logo
White House sends Dr. Oz to calm Senate nerves

White House sends Dr. Oz to calm Senate nerves

Politico7 hours ago

The Senate Republican megabill
is ailing. The White House thinks it has a doctor for that.
Dr. Mehmet Oz, the celebrity surgeon best known for dispensing medical advice on television and now a top Trump health official, has emerged as the administration's go-to salesman for the sweeping Medicaid overhaul at the center of the GOP's legislative ambitions.
Oz is increasingly pressing Republicans to back controversial cuts to the health program for low-income Americans, trekking to Capitol Hill several times in recent weeks to push for their support. He's privately counseled Republican senators and governors nervous over the potential fallout for their home states, and publicly promoted the far-reaching changes in a flurry of interviews.
And as the White House and Congress race to meet a self-imposed July 4 deadline to pass the legislation, officials are betting that Oz's medical credentials — and his personal star power — can convince Republicans and their constituents to embrace the legislation despite warnings it will cost millions of people their health care coverage.
'The more he can be out talking to members, and just in general, about the changes we're making and why they're so important and good is very helpful,' said Sen. John Hoeven (R-N.D.), who has urged senior White House aides to deploy Oz more frequently in the coming days. 'We think we've put together a good product, but there's others that we're still working to get on board.'
The megabill push represents the most visible role Oz has taken since joining the administration in April as Medicaid and Medicare chief, where he oversees an agency responsible for more than 160 million Americans' health care despite having little government or policymaking experience.
It's also perhaps the toughest sales job of his career, requiring Oz to sway skeptical Republicans in favor of policies that are projected to eliminate health insurance for 16 million people — many of whom live in red states.
Several Republicans remain wary of provisions that could cut insurance coverage and upend the finances of hospitals in their states. They've bristled at the efforts by Oz and others to downplay the tax-and-spending bill's implications, threatening to withhold their votes over worries it would decimate access to care where it's most needed.
'Our goal here needs to be to protect rural hospitals and make sure that they can keep their doors open,' said Sen. Josh Hawley (R-Mo.), one of a handful of holdouts who has expressed reservations about the depth of the Medicaid cuts.
At the same time, a separate GOP faction has demanded deeper cuts to government spending, with some taking their case this week directly to President Donald Trump. And among the public, polls show only a small minority of Americans support the overall bill.
The White House is nevertheless counting on Oz to play a central role in building support for the legislation, calculating that he has both the health care background and the bedside manner to assuage lawmakers' policy concerns.
A cardiothoracic surgeon by training, Oz became a daytime television fixture first as a health expert for The Oprah Winfrey Show before helming his own health and wellness show for more than a decade. A longtime Trump friend who frequently speaks with the president, the 65 year old has also maintained close ties to some Republican senators from his own failed run for office just a few years ago.
On Monday, Oz met with Senate Republican chiefs of staff to push for a decision on a so-called provider tax provision that has proven particularly politically divisive, while also trying to dissuade them from seeking new, deeper Medicaid cuts. The session followed an appearance last week at GOP senators' group lunch to pitch the merits of the bill's health care provisions.
'He's a very big asset in getting us across the finish line,' said a White House official, granted anonymity to discuss internal strategy. 'He has a lot of credibility to go into these lawmaker discussions, to talk to them and hear concerns out and then give the administration's viewpoint.'
Within the administration, Oz helped shape the White House's public messaging on Medicaid, at various points blaming 'lots of lobbyists' for fueling criticism of the bill, while downplaying its impact on health coverage across a series of television interviews — even amid nonpartisan projections that hundreds of billions of dollars would be cut from the safety net program.
'There is no scenario, not in this bill, not in anywhere I've seen, where we're not spending more money on Medicaid,' Oz said in a recent Newsmax interview.
Those aggressive performances have won praise among Trump officials, who dispatched him at times to help lawmakers and other allies workshop their own talking points. The work has also raised Oz's standing in the White House, where senior aides have been impressed by what two White House officials familiar with the dynamics and granted anonymity to discuss them described as his willingness to be a team player in government after decades as a high-profile celebrity.
'For over a decade, Dr. Oz developed a personal rapport with millions of Americans who tuned into his iconic TV show about health and wellness,' White House spokesman Kush Desai said in a statement, adding that as CMS administrator he's 'leveraging the immense intellect and telegenic charm he used build that following to now help President Trump deliver on his mandate of protecting and preserving Medicaid by slashing waste, fraud, and abuse.'
Yet as the megabill hits the home stretch, the persistent divide among Republican lawmakers has also exposed the limits of his salesmanship. Despite overseeing the Medicaid program and facing the task of enacting whatever policy is signed into law, Oz — barely three months into his first government job — has had little direct control over the specifics of the policy negotiations. Those details have instead been coordinated largely between White House domestic policy aides and Republican leaders on the Hill.
That has limited his ability to win over skeptics across the health care industry, including hospital groups that have been particularly outspoken in drumming up concerns about the bill's impact on Medicaid.
In one private meeting with hospital representatives earlier this month, Oz listened as they detailed the sprawling financial consequences for providers should Republicans forge ahead with major changes to Medicaid, according to a person in the room. But he had little to offer in response, insisting primarily that the GOP needed to find ways to limit the government's health spending.
'I don't know what he believes,' said the person, who was granted anonymity to detail the closed-door discussion. 'He's a real bright guy and everything, but he doesn't have control of the policy.'
Oz now faces an even trickier situation with the politically delicate provider tax that's divided Republicans on the Hill, jeopardizing the race to the party's July 4 deadline. After Senate lawmakers debuted a deeper funding cut than what Republicans proposed in the House, Oz publicly defended the effort, blasting the existing arrangements between states and hospitals as a form of 'legalized money laundering' that the administration needs to remedy, and breaking with Hawley and other GOP skeptics.
'I would disagree that that money goes to rural hospitals,' Oz said in a CNN appearance. 'The reality is that extra money that's left over goes to hospitals that are better connected, the hospitals with the biggest lobbyists and the best ability to influence what happens in the state capitals.'
Yet behind closed doors days later, Oz struck a more measured note, nudging Senate GOP staffers instead to stick to the language laid out by the House.
'He is a really gifted communicator,' said Avik Roy, chair of the Foundation for Research on Equal Opportunity and a longtime conservative policy expert. 'He may exceed people's expectations. But obviously what matters to some degree is what the policy is. And is the policy something that ordinary people are going to buy as a good policy?'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

