Brazil strikes deal with Musk's Starlink to curb criminal use in the Amazon rainforest
Brasilia, BRAZIL — Brazil's Federal Prosecutor's Office announced Friday a deal with Elon Musk's Starlink to curb the use of its services in illegal mining and other criminal activities in the Amazon.
Starlink's lightweight, high-speed internet system has rapidly spread across the Amazon, a region that for decades struggled with slow and unreliable connectivity. But the service has also been adopted by criminal organizations , which have used it to coordinate logistics, make payments and receive alerts about police raids.
It's the first agreement of its kind aimed at curbing such use following years of pressure from Brazilian authorities.
Starlink, a division of Musk's SpaceX, will begin requiring identification and proof of residence from all new users in Brazil's Amazon region starting in January. The company will also provide Brazilian authorities with user registration and geolocation data for internet units located in areas under investigation.
If a terminal is confirmed to be used for illegal activity, Starlink has committed to blocking the service. The deal is for two years and can be renewed.
Illegal gold mining has contaminated hundreds of miles of Amazon rivers with mercury and disrupted the traditional lives of several Indigenous tribes, including the Yanomami. Starlink, which first arrived in the region in 2022, has enabled criminal groups to manage mining operations in remote areas, where logistics are complex and equipment and fuel must be transported by small plane or boat.
'The use of satellite internet has transformed the logistics of illegal mining. This new reality demands a proportional legal response. With the agreement, connectivity in remote areas also becomes a tool for environmental responsibility and respect for sovereignty,' federal prosecutor André Porreca said in a statement.
Illegal gold miners and loggers have always had some form of communication, mainly via radio, to evade law enforcement. Starlink, with its fast and mobile internet, has significantly enhanced that capability, Hugo Loss, operations coordinator for Brazil's environmental agency, told The Associated Press in a phone interview.
'They've been able to transmit in real time the locations of enforcement teams, allowing them to anticipate our arrival, which seriously compromises the safety of our personnel and undermines the effectiveness of operations,' Loss said. 'Cutting the signal in mining areas, especially on Indigenous lands and in protected areas, is essential because internet access in these locations serves only criminal purposes.'
Jair Schmitt, head of environmental protection for the agency, said what's also needed is tighter regulation on the sale and use of such equipment.
The AP emailed James Gleeson, SpaceX's vice president of communications, with questions about the deal, but didn't immediately receive a response.
___
The Associated Press' climate and environmental coverage receives financial support from multiple private foundations. AP is solely responsible for all content. Find AP's standards for working with philanthropies, a list of supporters and funded coverage areas at AP.org .
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Gizmodo
43 minutes ago
- Gizmodo
Decoding Tesla's New 'Fully Autonomous' Car Video—and What It Isn't Telling You
Elon Musk's Tesla has dropped a 30-minute video designed to electrify fans and stir debate. Posted on June 28, the clip shows what Musk claims is a historic milestone: the first Tesla Model Y to drive itself from factory to customer home, without a person inside, and without remote operation. 'The first fully autonomous delivery of a Tesla Model Y from factory to a customer home across town, including highways, was just completed a day ahead of schedule!!' Musk posted on X (formerly Twitter) on June 27. The Model Y, the world's best-selling vehicle, navigates parking lots, highways, intersections, and city streets, following traffic signals and stopping for pedestrians. The destination? A very happy owner's home about 30 minutes away from Tesla's Austin Gigafactory. Come hang out with us & Model Y for 30 mins Full drive in 1x speed below — Tesla (@Tesla) June 28, 2025Musk didn't hold back: 'There were no people in the car at all and no remote operators in control at any point. FULLY autonomous!' He continued: 'To the best of our knowledge, this is the first fully autonomous drive with no people in the car or remotely operating the car on a public highway.' There were no people in the car at all and no remote operators in control at any point. FULLY autonomous! To the best of our knowledge, this is the first fully autonomous drive with no people in the car or remotely operating the car on a public highway. — Elon Musk (@elonmusk) June 27, 2025 Fans on X were ecstatic. 