
Scientists warn that greenhouse gas accumulation is accelerating and more extreme weather will come
WASHINGTON — Humans are on track to release so much greenhouse gas in less than three years that a key threshold for limiting global warming will be nearly unavoidable, according to a study to be released Thursday.
The report predicts that society will have emitted enough carbon dioxide by early 2028 that crossing an important long-term temperature boundary will be more likely than not. The scientists calculate that by that point there will be enough of the heat-trapping gas in the atmosphere to create a 50-50 chance or greater that the world will be locked in to 1.5 degrees Celsius (2.7 degrees Fahrenheit) of long-term warming since preindustrial times. That level of gas accumulation, which comes from the burning of fuels like gasoline, oil and coal, is sooner than the same group of 60 international scientists calculated in a study last year.
'Things aren't just getting worse. They're getting worse faster,' said study co-author Zeke Hausfather of the tech firm Stripe and the climate monitoring group Berkeley Earth. 'We're actively moving in the wrong direction in a critical period of time that we would need to meet our most ambitious climate goals. Some reports, there's a silver lining. I don't think there really is one in this one.'
That 1.5 goal , first set in the 2015 Paris agreement, has been a cornerstone of international efforts to curb worsening climate change. Scientists say crossing that limit would mean worse heat waves and droughts, bigger storms and sea-level rise that could imperil small island nations. Over the last 150 years, scientists have established a direct correlation between the release of certain levels of carbon dioxide, along with other greenhouse gases like methane, and specific increases in global temperatures.
In Thursday's Indicators of Global Climate Change report, researchers calculated that society can spew only 143 billion more tons (130 billion metric tons) of carbon dioxide before the 1.5 limit becomes technically inevitable. The world is producing 46 billion tons (42 billion metric tons) a year, so that inevitability should hit around February 2028 because the report is measured from the start of this year, the scientists wrote. The world now stands at about 1.24 degrees Celsius (2.23 degrees Fahrenheit) of long-term warming since preindustrial times, the report said.
The report, which was published in the journal Earth System Science Data , shows that the rate of human-caused warming per decade has increased to nearly half a degree (0.27 degrees Celsius) per decade, Hausfather said. And the imbalance between the heat Earth absorbs from the sun and the amount it radiates out to space, a key climate change signal, is accelerating, the report said.
'It's quite a depressing picture unfortunately, where if you look across the indicators, we find that records are really being broken everywhere,' said lead author Piers Forster, director of the Priestley Centre for Climate Futures at the University of Leeds in England. 'I can't conceive of a situation where we can really avoid passing 1.5 degrees of very long-term temperature change.'
The increase in emissions from fossil-fuel burning is the main driver. But reduced particle pollution, which includes soot and smog, is another factor because those particles had a cooling effect that masked even more warming from appearing, scientists said. Changes in clouds also factor in. That all shows up in Earth's energy imbalance, which is now 25% higher than it was just a decade or so ago, Forster said.
Earth's energy imbalance 'is the most important measure of the amount of heat being trapped in the system,' Hausfather said.
Earth keeps absorbing more and more heat than it releases. 'It is very clearly accelerating. It's worrisome,' he said.
The planet temporarily passed the key 1.5 limit last year . The world hit 1.52 degrees Celsius (2.74 degrees Fahrenheit) of warming since preindustrial times for an entire year in 2024, but the Paris threshold is meant to be measured over a longer period, usually considered 20 years. Still, the globe could reach that long-term threshold in the next few years even if individual years haven't consistently hit that mark, because of how the Earth's carbon cycle works.
That 1.5 is 'a clear limit, a political limit for which countries have decided that beyond which the impact of climate change would be unacceptable to their societies,' said study co-author Joeri Rogelj, a climate scientist at Imperial College London.
The mark is so important because once it is crossed, many small island nations could eventually disappear because of sea level rise, and scientific evidence shows that the impacts become particularly extreme beyond that level, especially hurting poor and vulnerable populations, he said. He added that efforts to curb emissions and the impacts of climate change must continue even if the 1.5 degree threshold is exceeded.
Crossing the threshold 'means increasingly more frequent and severe climate extremes of the type we are now seeing all too often in the U.S. and around the world — unprecedented heat waves, extreme hot drought, extreme rainfall events, and bigger storms,' said University of Michigan environment school dean Jonathan Overpeck, who wasn't part of the study.