RFK Jr. Admits He Knows Nothing About Actually Treating Measles
RFK Jr. Admits He Knows Nothing About Actually Treating Measles

Yahoo

time9 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

RFK Jr. Admits He Knows Nothing About Actually Treating Measles

Despite issuing guidance that measles can be treated with simple vitamins, Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. admitted Tuesday that he's never actually had to help someone recover from the disease before. Kennedy was excoriated by Washington Representative Kim Schrier before the House Energy and Commerce Subcommittee on Health Tuesday. She torched Kennedy for continuing to spread vaccine misinformation and refusing to listen to medical experts while he leads the nation's public health policy. 'Have you ever treated measles?' asked Schrier, a former physician. 'No,' Kennedy said with a short laugh. 'Well I have,' Schrier said. 'Let me tell you how miserable it is: These kids have high fevers, struggling to breathe, and they are crying. They suffer. The great thing is that there's a vaccine to prevent it.' Centers for Disease Control and Prevention officials have described the current measles outbreak in Texas as the worst uptick the agency has seen in measles cases in the last 25 years. But the lackadaisical public response to the contagion has only been made worse by Kennedy's politics, which include unfounded claims that the disease-eradicating vaccine was contributing to higher autism rates in kids. Schrier also accused Kennedy of lying to Republican Senator Bill Cassidy during his February confirmation hearings when he promised not to alter the CDC's Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices. Cassidy was a critical vote for Kennedy clinching the Cabinet role. 'But then two weeks ago you fired all 17 experts on that very committee. Mr. Secretary, question for you, did you lie to Senator Cassidy when you told him you would not change this panel of experts?' Schrier asked. Kennedy denied having made that commitment altogether, calling it 'inaccurate.' 'I made an agreement with him, and he and I talked many times about that agreement,' he said of Cassidy. Kennedy claimed that all 17 members had potential conflicts of interest before instating eight new members who were reputed vaccine and Covid-19 skeptics. In May, Kennedy justified a religious Texas community's decision not to receive the vaccine by claiming that the measles vaccine contains 'aborted fetus debris' as well as 'DNA particles.' It should go without saying, but the measles-mumps-rubella vaccine does not contain pieces of aborted fetuses. The vaccine contains live or weakened measles, mumps, and rubella viruses and ingredients to stabilize the solution. The return of historically eradicated diseases is thanks to a growing movement of anti-vax parents who refuse to provide their children with the same public health advantages that they received in their youth, mostly in fear of thoroughly debunked conspiracy theories. The researcher who sparked that myth with a fraudulent paper lost his medical license and eventually rescinded his opinion. Since then, dozens of studies have proven there's no correlation between autism and vaccines, including one study that surveyed more than 660,000 children over the course of 11 years. But America's is not the first measles response that Kennedy has bungled. Under Kennedy's stewardship, the anti-vax nonprofit Children's Health Defense had its own questionable history with the disease. Preceding a deadly measles outbreak on Samoa in 2019, the organization spread rampant misinformation about the efficacy of vaccines throughout the nation, sending the island's vaccination rate plummeting from the 60–70 percent range to just 31 percent, according to Mother Jones. That year, the country reported 5,707 cases of measles as well as 83 measles-related deaths, the majority of which were children under the age of 5.

