
Santa Fe City Council, mayoral candidates raise concerns about rocky rollout of election website
First-time Santa Fe City Council candidate David Montoya showed up at the City Clerk's Office at 9 a.m. May 5, the first day he could begin seeking signatures to get on the November ballot.
He asked if he needed a packet of information, he said, and was told all he needed to get started was a nominating petition, posted online.
He was surprised, then, to discover he was not included on the city's election website, created by a vendor through a contract with the City Clerk's Office; nor had he been notified when the portal went live, allowing residents to submit signatures and make donations electronically for candidates to qualify for public financing. He received a lackluster response from the office when he reached out again, he said.
IMG_0013.jpeg
David Montoya
"Everyone was indifferent about it," said Montoya, a District 1 candidate, adding the situation "raises serious questions for me about how the city interacts with everyday people on a customer service level."
He wasn't alone. It's been a rocky start to the municipal election, with tensions flaring. Several candidates running for mayor and City Council expressed similar frustrations about the rollout of the election website, which didn't go live until more than a week after the target date and initially didn't include all the candidates. Some described what they characterized as dismissive responses from city staff when they raised concerns — however, City Clerk Andréa Salazar said some of her employees have been treated disrespectfully by candidates as well.
"I had a lot of angry candidates threatening lots of things, being very aggressive with me and my staff, which I am not happy with," Salazar said Thursday. "No one has a right to yell at anyone or to threaten people."
'This isn't a fair race'
Mayoral candidate JoAnne Vigil Coppler, a former city councilor, said she learned about the election website on Facebook. When she visited the site, she realized a link for people to sign her petition wasn't live.
Joanne Vigil Coppler mug
JoAnne Vigil-Coppler
She contacted the City Clerk's Office last week, she said, and Salazar told her she was out of the office and would look into the issue Monday.
Vigil Coppler spoke with Assistant City Clerk Xavier Vigil, who told her the office couldn't fix the problem because it was an issue with the vendor. After more back and forth, Vigil Coppler said she notified the city she would file an injunction if the problem wasn't fixed or the website taken offline.
The problem was then solved.
"If not everybody could get their petitions signed, this isn't a fair race," Vigil Coppler said. "Is that too much to expect? No, it's not."
Part of the issue stemmed from emails the City Clerk's Office sent to candidates asking for their information — not everyone received one. Salazar said that also was a vendor-related problem and was corrected Monday.
5007723_030718_RonTrujillo002_CMYK.jpg (copy)
Former City Councilor Ron Trujillo
Former City Councilor Ron Trujillo, who is running for mayor for the second time after an unsuccessful bid in 2018, didn't receive an initial email but heard over the weekend he wasn't listed on the website. He has since been added.
The site shouldn't have been published until all problems were resolved, he said.
"There probably are kinks like that with every system … until you've gotten all the glitches out," Trujillo said. But, he added, "It shouldn't go live. That's the way I've always worked."
Mayoral candidate Oscar Rodriguez said he wasn't listed initially but received an email from the City Clerk's Office on Monday.
Oscar Rodriguez headshot
Oscar Rodriguez
"I trust there's no skulduggery," he said, "but still, it does give an advantage to those whose face appeared and who knew this technology was coming."
Rodriguez, a former city finance director who is running a campaign focused on improving basic city services, said the glitch felt emblematic of why he decided to enter the race: "There's just so much stuff that plagues the city with execution."
'They really should read up'
Like some of his rivals, Rodriguez said the website issues created an imbalance in the race.
Salazar pushed back on that assessment, saying candidates were able to use paper forms to collect signatures and donations starting May 5; the electronic option was an added bonus.
"It's a convenience that we're trying to make for people," she said. "We created this to help people, and we can not do it in the future, so no one has access to it. I guess that's the alternative."
City Councilor Michael Garcia, who is running for mayor, said he is familiar with the process because he has run in two past elections but is worried people running for the first time will be at a disadvantage.
michael_j._garcia_headshot_.jpg
Michael Garcia
Prior city clerks scheduled sit-down meetings with the candidates to answer questions and make sure they had everything they needed, he said, while this year, information was just posted on the city's website.
Salazar said she has been too busy to hold similar candidate sit-downs but is happy to meet with any candidate — and some meetings already have been scheduled.
"Part of the problem is, how can we reach out to people who we don't know are candidates?" she said.
She encourages anyone who wants to run for office to do their own research.
"What I tell candidates is they really should read up on the code, they should look at our website, they should make sure that they understand both the statutory sections that are in New Mexico statute, they should look at our charter, and they should also look at our public campaign financing and election code, and be as familiar with those to understand what the requirements are," Salazar said.
Voter ed effort coming
As of Thursday, most candidates who have publicly said they intend to run for office are listed. The exceptions are mayoral hopeful Tarin Nix and District 3 City Councilor Lee Garcia, who has said he intends to run for a second term.
Lee Garcia did not respond to multiple requests for comment on whether he has submitted paperwork.
