‘Illegal' among words most often linked to migrants in UK politics, report finds
The word 'illegal' has been one of the terms most strongly associated with migrants in UK parliamentary debates over the past 25 years, research has found.
Findings from the Runnymede Trust, published on Friday, examine how politicians and the media have portrayed migrants, refugees and Muslims in their discourse.
The first of two reports, A Hostile Environment: Language, Race, Politics and the Media, analysed parliamentary and media discussions from 2010 to 2014. It found that 'illegal' was the most commonly linked word to migrants in parliamentary debates.
Researchers say this framing reinforces the perception of migration as inherently unlawful.
Other frequently associated words during that period included 'non-EU', 'skilled', 'economic', 'temporary' and 'influx'.
A forthcoming second report, covering 2019 to 2024, is due to be released soon. However, early findings shared exclusively with the Guardian indicate that 'economic' and 'illegal' remain the top two words linked to migrants, alongside 'undocumented', 'cross', 'former' and 'skilled'.
The report also notes that after Theresa May's 2012 pledge to 'create a hostile environment for illegal immigrants', media coverage containing hostile rhetoric around migration and migrants more than doubled (a 137% increase) compared with the two years before.
At least 60 racial justice, migrants' rights and Muslim organisations have written to the government, urging action against what they describe as growing levels of racism.
The letter, sent six months after riots erupted across England, calls for urgent action to address the root causes and warns against treating them solely as a law and order issue.
'In the context of growing far-right sentiment across the globe, there is a real threat of renewed and increasing racist violence if we do not reset our approach,' the statement reads.
'Racist violence on the streets, and its explosion into online spaces, is a manifestation of the deep racism across our society. This painful anniversary should serve as a reminder of the need to address that and prevent further violence.'
The statement has been signed by the Runnymede Trust, the Institute of Race Relations, Migrants Organise, IMIX, Inquest, the Joint Council for the Welfare of Immigrants, and Maslaha.
The signatories call for the government to consult with racial justice and migrants' rights organisations to develop a long-term anti-racism strategy.
They also urge the government to acknowledge the role that hostile rhetoric and policies towards Muslims, migrants and refugees have played in fuelling far-right extremism. They demand an end to policies shaped by far-right narratives and call for an official definition of racism against Muslims.
Dr Shabna Begum, the chief executive of the Runnymede Trust, said: 'Last summer's racist riots are the outcome of normalised and intensifying racism, fuelled by politicians and the media and allowed to fester in online spaces. This anniversary is a stark reminder that hostile immigration policies and the racism they fuel can lead to devastating violence.'
Liz Fekete, the director of the Institute of Race Relations, added: 'Last summer's riots should not be seen as a one-off event but as part of an ongoing problem of racism, with continued physical attacks, abuse, and death threats online. What is needed from the government is a strategy that, from the outset, recognises that economic justice, anti-racism and community cohesion go hand in hand. Is the government capable of meeting that challenge?'
Zrinka Bralo, the chief executive of Migrants Organise, said: 'The racist riots of August 2024 have exposed the government's catastrophic failure to protect refugees and people seeking asylum in our country. For years, we warned that inflammatory rhetoric and inhumane policies would embolden far-right extremists.
'The government's refusal to provide safe, community based accommodation and its insistence on housing vulnerable people in disused barracks and profit-driven hotels continue to put them at risk of attacks and harassment.'
The Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government was approached for comment.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Reuters
2 hours ago
- Reuters
Slovakia will block EU's Russia sanctions if they harm national interests, Fico says
June 8 (Reuters) - Slovakia will block any European Union sanctions against Russia that damage its national interests, Prime Minister Robert Fico said on Sunday after parliament approved a resolution calling on the government not to back any new measures. Fico said that Slovakia wanted to stay constructive within the bloc, but he called the resolution a political tool with a strong message. "If there is a sanction that would harm us, I will never vote for it," Fico told a news conference shown on his party's YouTube page. Slovakia, a NATO and European Union member, has diverged from Western allies in its position on Ukraine under Fico and his leftist-nationalist government coalition, and stopped official state military aid to Kyiv as it battles Russia's invasion. Fico has also been an opponent of sanctioning Russia for its war against Ukraine, saying trade measures damage Slovakia and the EU more than Moscow. The new resolution, approved in a thinly attended parliamentary session, committed government members not to vote for new sanctions and trade limitations towards Russia. It had not been immediately clear to what extent the resolution was constitutionally binding. Fico said he could not support any measure stopping the import of Russian fuel for Slovakia's nuclear power plants. "I am interested in being a constructive player in the European Union, but not at the expense of Slovakia." Slovakia has not blocked any previous EU sanctions, including a 17th package targeting Moscow's shadow fleet, adopted in May. Attempts to hit Russia's gas and nuclear sectors have consistently hit obstacles, with opposition from Slovakia and other countries, like Hungary, that still rely on Russian energy supplies.