House Republicans advance 2026 Homeland Security funding bill
House Republicans advance 2026 Homeland Security funding bill

The Hill

time10 minutes ago

  • The Hill

House Republicans advance 2026 Homeland Security funding bill

House Republicans advanced legislation on Tuesday laying out funding plans for the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) for fiscal 2026, calling for boosts to immigration enforcement efforts. The GOP-led House Appropriations Committee approved the bill along party lines on Tuesday evening after members spent hours debating the legislation and proposed changes to the text. The bill allows for about $66 billion in total discretionary funding for fiscal year 2026, with the non-defense portion of those funds accounting for roughly $63 billion, or nearly two percent higher than current levels. It also calls for about a one percent decrease in defense funds for the annual bill, amounting to about $3.3 billion. Additionally, the bill allows for $26.5 billion in funding for what negotiators describe as 'major disaster response and recovery activities' and $6.3 billion in discretionary appropriations offset by fee collections. The measure comes as Republicans are also looking to greenlight further funding for the administration's mass deportation plans and immigration enforcement as part of a separate package aimed at advancing the president's tax agenda that GOP leadership hopes to pass before August. Among the biggest increases in the plan advanced on Tuesday is a nearly $1 billion boost for the U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), which would see $11 billion under the House GOP proposal. Republicans say the funding would allow for 50,000 detention beds, an increase for Transportation and Removal Operations to 'effectuate the removal orders of the more than 1.3 million aliens who no longer have a legal basis to remain in this country.' The bill calls for $31.8 billion for the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), or a $4.5 billion jump above current levels, and proposes $26.5 billion for the Disaster Relief Fund (DRF). It would also boost funds for the Transportation Security Administration, U.S. Coast Guard and Federal Law Enforcement Training Centers. However, it pushes to cut funding for a list of offices while calling for the elimination of the Shelter and Services Program, the Case Management Pilot Program, funding for soft-sided facilities, the Office of Immigration Detention Ombudsman, the Family Reunification Task Force and border management activities. It would also reduce funding for the Office of Civil Rights and Civil Liberties, the Office of the Secretary, the Office of Public Affairs, the Office of Policy, the Office of the General Counsel and the Office of Legislative Affairs. Republicans have touted the bill as delivering on key investments for the Trump administration's immigration enforcement and border security efforts. 'Alongside renewed leadership in the White House, we are replacing the consequences of past weakness with a posture of strong U.S. preparedness,' Rep. Mark Amodei (R-Nev.), head of the subcommittee that crafted the annual DHS funding bill, said in a statement. 'From our borders and ports to aviation and cyber, we deliver the personnel, training, and technology to reinforce our community defenses and confront those who wish us harm. I commend the advancement of this legislation, which ensures our laws are enforced, our agencies are equipped, and our citizens are protected.' But in a bill report accompanying the funding legislation, appropriators also detailed concerns with ICE's 'financial management practices,' which they noted 'have led to an inappropriate and disproportionate reliance on reprogramming and transfer authority to ensure solvency at the end of any given fiscal year over the past decade.' 'Actions already taken in fiscal year 2025 are especially egregious—ICE began spending more than its appropriated level shortly after the fiscal year commenced and operations now far exceed available resources,' it said, referring to the fiscal year that runs from October 2024 to September 2025. 'In order to sustain this heightened operational tempo, ICE has and will likely continue to use the bill's transfer and reprogramming authority to the maximum extent, once again taking from other components' operational priorities.' Democrats have come out in staunch opposition to the overall House GOP funding proposal. 'It fails to protect American citizens from being confronted in their homes and offices, or having their property seized, as this Administration's deportation policies ignore the boundaries of our laws,' Rep. Lauren Underwood (Ill.), top Democrat on the subcommittee alongside Amodei, said in a statement. 'It shamefully allows law enforcement to continue snatching people off the street, at church, at schools, without requiring proper identification or due process.' 'Meanwhile, the White House requested zero dollars to supplement FEMA's Disaster Relief Fund that all Americans rely on to recover from major disasters, and fails to acknowledge an urgent $8 billion dollar deficit in the DRF.' The committee considered a series of amendments on Tuesday during the hearing, including proposals by Democrats seeking to block the detention of U.S. citizens, the elimination of FEMA, or the dismantling of the Building Resilient Infrastructure and Communities program. An amendment offered by Rep. Andrew Clyde (R-Ga.) also sought to further reduce funding for the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) in the bill, which currently calls for $2.7 billion for the agency, or about $135 million lower than current levels. In detailing the amendment on Tuesday, Clyde said his proposal would reduce funding for the agency to be more in line with cuts sought in President Trump's fiscal year 2026 budget request level for the agency. 'I believe this cut is necessary to rein in the waste abuse and mission drift and politicization, political weaponization, excuse me, that plague to CISA under the Biden-Harris administration, as well as to return the agency to its core mission,' he said, while praising the Trump administration for 'proposing a $491 million cut to CISA.' However, Clyde ultimately withdrew his amendment, saying he reserved 'to offer on the floor.' In remarks at votes later he told The Hill that he thinks the House floor is a 'better venue than in committee,' adding he thinks 'we'll be more successful on the House floor than we would in committee.' Amodei told The Hill shortly after that he opposed the amendment and said 'it wouldn't get adopted' if brought to a vote in committee, adding he thinks 'CISA's taken enough hits already.' 'They've been punished enough for their alleged prior administration stuff, time to move on, especially since we're not in the middle of a receding threat environment,' he said.

