
Leicester Church of England: A preacher asked me out and then started stalking me
It seemed like a harmless encounter.It was the summer of 2021, and Jay Hulme, a volunteer at St Nicholas Church in Leicester, was on the door, welcoming people. That's when Venessa walked in."There was something awkward about her," he recalls. "But I assumed it was about being in a new church with new people, and we were just coming out of the pandemic. There was no red flag."Venessa Pinto, employed by the Leicester diocese of the Church of England as a lay preacher - a non-ordained person who can lead worship - returned a few more times to Jay's church.A few weeks later, they both happened to be at a midweek service in Leicester Cathedral. When it was over, she approached him and asked to speak privately. They stepped into the quiet of the old cathedral graveyard.Then she asked him out."I was very taken aback, because I didn't know her. And I was like, 'I'm gay, but thank you for asking.' But she asked me if it was because she was black."Jay was startled by the question. He gently reiterated that he could not go out on a date because he was gay - and also not in the right place for a relationship."I left it thinking, 'That was very awkward', but I think, 'That's the end of that.'"It wasn't.In fact, it was the beginning of a devastating campaign of stalking and harassment. And when Jay complained, the highest authority in the Church in Leicester - a top contender to be the next Archbishop of Canterbury - said he didn't believe him. Instead, he accused Jay of witchcraft.
'Vile man'
That summer, Jay Hulme, then in his mid-twenties, was at a very happy juncture in his life. He was a poet and author, an assistant warden at the LGBT-friendly St Nicholas Church and known on social media for his love of church buildings and theology.He was exploring his Christian faith and considering the possibility of training to become a priest in the coming years."I'm also trans, I'd come out a number of years before, and I'd finally come to a place of full and complete happiness with who I was. I saw my future unfurling before me in a way that had felt impossible before," he reminisces.After being rejected, Venessa, also then in her mid-twenties, sent Jay a series of "angry and accusatory" messages, saying he was gossiping about her. Though he tried to reassure her he wasn't, she was adamant.To try to resolve things, Jay agreed to a demand from her to meet. He had been determined that the meeting happened outside in public but a heavy rainstorm meant they ended up inside, alone together at her place of work.He says she yelled at him, telling him he was a liar, a racist and an awful person - demanding an apology over and over again without telling him what he was supposed to have done.Unsettled, Jay stopped interacting with Venessa and avoided her when she continued to come to his church. But then he started to get messages from anonymous online accounts which could be seen by his social media followers.
Jay quickly worked out the author was Venessa. She even sent him an email from her personal account apologising for what she described as the "pain" she'd caused.But the nastiness online escalated, with Venessa publicly making false allegations and threats.
Jay was concerned for his safety. He reported the harassment to Leicestershire Police. He says he didn't want Venessa prosecuted at that point - just for the abuse to stop.But he heard nothing back and the abuse continued relentlessly. Each time he blocked an account, another would spring up. Jay felt he had no way of escaping it."I felt like she was in my pocket, and in my house, and in my brain all of the time, saying these horrendous things and I couldn't get away," he says.Jay needed to stay online because of his writing and speaking commitments. But he was beginning to lose contracts. He suspects that was because of the allegations about him online.Finally, weeks after reporting it, the police did visit Venessa. The outcome was far from satisfactory for Jay."She told the officer that it was her friends who were sending the messages, and the officer told her to tell them to stop. I was told by the police that I should just delete my social media," he says.Jay says he got the impression the police did not appreciate the seriousness of the abuse because it was online.
