
Sinaloa Cartel Co-Founder 'El Mayo' Could Seek Deal With U.S. Authorities To Avoid Death Penalty
Sinaloa Cartel co-founder Ismael "El Mayo" Zambada could seek a deal with U.S. federal authorities to avoid the death penalty as he readies to appear before a court.
Zambada, captured last July, is set to take part in the hearing on Tuesday in Brooklyn. He faces numerous charges, including drug trafficking and murder conspiracy.
The drug lord had pleaded not guilty to charges against him in Texas and New York, but his strategy has seemingly changed since the death penalty became a concrete possibility.
"Mr. Zambada doesn't want to go to trial and is willing to accept responsibility for a charge that doesn't carry out the death penalty," his lawyer, Frank Perez, told Reuters back in February.
A spokesperson for the Brooklyn District Attorney declined to comment on the statements from Zambada's lawyer, but prosecutors had reportedly initiated negotiations to secure his cooperation in exchange for avoiding the death penalty.
Concretely, Zambada faces 17 charges in New York, including drug-trafficking, conspiracy to commit murder and money laundering. Prosecutors allege that Zambada played a central role in trafficking fentanyl into the United States, contributing to a surge in overdose deaths.
Although New York abolished the death penalty in 2004, federal charges allow for its application in cases involving mass murders or crimes comparable to terrorism. Zambada, 75, is the only Mexican defendant explicitly charged with fentanyl trafficking.
The drug lord is also requesting to be repatriated to Mexico, claiming he was unlawfully transferred to the United States without a formal extradition process. The Claudia Sheinbaum administration also revealed in February that it has requested Zambada's extradition up to four times since he was captured.
Zambada's defense contends that his abduction and subsequent transfer to the U.S. violated Mexico's sovereignty. He claimed he was taken from Culiacán, Sinaloa, and transported to Texas in a private aircraft with the involvement of Joaquin Guzmán López, son of Joaquín "El Chapo" Guzmán, as the faction of the cartel loyal to him continues to clash with those answering to Zambada.
Originally published on Latin Times

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Int'l Business Times
a day ago
- Int'l Business Times
AOC Gets GOP Lawmaker to Walk Back His Words After Questioning If He Used 'Intimidation' Against Democratic Governors
Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY) accused Rep. Gary Palmer (R-AL) of witness intimidation during a tense hearing on Capitol Hill Thursday. The hearing featured testimony from sanctuary state governors, Gov. Kathy Hochul of New York, Gov. JB Pritzker of Illinois, and Gov. Tim Walz of Minnesota. The state leaders clashed with Republicans over immigration enforcement, National Guard deployments, and states' rights. "Charges of obstruction should be brought against each one of you," Palmer said, adding, "I'll leave that up to the Department of Justice." Ocasio-Cortez swiftly challenged him. Palmer: Charges should be brought against each one of you AOC: Raising the prospect of charges against witnesses is a form of intimidation is it not? Palmer: I strike those words — Acyn (@Acyn) June 12, 2025 "That was intimidation of the witness," she said. "Raising the prospect of charges against witnesses is a form of intimidation, is it not?" Palmer acknowledged Ocasio-Cortez's objection. "I strike those words," he said, inspiring a wink from Ocasio-Cortez. During the volatile hearing, Hochul and Pritzker openly dared federal immigration czar Tom Homan to "come and arrest" them, accusing the administration of stoking fear and undermining local authority. Walz warned that such threats "undermine democracy." At another point, Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-GA) told Hochul, "The DOJ should prosecute you for murder," as she held up a photo of Laken Riley, a young woman murdered by a man who illegally entered the United States. ICE officials claim Riley's killer had previously been arrested in NY but was released before ICE could detain him. The case was cited in the controversial Laken Riley Act, which requires the detention without bail of undocumented migrants charged with a crime. The Governor's defense of their city's immigrant sanctuary policies comes amid anti-ICE protests taking place nationwide. Protests in LA have garnered national attention as President Donald Trump clashes with California Gov. Gavin Newsom over the deployment of federal troops to subdue demonstrations the Trump administration has described as "insurrection." Originally published on Latin Times House of Representatives Immigration © Latin Times. All rights reserved. Do not reproduce without permission.


Int'l Business Times
a day ago
- Int'l Business Times
Man Spit on ICE Agent While Being Detained for Reentering US After Being Deported: US Attorney
A 41-year-old man living in Los Angeles has been charged with assaulting a federal officer after allegedly spitting on an ICE agent while being arrested for reentering the U.S. illegally, federal prosecutors said. Omar Pulido Bastida, a Mexican national previously deported from the United States, had already been charged earlier this year with illegal reentry, according to the United States Attorney's Office . The man was living in the Historic South Central neighborhood of Los Angeles at the time of the incident. On Tuesday morning, ICE agents arrived at Pulido's home with a warrant tied to the illegal reentry case. After identifying himself from the second-story balcony, Pulido reportedly insulted the officer. When he later opened the front door, separated by an iron security gate, he told the agent, "I know my rights. I'm calling my lawyer," and then allegedly spit through the gate, hitting the officer in the face. ICE agents entered the home shortly after and found Pulido hiding in a second-floor storage room. He surrendered and was taken into custody. A federal magistrate ordered him detained, with arraignment scheduled for July 16 in U.S. District Court in Los Angeles. Pulido now faces one felony count of assaulting a federal employee, which carries a maximum sentence of eight years in prison. The investigation is ongoing, and the case is being prosecuted by the U.S. Attorney's Office's Domestic Security and Immigration Crimes Section. Originally published on Latin Times


