
I've seen devastation wrought by alcohol firsthand. Putting more ads on TV will not help
New proposed rules for free-to-air television in Australia could allow alcohol advertising from 10am even on weekends and during school holidays. As someone with lived experience of intergenerational addiction, I'm speaking out about this because this isn't just irresponsible, it's dangerous.
When we talk about alcohol ads on television, we're not talking about harmless marketing. We're talking about messages that reach into Australian homes, living rooms and seep into young minds.
I am alarmed by Free TV Australia's proposal, which would mean an additional 800 hours of alcohol advertising every year.
Already, one in three children in Australia see alcohol ads on TV. This is not harmless. Research shows that 90 per cent of adults with addiction began using substances problematically before the age of 18.
I know this story intimately. Addiction isn't just a theory to me. It's not a policy brief or a line in a report.
It's something I was born into. I grew up in a family shaped by trauma, violence and addiction. My dad struggled with alcohol and drugs and was imprisoned.
By 16, I was living in a young women's refuge and many of us there used substances to cope with trauma and family violence.
We were using them to numb, to escape, to soothe the wounds no one else could see. It was a coping mechanism, our reality.
But what changed my life wasn't luck. It was a community of support.
Today, I'm proud to lead SMART Recovery Australia, an organisation that now supports more than 450 meetings every week across the country, including 16 youth meetings reaching over 160 young people weekly.
We are growing because the need is growing. Young people are crying out for support that actually meets them where they are at.
We help people manage addictive behaviours in a safe, non-judgmental environment. We also host online meetings which are available to people who live regionally and remotely, so people can get the help they need without the obstacle of distance giving them an excuse not to.
Around 70 per cent of all SMART Recovery participants attend to address alcohol use, and many of our young participants are grappling with early exposure and the lifelong consequences of alcohol harm.
That's why we're urging the Australian Communications and Media Authority (ACMA) to reject this proposal and instead stand with front-line services, public health experts, and families across the country. To stand with young people because Australia is facing a youth addiction crisis.
National surveys show that one in six adolescents are struggling with some form of addiction whether it's alcohol, vaping, gaming, or drugs.
These numbers represent real young people, like the ones I see every day. They are smart, creative, hurting, but hopeful. What they need is protection, not profit-driven promotion of harmful products.
We believe in giving young people real choices, real support and real hope. Because addiction is behaviour, and we can all change our behaviour if we are given the tools and resources.
READ MORE:
We need to protect young people, not profit from their vulnerability. We need to fund programs that work and not allow harmful industries to take up more space in their lives. Every young life matters.
Every future counts, and no one should be left to face addiction alone.
This is more than a policy debate. This is about more than a change in broadcasting schedules.
It's a question of values. Do we value young lives, or do we value alcohol industry profits?
Let's stop pushing ads into loungerooms where children are watching. Let's start backing solutions that work.
We must choose prevention over profit, protection over promotion and community over chaos, because young lives depend on it.
New proposed rules for free-to-air television in Australia could allow alcohol advertising from 10am even on weekends and during school holidays. As someone with lived experience of intergenerational addiction, I'm speaking out about this because this isn't just irresponsible, it's dangerous.
When we talk about alcohol ads on television, we're not talking about harmless marketing. We're talking about messages that reach into Australian homes, living rooms and seep into young minds.
I am alarmed by Free TV Australia's proposal, which would mean an additional 800 hours of alcohol advertising every year.
Already, one in three children in Australia see alcohol ads on TV. This is not harmless. Research shows that 90 per cent of adults with addiction began using substances problematically before the age of 18.
I know this story intimately. Addiction isn't just a theory to me. It's not a policy brief or a line in a report.
It's something I was born into. I grew up in a family shaped by trauma, violence and addiction. My dad struggled with alcohol and drugs and was imprisoned.
By 16, I was living in a young women's refuge and many of us there used substances to cope with trauma and family violence.
We were using them to numb, to escape, to soothe the wounds no one else could see. It was a coping mechanism, our reality.
But what changed my life wasn't luck. It was a community of support.
Today, I'm proud to lead SMART Recovery Australia, an organisation that now supports more than 450 meetings every week across the country, including 16 youth meetings reaching over 160 young people weekly.