Stalker books onto same retreat
The police visit triggered even more angry messages from Venessa.Jay then started assembling a powerful body of evidence, now on a mission to prove the messages had not been sent by Venessa's friends, but by Venessa herself.He compiled a detailed spreadsheet setting out the connections between the numerous anonymous accounts which had sent abuse or posted allegations about him. They all led back to Venessa.Having lost faith in the police, Jay handed all this evidence to the Church of England, which promised to investigate his formal complaint.While he waited, he thought he would get some respite by going to a silent Jesuit retreat in rural Wales. Days later, a colleague told him Venessa had booked to go to the very same retreat.Jay had booked last minute and says there were not many slots left. "It's in the middle of nowhere. As far as I'm concerned there is no way that could have happened naturally."Jay left the retreat just hours before Venessa arrived. It left him terrified, feeling the stalking had now gone beyond the confines of the internet.
Accused of witchcraft
Finally, there was some positive news for Jay.Back in Leicester, the Church HR investigation concluded Venessa had been responsible for the abuse, to Jay's huge relief. He assumed that would be the end of it.But almost as soon as that happened, there was an unexpected turn.He was called into a meeting with the Bishop of Leicester, Martyn Snow - who's seen as a favourite to become the next Archbishop of Canterbury, leader of the Church of England.
Jay thought Venessa was going to lose her job. But it turned out the bishop had conducted his own investigation."I go in and the bishop sits down with this thick folder on his knee. And he begins to question me about my complaint. He actually states that 'It's he said, she said'."The bishop said he didn't believe that Venessa had been responsible for the harassment. And he wouldn't uphold Jay's complaint against her.Then he made an extraordinary accusation about Jay."Somebody had given a statement that I had been seen in the church, in the darkness, with a candle – and they thought I was conducting a seance. For clarity, I was praying with a candle in the dark, because that's a thing that Christians do," says Jay.It got worse.Bishop Snow accused him of practising witchcraft - both because of the "seance" and the fact Jay happened to have a close friend who was a tarot card reader."It felt like an enormous gut punch. These made-up allegations were being presented to me by a person with the power of a bishop, in a meeting which I suddenly realised I had no control over," says Jay."She [Venessa] had somehow managed to make a bishop become part of her stalking campaign of harassment and threats, and use his power and position, and I couldn't believe it was happening."Jay says he was told Venessa would not lose her licence to preach, but he would be punished.
He says Bishop Snow told him the process to begin his training for priesthood – something he decided he wanted to pursue – would be "slowed down".Jay was devastated. He went home feeling trapped. And after the complaint was dismissed, more messages were posted."Really horrific things, saying that I raped children, that I stole money, that I was a racist, a bully. She created fake accounts that were me saying really racist things and would then screenshot them and share those things," he says.Bishop Snow suggested to Jay that his allegations were not in keeping with Venessa's character. But Jay soon learned he wasn't the only person affected by Venessa's behaviour.
Complaints 'from 30 people'
A colleague who worked closely with Venessa, Kat Gibson, had been complaining about her for more than a year before the campaign against Jay began.Kat says Venessa was unpredictable and adversarial in the extreme. "I was just really scared when I was around her, thinking, 'what's she going to explode at me for this time?' with these explosive angry outbursts that I can't prevent."She adds that as the months went on, "around 30 people" from eight churches approached her to informally complain about Venessa's behaviour. She calls the issue an "open secret" but one that managers felt unable to tackle.In a joint statement, Kat's manager, Lusa Nsenga Ngoy - now a bishop in London - and Leicester Diocese said pastoral support and counselling were offered to those affected. The Church of England says Kat's complaints were treated with care and seriousness.
She was a lay preacher in Leicester, but Venessa soon gained increasing prominence on a national level.In 2022, several months into her stalking campaign against Jay Hulme, she was elected onto the Church of England's national assembly – the General Synod.Soon after, she was one of just a handful of people from Synod appointed to the Crown Nominations Commission, a panel that selects new bishops and archbishops. But all the while, she was sending countless sinister messages to Jay.
The online harassment from Venessa now included extreme pornographic content posted on his social media. Then she tweeted Jay's address.He went to the police a second time, but again felt no sense of urgency."There was a period where every night, I would wake up screaming because I dreamed that I was being murdered by Venessa. I had extra locks put on my door," Jay says.
