
‘It's thieving': impersonators steal elderly people's TikToks to hawk mass-produced goods
In April of this year, Daisy Yelichek was scrolling TikTok when something unusual appeared in her feed: a video of her 84-year-old father, George Tsaftarides, who runs an account sharing sewing videos from his small tailoring business in Ohio. But the video Yelichek was seeing was not from Tsaftarides' actual page, which has nearly 41,000 followers – but instead originated from a profile of someone claiming to be a 'sad old man' whose cat sanctuary was at risk of shutting down.
'Please stay 8 seconds so I don't have to shut down my cat shelter I poured my love into,' the text on the video said, adding that the sanctuary would be selling slippers to raise additional funds. The bid for sympathy worked on many viewers, garnering millions of views and tens of thousands of users leaving concerned comments. 'Just ordered two! Sending love to these kittens,' wrote one. Another commenter said: 'thank you for all you do for these babies.' Others even asked if there was a GoFundMe link to donate directly to the cat shelter.
Yelichek and her father were shocked. Tsaftarides does not run a shelter. The account posting the plea for funds appears to be a front for a scheme seeking to sell mass-produced slippers. Several of Tsaftarides' followers who actually ordered slippers complained that the fuzzy footwear came with 'made in China' tags and did not, in fact, appear to be handmade by an elderly man with a struggling cat sanctuary.
'These people are using my identity to make money and I don't understand why,' Tsaftarides said. 'It's thieving, it's stealing, and it's not right.'
Tsaftarides is not the only TikTok user who has had his likeness hijacked by such accounts. Charles Ray, an 85-year-old retiree based in Michigan, has also been targeted by accounts using doctored videos of his likeness. He started his actual TikTok account in January and uses it to share jokes with his followers.
'Earlier this year, my pastor told me a joke about a frog, and I thought, 'that ought to make people smile,' so I figured out how to make an account and told the joke, and it took off from there,' he said.
Ray's videos all follow a similar template: filmed in selfie mode, he tells a short joke. He was frustrated to learn his content, which he makes only to 'share joy' and not to earn money, was being lifted and edited to scam people. In one video, Ray is rubbing his eye, and the repost seems to imply he is crying. Another video uses a clip from a woman crying on TikTok about an unrelated issue, and another includes a user in a hospital bed.
Since she first discovered the proliferation and manipulation of her father's face, Yelichek has identified more than 100 accounts splicing his videos with other, unrelated users to sell mass-produced goods including slippers, headphone cases and blankets – all under the guise of independent sellers that need help. Some two dozen Instagram accounts and YouTube as well as a handful were pulling the same trick, according to a list compiled by Yelichek and a review of the accounts by the Guardian.
At one point, Yelichek even made contact with the account manipulating her father's likeness over direct message and pleaded with its owner to stop. The person behind the account claimed to be a poor 17-year-old boy based in Greece trying to make money for his family.
'I totally understand your situation but I also want you to understand mine,' he said, proceeding to post more stolen videos.
The con replicates a recurring genre of video on TikTok that has boosted sales for some small businesses: user makes a heartfelt post about a local store or restaurant that is struggling, and online followers are moved to support it. One typical post mimicking a local plea for help reads: 'Please just stay 15 seconds to save my pawpaw's slipper small business.'
In the case of videos Yelichek is seeing, many commenters who are moved by the fake story try to boost it by commenting names of celebrities and creating other engagement they believe TikTok prioritizes. 'Fun fact,' a comment on one video of the type reads, this one using the same formula but claiming to be a struggling cow sanctuary. 'Liking and replying to comments boosts more! Referencing popular things like Chappell Roan and Taylor Swift puts this video on the [for you page] of more people.' The video pulled in 1.4 million likes and 26,000 comments before being taken down. Yelichek says these accounts lift videos from other TikTok users as well and recontextualize them to create a false narrative.
Tsaftarides said his content being used to sell mass-produced goods is particularly frustrating, as he started his account to promote small businesses, including his own, and to encourage people to shop locally.
'All we want to do is show people our store and teach them about sewing,' he said. 'We don't make money off of our TikTok account.'
Yelichek said she and her father filed a police report to Jackson township police in Ohio, where their store is based, for identity theft and have made great efforts to get social networks to take the stolen content down – often to no avail. Yelichek said that while Instagram has removed a few of the profiles she reported, TikTok – the platform where the issue is more widespread – has been less responsive.
Sign up to TechScape
A weekly dive in to how technology is shaping our lives
after newsletter promotion
'If we comment on [these videos] saying they're spam, our comments often get deleted right away, with TikTok saying it's against their community guidelines,' Yelichek said, sharing screenshots of the messages. 'They've actually put strikes on my dad's account for me commenting on these videos to say that they are spam and scamming people.'
TikTok users who have gotten wise to the scheme have commented on videos calling out the scam. Like Yelichek, some comments say that TikTok responds to their reports of a video by saying it does not violate its community guidelines.
TikTok said in a statement that its community guidelines do, in fact, prohibit impersonation accounts and content that violates others' intellectual property rights. Reports of copyright infringement concerns may require proof of ownership, including links to the original content and links to infringing content. Meta similarly stated its Instagram terms of use do not allow posting content that violates someone else's intellectual property rights, including copyright and trademarks, and that violations can be reported on Instagram's help page.