We are growing because the need is growing. Young people are crying out for support that actually meets them where they are at.
We help people manage addictive behaviours in a safe, non-judgmental environment. We also host online meetings which are available to people who live regionally and remotely, so people can get the help they need without the obstacle of distance giving them an excuse not to.
Around 70 per cent of all SMART Recovery participants attend to address alcohol use, and many of our young participants are grappling with early exposure and the lifelong consequences of alcohol harm.
That's why we're urging the Australian Communications and Media Authority (ACMA) to reject this proposal and instead stand with front-line services, public health experts, and families across the country. To stand with young people because Australia is facing a youth addiction crisis.
National surveys show that one in six adolescents are struggling with some form of addiction whether it's alcohol, vaping, gaming, or drugs.
These numbers represent real young people, like the ones I see every day. They are smart, creative, hurting, but hopeful. What they need is protection, not profit-driven promotion of harmful products.
We believe in giving young people real choices, real support and real hope. Because addiction is behaviour, and we can all change our behaviour if we are given the tools and resources.
READ MORE:
We need to protect young people, not profit from their vulnerability. We need to fund programs that work and not allow harmful industries to take up more space in their lives. Every young life matters.
Every future counts, and no one should be left to face addiction alone.
This is more than a policy debate. This is about more than a change in broadcasting schedules.
It's a question of values. Do we value young lives, or do we value alcohol industry profits?
Let's stop pushing ads into loungerooms where children are watching. Let's start backing solutions that work.
We must choose prevention over profit, protection over promotion and community over chaos, because young lives depend on it.
New proposed rules for free-to-air television in Australia could allow alcohol advertising from 10am even on weekends and during school holidays. As someone with lived experience of intergenerational addiction, I'm speaking out about this because this isn't just irresponsible, it's dangerous.
When we talk about alcohol ads on television, we're not talking about harmless marketing. We're talking about messages that reach into Australian homes, living rooms and seep into young minds.
I am alarmed by Free TV Australia's proposal, which would mean an additional 800 hours of alcohol advertising every year.
Already, one in three children in Australia see alcohol ads on TV. This is not harmless. Research shows that 90 per cent of adults with addiction began using substances problematically before the age of 18.
I know this story intimately. Addiction isn't just a theory to me. It's not a policy brief or a line in a report.
It's something I was born into. I grew up in a family shaped by trauma, violence and addiction. My dad struggled with alcohol and drugs and was imprisoned.
By 16, I was living in a young women's refuge and many of us there used substances to cope with trauma and family violence.
We were using them to numb, to escape, to soothe the wounds no one else could see. It was a coping mechanism, our reality.
But what changed my life wasn't luck. It was a community of support.
Today, I'm proud to lead SMART Recovery Australia, an organisation that now supports more than 450 meetings every week across the country, including 16 youth meetings reaching over 160 young people weekly.
We are growing because the need is growing. Young people are crying out for support that actually meets them where they are at.
We help people manage addictive behaviours in a safe, non-judgmental environment. We also host online meetings which are available to people who live regionally and remotely, so people can get the help they need without the obstacle of distance giving them an excuse not to.
Around 70 per cent of all SMART Recovery participants attend to address alcohol use, and many of our young participants are grappling with early exposure and the lifelong consequences of alcohol harm.
That's why we're urging the Australian Communications and Media Authority (ACMA) to reject this proposal and instead stand with front-line services, public health experts, and families across the country. To stand with young people because Australia is facing a youth addiction crisis.
National surveys show that one in six adolescents are struggling with some form of addiction whether it's alcohol, vaping, gaming, or drugs.
These numbers represent real young people, like the ones I see every day. They are smart, creative, hurting, but hopeful. What they need is protection, not profit-driven promotion of harmful products.
We believe in giving young people real choices, real support and real hope. Because addiction is behaviour, and we can all change our behaviour if we are given the tools and resources.
READ MORE:
We need to protect young people, not profit from their vulnerability. We need to fund programs that work and not allow harmful industries to take up more space in their lives. Every young life matters.
Every future counts, and no one should be left to face addiction alone.