Apologies and conviction
Though there appeared to be inaction, behind the scenes the Church was clearly starting to realise it had a problem on its hands.While Jay had been told in summer 2022 that a Leicester Diocese investigation found Venessa had been responsible for Jay's harassment, he was also told that the Bishop of Leicester decided quite the opposite.The BBC has now learned that shortly before that, the bishop did tell Venessa to step back from ministry because of "her behaviour", though it is not known what this refers to.He also later revoked her licence to preach, after what's described as "new evidence" coming to light. The diocese also suggested she go on leave.But none of these things were made public and did not stop the unrelenting stalking of Jay.
All of a sudden, in late 2022, Leicester Diocese announced Venessa would be leaving.It said she would "pursue other opportunities" and thanked her for the positive contributions she had made.Again, this appeared to have no impact on the hate-filled barrages coming Jay's way."I wrote my own will because…I felt that I'd been let down by the police, I'd been let down by the diocese and as far as I was concerned, this would continue until one of us died," he says.In desperation, in December 2022 he went to the police again.In March 2023, 21 months after the stalking campaign against Jay began (and eight months after the Bishop of Leicester told Jay he did not believe him) the police finally took action against Venessa."I get a phone call from Leicestershire Police [who] basically acknowledged that they made a mess of it. And very soon Venessa was arrested. Her devices were confiscated," says Jay.In a statement, Leicestershire Police acknowledged their initial response fell short of the standards expected, adding it continued "to develop its knowledge and training in relation to preventing and detecting stalking offences".By the end of 2023, Venessa had been charged. In May 2024 she pleaded guilty to stalking, involving serious distress or harm and was given an 18-month community order and banned from contacting Jay for a year.
After Venessa's conviction, Jay asked for a meeting with the Bishop of Leicester, Martyn Snow, who now apologised. "He did acknowledge in some way his own part in it and that he should have done better, and I agree," says Jay.Leicester Diocese told us it took legal advice and is confident it followed HR practice and due process in handling Jay's complaint. But wouldn't say why it did not sack Venessa for months after concluding she had sent the messages to Jay.A spokesperson for the Church of England says they are "appalled by the serious criminal behaviour that led to Venessa Pinto's conviction."Venessa's colleague Kat Gibson was recently made redundant from her post in Leicester. She says she's much better, physically and mentally, and is pleased to be out of Church of England employment.
'Everybody failed to protect me'
And what of Venessa Pinto? Having carried out her community service and abided by the restraining order, she is once again preaching – and has also done missionary work in Brazil.In a statement to the BBC she said one aspect of the court case in particular changed everything for her."Reading [Jay's] victim impact statement brought into sharp focus the pain I caused and strengthened my resolve to take responsibility and make amends," Venessa says."I acknowledge the seriousness of my past conduct and do not seek to diminish its impact. I have moved forward in my life and hope those affected in Leicester and elsewhere can find it in their hearts to allow space for healing and growth," she says.But while Venessa admits to the harassment she was convicted of, she denies some other allegations, including the frequent angry outbursts Kat and others reported. In fact she says accusations of aggressive behaviour were never formally raised with her in Leicester.Venessa says she was going through a difficult period and was struggling with her mental health during her time in Leicester.
Her targeting of Jay has left him scarred. He struggles to open his email for fear of what he'll find and he says his finances have been destroyed by years of sporadic work."I feel that everybody failed to protect me. I almost feel like I was naive that when the police failed to protect me, I thought the Church, which talks about safeguarding, [would]," says Jay."It fails because people are scared to do the right thing. In James, my favourite book of the Bible, there's a bit that says that anybody who knows the right thing and fails to do it, commits sin. And that's the problem at the heart of this Church."