'Thank you for changing the world and how we function' wrote one. Thank you for changing the world and how we function — truly phenomenal to witness history being made. Just curious: if Tesla now has the tech where a car can drive itself fully autonomously from factory to a customer's home across the city (even on highways!), could you help us… — AIAgent (@ai_voiceagent) June 27, 2025'Fantastic to see this happening,' said another. Fantastic to see this happening and just shy of the 5th anniversary of the start of construction of Giga Texas! Historic! — Joe Tegtmeyer 🚀 🤠🛸😎 (@JoeTegtmeyer) June 27, 2025It's the kind of video that makes you believe the future has finally arrived. But this is Elon Musk and Tesla we're talking about—a company with a long history of over-promising and under-delivering on self-driving technology. To understand what's really going on, you need to understand the high-stakes, multi-billion-dollar race to build a truly autonomous car. At the heart of the self-driving race are two fundamentally different philosophies. On one side, you have Tesla. Its 'Full Self-Driving' (FSD) system relies almost exclusively on cameras and AI. The approach, known as 'Tesla Vision,' argues that if humans can drive with just two eyes, a car should be able to do the same with eight cameras providing a 360-degree view. The car's computer 'sees' the world and makes decisions based on an immense amount of video data it has been trained on. It's a visually impressive and lower-cost approach, as it avoids expensive hardware. On the other side, you have companies like Waymo (owned by Google's parent company, Alphabet). Waymo's system also uses cameras and radar, but its key sensor is LiDAR (Light Detection and Ranging). LiDAR units spin around, shooting out millions of laser beams per second to create a hyper-accurate, real-time 3D map of the car's surroundings. This gives the car a superhuman ability to 'see' distances, shapes, and objects with precise detail, day or night. It's more expensive but is widely considered by many in the industry to be a more robust and redundant system. The stakes are colossal: the company that cracks true, Level 5 autonomy—where a car can drive itself anywhere, anytime, without any human intervention—will not just dominate the auto industry, but will also revolutionize logistics, transportation, and urban life. With that background, let's look at Tesla's video again. The Model Y impressively handles various real-world scenarios. But Musk's claims of a historic first are, characteristically, exaggerated. A few days ago, on June 22, Tesla launched a very limited version of its robotaxi service in Austin. Not only did it involve a small number of cars and hand-picked customers, but every vehicle had a human supervisor in the passenger seat and was restricted to a 'geofenced' (geographically limited) area. Furthermore, Musk's claim that this is the 'first fully autonomous drive with no people in the car… on a public highway' is demonstrably false. Waymo already offers driverless rides that include highway travel to its employees in Phoenix, San Francisco, and Los Angeles. While not yet available to the public, the capability has been operational for some time. The key difference is that Waymo has spent years collecting data and validating its safety in these areas with its LiDAR-equipped fleet, while Tesla seems to be rushing to create a public perception of leadership. This Tesla video is a PR win. But given Musk's track record, a healthy dose of skepticism is warranted. It's highly probable this specific 30-minute route was meticulously mapped and tested by Tesla under ideal conditions to ensure a flawless performance for the video. The real test of autonomy isn't whether a car can complete one perfect, pre-planned trip; it's whether it can handle thousands of unpredictable trips, safely, over millions of miles. The most telling question remains: If Tesla's system is truly 'fully autonomous' as claimed in this video, why do its commercial robotaxis still require a human supervisor? Musk is a brilliant salesman, and this video is his latest, most compelling ad. It sells a vision of the future that is tantalizingly close. But as we've seen time and again, with Tesla, the gap between a promotional video and everyday reality can be vast. Until these cars are navigating countless cities without a human safety net, this 'historic' first is little more than a brilliant, but likely brittle, piece of marketing.