This is more than a policy debate. This is about more than a change in broadcasting schedules.
It's a question of values. Do we value young lives, or do we value alcohol industry profits?
Let's stop pushing ads into loungerooms where children are watching. Let's start backing solutions that work.
We must choose prevention over profit, protection over promotion and community over chaos, because young lives depend on it.
New proposed rules for free-to-air television in Australia could allow alcohol advertising from 10am even on weekends and during school holidays. As someone with lived experience of intergenerational addiction, I'm speaking out about this because this isn't just irresponsible, it's dangerous.
When we talk about alcohol ads on television, we're not talking about harmless marketing. We're talking about messages that reach into Australian homes, living rooms and seep into young minds.
I am alarmed by Free TV Australia's proposal, which would mean an additional 800 hours of alcohol advertising every year.
Already, one in three children in Australia see alcohol ads on TV. This is not harmless. Research shows that 90 per cent of adults with addiction began using substances problematically before the age of 18.
I know this story intimately. Addiction isn't just a theory to me. It's not a policy brief or a line in a report.
It's something I was born into. I grew up in a family shaped by trauma, violence and addiction. My dad struggled with alcohol and drugs and was imprisoned.
By 16, I was living in a young women's refuge and many of us there used substances to cope with trauma and family violence.
We were using them to numb, to escape, to soothe the wounds no one else could see. It was a coping mechanism, our reality.
But what changed my life wasn't luck. It was a community of support.
Today, I'm proud to lead SMART Recovery Australia, an organisation that now supports more than 450 meetings every week across the country, including 16 youth meetings reaching over 160 young people weekly.
We are growing because the need is growing. Young people are crying out for support that actually meets them where they are at.
We help people manage addictive behaviours in a safe, non-judgmental environment. We also host online meetings which are available to people who live regionally and remotely, so people can get the help they need without the obstacle of distance giving them an excuse not to.
Around 70 per cent of all SMART Recovery participants attend to address alcohol use, and many of our young participants are grappling with early exposure and the lifelong consequences of alcohol harm.
That's why we're urging the Australian Communications and Media Authority (ACMA) to reject this proposal and instead stand with front-line services, public health experts, and families across the country. To stand with young people because Australia is facing a youth addiction crisis.
National surveys show that one in six adolescents are struggling with some form of addiction whether it's alcohol, vaping, gaming, or drugs.
These numbers represent real young people, like the ones I see every day. They are smart, creative, hurting, but hopeful. What they need is protection, not profit-driven promotion of harmful products.
We believe in giving young people real choices, real support and real hope. Because addiction is behaviour, and we can all change our behaviour if we are given the tools and resources.
READ MORE:
We need to protect young people, not profit from their vulnerability. We need to fund programs that work and not allow harmful industries to take up more space in their lives. Every young life matters.
Every future counts, and no one should be left to face addiction alone.
This is more than a policy debate. This is about more than a change in broadcasting schedules.
It's a question of values. Do we value young lives, or do we value alcohol industry profits?
Let's stop pushing ads into loungerooms where children are watching. Let's start backing solutions that work.