A list of organisations in the UK offering support and information with some of the issues in this story is available at BBC Action Line

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


BBC News
34 minutes ago
- BBC News
Bude man arrested on suspicion of murder over death of woman, 93
A man has been arrested on suspicion of murder after the death of a 93-year-old woman in were called to a report of a concern for welfare for a woman at an address on Cherrill Gardens at about 13:00 BST on force confirmed that officers and paramedics attended, and a 93-year-old woman was pronounced dead at the scene.A 65-year-old man from the Bude area has been arrested on suspicion of murder and remains in police custody. 'Very sad case' Det Insp Rob Smith, senior investigating officer, said: "We are currently carrying out enquiries to establish what happened in this very sad case."A cordon has been set up to allow for a thorough investigation of the scene to take place."It is believed that the man and the woman were known to each other."The community should be reassured that this is being treated as an isolated incident and at this time we are not seeking anyone else in connection to the death."There will be a heightened police presence in the area over the coming days as enquiries are ongoing, and I would encourage anyone, if you have any concerns, to contact officers from the local neighbourhood policing team."


The Sun
37 minutes ago
- The Sun
Two-tier justice fury as Bob Vylan walks free over ‘death to IDF' chant while Tory councillor's wife locked up for tweet
CONTROVERSIAL rap act Bob Vylan should be "arrested and prosecuted immediately", says the shadow home secretary. The punk duo - who perform as Bobby Vylan and Bobbie Vylan - chanted "death to the IDF" and other alleged anti-semitic slurs during their Glastonbury appearance on Saturday. 11 11 Chris Philp has called for them to be treated in a similar fashion to Lucy Connolly, the Tory councillor's wife who was jailed for tweets in the aftermath of the Southport murders last summer. The former minister told the Daily Telegraph: 'It seems very clear that this man was directly inciting violence. "He should receive the same treatment under the law as others, such as Lucy Connolly. 'He should be arrested and prosecuted immediately. A failure to do so would be a clear example of two-tier justice under Sir Keir Starmer and his attorney general, Lord Hermer.' Connolly posted comments on her X account just hours after evil Axel Rudakubana murdered three girls in the Merseyside town on July 29 last year. Connolly, 41, shared a call to arms following the deaths of Bebe King, six, nine-year-old Alice Dasilva Aguiar and Elsie Dot Stancombe, seven, last July. Posts wrongly claimed monster Rudakubana was a Muslim asylum seeker when he was actually born in Cardiff and raised Christian. However, her punishment sparked fury across the political divide. Furious Brits noted that despite the former child minder quickly deleting her post, she remains in prison while paedos such as Hugh Edwards escaped jail time. It comes after PM Keir Starmer last night blasted the BBC for allowing little-known punk act Bob Vylan's hate-filled rant to be broadcast on live TV. Lead singer from the group Kneecap arriving at Westminster magistrates court in London They led the crowd in chants of 'death, death to the IDF (Israeli Defence Force)'. Demanding an explanation from director-general Tim Davie, the Prime Minister said: 'There is no excuse for this kind of appalling hate speech.' He was joined by a raft of MPs and Jewish groups condemning the failure to pull the gig from the air, with Lord Astin calling it a 'very dark day' for the corporation. Glastonbury Festival organisers said they were 'appalled' and said it 'crossed the line'. Avon and Somerset Police said yesterday it was investigating. The PM had previously said that controversial act Kneecap should be taken off the bill with one member facing a terror charge for allegedly waving a Hezbollah flag at a concert. Sir Keir last night said: 'I said that Kneecap should not be given a platform and that goes for any other performers making threats or inciting violence. 