Proud Boys, Oath Keepers leaders return to DC courthouse — as spectators
When Stewart Rhodes and Enrique Tarrio stepped into Washington, D.C.'s federal courthouse Friday, they were wearing jeans instead of jumpsuits.
The leaders of the Oath Keepers and Proud Boys were once described by federal judges as the uniquely dangerous instigators of a Jan. 6, 2021, conspiracy to stop the transfer of power from Donald Trump to Joe Biden. Rhodes received an 18-year sentence, Tarrio a 22-year sentence, the lengthiest of all Jan. 6 defendants.
On his first day of his second term, Trump erased their prison terms when he granted a sweeping reprieve to the more than 1,500 people charged or convicted for storming the Capitol nearly five years ago.
Now, the men stood in a hallway of the very building that had once condemned them to decades in prison, bantering with a small band of supporters and preparing to stare down a federal judge as she sentenced a Tarrio associate, former D.C. police officer Shane Lamond.
Rhodes and Tarrio say they attended Lamond's sentencing to show solidarity with a man they think Trump should pardon. Lamond was convicted of lying to federal investigators and his own colleagues to protect Tarrio from an investigation into his burning of a Black Lives Matter flag in the weeks before Jan. 6.
Lamond had been cultivating Tarrio as a source, but U.S. District Judge Amy Berman Jackson found that the roles had reversed: Tarrio pumped Lamond for information about the flag-burning probe while Lamond eagerly doled out details of his colleagues' work — and then lied about it. Jackson sentenced Lamond to 18 months in prison and scolded him for shaming his badge and department. Tarrio, who was still in prison at the time, testified in Lamond's defense, for a combative session that Jackson described Friday as 'bizarre.'
Lamond's sentencing makes him one of the few figures connected — even tangentially — to Jan. 6 to face criminal consequences in the second Trump term. While the men prosecutors and judges labeled the masterminds of the attack sat liberated in the public gallery, Lamond learned he is slated to go to prison in August. In fact, Trump's Justice Department asked Jackson to incarcerate Lamond for four years, a request the judge rejected as 'excessive.'
Afterward, Rhodes and Tarrio stood outside the courthouse and called on Trump to pardon Lamond — as well as the dozen Jan. 6 defendants like Rhodes who did not receive pardons but instead had their sentences commuted. Joining them was Ivan Raiklin, a longtime Trump ally who has called for retribution against those who targeted Jan. 6 defendants and has demanded investigations of the leadership of the Capitol Police.
Tarrio, who has been seen with Trump at Mar-a-Lago in recent weeks, said he didn't directly press the president to grant pardons and declined to describe their conversation, which he said was 'brief.'
'I'm not going to go into detail,' he said, a lit Marlboro in his hand. 'It was a very brief encounter.'
Several of the prosecutors who led the Proud Boys and Oath Keepers prosecutions have since been demoted or left the Justice Department altogether. Both men, however, expressed some frustration that the Trump administration had not more forcefully come down on Biden-era prosecutors and in fact still employed some of them. Rhodes called directly on the new interim U.S. Attorney Jeanine Pirro to purge more Jan. 6 prosecutors.
'I know she just started,' Rhodes said, 'but why are these guys still working for her?'
In fact, one of the prosecutors who led the team that put Rhodes in prison attended Lamond's sentencing, taking a seat in the public gallery just 5 feet from his former adversary.
Rhodes called the close encounter with the prosecutor a 'bizarre experience.'
'He's like 'Oh, nice to see you,'' Rhodes said. 'I was like, 'Not nice to see you.''