Nix is the deputy commissioner of public affairs for the New Mexico State Land Office and has said she will not start seeking signatures until June. Once she is a certified candidate in August, she has said, she intends to take a leave of absence from her state job.
Salazar said the City Clerk's Office is committed to being transparent and communicative, and is beginning to develop plans to educate people about how Santa Fe's ranked-choice voting process works, which may include sending out information with utility bills.
"We want to make sure that everyone has the tools they need to move forward, and we want to make sure the community also understands what's going on in this election cycle," she said.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Bloomberg
15 minutes ago
- Bloomberg
South Korea Says Trump Agrees to Ramp Up Tariff Talks With Lee
South Korea said newly elected President Lee Jae-myung spoke for the first time with Donald Trump and agreed to seek 'tangible results' in trade negotiations, after the US leader imposed a 25% tariff on all imports from its Asian ally. 'The two presidents agreed to work toward a mutually satisfactory agreement on tariff consultations between South Korea and the US as soon as possible,' presidential spokesperson Kang Yu-jung said in a statement after Friday's talks. The nations would have 'working-level negotiations,' she added.

Associated Press
26 minutes ago
- Associated Press
Judge says administration can dismantle the Institute of Museum and Library Services
WASHINGTON (AP) — A federal judge on Friday denied a request by the American Library Association to halt the Trump administration's further dismantling of an agency that funds and promotes libraries across the country, saying that recent court decisions suggested his court lacked jurisdiction to hear the matter. U.S. District Judge Richard Leon had previously agreed to temporarily block the Republican administration, saying that plaintiffs were likely to show that Trump doesn't have the legal authority to unilaterally shutter the Institute of Museum and Library Services, which was created by Congress. But in Friday's ruling, Leon wrote that as much as the 'Court laments the Executive Branch's efforts to cut off this lifeline for libraries and museums,' recent court decisions suggested that the case should be heard in a separate court dedicated to contractual claims. He cited the Supreme Court's decision allowing the administration to cut hundreds of millions of dollars in teacher-training money despite a lower court order barring the cuts, saying that cases seeking reinstatement of federal grants should be heard in the Court of Federal Claims. The American Library Association and the American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees filed a lawsuit to stop the administration from gutting the institute after President Donald Trump signed a March 14 executive order that refers to it and several other federal agencies as 'unnecessary.' The agency's appointed acting director then placed many agency staff members on administrative leave, sent termination notices to most of them, began canceling grants and contracts and fired all members of the National Museum and Library Services Board. The institute has roughly 75 employees and issued more than $266 million in grants last year. However, a Rhode Island judge's order prohibiting the government from shutting down the museum and library services institute in a separate case brought by several states remains in place. The administration is appealing that order as well.


Fox News
26 minutes ago
- Fox News
Charlamagne says Swalwell should 'cut it the f--- out' with claim he didn't know of Biden's decline
Radio host Charlamagne Tha God reflected Thursday on his interview with Rep. Eric Swalwell, D-Calif., earlier this week, slamming the congressman's claim he was not aware of then-President Joe Biden's decline. Charlamagne grilled Swalwell on Tuesday's episode of his "The Breakfast Club" radio show. He said Democrats "got on television and pretended to act like everything was fine" and asked Swalwell, "Why should we ever trust the Democratic Party after they lied to us [for] so long about President Biden?" Swalwell defended himself and his fellow Democrats throughout the podcast, claiming, "I don't think many of us were behind the scenes, to be honest. I didn't spend much time with President Biden behind the scenes." On Thursday, Charlamagne shared his disgust with Swalwell's answers to his "Brilliant Idiots" co-host, comedian Andrew Schulz. "I kept asking him a simple question over and over, 'Why should we ever trust Democrats ever again, knowing that y'all upheld this lie?'" Charlamagne said. After a clip of the interview, Schulz responded, "We clearly can't trust the Democrats that are currently in power that upheld the lie." "Anybody that wants to be the future of the party has to throw the Biden s--- under the bus," Charlamagne said. "Now, Eric and all of these guys are like, 'But we didn't know.' You gotta cut it the f--- out! You're actually around him!" Charlamagne, like Schulz, noted he has never met Biden in person, "but we've got eyes." "If they couldn't be honest about that, would they be honest about anything in the future?" Charlamagne asked, restating his point. He then addressed CNN host Jake Tapper and his new "Original Sin" book about the Biden cover-up as too little, too late. "You've got the same eyes, the same ears that I have. Way before that debate you had to see what we all were seeing," Charlamagne said, arguing journalists should have had the integrity to tell people what was going on. "Maybe that would have pushed him out way earlier." Schulz, who interviewed Trump during the campaign, argued that there is a double standard when podcasters are hammered for not asking this or that question to a politician guest, but those same critics turn a blind eye to legacy media personalities who "literally protected the guy who was unfit for office." Charlamagne agreed, calling on people to hold CNN and MSNBC to the same standard they hold podcasters. "I think that, like, the legacy Democrats still believe that people believe them," Schulz said, drawing laughter from Charlamagne. "And they are the last ones that believe that." Fox News Digital reached out to Swalwell for comment.