Island has an opportunity to protect tens of thousands of our residents from dramatic increases in their health insurance costs. Advertisement These are our neighbors, our co-workers, our family members. They deserve to know that their state has their back. We urge our colleagues in the General Assembly — and Rhode Islanders across the state — to support the Individual Market Affordability Act. And we thank the Because when everyone has access to health care, we're all stronger for it. State Representative June S. Speakman represents District 68 in Warren and Bristol. Senator Pamela J. Lauria represents District 32 in Barrington, Bristol, and East Providence. They are the sponsors of the Individual Market Affordability Act.
