
Australia's vast distances will drive shift to uncrewed defence systems, officials say
AVALON, Australia, March 26 (Reuters) - Australia's military will rely more on autonomous systems to overcome the disadvantage of having to protecting vast geography, said defence officials who predicted "friction in the system" as the balance tipped towards uncrewed systems.
Australia's air force is working with Boeing to develop an autonomous combat aircraft called Ghost Bat.
Speaking at the Australian International Air Show on Wednesday, Chief of Air Force Stephen Chappell said the Ghost Bat will this year demonstrate its capability and test payloads "with the exception of it being armed", before making recommendations to government.
"For us, autonomous platforms allow us to scale, so this is not about replacing crewed platforms, it is about providing greater scale and sustainability, and also increasing lethality and effects, and increasing survivability, particularly for crewed platforms or our defence personnel," he added.
Ninh Dong, chief of air and maritime at Australia's Defence Science and Technology Group, said Australia had a vast coastline and 2 million to 3 million square kilometres (772,000 to 1.2 million square miles) of northern ocean that need to be defended, and was looking for innovations that "overcome this asymmetric disadvantage of distance".
Autonomy and AI that are changing warfare globally will be important, and Australia has made hypersonic missiles a priority, Dong said.
"By holding adversaries at risk further away from Australian shores, they give us more time to respond to threats,' he said of such missiles.
Allan Hagstrom, director of combat futures at Air Force Headquarters, said expensive aircraft will need to integrate with cheaper technology, and autonomous projects are already causing "friction in the system" as defence forces reorganise.
"We are on that cusp where we are probably going to see in the next few years, the weight of crewed platforms and uncrewed platforms and the ratio shifting, and outnumbered by uncrewed platforms enabled by autonomy," he said.
The challenges included how to work collaboratively with other countries, as each nation makes decisions on the role of humans in the "optimal solution".
"We are not talking about taking the human out of the technological solution, but how do we leverage the human and the machine to provide the optimal solution,' he added.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Reuters
15 hours ago
- Reuters
Magnitude 6.5 earthquake strikes Colombia, GFZ says
June 8 (Reuters) - A magnitude 6.5 earthquake struck Columbia on Sunday, the German Research Centre for Geosciences (GFZ) said. The quake was at a depth of 10 km (6.21 miles), GPZ said.


Reuters
2 days ago
- Reuters
NASA says no decision yet on whether next Boeing Starliner flight will carry crew
WASHINGTON, June 6 (Reuters) - The earliest Boeing's Starliner spacecraft could fly again is early 2026, NASA said on Friday, as it evaluates whether to put humans on board one year after propulsion system issues on the capsule forced its debut crew to stay on the International Space Station for roughly nine months.


Reuters
3 days ago
- Reuters
Tesla seeks to block city of Austin from releasing records on robotaxi trial
June 6 (Reuters) - Tesla is trying to prevent the city of Austin, Texas, from releasing public records to Reuters involving the EV maker's planned launch of self-driving robotaxis in the city this month. The news agency in February requested communications between Tesla and Austin officials over the previous two years. The request followed CEO Elon Musk's announcement in January that Tesla would launch fare-collecting robotaxis on Austin public streets. Austin public-information officer Dan Davis told Reuters on April 1 that 'third parties' had asked the city to withhold the records to protect their 'privacy or property interests.' Austin officials on April 7 requested an opinion on the news agency's request from the Texas Attorney General's office, which handles public-records disputes. On April 16, an attorney for Tesla (TSLA.O), opens new tab wrote the AG objecting to the release of 'confidential, proprietary, competitively sensitive commercial, and/or trade secret information' contained in emails between Tesla and Austin officials. The Tesla attorney wrote that providing the documents to Reuters would reveal 'Tesla's deployment procedure, process, status and strategy' and 'irreparably harm Tesla.' Tesla and the Texas Attorney General's office did not respond to Reuters' requests for comment. Neal Falgoust, who oversees public records issues for Austin's Law Department, said the city "takes no position on the confidential nature of the information at issue" but is required to seek the Attorney General's opinion when "a third-party asserts that their information is proprietary and should not be released." Musk has staked Tesla's future on self-driving vehicles he has promised for a decade but hasn't delivered, making Austin's robotaxi launch closely watched as a potential milestone. Some analysts and investors attribute the majority of Tesla's stock market value to hopes for robotaxis and humanoid robots it has yet to deliver. Little is known about Tesla's plans in Austin. The company has said it aims to initially deploy between 10 and 20 driverless robotaxis in restricted geographic areas of Austin, which it has not publicly identified. In an April 23 response to Tesla's letter, a Reuters lawyer wrote that Tesla's intent to deploy the unproven technology on Texas roadways makes its plans 'an issue of enormous importance to Texas and the public at large' and underscored the public's right to know. Falgoust, the Austin law department official, did not respond to questions about whether the public was entitled to information about Tesla's driverless technology. Texas state law requires the Attorney General's office to decide within 45 business days, which would be next week.