Man avoids jail after attacking lawyer in courtroom
A Bahraini man who physically attacked his exwife's lawyer inside the Sharia Courts Complex in Hunainiyah has avoided jail time after the lawyer formally withdrew his complaint, citing an in-court apology and a family-brokered settlement.
The incident occurred on March 25, 2025, shortly after a family hearing had concluded. According to the Southern Governorate Prosecution, the defendant admitted to the assault and expressed remorse over his actions, which he said were driven by heightened emotions stemming from an ongoing family dispute.
The lawyer sustained injuries in the attack, though they were not serious enough to prevent him from returning to work.
Medical reports confirming the injuries were reviewed as part of the investigation.
The defendant was held in custody for over two weeks before being brought before the Minor Criminal Court, where he was formally charged with assault.
Prosecutors had acted swiftly, ordering his detention and referring the case to court immediately.
Witness statements and medical documentation were submitted, and the accused acknowledged the incident during questioning.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Tribune
9 hours ago
- Daily Tribune
Court annuls car deal over altered chassis
Tampering with a car's chassis number has cost a Bahraini seller BD14,625 after a court annulled the deal, ruling the buyer could not register the vehicle in his Gulf country due to the altered markings. The High Civil Court found that the vehicle's identification had been interfered with, preventing its registration abroad and rendering it useless for road use. The judge ordered the seller to return the full amount paid and to cover the cost of an expert's report, along with legal fees. Bank transfer The buyer had paid BD14,625 by bank transfer after agreeing the price with the seller. The vehicle was then shipped overseas. There, it failed inspection. The anti-counterfeiting division examined the chassis and spotted signs that the number had been tampered with. The traffic directorate refused to process registration. Knowledge The buyer, who had no knowledge of any tampering, hired a technical expert. On inspecting the car, the expert noted welding, sanding, and fresh paint around the area where the chassis number had been stamped. He concluded that the car carried a concealed fault: a forged number that made the vehicle unfit for legal use. Lawyer Sara Ali, acting for the buyer, told the court that her client was misled and that the car's condition amounted to a breach of contract. Contract She relied on Article 141(a) of the Civil Code, which allows one side to cancel a contract if the other fails to do their part. She also cited Article 415, which makes a seller liable for faults that reduce an item's use or worth, even if they were unaware of the defect, and Article 425, which gives the buyer the right to cancel the sale or demand payment if the item doesn't match what was promised. The court said the buyer could no longer make use of the car as intended and that the tampering destroyed the purpose of the sale. The inspection report from the Gulf state's crime unit and the expert's findings were enough to show the vehicle had been altered. The judge ordered the buyer to return the car. The seller must repay the BD14,625 and cover BD250 in expert costs. Both sides were told to pay their share of court fees.
Daily Tribune
9 hours ago
- Daily Tribune
Ten Bahrainis to Face Trial for BD 230,000 Fraud Involving SIO and Tamkeen
The Public Prosecution has announced that ten Bahraini nationals will face trial for submitting false information and using forged documents to illegally obtain over BD 230,000 from the Social Insurance Organization (SIO) and the Labour Fund, Tamkeen. According to the Head of the Financial Crimes and Money Laundering Prosecution, the defendants manipulated the online systems of both agencies to claim social insurance and wage support benefits they were not entitled to. Investigations revealed that some business owners submitted forged documents and entered false data into the SIO system. These actions allowed certain employees to appear as if they had longer periods of employment, enabling them to wrongly collect pensions, end-of-service benefits, and lump-sum compensations. The fraudulent claims totaled more than BD 90,000. In a similar scheme, the same group of individuals allegedly submitted fake documents to Tamkeen, securing over BD 140,000 in employee wage support. Upon receiving reports from both SIO and Tamkeen, the Public Prosecution launched an investigation. Witnesses from the two organizations were questioned, and a travel ban was placed on the suspects. Their bank accounts and assets were frozen. A forensic report confirmed the forgery of employment contracts, and several affected employees gave testimony. Authorities also traced the financial movements of the accused, with support from the National Financial Intelligence Center and the Anti-Corruption and Economic Crimes Department. After gathering all the evidence, prosecutors ordered the arrest and questioning of the accused. The case is now set to be heard on June 23, 2025, at the First High Criminal Court.
Daily Tribune
a day ago
- Daily Tribune
Bahrain's Distracted Driving Crisis: Court Links Phone Use to Fatal Accident, Orders Compensation
• Victim was crossing road • Driver distracted by phone • Court orders compensation for family You Know What: In Bahrain, using a mobile phone while driving is punishable by fines or suspension under Article 39 of the Traffic Law, but enforcement is limited and violations remain common, especially in residential zones. Mahir Haneef TDT | Manama An Indian expatriate who was struck and killed while crossing a street in Nuwaidrat has become a painful reminder of Bahrain's ongoing struggle with distracted driving. A court in Bahrain has confirmed that the driver who caused the fatal accident was using his mobile phone at the time of the collision. The incident took place on October 2, 2023. Mani V.V., 50, was crossing Road 4303 near an intersection when he was hit by a vehicle driven by a Bahraini national. He died three days later, on October 5 th, from head injuries. His family, including mother Santha V.V. and siblings Sasi, Ramesan, and Mini, filed a civil case seeking compensation. Driver distracted According to the cour'ts ruling, the driver had been using his phone while approaching the intersection and failed to notice the pedestrian in time. The court found him guilty of negligence and confirmed that his actions had directly caused Mani's death. The court cited the criminal case in relation to the incident, in which the driver was convicted and sentenced to six months in prison with licence suspension. He was later granted a pardon but the civil case proceeded independently. Despite the driver's release, the court held both him and his insurance company jointly liable for damages. Public concern Mani's death and the court's findings have stirred renewed concern about the widespread use of mobile phones by drivers in Bahrain. Although Article 39 of the Traffic Law bans hand-held phone use while driving, violations are common. On most days, drivers can be seen texting or taking calls even near schools, roundabouts, and residential zones, with little to no visible deterrent. The pattern of distracted driving has become a routine part of road behaviour, often overlooked unless it leads to a tragedy. This case stands out as one of the few where the courts have clearly linked such behaviour to a fatal outcome. Compensation ordered The court awarded BD 4,000 to Mani's mother and BD 500 each to his three siblings, acknowledging the emotional and moral damage caused by the loss. Although the family could not prove continuous financial support, the ruling recognised their grief and the lost hope of future care. In a letter shared with Indian authorities, the family expressed gratitude to lawyer Bushra Mayoof and the Pravasi Legal Cell for reviving a case that was initially dismissed. They also thanked the Indian Embassy and Kerala's Chief Minister for diplomatic and moral support during the ordeal. Systemic issue The case is significant not only for its compensation ruling but also for its documentation of distracted driving as the confirmed cause of death, which is rare in Bahrain's courts. Legal observers say this highlights how casual recklessness on the roads, especially involving mobile phone use, continues to pose risks to pedestrian safety and public life. It also signals a slow but steady move towards greater legal accountability.
