
Maine's only law school asks state for $1 million to reopen criminal law clinic
Apr. 15—Colleen Cosgriff learned a lot while volunteering at the front desk of her law school's legal clinic.
"Sitting there every single week and getting those calls was really grounding during a very academically rigorous (first) semester where the law feels very philosophical and you're learning about it in a textbook, and there's not a face and a voice to the people we're learning about," Cosgriff said.
Now in her second year at the University of Maine School of Law, Cosgriff is actually working in the clinic, where she and 28 other students help represent Mainers in all kinds of legal matters at no cost. It's a competitive program where students have to reapply each semester for a spot in one of five clinics.
This year, the school is hoping that the Legislature will help increase its capacity by paying for a new clinic focused on adult criminal cases.
"As we know all through the state, we need lawyers," said Leigh Saufley, the law school dean, and such a clinic would be "an immediate benefit for cases that can be taken today."
The state was found liable earlier this year for violating the constitutional rights of more than a hundred unrepresented criminal defendants because they weren't appointed a lawyer, waiting weeks, sometimes months, for representation. In its pitch to the Legislature, the law school argued its student attorneys can help, even if it's just a small dent.
More importantly, Saufley said, the clinic would introduce more students to careers in criminal justice.
"We simply have not had a lot of students thinking about the importance of criminal justice practice and the changes that they can make in their own community by engaging in criminal justice law, whether it's prosecution or defense," Saufley said. "Every community needs a great criminal law bar because together they can make a huge difference in what happens with people who come in contact with the criminal justice system."
But the law school's $1 million budget request faces competition. The governor has directed the Legislature to keep its budget proposal lean, and the law school is vying for money along with dozens of other related initiatives, including proposals from the judicial branch, victim services and the Maine Commission on Public Defense Services.
BRINGING BACK THE CLINICS
The University of Maine School of Law is the state's sole law school and has one of the oldest clinic programs in the country.
It has struggled to regain traction, though, since the 2008 market crash and recession, Saufley said, which took its toll on law schools across the country — and caused Maine Law to have to cut its previous criminal law clinical work.
"Maine Law really lost a whole lot of its vitality," Saufley said. "It lost criminal justice programs, it lost its center for innovation — there were a number of programs at Maine Law that were simply lost over that period of time because there wasn't sufficient funding to keep the law school going on some of those really important areas of law."
Today, the law school oversees five clinics: The Prisoner Assistance clinic helps incarcerated clients with civil matters, the Youth Justice clinic serves juveniles and young adults under 25, the Rural Practice clinic gives law students the opportunity to work outside the city, the Refugee and Human Rights clinic serves immigrants, and a General Practice clinic lets students address a broad array of cases based on their personal interests.
The students represented over 440 clients in 519 cases last year and assisted in more than 681 others.
Cosgriff, who has been working with the law school's Youth Justice clinic, said she would be interested in a criminal law option if it were offered.
"We're the only law school in the state, and our state is facing a huge challenge right now that I think is concerning to everyone, not just the defense bar," she said. "I think having a criminal law clinic and having more pathways to people is so important."
In addition to their clinic work, student attorneys also contribute to a weekly project, helping people file and respond to protection orders. The clinics run year-round, with students working both semesters and over the summer. All student attorneys are supervised by a professor.
"We run, essentially, a midsized firm," said professor Sarah Branch, who oversees the Youth Justice clinic. "You think about every law student's an attorney in the firm, we have all those client files and we manage it like a firm."
DIFFICULT FUNDING YEAR
The law school is requesting $1 million from the state to pay for the criminal law clinic for three years. That money would cover two supervising staff positions, including a professor and an office administrator.
The bill, LD 884, was passed out of the Legislature's Education and Cultural Affairs Committee with unanimous support. It is sponsored by Rep. Dan Ankeles, D-Brunswick. While state leaders are still fighting about who and what is at fault for the state's crisis, Ankeles said the legislation "avoids that debate completely and goes right to the source — the jobs pipeline."
"This will create a clear, well-lit professional pathway to criminal defense law at exactly the moment when Maine needs to staff up its public defender offices," Ankeles told the committee last month.
