logo
Who Was Syril Karn?

Who Was Syril Karn?

Gizmodo09-05-2025

'Who are you?' is the question that haunts Syril Karn for his entire life. From the moment we met him, prim and proper security uniform modified to be just so, a sense of purpose in a vast and uncaring universe has been at the core of understanding what makes Syril tick. The journey that took him across the galaxy reached a climactic moment in Andor's penultimate arc this week, and raised that haunting question once more. But the answer is more complicated than mere villain in Andor's narrative, doubting or otherwise. Because even as the hero of his own story, the man we know Syril to be, until the very end, is shaped less by himself and more by the systems and structures that made a tool of him.
This doesn't excuse Syril of being responsible for what he abets by the end of his story on Ghorman, of course. No matter how much he doubts by the time of the massacre unfolding around him what he's helped bring about, he still made the choice to be an agent of Imperial interests, both willing soldier and dutiful boyfriend. In not getting the chance to see the light, but to instead face one last ignominy, being so thrown by the villain he built up in his head as Cassian Andor, staring at him blankly and asking that dreaded question—who are you—that he fails to either take the shot he's waited years to take or notice the kill shot being lined up on himself is fitting punishment for those choices, after all. But the question is left as unanswered to us as it was to Cassian and Syril alike.
Who was Syril Karn? He was whoever anyone needed him to be. As long as it meant recognition, as long as it meant service, and in many ways, as long as it meant love.
As misguided as he might have been, one thing that is repeatedly shown to us throughout Syril's arc is that he does at the very least try to do what he thinks is right. It's presented to us as an almost comically annoying trait when we first meet him, but we're introduced to Syril as a corporate security officer unwilling to sweep the death of two of his colleagues under the rug, in the name of doing things not just for justice, but by the book he was given. It comes up again and again in his journey, this desire to do the right thing being tied into and twisted by what is, ultimately, an similar desire that breeds subservience to authority, regardless of that authority's scruples.
When we meet Syril's mother Eedy in that brilliant, intoxicatingly characterful moment of her slapping him across the face before giving him a hug, we're immediately told the kind of environment Syril grew up in. An absent father, and a mother similarly obsessed with status and hierarchy as he would come to be, created an environment primed for Syril to seek approval and validation outside of his family, regardless of the source. Perhaps, if Syril had been born 50 years earlier, that desire could've forged him into model citizen of the Galactic Republic—imperfect in its own ways, but still a structure that would've satiated his yearning for order in the chaos of the universe, a satisfaction with regulation and servitude, and moulded him a long a different line of thought. But instead, Syril came of age in the Republic's twilight, and was an impressionable young adult at the exact moment an authoritarian regime like the Empire and its corporate system cousins needed exactly that.
That's how you get the low-level security officer who surreptitiously modifies his uniform, in the hopes of recognition. It's how you get the same officer willing to overcommit a dozen men to a murder investigation, in spit of pressure to do otherwise, forever changing the course of his life. It's how, when that investigation blows up in his face, you get Syril simultaneously committing to a life of bureaucracy while also practically throwing himself into the arms of the ISB, a level of even higher authority. Young men like Syril—seeking order and the warmth of recognition, of a kind of love, in equal measure—are perfect for Star Wars' Imperial structure, because they make for willing sculptures, to be shaped into tools and into weapons as the structure so desires: the Empire runs on evil, but that evil is aided and abetted, and normalized across a galaxy, by a generation of Syrils Karn.
The blurred line between love and recognition in this structure becomes even further blurred in Andor's second season, as the unlikely, compellingly off-putting romance between Syril and Dedra flourishes alongside the latter's use of him as an eager field agent. At last, Syril seemingly has everything he wants: getting to play the dutiful Imperial citizen helping out in any way he can, while also getting the literal love of that regime through loving Dedra. But as much as the Empire craves people like Syril to use up in its engines, it similarly craves pushing them further and further as its desire for power and control becomes more brazen with confidence. So when Dedra and the Empire alike push that need, that yearning in Syril, to the limit on Ghorman, there was no other way he could break than badly. His physical abuse of Dedra when he finds out how much she knew about the Empire's plans for the Ghor is horrific, but it's a response born out of the thing the Empire made Syril into, a violent response to the betrayal of his subservience—of his love of Dedra and his love of the structure she represents—that dictates itself through violence.
And it's all that that sets the stage for his final act. Syril's final encounter with Cassian is a fascinating foil to his first all those years ago on Ferrix, a question of identity at gunpoint. On Ferrix, it was Cassian aiming the gun, uncaring of who exactly it was that it was pointed at. He needed information that Syril had; whoever he was or turned out to be was inconsequential, and not even worth the blaster bolt Luthen growled at Cassian to put in him. Who Syril Karn was was not a question worth asking in that moment. Five years later, amid the chaos of the Ghorman massacre—a slaughter Syril abetted as he yearned to have an answer to that question, to have purpose—it's only fitting that Cassian finally asks it. In doing so, Syril is broken one last time: the answer he thought he had built up over those years had just been ripped away from him, the love he thought he'd had as empty as the institution he had given his life to.
All that could be left, really, was the silence as the blaster bolt seared through his head. Used up and abandoned, in his final moments Syril Karn was nothing—another victim of the Empire on a day filled with them.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