Life on the other side: Refugees from 'old media' flock to the promise of working for themselves
Life on the other side: Refugees from 'old media' flock to the promise of working for themselves

Yahoo

time12 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Life on the other side: Refugees from 'old media' flock to the promise of working for themselves

NEW YORK (AP) — Six months ago, Jennifer Rubin had no idea whether she'd make it in a new media world. She just knew it was time to leave The Washington Post, where she'd been a political columnist for 15 years. The Contrarian, the democracy-focused website that Rubin founded with partner Norm Eisen in January, now has 10 employees and contributors like humorist Andy Borowitz and White House reporter April Ryan. Its 558,000 subscribers also get recipes and culture dispatches. In the blink of an eye, Rubin became a independent news entrepreneur. 'I think we hit a moment, just after inauguration, when people were looking for something different and it has captured people's imaginations,' she says. 'We've been having a ball with it.' YouTube, Substack, TikTok and others are spearheading a full-scale democratization of media and a generation of new voices and influencers. But don't forget the traditionalists. Rubin's experience shows how this world offers a lifeline to many at struggling legacy outlets who wanted — or were forced — to strike out on their own. Tough business realities, changing consumer tastes The realities of business and changing consumer tastes are both driving forces. YouTube claims more than 1 billion monthly podcast views, and a recent list of its top 100 shows featured seven refugees from legacy media and six shows made by current broadcasters. Substack, which launched in 2017 and added live video in January, has more than doubled its number of paid subscribers to participating content creators to 5 million in less than two years. Almost immediately after he was cut loose by ABC News on June 10 for an anti-Trump tweet, Terry Moran headed for Substack. Two former hosts of NBC's 'Today' show — Katie Couric and Hoda Kotb — announced new media ventures on the same day last month. 'I think you've seen, really in the last six months for some reason, this whole space explode with people who are understanding that this is a really important way to convey information,' says Couric, who's been running her own media company with newsletters, interviews and a podcast since 2017 and recently joined Substack. Among the most successful to make transitions are Bari Weiss, the former New York Times writer whose Free Press website celebrates independent thought, the anti-Trump Republicans at Bulwark and ex-MSNBC host Mehdi Hasan, who champions 'adversarial journalism' on Zeteo. Television news essentially left Megyn Kelly for dead after her switch from Fox News to NBC went bust. She launched a podcast in 2020, at first audio only, and SiriusXM picked it up as a daily radio show. She added video for YouTube in 2021, and gets more than 100 million viewers a month for commentary and newsmaker interviews. This year, Kelly launched her own company, MK Media, with shows hosted by Mark Halperin, Maureen Callahan and Link Lauren. While they thrive, the prospect of layoffs, audiences that are aging and becoming smaller and constant worry about disappearing revenue sources are a way of life for legacy media. Moving to independent media is still not an easy decision. Taking a deep breath, and making the leap 'If I'm going to jump off a cliff, is there water or not?' former 'Meet the Press' moderator Chuck Todd says. 'I didn't know until I left NBC. Everybody told me there would be water. But you don't know for sure until you jump.' It takes some adjustment — 'At first I was like, 'do you know who I used to be?'' Couric jokes — but some who have made the jump appreciate the nimbleness and flexibility of new formats and say news subjects often respond to the atmosphere with franker, more expansive interviews. Jim Acosta, who traded a CNN anchor desk for a video podcast he does from his home after deciding not to make a move he considered a demotion, says he's been surprised at the quality of guests he's been able to corral — people like Hakeem Jefferies, Pete Buttigieg and Sean Penn. Many podcasters succeed because they communicate authenticity, former Washington Post editor Marty Baron said in an interview at the George W. Bush Presidential Center. Traditional journalists trade on authority at a time people don't trust institutions anymore, he said. Couric has seen it in some of the feedback she gets from subscribers. 