Activists set sail for Gaza with Greta Thunberg on board
Activists intend to bring aid supplies to the Gaza Strip using a sailing ship, with Swedish activist Greta Thunberg on board.
The Madleen has set sail from the Sicilian city of Catania, a spokeswoman for the Freedom Flotilla Coalition confirmed on Sunday, adding that 12 activists from various countries are on board.
The activists had announced their intention to use the ship to break through what they described as "Israel's illegal blockade" of the coastal strip and to bring "humanitarian aid, hope and solidarity to Gaza."
Baby food and medical supplies are reportedly on board. The group aims, according to their own statements, to draw international attention to the humanitarian situation on the ground with their action.
A month ago, activists had already attempted to show solidarity with Gaza with an aid boat. At that time, a fire broke out on one of the ships they were using near the Mediterranean island of Malta. Activists said it was a drone attack, while the Maltese government rejected this.
Thunberg had previously wanted to join her fellow activists on board. The 22-year-old became known for her determined fight for more action on climate change, but for some time now, she has been particularly advocating for the Palestinians. In doing so, she repeatedly criticizes Israel's actions in the Gaza war.
Israel had recently slightly eased a nearly three-month blockade of food, medicine and other essential supplies to the Gaza Strip. Israel says it wants to pressure the Palestinian Islamist Hamas movement to release the hostages it is holding in the coastal area.
Israel's offensive on Gaza, which began after the Hamas attacks in October 2023, has now lasted for more than a year and a half.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
37 minutes ago
- Yahoo
How the Boulder attack highlights the danger to soft targets
New Orleans, Harrisburg, Washington D.C., and now Boulder -- four attacks, all carried out by radicalized individuals targeting soft civilian locations. These tragedies have left communities grieving and the nation once again asking: why? Since the 9/11 terrorist attacks, the threat landscape in the U.S. has evolved dramatically. That coordinated attack involved complex planning, training and support networks. MORE: Boulder group leader recounts 'panic' as attack unfolded: 'They're literally on fire' Nearly a quarter century later, terrorist groups have adapted. Instead of highly organized cells, they now often rely on so-called "lone wolves" -- people radicalized in isolation who require little to no external coordination. These actors can strike without warning, making prevention increasingly difficult. The 2025 Department of Homeland Security Threat Analysis highlights this shift. "Lone offenders and small groups continue to pose the greatest threat of carrying out attacks with little to no warning," it said. "Violent extremist responses to domestic sociopolitical developments -- especially the 2024 election cycle -- and international events are likely to inspire attacks in the Homeland." This observation aligns with the findings of the 2015 study "Lone Wolf Terrorism in America," which defined lone wolf terrorism as politically motivated violence carried out independently, without direct command or ties to established groups. The radicalization of these individuals, the study found, often follows a pattern: personal and political grievances, online affinity with extremist sympathizers, identification of an enabler, broadcasting of intent and a final triggering event. In today's digital age, the radicalization process has been drastically accelerated by the internet and dark web. Radicalization is the key to perpetuating these attacks and the study validated a series of commonalities associated with pathways to radicalization for lone wolf terrorists. MORE: Pittsburgh synagogue massacre: Remembering the 11 victims The radicalization model indicated that lone wolf terrorism begins with a combination of personal and political grievances which form the basis for an affinity with online sympathizers, which is what we have seen in large measure since the start of the Israel-Hamas war. This is followed by the identification of an enabler, followed by the broadcasting of terrorist intent. The final commonality is a triggering event, or the catalyst for terrorism, as noted by the National Institute of Justice. It highlighted that terrorist organizations now have unprecedented access to vulnerable individuals, who can be radicalized and equipped with rudimentary tools of violence -- all with the click of a mouse. A 2017 University of Maryland study drove the point home. "Since 2006, 98% of all deaths from terrorism in the U.S. have resulted from attacks carried out by lone actors," it said. Their preferred targets? Almost always soft ones -- unprotected public spaces where civilians gather freely. MORE: 2 Israeli Embassy staffers killed in 'act of terror' in Washington, DC Combating this expanding threat requires focused action across three key areas: mindset, signatures and planning. America must move from a place of denial to proactive vigilance. A security mindset involves proactively considering potential risks, vulnerabilities and taking steps to mitigate them. This includes thinking like an attacker and constantly being on the lookout for security flaws, which is best done with the coordination of local law enforcement. Mindset for the public also includes accepting the "see something say something" mantra and ensuring that whenever anyone sees something strange or makes them uncomfortable, they report it to 911 or local law enforcement. That may mitigate a threat in itself. Public participation is vital. Adopting a "see something, say something" approach and encouraging citizens to report suspicious activity to authorities can help