ANDOR Showrunner Tony Gilroy Was Denied Only One Thing, Dropping STAR WARS' First F-Bomb
ANDOR Showrunner Tony Gilroy Was Denied Only One Thing, Dropping STAR WARS' First F-Bomb

Yahoo

time37 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

ANDOR Showrunner Tony Gilroy Was Denied Only One Thing, Dropping STAR WARS' First F-Bomb

We're all still reeling from the end of Andor, one of the greatest chapters in the entire Star Wars franchise. It's hard to believe that such a hard-hitting, grounded piece of storytelling came from the galaxy far, far away. Disney and Lucasfilm gave Andor showrunner (and Rogue One co-writer) Tony Gilroy a reported $650 million to produce Andor, and gave him almost full creative control. In fact, Gilroy is on the record as saying that Lucasfilm president Kathleen Kennedy allowed him to introduce subjects like police brutality and brothels in the very first episode without pushback. But Lucasfilm put their foot down with one thing. They denied Andor dropping Star Wars' first f-bomb. Speaking at the ATX TV Festival (via Fandom Wire), Gilroy said that in the two seasons of Andor, he received only one creative note from Disney. And it had to do with the use of profanity. In the first season, the speech by Cassian's adoptive mother Maarva (Fiona Shaw), originally ended with the words 'F*** the Empire'. Instead, Disney said 'Can you please not do that?' And so 'F*** the Empire' became 'Fight the Empire.' Which honestly works just as well. And the message isn't lost with 'Star Wars' first f-bomb' controversy. Funnily enough, Tony Gilroy did use Andor to become Star Wars' first official use of the s-word. This happened when Bail Organa tells Mon Mothma to 'Tear the shit out of this place' during her senate speech. Personally, we prefer when sci-fi fantasy franchises make up their own cuss words. Battlestar Galactica did it best with the word 'frak,' which worked great. We all knew what frak really meant, and they didn't have to worry about censors. 'E chu ta' is an example of ugly Star Wars universe slang/insult. But after all this time, we still don't know what it really means! C'mon Star Wars. Come up with a good f-bomb substitute already.

‘Streaming is dead' — Disney's waning appetite for big budget productions dogged creator of popular Star Wars series Andor
‘Streaming is dead' — Disney's waning appetite for big budget productions dogged creator of popular Star Wars series Andor

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

‘Streaming is dead' — Disney's waning appetite for big budget productions dogged creator of popular Star Wars series Andor

