Role of influencers to be considered under EU's 'democracy shield' plans
THE ROLE OF influencers will be considered under the EU's plan to develop a 'democracy shield' which aims to tackle the spread of online misinformation and protect European democracy, according to Michael McGrath, European Commissioner for Justice.
Speaking at an event at the IIEA in Dublin today on 'Future-Proofing EU Democracy', McGrath was questioned on the role of influencers online and in particular the information they are disseminating to younger people.
'On the role of influencers, yes, we are going to consider it in the context of 'the Shield' and also from a consumer point of view under the proposed Digital Fairness Act.
'I think the key issue there is transparency. If somebody is part of a commercial transaction, is being paid to promote a product or a service. I think consumers and the general public have a right to know that. There is legislation here in Ireland, but not every member state has such legislation. But it is an area that is going to be considered,' said McGrath.
The Competition and Consumer Protection Commission (CCPC) and Advertising Standards Authority
published guidance on influencer marketing
in October 2023. The agencies are understood to be clamping down on the regulations this year.
Fact-checking network
McGrath, who is the Irish Commissioner responsible for democracy, justice, the rule of law and consumer protection also spoke about Europe's plans to build a European network of fact-checkers, which he said will operate in all official EU languages.
He said they will play 'a crucial role in verifying information and countering disinformation'.
The network will empower citizens with accurate information, crucial for informed decision making, he said.
'But let me be clear, defending facts is not censorship. The right to freedom of expression does not apply to incitement or to hate speech, fake accounts or bots or trolls, nor does it apply to deliberate attempts sponsored by hostile actors to influence political debates and elections,' he said.
European Commissioner for Justice Michael McGrath.
Alamy Stock Photo
Alamy Stock Photo
McGrath said the public's 'genuine concern about issues' such as the cost-of-living, housing, and immigration are oftentimes 'being manipulated'.
'That is what we have to guard against and make sure that the manipulation is rooted out and is addressed. And that's what we will seek to do through the various tools and platforms that we have,' he said.
Advertisement
'I think it's important we do invest in providing people with the facts. At the end of the day, it's the people's democracy. They will elect whoever they want to elect. It's their choice and we must always uphold and defend the rights of people to freely choose their representatives, but they shouldn't be doing so based on uninformed opinions.
'They should have the information that they need to make up their own mind, or at least know where they can access it. We have a duty, I think, to inform people where information is being brought forward that is blatantly incorrect,' the commissioner said.
McGrath said he had 'no fears around freedom of speech' within the European Union.
'It is absolutely safe. In fact, I think people have never had more freedom to speak and to express strongly held views on a whole range of different issues.
'Any of us only have to open up our phone or computer, we will see very strongly held views being expressed, expressed on an ongoing basis about a whole range of issues. And that is absolutely right and proper.
'People should have the right to do so, and as the commissioner in charge of the charter of fundamental rights, I will be the first to stand in defense of freedom of expression,' said McGrath.
'Delicate issue'
When asked about people that express what some might describe as 'far-right' views, McGrath said there is a need to 'be careful not to give the impression that 'we know best' or that we are lecturing people or telling people, 'well, you don't realise the importance of democracy' or 'you're voting for the wrong people', or 'you're misinformed''.
Describing it as a 'delicate issue', McGrath said there is a need to engage with people, stating that the most powerful tool of all is to listen to people about why they hold the views that they hold and why they vote the way that they vote.
The work underway is to ensure everyone has the information that they need and can access factual information, he explained.
'That, for me, is fundamentally what our role is. People will vote for who they choose. That's their fundamental democratic right, the founding value of the European Union, and we must protect and uphold it in every respect. But we have to make sure that that the pillars of our democracy and the pillars that support them in their decision-making, around rule of law, around equality, around freedom, around human rights, respect for human dignity, that all of those, are fully upheld,' said McGrath.
GDPR Reforms
The commissioner was also asked about reforms to GDPR
that are in the works
at a European level. McGrath said there is a need to strike a balance, but confirmed that there are moves to simplify the burden of compliance with the GDPR rules.
'We are committed to doing that, so I will be bringing forward measures to ease the burden of compliance with GDPR, while at the same time protecting that fundamental right of the protection of of personal data,' he said.
