Liberal leader refuses to show hand on contentious abortion bill
NSW Opposition Leader Mark Speakman is refusing to say whether he will back legislation to amend the state's abortion laws so experienced nurses and midwives can prescribe medical terminations up to nine weeks.
The state's lower house will this week vote on a bill put forward by NSW Greens MP Amanda Cohn to widen abortion access, after a NSW Health review found so-called 'abortion deserts' across the state were undermining the landmark 2019 legislation which decriminalised it.
The bill – which was significantly pared back before passing the upper house last week – allows for nurse practitioners and endorsed midwives to prescribe the abortion pill MS-2 Step to women up to nine weeks' gestation.
The legislation has prompted a series of protests outside parliament organised by the anti-abortion campaigner Joanna Howe. A gathering last week was attended by former prime minister Tony Abbott and the Catholic Archbishop of Sydney Anthony Fisher.
Despite that, the legislation – which is subject to a conscience vote for both Labor and Coalition MPs – has won support in both major parties, with Premier Chris Minns and opposition health minister Kellie Sloane saying they will support it after some of the more contentious elements of the bill were removed during debate in the upper house.
'I wouldn't have supported any of the provisions that the upper house ended up taking out of the legislation, [but] the only element that remains is that those practitioners are able to prescribe that medication to the public, in line with TGA guidelines,' Minns said.
'MPs will make up their own mind when it hits the Legislative Assembly … I will be supporting them, [but] it's a conscience vote.'
Sloane said she would also support the changes, citing the same NSW Health statutory review which recommended it after finding terminations are beyond the reach of many vulnerable women who cannot afford private clinics or live outside metropolitan areas.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Age
19 minutes ago
- The Age
‘Pathetic scare campaign': Minister says surprise toll changes won't affect Story Bridge
Tolls on Queensland roads can be hiked more easily after laws passed state parliament, but Transport Minister Brent Mickelberg has denied there are plans to toll the Story Bridge. The LNP made surprise amendments to the Transport Infrastructure Act on Wednesday night during debate on a parole board bill. The amendments would give the minister the power to make a declaration over tolls, charges or payment arrangements, potentially reducing administration and costs. Explanatory notes say the changes would streamline upgrades to the Gateway and Logan motorways. Labor transport spokesman Bart Mellish said it could affect the Story Bridge and Coomera Connector, and meant the government could slap a toll on any road or hike an existing toll without 'fear, favour or proper consultation'. 'These amendments look technical, but their implications are far-reaching,' he said. Loading 'They quietly pave the way for tolls to be declared on Queensland roads with less scrutiny and less transparency.' But Mickelberg accused Labor of a 'pathetic scare campaign' and said the changes had nothing to do with the Story Bridge, arguing they were about removing red tape.
Sydney Morning Herald
19 minutes ago
- Sydney Morning Herald
‘Pathetic scare campaign': Minister says surprise toll changes won't affect Story Bridge
Tolls on Queensland roads can be hiked more easily after laws passed state parliament, but Transport Minister Brent Mickelberg has denied there are plans to toll the Story Bridge. The LNP made surprise amendments to the Transport Infrastructure Act on Wednesday night during debate on a parole board bill. The amendments would give the minister the power to make a declaration over tolls, charges or payment arrangements, potentially reducing administration and costs. Explanatory notes say the changes would streamline upgrades to the Gateway and Logan motorways. Labor transport spokesman Bart Mellish said it could affect the Story Bridge and Coomera Connector, and meant the government could slap a toll on any road or hike an existing toll without 'fear, favour or proper consultation'. 'These amendments look technical, but their implications are far-reaching,' he said. Loading 'They quietly pave the way for tolls to be declared on Queensland roads with less scrutiny and less transparency.' But Mickelberg accused Labor of a 'pathetic scare campaign' and said the changes had nothing to do with the Story Bridge, arguing they were about removing red tape.
Sky News AU
an hour ago
- Sky News AU
Choice sunscreen test finds most brands do not meet SPF 50 claims
Major sunscreen brands are not living up to their SPF claims, according to a new test from consumer group Choice. Choice tested 20 popular SPF50 and SPF50+ sunscreens and found that only four lived up to the standard they claimed, with 16 falling short. SPF stands for 'sun protection factor' and is the measure of how well the sunscreen protects from the sun's UV rays. An SPF 50 sunscreen is meant to block about 98 per cent of the rays, meaning it will take 50 times longer to get burnt than with unprotected skin. The consumer group tested the products with experts in an accredited sunscreen lab, with four products returning SPF results in the 40s, four in the 30s, and seven in the 20s. Choice chief executive Ashley de Silva said the tests showed that products were not meeting consumer expectations. 'Consumers expect sunscreen to protect them in line with the SPF rating on the product, but as our testing has shown, the SPF label doesn't always match what's in the bottle,' he said. One sunscreen, Ultra Violette's lean screen SPF 50+ mattifying zinc skinscreen, astoundingly returned a result of just SPF4. 'We were really shocked to see the results for Ultra Violette's lean screen SPF 50+ product, so much so that we actually decided to test a different batch at a completely different lab in Germany to confirm the results,' Mr de Silva said. 'Those tests found the product had an SPF of 5 – an almost identical result to our initial testing.' The consumer group was, however, quick to remind people that while a sunscreen may have ranked lower than claimed in its tests, that does not mean that products do not work. A sunscreen with an SPF of 30 or 20 can still give significant sun protection and is much better than using no sunscreen at all. Choice have told the Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA) and Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC) about the results of the tests and asked the TGA to conduct their own tests. 'Risk of death': Grim call on Temu itemsAussies warned over new pay trend 'Choice is calling on the TGA to urgently carry out its own sunscreen compliance testing and on the ACCC to investigate if any SPF claims are misleading,' Mr de Silva said. 'Currently, the TGA relies on reports provided by manufacturers to ensure the safety, quality and efficacy of sunscreen products. 'Unfortunately, these reports may not be providing the accurate information consumers need when choosing sunscreens for themselves and their families.' Originally published as Consumer group finds most sunscreens do not meet SPF claims