Public defense leaders have previously said they're doing more outreach at the law school to combat mass retirements and a shortage of lawyers available for court-appointed work. (Prosecutors say they have also struggled to attract new attorneys to their ranks.)
The legislation was modeled after a proposal in 2022 that led to the Rural Practice clinic, which also cost a little more than $1 million for three years. Much of that has been covered by funds from the Office of the Maine Attorney General through the enforcement of state antitrust laws.
Ankeles said in committee that he understands that any bills with a cost this year are at a disadvantage, but "it's very easy to imagine the cost of not setting up this type of clinic being far, far higher in the long run."
The bill is supported by the University of Maine System and the state bar association.
Sam Warren, a spokesperson for the system, told lawmakers their support "would send a strong message that this is a priority to the state," as the law school struggles to hire faculty for criminal law because the salary isn't competitive.
CREATING A PATHWAY
Jeffrey Sullivan, a third-year student, said he's a better attorney after having worked in the youth justice clinic.
It's complicated work; he has two clients who each have several cases in more than one court.
"We work the case," Sullivan said. "You review discovery, you meet with your client to get information from them, you write motions, you negotiate with prosecutors, you meet with your supervising professor to get any and all advice. ... I think it really is like the best way to learn how to be a lawyer, without completely winging it on Day One with your bar card."
Sullivan said he was interested in criminal law before law school, but that interest grew through his experience in the clinics. He was one of the founding members of the law school's "Students for the Sixth" group, a nod to the constitutional right to an attorney when you can't afford your own.
In the group's brief 2 1/2 years, members have followed an unprecedented civil rights lawsuit against the state's system for representing poor Mainers and the creation of its first public defense offices.
The group hosts public panels, including a "6th Amendment and Maine" discussion with prosecutors, defense attorneys and the director of the Maine Prisoner Advocacy Coalition.
"It's a group for like-minded people to create a community together, and to start conversations, to have conversations within the law school with students and the legal community," Sullivan said.
He will graduate soon and has accepted a public defender position in New Hampshire. Unlike other states, Maine has fewer than 30 public defenders, and still has yet to open offices in southern Maine and on the Midcoast. The state relied exclusively on private attorneys until 2022.
Sullivan said he regrets that there's not an opportunity for him yet in Maine. But Branch said that's not the only point of introducing Maine law students to criminal justice law.
"What we want here is for our students to be hopeful and determined when it comes to this work," Branch said. "And I think more clinic opportunities give them the chance to go, 'I'm not only making a difference in one person's life. This can be a life for me, and it can bring me passion and hope,' and all the things you want from a career in the law."
Copy the Story Link

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

2 hours ago
Arizona governor vetoes bill banning teaching antisemitism, calls it an attack on educators
PHOENIX -- Arizona Gov. Katie Hobbs has vetoed a proposal that would have banned teaching antisemitism at the state's public K-12 schools, universities and colleges and exposed educators who violate the new rules to discipline and lawsuits. The proposal would have prohibited teachers and administrators from teaching or promoting antisemitism or antisemitic actions that create a hostile environment, calling for the genocide of any group or requiring students to advocate for an antisemitic point of view. It also would have barred public schools from using public money to support the teaching of antisemitism. Educators would have personally been responsible for covering the costs of damages in lawsuits for violating the rules. Hobbs, a Democrat, said Tuesday that the bill was not about antisemitism but rather about attacking teachers. 'It puts an unacceptable level of personal liability in place for our public school, community college, and university educators and staff, opening them up to threats of personally costly lawsuits," she said in a statement. "Additionally, it sets a dangerous precedent that unfairly targets public school teachers while shielding private school staff." Hobbs described antisemitism as a very troubling issue in the U.S., but said students and parents can go through the state's Board of Education to report antisemitism. The measure cleared the Legislature last week on a 33-20 vote by the House, including a few Democrats who crossed party lines to support it. It's one of a few proposals to combat antisemitism across the country. Democrats tried but failed to remove the lawsuit provision and swap out references to antisemitism within the bill with 'unlawful discrimination' to reflect other discrimination. The bill's chief sponsor, Republican Rep. Michael Way, of Queen Creek, called the veto 'disgraceful,' saying on the social media platform X that the legislation was meant to keep 'egregious and blatant antisemitic content' out of the classroom. 