Andor creator Tony Gilroy reveals he had to fight tooth and nail with company execs to bring his second season of the critically acclaimed Star Wars series to life, as Disney told him 'we don't have the money we had before.' All told the two seasons and 24 episodes of Andor, the best received Star Wars series on Disney+, cost $650 million to produce. After a golden era of top-notch content for the small screen, is streaming now dead? That was at least the message Walt Disney managers wanted to impart on Andor's acclaimed creator Tony Gilroy when he began filming the past twelve episodes for the 126 million Disney+ subscribers. 'In Season 2, they said 'streaming is dead, we don't have the money we had before,' Gilroy said at the ATX Television Festival in comments reported by IndieWire, 'so we fought hard about money.' All told, production costs for the 24 mostly hour-long episodes across two seasons ran to $650 million, he said. A source familiar with the production told Variety the episodes cost roughly $20 million each after tax incentives, similar to the reported budgets of Warner Bros. Discovery's House of the Dragon and Severance from AppleTV+. Disney did not respond to a Fortune request for comment. Ever since Rian Johnson's hugely divisive The Last Jedi eight years ago, Lucasfilm has struggled to win fans of George Lucas' epic Star Wars trilogy back to his rich universe. A feature film hasn't hit theaters since 2019's The Rise of Skywalker, the disappointing conclusion to Rey Palpatine's saga. Andor has been the rare bright spot for the Disney studio, becoming easily the most critically acclaimed Star Wars entry on Disney+, according to Rotten Tomatoes. When the entertainment giant first launched its streaming service Disney+ in late 2019, money was no object as CEO Bob Iger needed more and more content to chase subscribers in the race with larger rival Netflix. But after a series of expensive flops including Lucasfilm's own fantasy series Willow and The Acolyte, set in the same Star Wars universe as Andor, the cash Disney was throwing around began to dry up. In February 2023, Iger pledged to investors he would slash $3 billion in content costs as part of a wider plan to achieve sustained profitability at its Entertainment Direct-To-Consumer streaming operations. Last month Disney posted its third straight quarterly operating profit for streaming, which now also fully consolidates Hulu after acquiring the remaining minority stake from Comcast. The Entertainment DTC business is now a core driver of earnings growth. In the first fiscal half through the end of March, the segment swung to $629 million operating profit from a loss of $91 million a year earlier, more than offsetting declines in its Linear Networks segment comprised of broadcast and cable assets. By comparison, only cash-rich tech companies seem to have the financial firepower to continue financing heavy losses with little regard to achieving profitability, a luxury that legacy media companies can ill afford. Apple, for example, has reportedly been willing to fund its streaming ambitions to the tune of $1 billion in losses on average per year. This story was originally featured on

Diddy trial replay: Jury pool narrows, but selection will have to wait
Diddy trial replay: Jury pool narrows, but selection will have to wait

Yahoo

time2 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Diddy trial replay: Jury pool narrows, but selection will have to wait