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CBS News
4 hours ago
- CBS News
Former Proud Boys leader Enrique Tarrio, 4 other members sue U.S. government over Jan. 6 prosecutions
Five members of the Proud Boys, a far-right militant group, claim their constitutional rights were violated when they were prosecuted for their participation in the Jan. 6, 2021, attack on the U.S. Capitol, according to a lawsuit filed Friday. The lawsuit was filed in Orlando federal court by former Proud Boys chairman Enrique Tarrio, Joseph Biggs, Zachary Rehl, Ethan Nordean and Dominic Pezzola. It seeks unspecified compensatory damages plus 6% interest and $100 million plus interest in punitive damages. FILE - Proud Boys leader Henry "Enrique" Tarrio is seen during a rally organized by the Proud Boys in Portland, Ore., on Sept. 26, 2020. Allison Dinner / AP "There was hostages in this country," Tarrio said during a news conference Friday afternoon. "It's not about any other country today, and that's why this lawsuit is so important to bring back law and order into our system." The lawsuit claims the men were arrested with insufficient probable cause and that government agents later "found" fake incriminating evidence. They also claim they were held for years in pretrial detention, often in solitary confinement. "The Plaintiffs themselves did not obstruct the proceedings at the Capitol, destroy government property, resist arrest, conspire to impede the police, or participate in civil disorder, nor did they plan for or order anyone else to do so," the lawsuit said. Tarrio, Biggs, Rehl and Nordean were all convicted of seditious conspiracy and other crimes for their participation in the Capitol riot that sought to stop Congress from certifying former U.S. President Joe Biden's win over President Donald Trump in the 2020 presidential election. Pezzola was acquitted on the conspiracy charge but convicted of stealing a police officer's riot shield and using it to smash a window. After returning to office earlier this year, Trump granted pardons to almost all of the more than 1,500 people who stormed the Capitol. While Tarrio received a pardon, the other four plaintiffs had their sentences commuted. The lawsuit said all four applied for pardons on May 13. The U.S. Justice Department didn't immediately respond to a message seeking comment.
Yahoo
6 hours ago
- Yahoo
Why Cuomo's sexual harassment accusations are playing little role in the NYC mayoral race
NEW YORK — Mayoral candidate Jessica Ramos Friday joined a string of unions, interest groups and elected officials lining up to endorse former Gov. Andrew Cuomo's bid for mayor despite previously demanding his removal from office in 2021 amid multiple allegations of sexual harassment. Ramos, who slammed Cuomo over the allegations as recently as Wednesday, has said it took 'tremendous courage' for the accusers to come forward publicly. But she said the former governor's potential to stand up to President Donald Trump largely outweighs her concerns about the allegations. The explosive claims that rocked Albany just four years ago appear to be playing little role amid Cuomo's political comeback run and his current status as the front-runner heading into the Democratic mayoral primary. Polls consistently show Cuomo coming out on top, even as his unfavorability ratings remain high. It is a remarkable and rapid turnaround for Cuomo, who stepped down from his post as governor after an investigation found he had sexually harassed nearly a dozen women, accusations he denies, and amid an imminent threat of impeachment from state lawmakers. Two key factors have helped fuel Cuomo's run: Shifting attitudes about sexual harassment and the #MeToo movement and the demand for a strong leader to navigate a fraught political landscape marked by the chaos of Trump's second stint in the White House. 'This today is not about forgiveness or about forgetting anything,' Ramos, who in 2021 was among the first to call for Cuomo's resignation, said Friday. 'This is a very sober take on where we are in this race and the type of leadership that is required at a time when I need workers and I need immigrants protected.' At the time of Cuomo's resignation, public outrage at the sexual misconduct and harassment carried out by men in power was running high. The leak of Trump's infamous 'Access Hollywood' tape shortly before his election in 2016 and the revelations about Harvey Weinstein in the New York Times and the New Yorker in 2017 touched off a powerful movement that spread to Hollywood, sports, business and politics. Over the past couple of years, though, many see the movement as having lost some momentum, especially with Trump's election to a second term. 'The people who are going to vote for him have clearly made a decision that whatever he was accused of doing, it's forgivable, to a point,' Basil Smikle, a Democratic strategist told the Daily News. 'They are willing to look past what he is accused of, because whatever they feel is happening in the city now, is more important to their immediate lives.' Both the upcoming mayoral election and last November's presidential contest unfolded against a national backlash to not only #MeToo, but to Black Lives Matter and the broader concept of 'wokeness,' which became a key talking point for Trump during the 2024 campaign. Some of those national sentiments may be trickling into New York's mayoral race. Trump himself has been accused of sexual misconduct by more than two dozen women and was found civilly liable for sexually assaulting E Jean Carroll in 2023. Cuomo's ability to mount a comeback is a 'feature of the Trump era,' Smikle said. Cuomo's steady lead in the race has held despite his opponents' attempts to resurface the scandals and stir public outrage, especially right after Cuomo entered the race. During a radio appearance earlier this month on 97.9 La Mega, for example, Cuomo flirted with a radio host half his age. As music played in the studio, host Excarlet Molina, 29, asked Cuomo if he would 'dance merengue with the Dominicans.' 