Ray, the 85-year-old jokester, said he tried reporting the videos to TikTok but got responses that the content he had flagged did not violate TikTok's community standards. Like Yelichek, he said his comments on the videos alerting followers to the scam were frequently removed, and that he gets 'no help from TikTok' and does not know how to further communicate with the company.
TikTok said in a statement that it continuously takes action against such copyright violations. It added that 94% of all content removed for violating community guidelines on fake engagement in the fourth quarter of last year was removed proactively rather than in response to reports.
Meanwhile, some users are catching on to this particular kind of sadness bait – with recent videos going viral alerting people to the fact that the posts begging for help with failing cat shelters, cow farms and other heart-wrenching fictions are not real.
Though awareness may spread, the impersonating videos remain available. In lieu of takedowns, Ray said he has decided to continue to make his videos because many of his 13,000 followers have told him they look forward to his posts each day.
'With everything that's going on nowadays, people need to smile,' he said. 'If my followers smile, even for a minute, they've forgotten their troubles for a minute. So that's all I try to do – to make people smile. This is not going to stop me.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Telegraph
24 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Johnny Depp: My friends betrayed me
Johnny Depp, the Hollywood actor, has claimed he was betrayed by his friends after being accused of abuse by his ex-wife Amber Heard. The strongly denied claims were first levelled against Depp, 62, by Heard during divorce proceedings in 2016. The actor's failed marriage to the 39-year-old actress made international headlines when details of alleged violence between the pair were aired in courts in the UK and US. Depp has now criticised the behaviour of several close friends at the time and also claimed he had been a 'crash test dummy for the #MeToo movement'. 'I'll tell you what hurts. There are people, and I'm thinking of three, who did me dirty. Those people were at my kids' parties, throwing them in the air,' he told The Sunday Times. 'And, look, I understand people who could not stand up [for me], because the most frightening thing to them was making the right choice.' One individual who spoke out against Depp despite their long working relationship was Tracey Jacobs, his agent of 30 years, who was sacked in 2016. She claimed during Depp's legal battles that studios were 'reluctant' to hire him because of his lateness. Depp said of Jacobs: 'My loyalty is the last thing anybody could question. I was with one agent for 30 years, but she spoke in court about how difficult I was.' His image came under global scrutiny when he brought a libel case against The Sun newspaper after he was described as a 'wife-beater' in a column. Numerous alleged details of the couple's marriage were made public during the case, including claims of the actor having a finger severed, being struck by Heard, passing out drunk and finding her faeces in their bed. Depp said he felt compelled to risk revealing details of his personal life, adding: 'Look, it had gone far enough. I knew I'd have to semi-eviscerate myself. Everyone was saying 'It'll go away'. But I can't trust that.' While a judge ruled against Depp in his High Court case against The Sun, the star won damages for defamation from Heard in June 2022 following a legal battle in the US. But the allegations of abuse levelled against Depp by Heard continued to dog the film star, whose presence at the Cannes film festival in 2023 was opposed by several feminist groups in France. Following a period away from major Hollywood productions, Depp has this year been working on his comeback film Day Drinker. In the thriller, Depp will star as a mysterious guest on a private yacht who finds himself entangled with a criminal, played by Penelope Cruz.


The Sun
25 minutes ago
- The Sun
Legendary actor, 94, and star of 70s police sitcom looks unrecognizable on rare outing – can you guess who it is?
A LEGENDARY actor has stepped out for an outing - but can you guess who he is? The actor, 94, was a huge star of a popular 70s police sitcom, and now looks so different from his dapper role as a cop. 6 He played the role of Captain Barney Miller in the hit series Barney Miller, which aired from 1975 until 1982. The role even earned him seven Primetime Emmy nominations and three Golden Globe Award nominations. In the series, his character had a full head of brown hair with gray strands dotted throughout. He also sported a luscious brown moustache. Have you guessed who he is yet? You've got it, it's Hal Linden, whose real name is Harold Lipshitz. The beloved TV icon was spotted out on Wednesday and kept things casual in a rather relaxed outfit. Hal could be seen rocking an all-black outfit comprising of trousers and a smart button-down shirt. He completed the look with some black trainers and a gray jacket. Holding a flask, Hal looked concentrated as he walked around Los Angeles. 00s reality star looks completely unrecognizable from 'wild' days as she trades in hard partying for tradwife lifestyle Hal shot to fame on Broadway when he replaced Sydney Chaplin in the musical Bells Are Ringing. He was married to Fran Martin, whom he met in 1955. They married in 1958 and had four children. Fran sadly died in 2010. Speaking about his role as Barney in the hit police sitcom, Hal was interviewed in 2017. Speaking to Vulture, he spoke about the comedic value of the show. "It does fit, because we used to cut lines from the script. "There'd be a punchline and we'd do the scene, and you'd find out that all you had to do was cut back to a physical reaction. "They were just as funny as the words." He went on: "We'd cut punchlines all the time. Yes, I think minimalist is a good description of the writing. "There's very few 'jokes' in Barney Miller. It was all relationship humor." As well as his role in Barney Miller, Hal is known for his guest roles in several other films and TV shows. Hal has had guest appearances in Touched by an Angel, The King of Queens, Gilmore Girls, and Law & Order: Criminal Intent. 6 6 6