Editor's note: This page reflects the news from Sean "Diddy" Combs' trial on Wednesday, May 7. For the latest updates from Diddy's trial, read USA TODAY's live coverage for Friday, May 9. Jury selection in Sean "Diddy" Combs' ongoing sex crimes trial is continuing as prosecutors and the one-time mogul's attorneys face off over the pivotal panel. Lawyers reconvened in Manhattan court on May 7 to continue their interviews of prospective jurors in the high-profile legal proceeding. Jurors have been questioned one by one by Judge Arun Subramanian, the prosecution and the defense to determine their qualifications to serve. By the end of court proceedings on May 7, attorneys had narrowed down the 45 possible jurors needed to move forward in the process. Jurors were repeatedly asked if they, a family member or a friend had been a victim of sexual assault, sexual harassment or domestic violence, and whether they or a loved one had been charged or accused of such crimes. Diddy on trial newsletter: Step inside the courtroom as music mogul faces sex crimes charges During his final pretrial hearing on May 2, Combs, 55, confirmed he turned down a potential plea deal in the case. A judge previously rejected a request from the rapper's legal team to delay the start of the trial. Combs could spend the rest of his life in prison if convicted. The wide pool of potential jurors for Combs' trial has been narrowed to just 45 candidates after several days of intense questioning. Six women and five men were given the green light May 7, after lawyers for either side and the judge interviewed 22 candidates. Their age bracket ranging from mid-20s to early 70s, the group represents a varied cross-section of society, with one juror working as a graphic designer and another in administration at the counterterrorism office of the United Nations. The group who will decide Combs' fate is not yet in final ink, though, and the legal teams will need to return May 9 to select the actual jury ahead of opening statements set for next week Another potential juror was moved into the approved pool after being questioned about their social media habits. Combs' defense referenced a meme that they implied the potential juror may have interacted with on social media, but the juror chalked this up to "doomscrolling" and "mindlessly swiping." When the judge asked the juror if they had seen things while "doomscrolling" that might make them biased against Combs, they said no. The potential juror went to the same high school as Combs, though they graduated 30 years apart. One potential juror, questioned for about 25 minutes, continually sighed and trailed off in his speech. Subramanian noted that the man neglected to fill out all the questions on his juror questionnaire. "I was tired," the potential juror responded. "I was binging the new 'Star Wars' (series) 'Andor.' It just came out." Subramanian laughed at his admission and said, "Will you be able to concentrate or will you be too busy binging 'Andor'?" The potential juror said he would, responding, "Like I said, 'I was binging, I'm just being lazy.'" Although federal prosecutors said the potential juror was "meandering" and were worried about his "own personal discipline" if he was selected for the trial, Subramanian said none of his answers warranted a dismissal. He did, though, call the juror "sleep deprived." Combs' lawyer Agnifilo offered his opinion on the matter by quipping, "I'm very curious to watch what he was binging." One potential juror had an obvious conflict of interest: he was friendly with Subramanian after serving as his co-counsel in several cases, meaning they previously represented clients together. They have known each other for about 10 years. When the potential juror walked in, Subramanian amiably asked him: "What is your opinion of the judge in this case?" The prospective juror responded, "He is fair, he is gregarious and he is brilliant." The prosecutor said she was worried he would have "outsize influence on other jurors" because of his position. He was dismissed. One juror, who was admitted to the pool, said she had seen the footage released by CNN of Combs allegedly assaulting ex-girlfriend Cassie Ventura Fine, and that she "felt he would be guilty of domestic violence." When the judge reminded her that the charges against Combs in this case are not domestic violence, she said that she would aim "to judge people on what they actually did," and that she would "want to hear the whole story behind the video." As lawyers narrowed in on her ability to be balanced, she raised some eyebrows among journalists by seemingly walking back earlier sentiments. She said she thinks people tend to jump on the bandwagon to say something bad has happened to them – an apparent reference to the onslaught of civil suits Combs has faced in the wake of his federal indictment. The judge overseeing Combs' sex trafficking trial admonished a lawyer close to the hip-hop mogul's defense team for referring to the prosecutors in the case as a "six-pack of white women" in comments on a podcast. The lawyer, Mark Geragos, said in a May 2 episode of "Two Angry Men," a podcast he co-hosts with celebrity news website TMZ's founder Harvey Levin, that the racial and gender composition of the six-member prosecution team was "interesting." Geragos said race may be an "undercurrent" at the trial, but would not be a focus of Combs' defense. "That's something that you shouldn't, that no one should be saying as an officer of the Court and a member of the bar," Subramanian told Geragos in a private conversation in his robing room on May 6 before jury selection resumed, according to a trial transcript. "Referring to the prosecution in this case as a six-pack of white women is outrageous," said the judge, who is of South Asian descent. During his final pretrial hearing on May 2, Combs confirmed he turned down a potential plea deal. It is unclear what the deal consisted of. In addition to questions about a history of sexual assault, jurors were given a list of people and places related to Combs in some ways. The names included Michael B. Jordan, Kid Cudi, Cassie Ventura, Michelle Williams, Mike Myers, Dallas Austin, Lauren London and Dawn Richard. The list, a who's who of Hollywood and music elite, paints a picture of Combs' far-reaching influence in the entertainment industry. For example, Kid Cudi, an Ohio-born rapper who was briefly romantically involved with Combs' ex-girlfriend Cassie Ventura, is likely on the list as a 2023 civil lawsuit from Ventura against Combs accused the hip-hop mogul of threatening to blow up Cudi's car. (Ventura and Kid Cudi briefly dated "during a rough patch" in her relationship with Combs, she said.) Ventura, who is also on the list, alleged in a bombshell lawsuit in 2023 that Combs had trafficked, sexually assaulted and physically