'Are you asking me to go dancing with you?' Cuomo responded. After the music stopped, he followed up: 'I want to know if we have a date?' Cuomo's camp maintained that the interaction was a joke. The incident generated backlash on social media, with users calling him a 'sex pest' and 'gross.' Regardless, it barely made a dent in the campaign. And at Wednesday's debate, where Cuomo faced attacks on all manner of issues, the allegations weren't a major line of attack. Brad Lander said that having 'sexually harassed 13 women' should disqualify Cuomo from being mayor. And Michael Blake, a former state assemblymember who's polling poorly, said that 'the people who don't feel safe are the young women, mothers and grandmothers around Andrew Cuomo.' During the debate, Cuomo pointed out that he was never charged in connection with the allegations. 'I said at the time that if I offended anyone, it was unintentional, but I apologize, and I say that today,' he said. His team declined to comment for this story. Cuomo's seeming ability to brush past the allegations doesn't sit well with some. 'He has been welcomed back into the political class with open arms as opposed to being required to take responsibility for his actions,' Erica Vladimer, co-founder of the Sexual Harassment Working Group, said. 'He continues to harass and retaliate against the women he already sexually harassed and retaliated against and there's no indication that he's going to change his ways.' Vladmier was referencing to Cuomo's circle of lawyers and aides efforts since the accusers went public to discredit them, challenging their credibility including in court proceedings. The former governor's legal expenses, have cost taxpayers tens of millions of dollars, according to the state comptroller. Karen Hinton, who claims Cuomo acted sexually inappropriately towards her in 2000, when she worked for him as U.S. Secretary of Housing and Urban Development, said she was disappointed about his bounce back into the limelight. 'It's shocking in many ways and sad that New Yorkers are not standing behind these women,' Hinton said. 'It's just not an issue for people,' she continued. 'People don't care. People voted for Trump even though he sexually assaulted a woman in a department store in New York. People don't care, so maybe it's not that big a deal.' Hinton also noted state lawmakers' disdain for Cuomo's often retaliatory style of governance — leaving him without allies he needed when the allegations came out. Stepping down from office also shot down the possibility of impeachment in the State Assembly, giving him a clearer path to mount a political comeback. 'I think many of those members, and they're mostly men, didn't care about the sexual harassment claims,' Hinton, who also worked under Mayor Bill de Blasio, said. 'They just cared to get rid of him because he's nasty and mean and spiteful, and if you cross his path and do something that he doesn't want you to do, he's coming after you.' With White House policies sowing uncertainty and fear in New York City amid threats of slashing federal support for critical programs like Medicaid and SNAP, many see a need for a strong leader to stand up to the president. Mayor Eric Adams is no longer a factor in the Democratic primary. He announced he'd run as an independent in November following widespread criticism for being overly acquiescent to Trump after the president's DOJ dismissed the mayor's corruption case. The rest of the mayoral field mostly leans further left than either Cuomo or Adams, with no strong center-left candidate, so far, posing a significant challenge to the former governor. His closest rival is Zohran Mamdani, a socialist campaigning on free buses and freezing rent for stabilized tenants. Mamdani risks alienating moderates, especially pro-Israel voters for his characterization of the country's military campaign in Gaza as a 'genocide.' Cuomo has made his support of Israel a central facet of his campaign and has called rhetoric like Mamdani's a 'cancer.' For many voters, Cuomo appears to be the best option. Even as Cuomo stepped down in 2021, he still had a base of support. His name recognition, in part tied to his father, Mario, and the perception during the COVID pandemic that his leadership was a foil to Trump's chaos, continued to appeal to some voters. A Quinnipiac poll from just days before his resignation showed that he had a 28% approval rating, with 25% of poll takers saying he should not step down. During his time away from the spotlight, Cuomo loosely engaged that base, laying the groundwork for a potential run as he made stops at Black churches and met with political power players. 'There was still a good chunk of the city that remembered that, and especially now that Trump is in office, they want someone who's gonna fight for them, but also protect them and also make sure that they have a good quality of life,' Smikle said. Not everyone is convinced. Vladimer, with the Sexual Harassment Working Group, said that she doubts that Cuomo will truly be able to effectively confront Trump. 'The perception of Cuomo standing up for New Yorkers — that's all it really is — a perception,' Vladimer said. 'It is not reality. Cuomo has only shown us through his actions that he can only and will only punch down and that includes on young women government staffers.' But power players, politicians and union leaders have largely coalesced behind the former governor, even though some had pressed for his removal in 2021. Super PACs in his support have collected millions in donations, including a $1 million donation from Doordash and $2.5 million by the Housing for All PAC, which is funded by the New York Apartment Association. Manny Pastreich, the president of Hotel and Gaming Trades Council and 32BJ, said in April the union was endorsing the former governor in part because Cuomo would be able to fight back against Trump's 'attacks.' Others, like Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand, D-N.Y., have not outright supported Cuomo but have stayed silent as he makes his comeback — a sharp contrast to her condemnation of him in 2021. 'Andrew Cuomo is equipped to stand up to attacks on our city that threaten our finances, our jobs, our public transportation, our health care, our Social Security and our rights,' Pastreich said in announcing his union's endorsement.