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
America's Newest Space IPO Was a Smashing Success
Voyager Technologies was supposed to IPO for a price as low as $26 a share -- but didn't. IPO shares began trading on their first day near $70 a share. They've gone nowhere but down since. Voyager IPO investors made out like bandits, but now investors must come to terms with this fact: Voyager stock won't be profitable anytime soon. 10 stocks we like better than Voyager Technologies › As the old saying goes, "Sometimes, it's better to be lucky than to be good." Take investors in the Voyager Technologies (NYSE: VOYG) initial public offering (IPO), for example. Once upon a time, space stocks were a rarity. So much so that Sir Richard Branson was able to IPO Virgin Galactic as the only real way for investors to "dabble a little bit in a spaceship company, own a little bit of a spaceship company" -- and watch the stock price zoom into orbit. Virgin's success soon inspired a wave of imitators -- special-purpose acquisition companies (SPAC) that dutifully zoomed when first created, only to crater thereafter, frightening many investors away from the idea of investing in space stocks for years. That all changed, however, when President Donald Trump won his second term of office, promising to bring Elon Musk into government and invest heavily in space exploration. Space stocks zoomed once again, sending the share prices of companies like Redwire (NYSE: RDW), BlackSky (NYSE: BKSY), and Rocket Lab (NASDAQ: RKLB) to the Moon earlier this year. It was at this propitious moment in time that Voyager Technologies decided it, too, would go public. Wooing investors with promises to build an international coalition of companies and create a new, privately owned space station to replace the International Space Station (ISS), Voyager stock debuted to widespread acclaim on June 11. Expected to price as low as $26 a share (and actually pricing at $31), Voyager opened its first day of trading at $69.75 -- more than twice the expected price. Even falling to close at $56 and change, it's hard to call Voyager's IPO anything but a smashing success. If you got in anywhere near the IPO price, you were lucky indeed! But what if you were not among those lucky few who got in at the IPO price? Well, in that case, I'd say you're probably feeling a bit less fortunate. The first 10 trading days since Voyager's IPO have not been kind to momentum investors. Seeking a rocket ride "to the moon," they instead have found themselves on an elevator slowly descending to Earth. By close of trading last Friday, for example, Voyager stock had given up much of its IPO price gains and fallen to close within pennies of $43 a share. Again, a nice profit if you were lucky enough to get in on the ground floor. But a significant loss if you didn't. Now, on the flip side, Voyager's steeply fallen stock price does give investors, who didn't get in at the IPO price, a second bite at the apple and a chance to buy into the stock at a bit more than its price immediately post-IPO (it was trading at $48.25 a share at Friday's open). But should you even want to? Let's run a few numbers and see if an answer arises. Let's begin with the basics: Voyager Technologies is a $2.5 billion small-cap aerospace and defense contractor. Best known for its role leading a consortium of companies building the Starlab space station, Voyager actually gets only about half its revenue ($75 million last year) from space activities. The other half ($78 million) comes from "defense and national security" products, including "artificial intelligence (AI)-enabled edge computing platforms and missile propulsion modules." Neither half of Voyager is currently profitable according to generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP), however. Indeed, according to data from S&P Global Market Intelligence, Voyager reported $74 million in net losses last year -- losing about $0.50 for every $1 in products it sold. The company's also burning cash at an even higher rate, with free cash flow running negative to the tune of more than $125 million last year (nearly 70% worse than the GAAP numbers make it seem). With no Wall Street analysts yet publishing earnings forecasts for Voyager, it's hard for an investor to know when Voyager might eventually turn profitable. But here's my two cents: With Voyager currently working full tilt to build the Starlab space station, management forecasting that the station will cost "approximately $2.8 billion to $3.3 billion" to build, and Voyager hoping to launch the station aboard a SpaceX Starship rocket (which hasn't yet been certified for flight) in 2029, the absolute earliest anyone should expect to see Voyager turn a profit is 2029. Most likely, it will take some time after the first launch before Starlab begins raking in enough revenue to help Voyager turn a profit. Most definitely, the company won't be able to get anywhere near profitability before Starlab is launched. Long story short, that means Voyager will spend the next several years deeply unprofitable as it spends hand over fist to build its multibillion-dollar space station. Whether the situation then improves after the station is built is anyone's guess. Before you buy stock in Voyager Technologies, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the for investors to buy now… and Voyager Technologies wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $704,676!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $950,198!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor's total average return is 1,048% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 175% for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join . See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of June 23, 2025 Rich Smith has positions in Rocket Lab. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Rocket Lab and S&P Global. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. America's Newest Space IPO Was a Smashing Success was originally published by The Motley Fool