'To suggest that it threatened the speech of most Arizona teachers is disingenuous at best,' he added. Opponents said the bill aimed to silence people who want to speak out on the oppression of Palestinians and opened up educators to personal legal liability in lawsuits students could file. Students over the age of 18 and the parents of younger pupils would have been able to file lawsuits over violations that create a hostile education environment, leaving teachers responsible for paying any damages that may be awarded, denying them immunity and prohibiting the state from paying any judgments arising from any such lawsuits. Last week, Lori Shepherd, executive director of Tucson Jewish Museum & Holocaust Center, wrote in a letter to Hobbs that if the bill were approved it would threaten teachers' ability to provide students with a full account of the holocaust. Under the bill, 'those discussions could be deemed 'antisemitic' depending on how a single phrase is interpreted, regardless of intent or context,' she said. The bill would have created a process for punishing those who break the rules. At K-12 schools, a first-offense violation would lead to a reprimand, a second offense to a suspension of a teacher or principal's certificate and a third offense to a revocation of the certificate. At colleges and universities, violators would have faced a reprimand on first offense, a suspension without pay for a second offense and termination for a third offense. The proposal also would have required colleges and universities to consider violations by employees to be a negative factor when making employment or tenure decisions. Under the proposal, universities and colleges couldn't recognize any student organization that invites a guest speaker who incites antisemitism, encourages its members to engage in antisemitism or calls for the genocide of any group. Elsewhere in the U.S., a Louisiana lawmaker is pushing a resolution that asks universities to adopt policies to combat antisemitism on campuses and collect data on antisemitism-related reports and complaints. And a Michigan lawmaker has proposed putting a definition of antisemitism into the state's civil rights law.
Yahoo
4 hours ago
- Yahoo
November statewide special election for collective bargaining referendum ‘not off the table,' Cox says
SALT LAKE CITY () — Governor Spencer Cox is mulling whether to call a special statewide election this November that would allow Utahns to vote on repealing that bans public labor unions from collective bargaining. 'It's not off the table,' . 'We could have a special election this year, it's still possible.' During a monthly news conference with reporters, the Governor was asked about whether he would call a special election in 2025 or hold off until Utah has a scheduled statewide election in 2026. State law requires the referendum to be placed on a statewide ballot, but state law allows him to decide whether that's in the 'next regular general election' or whether he calls a special election. The Governor said he's still having conversations with the legislature and county clerks who would be tasked with overseeing a statewide election in a municipal year, to analyze the cost and other factors like whether it's a burden to cities that may cancel elections in 2025. 'Just trying to see what's best — is it best to get it on now and get it over with, is that easier? Is it too much pressure on places that won't be having an election?' Cox said. 'What kind of burden with that add? We're looking at all of those things, and we'll make a decision when that deadline gets closer.' Utah lawmakers oppose AI regulation in Trump's 'Big, beautiful bill' The Governor has until June 21 to make that call; that's when the Lt. Governor declares whether the referendum signature gathering effort was sufficient, which is all but certain after public labor unions . The office has from taking effect. 'No matter when this issue appears on the ballot, we are confident that when Utah voters decide, public workers will win. We are strong, ready, and united,' said a spokesperson for the Protect Utah Workers coalition — the group of labor unions that organized the referendum effort. 'The HB267 referendum made history with nearly 10% of Utahns signing the petition in just 30 days to put it on the ballot. Our success sends a powerful message: Utahns believe in the right to organize and stand with public workers,' their statement said. 'HB267 is a power grab by politicians trying to silence the voices of everyday working people. But more than a quarter million Utah voters saw through it and pushed back.' Neither the public labor unions nor Governor Cox elaborated on which year they would prefer, but it's almost certain that politics are at play for both sides. 