11 11 'The BBC needs to explain how these scenes came to be broadcast.' He was backed by his Health Secretary Wes Streeting who said the corporation had "questions to answer". The pro-Palestine duo Bob Vylan also declared 'from the river to the sea Palestine…will be free' seen by the Jewish community as calling for Israel's elimination. BBC bosses had already said that Kneecap's performance wouldn't be shown live on Saturday afternoon but act Bob Vylan – on stage before them - caught them unawares. Culture Secretary Lisa Nandy contacted Mr Davie asking for an 'urgent explanation' into what checks had been made in advance of their appearance. Critics last night said BBC chiefs must be fired for broadcasting anti-Israel jibes which descended into a 'sickening hate rally'. Corporation bosses have been ordered to explain why licence fee cash was spent on the shameful outburst to viewers watching at home on the BBC iPlayer. Lord Austin said: 'Glastonbury was turned into a sickening hate rally. 'You have to ask just what on earth the BBC is doing with our licence fee? 'They send hundreds of BBC staff to cover Glastonbury, but no one no one did anything to stop this easily foreseeable incident being broadcast?' He urged Director-General Tim Davie to launch an urgent probe and swing the axe at those who are responsible. He called the incident that totally overshadowed the three-day event as a 'very dark day' for the corporation. He added that the incident 'calls its very purpose and future into question, if it can't stand up for British values and instead gives a platform to extremists'. Meanwhile, shadow Foreign Secretary Priti Patel said the whole incident calls into raises the prospect of whether the BBC should call itself the national broadcaster. She said: 'Glastonbury and the BBC are inciting murder and terrorist violence against Jewish people. 'We are witnessing dangerous extremes in our country of intolerance towards the Jewish community which is unacceptable and should never ever be tolerated. 'This display of invective and hatred has highlighted again, the BBC's editorial failings on antisemitism and anti-Israel bias which are now so consistently widespread we need change at the BBC - they no longer hold the respectability to claim the mantle of our national broadcaster.' Members of the Commons' Culture select committee will meet tomorrow (Tues) to discuss when BBC bosses come before members to be quizzed. Chair Caroline Dinenage said the matter raises 'questions about live broadcast/delays and editorial decision making on the fly'. Telly personality and criminal barrister Rob Rinder said: "You can stand for Palestinian rights without denying Jewish ones. "You can oppose a government without wishing away a people. 'If your activism leaves no room for someone else's safety, grief or history it's not activism. It's hate." But former Cabinet Minister Lord Hain said it wasn't a time to 'fret' over the performance and the language used. But Glastonbury and organiser Emily Eavis said it was also 'urgently reminding' everyone involved in the festival there was no room for 'anti-Semitism, hate speech or incitement to violence'. They added in a statement that they stood against all forms of war and terrorism. Former BBC executive Danny Cohen said regulator OFCOM should intervene and an investigation led by the corporations's Board led by Chairman Samir Shah. But Avon and Somerset Police said video evidence is being assessed "to determine whether any offences may have been committed that would require a criminal investigation". Former Cabinet Minister Lord Hain insisted it wasn't a time to 'fret' over the performance and the language used. He said: 'I don't think we should fret too much about this, I think we should simply be grown up about it and say, yeah, people are saying things that we don't agree with, but that's music, it's said and it's gone amidst a few loud drum beats.' The controversy came after one member of Kneecap also used their performance on the West Holts stage to suggest fans 'start a riot' at bandmate Liam O'Hanna's next court date. But there will be no charges brought in relation to a November 2023 appearance by the group where they say 'the only good Tory is a dead Tory. Kill your local MP' which was caught on video. A BBC spokesperson last night said: 'Some of the comments made during Bob Vylan's set were deeply offensive. 'During this live stream on iPlayer, which reflected what was happening on stage, a warning was issued on screen about the very strong and discriminatory language. We have no plans to make the performance available on demand.' ROD LIDDLE It's an outrage that Southport tweeter was treated worse than a sex offender – but I know what Two-Tier Keir's game is By Rod Liddle THE law is not an ass – but judges frequently are. And they are at their most stupid when they appear to have been politically co-opted. Lucy Connolly's appeal has been rejected by a pompous, public school trio in the appeal courts. She is the woman with no previous convictions who was sentenced to 31 months for tweeting something horrible about asylum seekers. That was during those riots last summer. When