The National
5 hours ago
- The National
Richard Tice in row with Laura Kuenssberg over Anas Sarwar comments
The deputy leader of Reform UK doubled down on his party's recent attack advert against Scottish Labour, which has been widely condemned as "racist", during the BBC's Sunday with Laura Kuenssberg programme. The political advert, which was seen by more than one million people on Facebook, falsely claimed that Sarwar would 'prioritise the Pakistani community'. READ MORE: Scottish Government urges Chancellor to drop 'damaging' cuts ahead of spending review The ad includes selected clips from a video spread by far and alt-right agitators on social media in a bid to claim that Europe was under threat from 'multiculturalism' and mass immigration, specifically of Muslims. While it has been branded "racist" by both the SNP and Scottish Labour, Farage doubled down and went on to tell a press conference in London that Sarwar had "introduced sectarianism into Scottish politics". During the programme on Sunday, Kuenssberg asked Tice about his party leader's comments, saying: "Your leader Nigel Farage claimed that the Muslim Scottish Labour leader Anas Sarwar had said that he would prioritise the Pakistani community. "He did not use those words. Was Nigel Farage's claim false?" Tice refused to be drawn on whether the claim was false, as he said: "No, look, what we would talk about was that actually, the Labour leader in Scotland was essentially sort of developing sectarian politics, and we called that out. "We had the Scottish by-election and we came within 750 people of winning it. "So the ridiculous claims made by the other main politicians in Scotland about us, frankly, the voters have just ignored, and we came within a whisker of an absolute shock, a seismic shock. Richard Tice "We got 26%, it was a three-way marginal, and I think Scottish politics is changing." Reform UK came third in Thursday's Hamilton, Larkhall and Stonehouse by-election, with their candidate Ross Lambie winning 7088 votes. The party won 26.2% of the vote share but were 1471 votes away from beating Scottish Labour's Davy Russell, not 750 votes as Tice – who was at the count – claimed on Sunday. Tice went on: "We had a very simple slogan that seemed to work. 'Drill, Scotland, drill'. The oil and gas industry generates huge prosperity for Scotland, for the United Kingdom, and we should be embracing it and enhancing it, not shutting it down, which the Labour Government has essentially followed what the Tories did before with the ridiculous windfall tax." Kuenssberg returned to Farage's claims about the Scottish Labour leader, as she asked: "Do you not think it's important to say things that are true in politics? "Mr Farage claimed that Anas Sarwar had used words that he simply did not. He made a false claim on a sensitive issue. Was he wrong to do that?" Tice then doubled down on his party's claims about Sarwar bringing in sectarianism into Scottish politics. "No, look, it is sensitive, you're right," he said. "But was it right for Mr Sarwar to claim that Pakistanis and the South Asian community should, for example, dominate and dictate the Scottish educational agenda?" READ MORE: The Supreme Court's sex ruling faces legal challenges – will they succeed? Kuenssberg interrupted: "My question to you is whether or not it was right for Mr Farage to make a false claim about words Anas Sarwar did not use?" Tice said: "Well, you can interpret. I think in the overall context it was not a false claim. "It was what Mr Sarwar was doing, which was bringing sectarian politics into Scottish politics. And that is wrong, that's not how we do things." First Minister John Swinney said at the time that Farage had "brought racism and hatred" into the by-election campaign, as the SNP submitted a formal complaint to Meta, Facebook's parent company. Meanwhile, Sarwar branded Farage a "poisonous man who doesn't understand Scotland". Scottish Labour have been contacted for comment.
The Herald Scotland
8 hours ago
- The Herald Scotland
GOP lawmaker slammed for 'hateful' post about congressional chaplain
"This should have never been allowed to happen," she wrote. "America was founded as a Christian nation, and I believe our government should reflect that truth, not drift further from it." Initially, Miller misidentified the man, Giani Surinder Singh of the Gurdwara South Jersey Sikh Society, as Muslim. Her X account later edited the post to correctly describe him as Sikh before deleting the comment entirely. Muslims are adherents to Islam. Sikhism is a different religion, the fifth largest in the world. It was founded in the Punjab region of South Asia. There are roughly 750,000 Sikhs in the United States, according to the Sikh Coalition. A spokesperson for Miller did not immediately respond to a request for comment. Miller's remarks swiftly prompted backlash from Democrats and Republicans. "A Sikh prayer on the House floor--followed by a Christian prayer one week and a Jewish prayer the next--doesn't violate the Constitution, offend my Catholic faith, or throttle my support for Israel," wrote Rep. Nick LaLota, R-New York, on X. "Live and let live." Rep. David Valadao, R-California, also said he was "troubled" by Miller's post. Democratic leadership denounced Miller's comments, too. "It's deeply troubling that such an ignorant and hateful extremist is serving in the United States Congress," Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries wrote on X. "That would be you, Mary." Zachary Schermele is an education reporter for USA TODAY. You can reach him by email at zschermele@ Follow him on X at @ZachSchermele and Bluesky at @