DW
3 days ago
- DW
South Korea: Can new president end 'revenge politics'? – DW – 06/11/2025
Each of the previous six South Korean presidents has faced criminal investigations during or after leaving office. President Lee had promised to break that streak, but has launched his own probe into his predecessor. Despite pleas for reconciliation and a break from the cycle of political revenge before and since South Korea's recent presidential elections, it appears newly elected President Lee Jae-myung is showing no mercy to his predecessor, the deposed Yoon Suk Yeol, and has approved new investigations into the former president and his wife. Each of the last six South Korean leaders going back to Roh Moo-hyun, who was elected in 2003, has faced criminal investigations by subsequent administrations for their actions in office or for other alleged wrongdoings, usually with disastrous consequences. Roh died by suicide after being accused of bribery while his successor, Lee Myung-bak, was convicted after leaving office for bribery, embezzlement and tax evasion, and sentenced to 15 years in prison. The next occupant of the presidential Blue House, Park Geun-hye, was impeached in 2016 for influence-peddling and given a 25-year prison term for corruption. The next full-time president was Moon Jae-in, who was in April 2025 indicted on corruption charges related to his son-in-law obtaining a job at an airline in a case that is ongoing. His replacement was Yoon, who was struggling in the public opinion polls in December when he declared a short-lived martial law that now sees him on trial for insurrection. Yoon was removed from power after he declared a short-lived martial law and he's now facing a trial for insurrection Image: Kim Soo-hyeon/REUTERS A vow to break the cycle In a press conference on May 25, just nine days before the election, Lee said only he could end the cycle of political retaliation, as he had been on the receiving end of such attacks. But on Tuesday, one week after election day, President Lee signed bills mandating special counsel investigations into Yoon's declaration of martial law — in addition to the court case that is ongoing — as well as a probe of his wife, Kim Keon-hye, on suspicion of corruption. "I am going to admit that I am very disappointed that the same vicious cycle of revenge we have seen in the past is repeating again," said Kim Sang-woo, a former politician with the left-leaning South Korean Congress for New Politics and now a member of the board of the Kim Dae-jung Peace Foundation. "The People Power Party (PPP) is in complete disarray since the election and is not a forceful adversary for Lee or the Democratic Party (DP), so this could have been an opportunity for a conciliatory approach to the opposition, to improve the political situation and move away from the confrontational politics that we have experienced for so long," he told DW. "It is clear that is not happening and I worry that Lee will use the huge power that he now has for his own gain," Kim said. "I fear for the country's political future." S. Korean bombs hit near N. Korea border in military drill To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video Lee wields great power Lim Eun-jung, a professor of international studies at Kongju National University, has similar concerns about the concentration of power in Lee's hands. "There were good reasons why each of the former presidents went to prison, but this time Lee kept saying that he did not want revenge," she said. "Yoon may deserve arrest and indictment for declaring martial law, but was launching a special investigation into his wife necessary?" Kim Sang-woo, of the Kim Dae-jung Peace Foundation, points out that Lee himself has been the subject of a number of legal cases dating back to 2018 and including publishing false information over elections and breaching campaign laws by lying during a televised debate in 2020. In 2023, he became the first serving politician since 1998 to be questioned about a criminal case when he was quizzed over corporate donations in return for favors. He was indicted the same year on bribery, corruption, breach of trust and conflict of interest charges over a massive construction project in the town of Seongnam, where he was previously mayor. He has also been accused of illegally funneling $8 million (€7 million) to North Korea through a clothing company. On June 5, the Supreme Court confirmed a prison sentence for one of Lee's closest advisers for his part in the North Korean funds case, although Lee has constantly managed to delay rulings that would have made him ineligible to run in the presidential election. South Korea goes all in on nuclear energy To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video Retrial delayed On June 9, the Seoul High Court ruled that a retrial on election law violation charges would have to be delayed until after Lee leaves office, as the South Korean constitution exempts a sitting president from criminal prosecution, except in the case of insurrection or treason. "Lee has a lot of power now and it is possible that he will try to protect himself after his term is completed by passing new laws," Kim said. "If he does try to do that then I think it will be very detrimental to his support and the public will be angry, especially the moderates who supported him this time," he added. "If the Democratic Party does push through legislation like that, then South Korea will be in a situation where politicians become even more set on confrontation rather than trying to find ways to reconcile their differences, through dialogue, through compromise." Edited by: Srinivas Mazumdaru