Daily Mail
26 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
It's the number one attraction in the world but dissatisfied customers share hilarious and scathing reviews
The Empire State Building stands tall as one of the most iconic buildings in the world and just over 2.5million guests visit each year to climb to the top of New York City 's iconic emblem. It serves as the backdrop for many a movie, TV show, and big city dream board and most visitors thoroughly enjoy their time at the attraction. TripAdvisor rated it the #1 attraction in the world last year but that hasn't stopped people from leaving scathing, if not slightly nonsensical reviews on their website. Whether its the weather on the day of the visit, lack of unlimited coffee or the price point, lots of people found something to complain about at the sought after attraction - one person even claimed how much they disliked it but had visited three times! For reference, the building, which was originally constructed in 1931, sells $44 tickets to its 86th floor observatory. If tourists want to see the city from even higher, they can pay $80 to add on the 102nd to their journey upwards. For just over $150 visitors are able to take two trips to the top in one day and get admission to American Museum of Natural History, 9/11 Memorial & Museum, and the Statue of Liberty. Each of the admissions passes can be accompanies by an Express Pass which allows patrons to skip the line. Of the 96,707 reviews as of Friday, 63,356 give the building 5 stars, rating it as 'excellent', and just 1,788 people say their experience was 'terrible' by rating it with just one star. We've rounded up the most extraordinary reviews of the bunch. Some of the one star reviews are all too ready to critique the building for the views available at the top, whether that be because of the weather or vantage point of the building Some of the one star reviews are all too ready to critique the building for the views available at the top, whether that be because of the weather or vantage point of the building. 'Nothing could be seen. No refunds available which is ridiculous. Nothing interesting on the floors prior to the top. Not worth the money,' one poster wrote. Another shared: 'Honestly not a very good experience. We waited all day to enjoy a night at the Empire State Building. We spent $50 each for the ticket to see nothing but clouds because it was very clouded and when we asked the workers what could be done, if we could get a refund or exchange the the day for another day the employee wasn't very nice and not understanding. 'With quote saying it wasn't their doing and that can't control that however if they say there wasn't a view why let us go all the way up or closed it down or any other type of solution very unsatisfied we came all the way from Florida with family to see the Empire State Building to see absolutely nothing.' One commenter admitted that despite their dissatisfaction, they'd visited the building three times. 'Pathetic theatrical security check, unprofessional. Not worth it. An hour for nothing. Anyway... I don't recommend it. I've been three times before..,' they wrote. Others thought the price point was too steep for the experience they were given. A reviewer wrote: 'There is a very small space and so much crowd. Its very expensive for that experience and not worthy.' 'You need to be careful when booking this attraction as when things go wrong this money grabbing greedy attitude attraction with shockingly poor customer service is not giving refunds. They make you click terms and conditions with a clause this is a non refundable ticket. And it is not a cheap attraction, so think twice before you book it. 'Here is what happened in my case: unfortunately, it was very foggy on the day when I wanted yo visit. I paid for both floors 86 and 102. It was really foggy and visibility was zero! I paid a lot of money and saw literally just the fog :). I was offered a rebooking to other day option. The problem was I was flying back to Europe next day, so I could not use it. When I asked for a refund they send an email with an automated, copy and paste message, saying more or less that tickets are non refundable and I can rebook. They didn't care I have no day to rebook it as I am leaving. Nobody even responded to my second email. Shocking customer service. 'You are an observation deck and when the visibility is zero you should be giving refunds, especially to people who are unable to rebooking it to later date as in my case. You customer service is shocking!!! Terrible. I have wasted so much money (there was three people in my party, $289 to see the fog). I hope your money grabbing company will enjoy my dollars. Profit is what matters here not customers. 'Here is my suggestion to Make Empire State Building Great Again: Issue refund to people who see only fog and can not rebook it to other date and please, please improve your shockingly bad customer service. Thank you.' According to their website, patrons often have the opportunity to reschedule and see a live view of the top of the building, to ensure what they see will be to their liking. And some just called for a staffing overhaul. One person wrote on TripAdvisor: 'The experience on it's own was amazing, what made it bitter was the staff member clocking pictures on a green screen right after the tickets are scanned. 'I didn't want my photo taken and he clearly wanted to force me into it, he clearly makes commission off those pictures handing out postcards with barcodes. He was quite weird and unpleasant.' Another wrote: 'Mediocre. Paid extra to skip the line and felt like I was given prejudiced service compared to others.' Where as another said: 'We paid a good amount of money thinking that we would get coffee unlimited and pastries and no. One coffee and one pastries and they are super rude. No like.' The Empire State commented that with the package the person has bought there was refreshments included but it was not unlimited. Graciously, the Empire State Building team commented back to their dissenters, apologizing for their negative experience and offering explanations and solutions for another visit.