Los Angeles Times
6 hours ago
- Los Angeles Times
Former DC police officer sentenced to 18 months for lying about leaking info to Proud Boys leader
WASHINGTON — A retired police officer was sentenced Friday to 18 months behind bars for lying to authorities about leaking confidential information to the Proud Boys extremist group's former top leader, who was under investigation for burning a Black Lives Matter banner in the nation's capital. Shane Lamond was a lieutenant for the Metropolitan Police Department in Washington, D.C., when he fed information about its banner burning investigation to then-Proud Boys national chairman Enrique Tarrio. Last December, after a trial without a jury, U.S. District Judge Amy Berman Jackson convicted Lamond of one count of obstructing justice and three counts of making false statements. Tarrio attended Lamond's sentencing and later called for President Trump to pardon Lamond. 'I ask that the Justice Department and the president of the United States step in and correct the injustice that I just witnessed inside this courtroom,' Tarrio said outside the courthouse after the sentencing. Prosecutors had recommended a four-year prison sentence for Lamond. 'Because Lamond knew what he did was wrong, he lied to cover it up — not just to the Federal Agents who questioned his actions, but to this Court,' they wrote. 'This is an egregious obstruction of justice and a betrayal of the work of his colleagues at MPD.' Lamond's lawyers argued that a prison sentence wasn't warranted. 'Mr. Lamond gained nothing from his communications with Mr. Tarrio and only sought, albeit in a sloppy and ineffective way, to gain information and intelligence that would help stop the violent protesters coming to D.C. in late 2020, early 2021,' they wrote. Tarrio pleaded guilty to burning the banner stolen from a historic Black church in downtown Washington in December 2020. He was arrested two days before dozens of Proud Boys members stormed the U.S. Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021. Tarrio wasn't at the Capitol that day, but a jury convicted him of orchestrating a violent plot to keep Trump in the White House after he lost the 2020 election. Lamond testified at his bench trial that he never provided Tarrio with sensitive police information. Tarrio, who testified as a witness for Lamond's defense, said he did not confess to Lamond about burning the banner and did not receive any confidential information from him. But the judge said she did not find either man's testimony to be credible. Lamond retired in May 2023 after 23 years of service to the police department. Prior to that he had supervised the intelligence branch of the police department's Homeland Security Bureau. He was responsible for monitoring groups like the Proud Boys when they came to Washington. Prosecutors said Lamond tipped off Tarrio, whom he had met in 2019, that a warrant for his arrest had been signed. They pointed to messages that suggest Lamond provided Tarrio with real-time updates on the police investigation. Lamond's indictment said he and Tarrio exchanged messages about the Jan. 6 riot and discussed whether Proud Boys members were in danger of being charged in the attack. 'Of course I can't say it officially, but personally I support you all and don't want to see your group's name and reputation dragged through the mud,' Lamond wrote. Lamond said he was upset that a prosecutor labeled him as a Proud Boys 'sympathizer' who acted as a 'double agent' for the group after Tarrio burned a stolen Black Lives Matter banner in December 2020. 'I don't support the Proud Boys, and I'm not a Proud Boys sympathizer,' Lamond testified. Lamond said he considered Tarrio to be a source, not a friend. But he said he tried to build a friendly rapport with the group leader to gain his trust. Kunzelman writes for the Associated Press.