Andrew Dessler, a Texas A&M University climate scientist who wasn't part of the study, said the 1.5 goal was aspirational and not realistic, so people shouldn't focus on that particular threshold.
'Missing it does not mean the end of the world,' Dessler said in an email, though he agreed that 'each tenth of a degree of warming will bring increasingly worse impacts.'
___
The Associated Press' climate and environmental coverage receives financial support from multiple private foundations. AP is solely responsible for all content. Find AP's standards for working with philanthropies, a list of supporters and funded coverage areas at AP.org .
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Medscape
16 minutes ago
- Medscape
Can Tumor Patterns Predict Lymphoma Treatment Success?
Large B-cell lymphomas (LBCL) exhibit three distinct microenvironment archetype profiles defined by specific immune and stromal cell patterns. These profiles show divergent cell-cell communication pathways and correlate with different clinical outcomes following CD19 Chimeric Antigen Receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy. METHODOLOGY: Researchers employed single nucleus multiome sequencing of 232 Large B cell lymphoma tumors and controls to comprehensively define the cellular landscape and stereotypical patterns in lymphoma microenvironment archetype profiles. Analysis included 217 lymphomas (110 newly diagnosed and 107 relapsed/refractory cases) and 15 controls. Control tissues comprised nonmalignant reactive lymph nodes biopsied due to suspicion of lymphoma in patients with (n = 13) or without (n = 2) prior lymphoma diagnosis. Available remaining nuclei underwent DNA and RNA extraction followed by whole-exome sequencing (n = 174), low-pass whole-genome sequencing (n = 174), and bulk RNA sequencing (n = 208). TAKEAWAY: Cell subsets co-occurred in three distinct lymphoma microenvironment archetype profiles characterized by: sparsity of T cells with high frequencies of cancer-associated fibroblasts and tumor-associated macrophages; lymph node architectural cell types with naive and memory T cells; or activated macrophages and exhausted CD8+ T cells. Researchers identified that divergent patterns of cell-cell communication underpinned the transcriptional phenotypes of archetype-defining cell subsets. The Fibroblast/Macrophage archetype showed association with inferior outcomes following first-line rituximab plus chemotherapy treatment. Analysis revealed that patients with T-cell exhausted archetype tumors had significantly higher rates of progressive disease as best response to CD19 CAR T-cell therapy (4/6) compared to Lymph Node archetype (0/8; Fisher test, P = .017). IN PRACTICE: 'The assembly of nonmalignant components of human tumors into prototypical microenvironmental patterns, or archetypes, has been described across cancers. Each archetype consists of a dominant, interconnected cellular network that promotes tumor growth through divergent mechanisms. Furthermore, differences in cell frequency and function between microenvironment archetypes have been suggested as potential biomarkers for immunotherapy response,' the authors of the study wrote. SOURCE: The study was led by Michael Green, PhD, MD Anderson Cancer Center in Houston. It was published online in Cancer Cell . LIMITATIONS: According to the authors, the patient cohort's clinical heterogeneity, while reflecting real-world population, limited their ability to directly assess associations between archetypes and outcomes. The researchers noted that the Fibroblast/Macrophage archetype is linked to high-risk features and increases in prevalence in later therapy lines, while the Lymph Node archetype is associated with low-risk features and declines in prevalence, potentially skewing distribution among treated patients. The authors acknowledged uncertainty about whether LymphoMAPs remain stable between diagnosis and relapse or change with treatment. The researchers emphasized the need for studying LymphoMAP archetypes in uniformly treated cohorts and randomized trials, preferably with biopsies at both baseline and relapse. DISCLOSURES: The study received funding from the Schweitzer Family, the MD Anderson Lymphoid Malignancies Program and NCI P01 CA272295. Michael Green, PhD, reported ties with Sanofi, Kite/Gilead, Abbvie, Allogene, Bristol Myers Squibb, Arvinas, Johnson & Johnson, Daiichi Sankyo, and DAVA Oncology and stock ownership in KDAc Therapeutics. Todd Fehniger, MD, PhD, disclosed being an inventor on patent applications held by Washington University, as well as having relationships with Wugen Inc, Orca Bio, Indapta Therapeutics, HCW Biologics Inc, Affimed, AI Proteins, and the National Institutes of Health. Additional disclosures are noted in the original article.