an awful lot of people received very peremptory justice for saying stuff online. Everybody could see that Connolly's sentence was ludicrously severe. Utterly inappropriate for the crime. Everybody, that is, except Sir Keir Starmer, who tried to claim he didn't know the details of the case. And the Appeal Court judges, led by Lord Justice Tim Nice-But-Dim Holroyde. Well, actually not that nice. Connolly got a longer sentence than has been doled out recently to sex offenders, domestic abusers, robbers, burglars, stabbers . . . and everybody knows why. It's because the new Labour government wanted swift justice handed down to these 'racists'. So these were political crimes, then. And as Boris Johnson said, it is as if we were in a police state. The judges concluded: 'There is no arguable basis on which it could be said that the sentence imposed by the judge was manifestly excessive.' For the rest of us, watching these proceedings in mounting fury, the precise reverse was the case. There seems no arguable basis on which it could be said that the sentence imposed WASN'T manifestly excessive. Lucy's distraught husband, Conservative councillor Ray Connolly, fumed: 'The court had the opportunity to reduce her cruelly long and disproportionate sentence, but they refused.' And Lucy's barrister said: 'They have basically deemed her racist and they've decided that that is the ultimate moral sin. Perhaps it is in their world. 'We now have a Labour-supporting establishment and it is their inherent moral evil that the minute you can get painted as a racist, even though you're obviously not a racist, you become a second-rate citizen.' This is precisely the case and it is hugely damaging to our society. It means we lose all faith in our legal system — if we ever had any in the first place — when such outrageous miscarriages of justice occur. For a long while now, the courts have operated a two-tier system for sentencing. And they do that because, just as the right-wingers say, we live in a two-tier country. There are the asylum seekers who judges will seemingly not deport, no matter what heinous crimes they may have committed. And similarly the eco-protestors who cause misery and mayhem, but are praised by idiot judges for their commitment to the cause. And then, while people who tweeted nasty stuff about those asylum seekers get banged up in Starmer's state without so much as a by-your-leave, the Government refuses to hold an inquiry into the rape-gangs scandal which implicated so many Asian- Muslim men up and down the country. What has happened to Lucy Connolly is a scandal. And it is a scandal which involves the judges AND the Government. In collusion. When that happens, we are no longer living in a free country. 11 11 11 11 11


Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
BBC under fire for airing Glastonbury 'death to IDF' chant
BBC bosses should be prosecuted for broadcasting a vile anti-Semitic outburst at the Glastonbury festival, the Tory party said tonight. Shadow Home Secretary Chris Philp said the corporation 'appears to have broken the law' by transmitting a punk duo's calls for the deaths of Israeli soldiers. Top lawyer Lord Carlile said the BBC may have committed a criminal offence, while Sir Keir Starmer said the broadcaster had serious questions to answer. The growing backlash comes after the BBC live-streamed Bob Vylan's performance uninterrupted on its iPlayer site. It could now face an investigation into whether it has breached public-order laws. Such are the implications of the chants that the US State Department is also reportedly gearing up to revoke the band's visas ahead of a forthcoming tour. During Saturday's performance by the London-based pro-Palestinian duo, vocalist Bobby Vylan shouted 'Death, death to the IDF', the Israeli Defence Forces. He followed the chant, which was repeated by the audience, with 'From the river to the sea, Palestine ... will be free' – regarded by many Jews as a call for Israel 's elimination. Broadcasting material calling for the death of an individual or group is an offence under the Public Order Act 1986. It carries a maximum sentence of seven years in prison. Detectives from Avon and Somerset Police, the force responsible for the policing of Glastonbury, are reviewing footage of the performance. It is understood that BBC director-general Sir Tim Davie would have to bear ultimate responsibility if the Crown Prosecution Service decided to take the matter further. Mr Philp said: 'It looks clear that Bob Vylan were inciting violence and hatred. 'They should be arrested and prosecuted – just like some of those who did the same during the riots last summer. 