'Somebody has to stop it:' Gov. Cox defends Trump's decision to deploy troops to LA Political insiders have told that holding a special election in 2025 could favor the law staying in place because turnout is lower in a municipal year, meaning there might be less support overall for the teachers, firefighters, and the other public workers whom voters, by and large, want to support. However, a recency bias from this past legislative session and the momentum from their signature gathering efforts, coupled with perceived injustices to those public workers, may also be a factor, those insiders noted. A 2025 election also gets the issue decided on faster. However, paying for a statewide election would come at a cost to taxpayers, likely in the millions. A 2026 election, however, could be the preferred path as it gives both sides more time to message and raise more money to fight off any counter-messaging. Bureau of Land Management approves construction of Millard County potash mine November statewide special election for collective bargaining referendum 'not off the table,' Cox says Family, police seeking information on missing 15-year-old girl from West Jordan RSL hoping to make a run in second half of season Utah lawmakers oppose AI regulation in Trump's 'Big, beautiful bill' Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

Yahoo
5 hours ago
- Yahoo
Wyoming lawmakers on gaming committee revisit local control of HHR machines
CHEYENNE — Local control over simulcast permits will be the primary focus of Wyoming's new Select Committee on Gaming this year, as lawmakers prepare to draft a bill for the next legislative session. Chairman Sen. John Kolb, R-Rock Springs, reminded committee members the next session — which begins in early February — is a budget session. This means all non-budget bills will need to pass a two-thirds introductory vote for the Legislature's consideration. 'In the past, you know, we have not been successful legislatively (with gambling),' Kolb said during the committee's first meeting in Casper on Monday. Sen. John Kolb, R-Rock Springs (2025) Sen. John Kolb, R-Rock Springs Last year, members of the Legislature's Joint Appropriations Committee voted to sponsor five gambling-related bills for this year's legislative session. Four of the five bills died immediately, and one made it through the House of Representatives before dying in the Senate. Gambling in Wyoming recently exploded into a billion-dollar industry, and lawmakers are scrambling to decide what action is needed from the state to further regulate it. Legislative leadership assigned gambling as a study topic to the JAC last year, and a working group was formed, led by former Rep. Tom Walters, R-Casper. Since then, it's become apparent to lawmakers that gambling is a complicated issue. In response, the Management Council created a new select committee entirely focused on gambling in April. The committee has three meetings scheduled during the Legislature's off-season, formally known as the interim. Given the short amount of time, Kolb suggested starting with the framework of House Bill 85, which promotes local control over simulcast permits. HB 85 made it the farthest last session before dying in the Senate. 'Local control is very high on the list of things that need to be dealt with first,' Kolb said. 'We have to keep our eye on the ball and focus on what's achievable.' He also urged unified support between the two legislative chambers once this bill is drafted and filed for the session. 'We need the House, as we need the Senate, to work on a product,' Kolb said. 'We may not always have 100% agreement with that, but we need to have enough agreement that we want to move this forward.' HB 85 background A simulcast permit is needed to establish off-track betting sites (OTBs) and historic horse racing (HHR) machines. County commissioners reserve the sole authority to approve or deny these permits. However, state statute doesn't give the county any power to regulate gambling beyond the initial approval. Still, commissioners have incorporated limitations within approved simulcast permits, but these have yet to be challenged in court, said Wyoming County Commissioners Association Executive Director Jerimiah Rieman. It's unclear whether regulations imposed by commissioners would survive litigation. The Wyoming Supreme Court ruled in 2023 under the 'the plain and unambiguous language of the Pari-Mutuel Act' that county commissioners cannot revoke permits after granting approval. 'Once the commissioners say yes, they have no other authorities,' Rieman said. 'They've transferred that responsibility to the (Wyoming) Gaming Commission.' Rieman proposed a bill draft before the JAC in 2024, the original version of HB 85, that initially outlined regulatory authority to county commissioners once a simulcast permit is approved, including the ability to revoke a permit 'if there's good reason to do so.' The draft underwent several revisions, including an amendment that extended approval authority to city and town governments for simulcasting permits within city limits. 