Forbes
22 minutes ago
- Forbes
SpaceX Rocket Explodes Into Giant Fireball During Test At Texas Starbase Facility
SpaceX's Starship rocket exploded into a massive fireball while it was being prepared for a flight test at its Starbase testing facility in Texas on Wednesday night, marking the latest in a series of explosions that have marred the testing of the rocket company's most powerful launch vehicle. FILE PHOTO- SpaceX's mega rocket Starship exploded during a test on Wednesday night. The explosion took place around 11 p.m. CDT and was captured on SpaceX's livestream as the Starship rocket was being prepared for a flight test. In a statement, the company said it was preparing the Starship for its tenth flight test when it 'experienced a major anomaly while on a test stand.' SpaceX said the safety clear area around the rocket test site was 'maintained throughout the operation and all personnel are safe and accounted for.' The company said there are 'no hazards to residents in surrounding communities,' but urged locals to ' not attempt to approach the area while safing operations continue.' A spokesperson for the Brownsville Fire Department told ABC affiliate KRGV-TV that firefighters have been dispatched to the site of the explosion, but the full scale of the incident was unknown to them. This is a developing story.


CBS News
30 minutes ago
- CBS News
SpaceX Starship upper stage explodes during ramp-up to expected engine test firing
A SpaceX Starship upper stage exploded in a spectacular conflagration during ramp-up to an expected engine test firing at the company's Starbase manufacturing facility on the Texas Gulf Coast late Wednesday, destroying the rocket in what appears to be a major setback for the Super Heavy-Starship vehicle Elon Musk says is critical to the company's future. Video from LabPadre, a company that monitors SpaceX activities at Starbase, showed the Starship suddenly exploded in a huge fireball just after 11 p.m. CDT, 10 to 15 minutes before the anticipated engine test firing, sending flaming debris shooting away into the overnight sky from a churning fireball that engulfed the test stand. A SpaceX Starship upper stage blew up late on June 18, 2025 at the SpaceX Starbase manufacturing facility on the Texas Gulf Coast. LabPadre via Storyful The video showed what appeared to be two major explosions, the first detonation near the nose of the rocket followed a moment later by a second eruption of flame and debris on the left side of the spacecraft. The test stand disappeared in a billowing fireball that rose into the overnight sky like a bomb blast. The Starship was being filled with a full load of liquid oxygen and a partial load of high-energy methane fuel when the detonations occurred. Ninety minutes after the initial blast, fires appeared to still be burning out of control at what is known as the Massey test site, where cryogenic testing and hotfire tests are typically conducted. "On Wednesday, June 18 at approximately 11 p.m. CT, the Starship preparing for the tenth flight test experienced a major anomaly while on a test stand at Starbase," SpaceX said in a statement on the social media platform X. "A safety clear area around the site was maintained throughout the operation and all personnel are safe and accounted for. Our Starbase team is actively working to safe the test site and the immediate surrounding area in conjunction with local officials. "There are no hazards to residents in surrounding communities, and we ask that individuals do not attempt to approach the area." The explosion's impact on the test site infrastructure was not immediately known. SpaceX has a history of making relatively quick recoveries from failures or setbacks but this mishap, along with destroying a nearly-ready-to-launch Starship, may have caused significant damage to Starbase infrastructure. In any case, the next test flight will be indefinitely delayed. Known as Ship 36, SpaceX was expected to launch the Starship atop a huge Super Heavy booster around the end of the month on the integrated rocket's tenth unpiloted test fight. Hotfire tests are a normal precursor to actual flights, allowing engineers to verify upgrades and overall performance prior to committing it to launch. SpaceX has launched nine Super Heavy-Starship test flights since April 2023. The first three flights ended with explosions or breakups that destroyed both stages. The fourth, fifth and sixth test flights were partially successful, but two of the three most recent flights ended with Starship explosions before the spacecraft could reach its planned sub-orbital trajectory. The third, most recent flight on May 27 reached its planned trajectory but spun out of control and broke up during atmospheric entry. NASA is counting on the giant rocket to launch a Starship variant carrying astronauts to a landing near the moon's south pole in the next two or three years. To get the Human Landing System -- HLS -- Starship variant to the moon, SpaceX will need to launch 10 to 20 Super Heavy-Starships to refuel the lander in low-Earth orbit before it can head for the moon to await the arrival of the astronauts aboard a Lockheed Martin-built Orion crew capsule. Given the complexity of the architecture, the need to launch multiple Super Heavy-Starships, perfect the autonomous transfer of super cold propellants and new technology to keep the cryogenic liquid methane and oxygen from warming up and boiling away in space, failures like Wednesday's will make the schedule all the tougher to meet.