abused her during their decade-long relationship. The two "amicably" settled the lawsuit a day after her filing, and Combs' team alluded to a "substantial eight-figure settlement" in court documents for his criminal case. No, Mark Geragos, the famed attorney who has represented prominent people ranging from Michael Jackson to the Menendez brothers, isn't officially part of Combs' legal team. His daughter, Teny Geragos, is serving on Combs' defense. Mark Geragos has been seen in the courtroom since jury selection started earlier in the week. Prosecutors called out his presence in a letter to Subramanian, accusing Combs' defense of trying to consult with the longtime lawyer and saying he should have to abide by the rules set for attorneys in the case if he's working with Combs. Mark Geragos has denied his involvement, saying in a statement to CNN, "I'm here to support my daughter. (Combs) is a friend." Lisa Bloom, an attorney representing two accusers in civil cases against Combs and one in his criminal case, pointed to the number of potential jurors who have told the court they or a loved one are a sexual assault survivor. Jurors have repeatedly been asked about sexual assault and harassment due to the nature of the case against Combs, and almost all have said they have some personal connection to the crimes. "One thing that's made me sad sitting through the jury selection in the court is how many people say they have been the victim of sexual harassment or sexual assault, or somebody close to them has, it's still quite a large number," Bloom told NewsNation's "Banfield." "And if you break it down to the female jurors, even larger." Bloom is representing Danity Kane member Dawn Richard, a prominent Combs collaborator who accused him of physical and sexual abuse in a lawsuit last year. Richard claimed the producer stole her work, withheld payment and subjected her to "inhumane" working conditions, which included assault, groping and false imprisonment, over the course of nearly a decade. Combs' attorney denied the allegations at the time the lawsuit was filed. Cameras aren't allowed in the courtroom where Combs is on trial for sweeping sex crimes charges, but courtroom sketches are available of the one-time mogul. As his trial kicks off, Combs has been depicted with graying hair and often wearing a blue sweater over a white collared shirt. The outfits are intentional: Combs is allowed to have five shirts, five sweaters, five pairs of pants and two sets of lace less shoes to wear in the Manhattan federal courtroom, according to an order signed by Subramanian on April 30. That means he doesn't have to wear a jumpsuit assigned to him in the detention center where he has been held since his arrest last year. How does jury selection work in a case like this? Attorneys on both sides need to approve a group of 45 prospective jurors to ultimately select the 12 final jurors who will sit for the case alongside six alternates. While it looks like they could clear that 45-juror bar on May 7, prosecutors signaled the jury may be selected on May 9. They asked to perform peremptory strikes then, using a tool later in the week that allows lawyers to remove a potential juror without any cause, according to multiple reports. Lawyers don't get unlimited strikes, and they're not allowed in all courts. One person who won't be selected for the jury: A woman who works at HBO who had moved forward in the jury selection process. Combs' lawyers had objected to her being included because the media company recently released a documentary titled "The Fall of Diddy." The judge had denied the request because the potential juror didn't work on the film. But when Combs' lawyers raised the request again, the judge agreed after prosecutors consented. The trial will not be televised, as cameras are typically not allowed in federal criminal trial proceedings. USA TODAY will be reporting live from the courtroom. Nicole Westmoreland of Westmoreland Law LLC is the latest lawyer to join Combs' legal team after filing a notice of attorney appearance with the court on May 6. Combs' defense team was already led by attorneys Marc Agnifilo and Teny Geragos. Both are founding partners at Agnifilo Intrater. Geragos is "particularly experienced in defending and investigating allegations of sexual misconduct," according to the firm's website. Brian Steel, who represented Young Thug in the rapper's RICO trial, is also working with Combs, as are attorneys Alexandra Shapiro, Xavier R. Donaldson, Anna Maria Estevao and Jason Driscoll. Combs will argue at his sex trafficking trial that women who took part in his elaborate sex parties did so willingly, but his lawyers will face an uphill battle trying to undermine the credibility of accusers who say the hip-hop mogul forced them to participate. Prosecutors with the Manhattan U.S. Attorney's office say that for two decades, he used his business empire to lure women into his orbit with promises of romantic relationships or financial support and then used violence and threats to obligate them to take part in days-long, drug-fueled sexual performances known as "Freak Offs" with male sex workers. "The defense has quite the uphill battle ahead," said Heather Cucolo, a New York Law School professor. "There was a clear power dynamic, and that power dynamic is going to be a main focus and a main issue here." Lawyers for Combs have said prosecutors are improperly trying to criminalize a consensual "swingers" lifestyle in which he and his longtime girlfriends sometimes brought a third person into their relationships. Combs is facing federal sex crimes and trafficking charges in a sprawling suit that has eroded his status as a power player and kingmaker in the entertainment industry. He was arrested in September and has been charged with racketeering, sex trafficking and transportation to engage in prostitution. He has pleaded not guilty to all five counts. His indictment emerged alongside dozens of separate civil suits suggesting a pattern of abusive behavior and exploitation spanning decades, including accusations of rape, sexual assault and physical violence. Assuming all parties can agree on 45 jurors by the end of the May 7 session, the prosecution and defense will spend May 8-9 preparing for opening statements, which begin May 12. Despite repeated attempts at bail, Combs was ordered to remain in custody at the Special Housing Unit in Brooklyn's Metropolitan Detention Center ahead of trial — a ruling his legal team has challenged in the Second Circuit Court of Appeals. He's been jailed since his arrest on Sept. 16, 2024. Contributing: Patrick Ryan and Anna Kaufman, USA TODAY; Reuters This article originally appeared on USA TODAY: Diddy trial: When will jury selection in Sean Combs' case finalize?

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store