'By broadcasting the duo's vile hatred, the BBC appears to have also broken the law. I call on the police to urgently investigate and prosecute the BBC as well for broadcasting this. 'Our national broadcaster should not be transmitting hateful material designed to incite violence and conflict.' DailyWire this evening said the US State Department were looking to revoke the band's visas. A senior official reportedly told them: 'As a reminder, under the Trump Administration, the U.S. government will not issue visas to any foreigner who supports terrorists.' The punk duo have a twenty-city tour through the States lined up later in the year. Bob Vylan were performing as a warm-up act for controversial Northern Irish rappers Kneecap – one of whose members is facing a terror charge for allegedly displaying a flag in support of the banned organisation Hezbollah . Sir Keir said there was no excuse for Vylan's 'appalling' hate speech. 'I said that Kneecap should not be given a platform and that goes for any other performers making threats or inciting violence,' he added. 'The BBC needs to explain how these scenes came to be broadcast.' Lord Carlile said people were free to make anti-Israel comments but when those comments spilled over into death threats, or something that sounded like death threats, the BBC had a responsibility not to broadcast unlawful material. The KC, who served as the Government's independent reviewer of terrorism legislation for ten years, added: 'I would be interested to know whether the BBC took legal advice and, if so, what that legal advice was. I'm very troubled they may have broadcast unlawful material under section 22 of the Public Order Act.' Glastonbury organiser Emily Eavis said: 'Their chants very much crossed a line and we are urgently reminding everyone involved in the production of the festival that there is no place at Glastonbury for anti-Semitism, hate speech or incitement to violence .' But lawyer Mark Lewis, who specialises in libel cases, said the apology had come too late. He added: 'It is a bit rich that they try to lock the stable doors after the horse has bolted. Glastonbury was warned what was likely to happen and now it is likely there will be legal consequences.' Former Tory culture secretary Nadine Dorries said the BBC had 'serious questions to answer', adding: 'It is quite right that lawyers are asking whether the broadcasting of the chants made on the stage at Glastonbury have crossed the line into a criminal offence. Police should seek swift advice and take action immediately.' Dame Priti Patel, former home secretary and current Shadow Foreign Secretary, added: '[The BBC] no longer hold the respectability to claim the mantle of our national broadcaster .' Former Labour minister Lord Austin said: 'This weekend Glastonbury was turned into a sickening hate rally, and chants for death were beamed into millions of homes by the BBC. 'Tim Davie must now launch an urgent investigation and fire those found to be responsible. He must understand this is a very dark day for the corporation that calls its very purpose and future into question.' Former director of BBC television Danny Cohen told The Daily Telegraph: 'The police should investigate, as should the BBC's board, led by chairman Samir Shah . How much longer can they tolerate the failings of BBC leadership on anti-Semitism and bias?' A spokesman for the Campaign Against Antisemitism said: 'The BBC has surpassed even itself in endangering British Jews by airing this violent chanting . Toby Young, president of the Free Speech Union, raised the case of childminder Lucy Connolly, who was jailed for tweets she made about deporting asylum seekers and burning down hotels housing them after the Southport killings of three girls at a dance studio. She is currently serving a 31-month sentence. He added: 'She caveated what she said by adding 'for all I care', whereas he [Vylan] clearly does care and wants every member of the IDF, which includes virtually the entire population of Israel, to be killed, so the case for prosecuting him is stronger. But to be clear, neither should be prosecuted.' Bob Vylan's performance was later removed from iPlayer. A BBC spokesman said: 'Some of the comments made during Bob Vylan's set were deeply offensive. 'During this live stream on iPlayer, which reflected what was happening on stage, a warning was issued on screen about the very strong and discriminatory language. We have no plans to make the performance available on demand.' Avon and Somerset Police were approached for comment. Meanwhile, Little Mix singer Jade led the Glastonbury crowd in chanting 'f** * you ' towards the Reform Party during her performance on Saturday.