We must choose prevention over profit, protection over promotion and community over chaos, because young lives depend on it.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


7NEWS
2 hours ago
- 7NEWS
Aussie grandmother diagnosed on her birthday with lung cancer, the same disease that killed husband
A grandmother has been diagnosed on her birthday with the same cancer that killed her husband 18 years ago. Jenny Egan was delivered the shocking news that a large mass had been found on her lung on May 7, when she was meant to be celebrating turning 64. Egan, from Fishing Point in NSW, is now preparing to begin treatment for stage four lung cancer which has grown onto her chest wall and spread into her adrenal gland. 'I was just crying. I was devastated for my kids having to go through this again,' Egan told of the moment she learned her life had been turned upside down. '(My husband) was given 12 months and that's how long he lived.' Egan, a patient transfer officer with State Medical Assistance, set an appointment with a doctor when she started feeling serious chest pain whenever she coughed, laughed or would lie down. But she almost cancelled the booking on the day because, by then, the pain had subsided. Going to the appointment, she had tests and less than 24 hours later — on her birthday — she was hauled back in to hear the shocking news. 'I was thinking 'oh my God. How can I have lung cancer?' There's no pain and I didn't feel any different to how I have always felt,' she said. Doctors told her the cancer could not be surgically removed. She will begin radiation for the metastatic lesion on her adrenal gland next week, followed by chemotherapy and radiation to her lung. Her daughter, Brittney Egan, said the treatment 'will hopefully extend her chances of being with us for a little while longer, but with her strength, we are hoping for more'. 'We are so thankful on where things are today with treatments because 15 years ago the doctors would have palliated (Egan) and not given her very long left with us,' she said. 'It's going to take me' Egan, a grandmother-to-two and mother-of-two, said she will continue to fight. 'It is going to take me but I don't know when. I don't know much time I have,' she said. 'I'm on a bit of a rollercoaster ride — laughing one moment and then in a ball crying the next. 'I'm not giving up. I've been knocked down a thousand times before but I will not give up.' Egan told her health blow comes after she was the victim of a scam last year that left the fiercely independent grandmother unable to dip into her super or savings to cover mounting out-of-pocket costs. Loved ones and strangers have chipped in generously via a GoFundMe to help with medical and living expenses. Egan said she was 'overwhelmed' by those offering to help in her time of need. National Lung Cancer Screening Program Lung cancer is among the most common cancers in Australian men and women, with more than 15,000 cases diagnosed in 2024. It is Australia's deadliest cancer, with more than 9000 deaths attributed to lung cancer in 2022. The Lung Foundation Australia is hopeful a National Lung Cancer Screening Program being launched in July will help detect cases earlier, when treatment is most effective. The program aims to save 12,000 lives over the next decade by using CT scans to look for lung cancer in high-risk people without any symptoms. 'There's hope that the tide will turn and it will be far more common that people will be diagnosed at earlier stages of the disease like other common cancers in Australia, giving people better treatment options and the opportunity to live well for longer,' Lung Foundation Australia chief executive Mark Brooke told To be eligible for the program, you need to be between 50 and 70 years of age and have a history of cigarette smoking.


Perth Now
4 hours ago
- Perth Now
Erin McNaught and Stace Cadet's son, 7 months, diagnosed with brain tumour
Erin McNaught and Stace Cadet have been left heart-broken after their seven-month-old son was diagnosed with a brain tumour. The 43-year-old model - who was previously married to musician Example - and the Australian record producer had noticed a "rapid decline" in their little one Obi's behaviour and happiness in recent weeks. The couple took him to hospital, where a neurosurgeon delivered the heart-breaking news that he has a "large brain tumour" on the right side of his brain, leaving the pair "absolutely shattered". In a joint post on Instagram, they wrote: "For the last few weeks we have noticed a rapid decline in Obi's behaviour and happiness. He was having problems eating, sleeping and most recently, keeping his head straight. Late on Tuesday, as a precaution we took our little man in for an MRI under instruction from our Doctor. At about 6:00pm Tuesday night we met with a neurosurgeon who broke the heartbreaking news that Obi has a large brain tumour on the right side of his brain. We are absolutely shattered and the last few days have been our hardest days. (sic)" Erin and Stace Cadet "remain hopeful" the mass can be removed and their boy can be "happy and healthy" again. They added: "Our team at the Queensland Children's Hospital have been incredible and we remain hopeful that we can remove the mass and get Obi healthy and happy, pending the results. We have a long and difficult road ahead us but are so lucky to have our family and friends' support at this time and we're keeping focussed on getting our little boy back." The couple welcomed Obi into the world last October. Stace Cadet - whose real name is Stasi Kotaras - said at the time: "We are so in love with him, we can't believe he's finally here. "Fair to say we didn't get a lot of sleep when we got home from the hospital last night. Mostly because we can't take our eyes off him." Erin added: "It wasn't the easiest pregnancy and a little touch and go at times but having him home with us now, has made us quickly forget the tough moments."