thwart attacks before they happen. MORE: Gov. Shapiro gives sit-down interview from residence after arson attack For law enforcement, prevention depends on recognizing key behavioral signatures: Political or personal grievances. Alignment with online extremist networks. Public declarations of violent intent. Association with enablers. Recent triggering events. Early identification of these markers can be crucial in stopping a threat before it materializes. Public events and soft targets -- places like music festivals, sporting venues, shopping centers, houses of worship, or restaurants -- are attractive to attackers because of minimal security and maximum impact. Security planning must become an essential part of every public gathering, regardless of size or location. This means: Coordinating with local law enforcement. Developing tailored incident response plans. Training staff and volunteers on emergency procedures. Creating systems to report and respond to concerns. The Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) emphasizes the importance of planning to secure public gatherings. We must confront the reality that terrorism today often does not come from abroad or in large groups -- it comes from within, from individuals radicalized online and motivated by perceived injustice or ideological fervor. These lone actors, acting on grievance and enabled by the internet, present a formidable and evolving threat to American public life. To keep communities safe, security must no longer be an afterthought. It must be integrated into every public event and venue -- supported by awareness, informed by intelligence and rooted in partnership between citizens and authorities. Only through collective vigilance and proactive planning can we hope to disrupt the next lone wolf before they strike. Donald J. Mihalek is an ABC News contributor, retired senior Secret Service agent and regional field training instructor who served during two presidential transitions. He was also a police officer and served in the U.S. Coast Guard. Richard Frankel is an ABC News contributor and retired FBI special agent who was the special agent in charge of the FBI's Newark Division and prior to that, the FBI's New York Joint Terrorism TASK force. The opinions expressed in this story are not those of ABC News.
Washington Post
41 minutes ago
- Washington Post
Israel says it fired ‘warning shots' near aid site; health officials say 27 dead
JERUSALEM — Twenty-seven people were killed and at least 160 injured in a shooting Tuesday near an aid distribution site in southern Gaza, Gaza's Health Ministry and the International Committee of the Red Cross said. In a statement, the Israeli military said its troops fired warning shots at Palestinians who had strayed from a route leading to the site.
CNN
an hour ago
- CNN
Boston Consulting Group terminates contract with controversial US-backed Gaza aid organization
A US consulting firm has canceled its contract with the controversial US and Israel-backed aid organization set up to distribute food and humanitarian supplies as famine conditions worsen in war-ravaged Gaza, a spokesperson for Boston Consulting Group told CNN. 'Unapproved follow-on work relating to Gaza lacked buy-in from multilateral stakeholders and was stopped on May 30. BCG has not and will not be paid for any of this work,' the spokesperson said. The BCG partner who was in charge of the work with the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation has been put on administrative leave while a formal review of the firm's involvement is carried out, the spokesperson added. The news comes as nearly 30 Palestinians were killed and dozens were injured on Tuesday after coming under fire for a third consecutive day near an aid distribution site operated by the organization in southern Gaza, according to the Palestinian Ministry of Health and Nasser hospital. The Israeli military said its forces opened fire multiple times after identifying 'several suspects moving toward them, deviating from the designated access routes.' 'The troops carried out warning fire, and after the suspects failed to retreat, additional shots were directed near a few individual suspects who advanced toward the troops,' the Israel Defense Forces (IDF) said in a statement, which also said they are looking into reports of casualties. The deadly incidents have exacerbated concerns about the organization, which is meant to run a new, tightly controlled, mechanism for aid deliveries into Gaza, but has been criticized by the United Nations and others, who warn the way it operates is endangering civilians and is likely to further displace Palestinians. The GHF's plan for delivering aid was approved by Israel and the US, which have said it is designed to prevent Hamas from 'stealing' aid. Asked about reports of BCG severing ties with the organization, a senior Trump administration official suggested without evidence that it was tied to media coverage. BCG's decision is a further blow to the organization and comes a week after the group's Executive Director Jake Wood quit. The consulting firm began working with GHF in October 2024 to 'help establish an aid organization intended to operate alongside multilateral efforts to deliver humanitarian support to Gaza,' the spokesperson said. Despite the break with the outside firm, the foundation said that it would continue its work 'full-steam ahead.' GHF has delivered more than 7 million meals in eight days, said John Acree, GHF's interim director. 'In an operating environment as complex and volatile as Gaza, that kind of safe, direct, and large-scale aid delivery is unprecedented. We remain focused on one thing: getting food to the people who need it most. And right now, we are the only organization doing that at scale, with consistency and safety,' Acree added. CNN's Oren Liebermann and Jennifer Hansler contributed reporting.