'Do I like where HB 85 got to? No,' Rieman said, although he mentioned his support for extending approval authority to city and town governments. 'But this is an important issue for us.' Rep. Jayme Lien, R-Casper (2025) Rep. Jayme Lien, R-Casper Co-Chairwoman Rep. Jayme Lien, R-Casper, asked Rieman if counties could regulate gambling entities through zoning laws. The county commissioner said he spoke with 11 of the counties with HHR machines last week, and none of them have specific zoning for HHR operations. 'It is important to note that there are a number of counties where zoning is not part of a lexicon,' Rieman said. 'And I doubt we'll have zoning anytime in the near future, and I suspect most of the others will not.' He added that most HHR machines operate within city and town limits, which are outside of county jurisdiction to implement zoning policy. Furthermore, zoning regulations do not grant authority to revoke simulcasting permits. 'You're gonna have to give us that,' Rieman said. City, town control City and town government leaders have also been frustrated by their inability to control how many HHR machines pop up within their jurisdiction. Cheyenne Mayor Patrick Collins previously told the Wyoming Tribune Eagle he supported HB 85. 'My frustration right now is that we have 10 approved casinos inside the city limits, and our governing body had no input on their approval,' Collins said. 'We're the governing body closest to the people living in Cheyenne, and I think we should have had the responsibility for making that decision.' Wyoming Association of Municipalities (WAM) Executive Director Ashley Harpstreith said OTBs impact city resources, including law enforcement, first responders, street maintenance and other public services. Ashley Harpstreith Ashley Harpstreith She added that city zoning ordinances are not enough to regulate the social and welfare issues from this industry. 'We need legislation to allow local governments (the) ability to impose specific conditions on permits, such as hours of operation or location restrictions based on their unique needs and concerns,' Harpstreith said. Cheyenne City Council President Mark Rinne said six of the seven properly zoned HHR sites in the city were approved through the Cheyenne Board of Adjustment. However, members of this board are not elected by the public, he said. 'They are not beholden to the public as (city) council members are,' Rinne said. 'Unless you have to go to the Board of Adjustment for something, you don't even know they exist. We may indirectly have control through zoning, but honestly we do not.' 100-mile rule Under the 100-mile rule, no simulcasting may be conducted within 100 miles of a live horse racing event. The Gaming Commission may waive the 100-mile limitation 'if the simulcast permit application includes written approval from the permittee whose permitted premises is within the 100-mile limitation,' according to W.S. 11-25-102(a)(vii)(C). Kolb recalled his days as a county commissioner, when the 100-mile rule first came about. Race tracks in Uinta and Sweetwater counties were going out of business due to lack of public attendance, he said. 'Now, with HHR, we don't have that issue anymore,' Kolb said. 'It's certainly a new day.' 307 Horse Racing President Kyle Ridgeway previously testified in February, during the session, that the 100-mile rule 'hurt our business' by forcing OTB vendors to close during a live horse racing event. Both Reiman and Harpstreith, representing county commissioners and local municipalities, respectively, said their organizations supported getting rid of the 100-mile rule entirely. However, attorney and former Cheyenne Republican lawmaker Affie Ellis urged caution against wiping out this rule. Former Sen. Affie Ellis Former Sen. Affie Ellis. 'I think it's a very effective tool that ties the HHR activity to the growth of Wyoming's horse racing industry,' Ellis said. Revenue from HHR machines contributes to the purse of horse racing events, which is key to the survival of horse racing tracks in Wyoming, Ellis said. The purpose of the 100-mile rule is 'to incentivize more horse tracks coming online.' In a follow-up phone call on Tuesday, Ellis told the WTE the rule is an opportunity for purse contribution negotiations between track operators and OTB vendors. She added it's not the intention of Cowboy Racing, her client, to shut down OTB vendors during race days. Cowboy Racing recently completed construction of Wyoming's first full-size live horse racing track 10 miles east of Cheyenne at Thunder Plains Park. The company has said it intends to operate at least three gaming facilities within the city limits of Cheyenne. 'We don't want anyone to close during our race times and race days,' Ellis said. 'If the agreement has a reliance on a percentage of that gaming revenue, we want that (OTB) to be open because that supports the purse.' Lawmakers will consider different bill drafts regarding local control at their next meeting in Evanston on Aug. 8-9.