Sky News AU
8 hours ago
- Sky News AU
More than a dozen Aussie sunscreens fail to meet SPF claims on their labels, consumer group Choice finds in shock new report
More than a dozen favourite Australian sunscreens have failed to meet their SPF claims, according to a shock report by consumer group Choice. Twenty SPF 50 or 50+ products from different brands and retailers were subject to the test, which Choice said was conducted by experts in an accredited sunscreen lab. Sixteen of the 20 sunscreens under the microscope did not meet the SPF ratings stated on their labels, with only four living up to their claims, the analysis found. The worst performer, according to the report, was Ultra Violette's Lean Screen Mineral Mattifying Zinc Skinscreen which returned an SPF rating of four despite being labelled as 50+. Some Cancer Council products, including its SPF 50+ Ultra Sunscreen and Everyday Value Sunscreen SPF 50, tested at almost half their advertised ratings at 24 and 27, respectively. Woolworths' Sunscreen Everyday Tube SPF 50+ returned a rating of 27. Choice CEO Ashley de Silva said a follow up analysis was conducted for Ultra Violette's Lean Screen given the astonishing test result. "We were really shocked to see the results for Ultra Violette's Lean Screen SPF 50+ product, so much so that we actually decided to test a different batch at a completely different lab in Germany to confirm the results," he said in a statement. "Those tests found the product had an SPF of five - an almost identical result to our initial testing." A spokesperson for Ultra Violette said the company does not accept the results "as even remotely accurate". "Lean Screen contains 22.75 per cent zinc oxide, a level at which, when applied sufficiently, would render a testing result of SPF 4 scientifically impossible," a spokesperson said. Among the top performers included La Roche-Posay Anthelios Wet Skin Sunscreen SPF 50+ which tested as providing a higher protection rating of 72. Neutrogena's Ultra Sheer Body Lotion returned a slightly higher SPF of 56, over its printed label of 50, while the Cancer Council's Kid Sunscreen SPF 50+ tested at 52. Popular makeup brand Mecca Cosmetica's To Save Body Hydrating Sunscreen had an SPF of 51, according to the report. Choice has called on the Therapeutic Goods Administration to conduct its own compliance testing in the wake of the analysis, as it urges the ACCC to investigate any misleading SPF claims. "Currently, the TGA relies on reports provided by manufacturers to ensure the safety, quality and efficacy of sunscreen products," Mr de Silva said. "Unfortunately, these reports may not be providing the accurate information consumers need when choosing sunscreens for themselves and their families." However, Mr de Silva noted the consumer group's testing does not mean sunscreen is not effective. "While some specific sunscreens did not meet their claimed SPF, a sunscreen with an SPF of 30 or even 20 still offers a significant amount of sunscreen protection, and any sunscreen is better than none at all," he said. A TGA spokesperson confirmed to it is investigating the findings and will "take regularly action as required". The authority said it cannot comment on whether individual products may be subject to investigation, or compliance and enforcement activity due to privacy and legal restrictions. "The TGA acknowledges that there is variability in SPF testing results across laboratories, which is largely due to current reliance on human subject testing," a spokesperson said. "Limited inter-laboratory calibration may also lead to inconsistencies in methodologies and results. "While encouraging progress is being made internationally toward in-vitro sunscreen testing which would improve consistency of results, this will not eliminate the need for human subject testing, particularly for verifying water resistance claims." The TGA reiterated the importance of using sunscreen in addition to other sun safety measures such as wearing a wide-brimmed hat, protective clothing and sunglasses. "We note that a number of the products Choice tested provided results in the range of SPF 30," the regulator said. "It is important to note that SPFs in the range of 30 to 59 provide 'High protection', while a SPF of 60 or higher (SPF 50+) provides 'Very high' protection. "Therefore, products with an SPF of 30 are effective to use. "Consumers are also advised that, irrespective of the SPF rating, sunscreens should be applied liberally and reapplied frequently." A spokesperson for the ACCC said it is considering the issues raised in Choice's report in accordance with its Compliance and Enforcement Policy. "The ACCC will engage closely with the Therapeutic Goods Administration in considering the allegations," a spokesperson said in a statement to "In addition to obligations under therapeutic goods legislation, businesses also have obligations under the Australian Consumer Law, including an obligation not to make false or misleading representations." has contacted the Cancer Council and Ultra Violette for further comment.