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Job openings among the largest U.S. federal contractors have plummeted at 25x the rate of all other jobs amid DOGE cuts, report finds
While job openings have broadly remained steady, opportunities in private-sector government contractors have plummeted, according to new data from Indeed. A 15% drop in job listings for the 25 largest U.S. government contractors since Jan. 20 coincides with mass funding cuts facilitated by Elon Musk's Department of Government Efficiency. Elon Musk's mass spending cuts across the government have not just slashed the federal workforce, but may also have axed job opportunities among the largest government contractors in the private sector. Since the beginning of President Donald Trump's second term, job openings for the 25 private-sector companies with the largest government contracts have dropped 15%, according to a report published on Thursday by the Indeed Hiring Lab. Listings for all other jobs dipped only 0.6% in the same period. The precipitous drop in job opportunities at massive government contractors—such as Boeing, Honeywell and Deloitte (though the data does not analyze job openings for the individual companies)—coincides with the Musk-led Department of Government Efficiency's (DOGE) culling of private-sector contracts, part of the advisory's efforts to reduce so-called government waste and abuse. DOGE claims to have saved taxpayers $180 billion in workforce reductions, contract and lease cancellations, and other spending cuts, though experts warn the advisory's calculations are inaccurate and inflated. These cuts have made their mark on the private sector, with tech companies like Oracle and Leidos reportedly having contracts terminated by DOGE as part of the Pentagon's goal to slash $580 million in funding. The cuts have also hit Big Four consulting companies like Deloitte, which saw the elimination of at least 120 contracts totalling more than $1 billion, according to a Fortune analysis from April. Stark disparities in job opportunities available overall compared to the 25 major contractors may indicate these companies are starting to make tough decisions following DOGE cuts, according to Cory Stahle, the report's author and economist at the Hiring Lab. 'It's clear that these [cuts to government] funding are having an impact on some of these companies—hiring plans and where they see things going in the coming months—especially as they've seen potential pullback to their streams of funding from the government,' Stahle told Fortune. Companies have begun to report the impact of these cuts. Tech consultancy Accenture warned in March the Trump administration's cost-cutting could impact sales and revenue. Federal contracts make up about 8% of its global revenue and 16% of its Americas revenue in fiscal 2024. The company reported a quarterly earnings beat last week, but a 6% decrease in bookings. Chief financial officer Angie Park said the impact of federal funding cuts on the business, though, was 'immaterial.' Booz Allen Hamilton, a consultancy among the top 25 contractors, which derives about 98% of its revenue from government contracts, announced it would lay off about 2,500 employees, primarily staff involved in parts of the company working for non-defense U.S. agencies. 'All presidential transitions create some degree of near-term disruption, followed by opportunity,' Booz Allen CEO Horacio Rozanski said in an earnings call. 'We now see that these dynamics are indeed in play, at a rate and speed that is beyond what we originally expected.' What concerns Indeed's economist Stahle about the data related to job openings is how much government-contractor jobs have been impacted compared to the rest of the labor market. Since February 2024, job listings for positions at government contractors have plummeted 44%, according to the Indeed data, while all other listings have increased 14% since before COVID. While the number of job openings have more broadly stabilized, the recent data indicates the trend of government-contractor job listings 'is not changing the way the rest of the labor market is changing,' Stahle said. 'We're starting to see a break in patterns, which I think is what's most notable about this,' he added. Fewer job listings for these massive private-sector contractors may mean fewer opportunities for fired federal workers seeking news jobs, particularly as applications among this demographic soared in the spring as a result of DOGE's mass workforce cuts. Most of these fired federal employees are knowledge workers looking for white-collar positions usually offered by government contractors, according to Stahle. Not only are fewer job openings available to these federal workers, but also to college students and young professionals entering the workforce. 'The broader labor market impact could be much larger than a 25-company series might indicate,' Stahle said. 'We want to hit that soft landing we've been talking about for a couple years, and hopefully start to see things turn around. We don't want to continue to go down forever.' This story was originally featured on Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