The Journal FactCheck
unit is the fact-checker partner for the Ireland EDMO hub (European Digital Media Observatory). You can find more about our collaborative work across media literacy, research and other tools against disinformation
here
.
EDMO receives funding from a European Union programme but is an independent observatory with its own governing board and an independent advisory board. You can read more about EDMO
here
, and the Ireland EDMO hub
here
.
Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone...
A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article.
Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation.
Learn More
Support The Journal
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Times
an hour ago
- Irish Times
EU cannot ignore what's happening in Poland and The Netherlands
The apparent collapse of the Dutch coalition government – caused by Geert Wilders withdrawing his party's support over the issue of migration and asylum seeking – is another indication that there are very dark clouds on the horizon for the European continent's future and security. Taken together with the results of the Polish presidential election , political developments and prospects in a growing number of member states of the EU and in Britain, this collapse is confirmation both of polarising populist politics and evaporating underlying consensus among voters. This is the case across all of the continent's democracies – which represents a dangerous weakening in the face of threats from Putin's Russia and naked hostility from Trump's America. It is obvious from the demands made by Russia at the Istanbul conference that Putin is seeking not just to redefine the Russian-Ukrainian border by force, but also to enforce a form of political capitulation and Moscow hegemony on what he hopes will be a defeated satellite Ukraine and its impotent European allies. Washington's position has been cowardly, deceitful and evasive at best. The evidence is growing that Trump's foreign policy is nothing but shape-throwing and the growls of a paper tiger, which quieten into purring when confronted by adversity. Trump is increasingly concerned about the latest label applied to him by his critics: Taco. That is an acronym for 'Trump always chickens out'. READ MORE His critics point out that belligerent threats made on the international stage – whether directed at Afghanistan's Taliban, North Korea 's atomic missile programme or Iran's nuclear programme – have all been followed by climbdowns. The feeble Houthis alone have felt US armed intervention, and then only from the lofty or distant safety of airborne cockpits. In the course of the Shangri-La Asian summit in Singapore, Trump's defence secretary Pete Hegseth claimed the Asia-Pacific region was now the main focus of US security concerns – signalling a demotion of the North Atlantic alliance as a buttress of American foreign policy. Ominously, he stated that any Chinese invasion of Taiwan by the year 2027 would 'result in devastating consequences' and reminded China that Trump had said that Taiwan would not be invaded 'on his watch'. He said the US wanted to make the 'costs' for China 'too high' and to deter an invasion by executing peace through strength – 'overt and covert'. I say 'ominously' because Hegseth's words were deliberately ambiguous, and less clear in intent than Biden's pledge to defend Taiwan. Devastating consequences were last threatened on North Korea in Trump's first term – only to evaporate in pathetic theatrics at a Singapore summit where 'nice' thoughts and words were exchanged with Kim Jong Un. Since then, North Korea has backed the Russian invasion of Ukraine – all the while developing its intercontinental ballistic missile programme and nuclear capability. A case, surely, of impunity met by Taco. Trump's cabinet members, however, seem to have been given licence to interfere in electoral debate in Europe. They have been openly supportive of the Alternative for Germany, George Simion in Romania , Nigel Farage in Britain and Karol Nawrocki in Poland. Nawrocki's victory is not at all a disaster for the EU but it is a wake-up call for the EU's federalist-leaning elite. In football language, they have lost the changing room. As long as the member states continue to accord competence to the incompetent EU in asylum seeking and migration matters, the decline in European cohesion will continue and, most likely, accelerate. This reality is dawning on the member states – if not in Brussels. There is a growing recognition that adherence to the outdated refugee conventions at the level of EU law and European Convention on Human Rights obligations in the face of international migration patterns is simply unsustainable politically, economically and socially. Like the Austrian chancellor and other member state leaders have done, publicly calling for change is the first priority for an EU struggling externally to face such hostility, overt and covert, from Moscow and Washington. Opposition is also coming internally from the union's own electorates. Even Keir Starmer sees the reality of uncontrolled migration from a British perspective. The matter is urgent. Schengen has been in a state of de facto part suspension. The EU is a treaty-based entity that is sustained by the principle of conferral; it is not a sovereign entity. The collective error of conferring policy competence on the EU in these areas is now clear to the member states; they can act together to repatriate legal and policy competence in these areas to the member states. [ Michael McDowell: Migration policy is the EU's biggest weakness and Donald Trump is aiming to exploit it Opens in new window ] The heady days when Angela Merkel could demand open refugee access, not alone to Germany but to all member states on the basis of burden-sharing, are politically over. Peter Sutherland 's sobriquet of 'heroine' bestowed by him on Merkel when he was UN special representative for international migration is a fading memory. Fundamental change is not merely possible or probable; it is becoming an existential necessity.