'There's some disenchantment with legacy media,' she says. 'There are certainly some people who are frustrated by the capitulation of some networks to the administration, and I think there's a sense that when you're involved in mainstream media that you may be holding back or there may be executives who are putting pressure on you.' Is there an audience — and money — on the other side? Substack says that more than 50 people are earning more than $1 million annually on its platform. More than 50,000 of its publishers make money, but since the company won't give a total of how many people produce content for the platform, it's impossible to get a sense of the odds of success. Alisyn Camerota isn't making money yet. The former CNN anchor left the broadcaster after she sensed her time there was running out. Blessed with a financial cushion, she's relishing the chance to create something new. She records a video podcast, 'Sanity,' from her basement in Connecticut. A former Fox colleague who lives nearby, Dave Briggs, joins to talk about the news. 'It's harder than you think in terms of having to DIY a lot of this,' Camerota says, 'but it's very freeing.' Different people on the platform have different price points; some publishers put everything they do behind a pay wall, others only some. Acosta offers content for free, but people need to pay to comment or discuss. Zeteo charges $12 a month or $72 a year, with a $500 'founding member' yearly fee that offers access to Mehdi. The danger for independent journalists is a market reaching a saturation point. People already stress over how many streaming services they can afford for entertainment. There's surely a limit to how many journalists they will pay for, too. 'I hope to make a living at this,' Acosta says. 'We'll see how it goes. This is a bit of an experiment. I think it's a valuable one because the stakes are so high right now.' A strong point of view is one route to success To succeed in independent media, people need a strong work work ethic, self-motivation and an ability to pivot quickly to deal with changing markets, says Chris Balfe, founder of Red Seat Ventures. He has created a thriving business ushering conservative media figures into the new world, including Kelly, Bill O'Reilly, Tucker Carlson and Piers Morgan. Balfe's clients all have strong opinions. That's a plus for consumers who want to hear their viewpoints reflected back at them. 'I think you need a point of view and a purpose," Rubin says. "Once you have that, it helps you to organize your thinking and your selections. You're not going to be all things to all people.' That's one of the things that concerns Acosta and Todd. They're looser, and they certainly say what they think more than they felt free to do on television; a remark Acosta made on June 17, while appearing on Rubin's podcast, about Trump marrying immigrants was criticized as 'distasteful' by the White House. But at heart, they consider themselves reporters and not commentators. Is there enough room for people like them? Todd has a podcast, a weekly interview show on the new platform Noosphere and is looking to build on an interest in improving the fortunes of local news. He believes that opinion can help someone build an audience quickly but may ultimately limit growth. As Rubin did, they will find out soon enough. 'As it turned out," she says, 'what was on the other side was much more exciting and successful and absorbing than I could ever have imagined.' ___ David Bauder writes about the intersection of media and entertainment for the AP. Follow him at and

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store