Irish Examiner
an hour ago
- Irish Examiner
'RTÉ investigates' shows dire practices in privately-run nursing homes
Residents at two privately-run Irish nursing homes were left to sit in their own urine and subjected to manhandling by staff, among many other abuses, a bombshell new investigation shows. RTÉ Investigates will tonight broadcast Inside Ireland's Nursing Homes, the result of a months-long undercover investigation at two nursing homes — The Residence in Portlaoise and Beneavin Manor in north Dublin City. The programme details a litany of questionable behaviour and practices, including: A resident with mobility challenges being left on their own in a bathroom; A man being refused a toilet break for 25 minutes due to chronic understaffing; A frail female resident with dementia, considered a serious fall risk, being left alone on the edge of her bed for several minutes at night while confused and agitated and seeking a toilet break; A man repeatedly being left sitting in an unchanged incontinence pad despite still being able to use a toilet and having requests to do so denied; 'Fake' lists of activities created for residents' logs in order to show their time as occupied by pursuits, when the sole activity noted for residents was watching television. The cost for a resident staying at the two homes in question is €1,320 and €1,514 per week. The investigation will likely lead to renewed calls for Ireland to enact an adult safeguarding law — which was promised after a similar scandal at the Leas Cross nursing home in north Dublin in 2005, but which has never introduced. The investigation also found that understaffing is endemic at the two homes, which are run by French corporate Emeis. It has been the subject of similar scandals in France in the past five years. The undercover investigation shows one staff member typically assigned to care for more than 20 residents at a time, particularly at night. This means that residents cannot be brought to the bathroom or taken outside for exercise and are typically confined to one overcrowded room. The scene involving the frail female dementia payment is particularly distressing — with the lady in question calling for help for several minutes before finally being attended to by a nurse. Another shows a healthcare assistant declaring that 'these bells are driving me mad' as assistance bells ring out across a corridor in the Portlaoise home, with no staff available to answer them. Staff are informed that if all incontinence pads in their itinerary are used, they will have to make do with 'what's there'. A nurse is heard on camera objecting to this practice, noting that 'incorrect incontinence wear is a form of abuse'. The practice of 'double-padding' — placing two incontinence pads on a person in order to double the amount of moisture to be collected, which can lead to pressure sores — is also depicted in detail. The investigation also shows multiple staff at the two homes ignoring care plans indicating that frail residents should only be moved using hoists, with manual handling forbidden. Instead, staff are seen moving residents by gripping them under their arms or by their trouser belts. Neither Emeis nor the Health Information and Quality Authority (Hiqa) had replied to a request for comment at the time of publication. Hiqa had repeatedly inspected the two homes featured in recent years. The most recent inspection of the Portlaoise home found that the institution was 'short-staffed', with some residents who were at a high risk of malnutrition. Emeis told RTÉ that the evidence of poor care standards, handling care plans being ignored, and the lack of dignity afforded to residents is 'deeply distressing', adding that it 'does not tolerate any individual or systemic neglect or practices'. Addressing the evidence uncovered by the investigators, David Robinson, a consultant geriatrician at St James Hospital in Dublin, said the situation is 'about abuse'. 'There is no other word for it, really,' he said. 'This is going to shorten people's lives and the lives that they have will be more miserable because of the situation that they're in,' said Prof Robinson. Read More Home care regulation will reduce choice and boost big firms' profits
Irish Independent
4 hours ago
- Irish Independent
Domestic abuse victims ‘re-traumatised' at custody and access proceedings
Cian Ó Broin Research into the Irish family law system has found that adult and child victim-survivors of domestic abuse are being 're-traumatised' during guardianship, custody and access proceedings. International evidence has shown that the prevalence of domestic violence and abuse (DVA) in all family law cases is disproportionately high, but the Irish system is 'not sufficiently DVA-informed or responsive'.
