Mistakenly deported man Kilmar Abrego Garcia to remain in jail for now
A Salvadoran national whose mistaken deportation spurred national outcry in the United States will remain in jail for now, as lawyers discuss how to prevent him from being removed from the country a second time.
On Wednesday, Kilmar Abrego Garcia was set to be released from pre-trial custody without having to post bail. He is being held in detention in Nashville, Tennessee, on criminal charges of human smuggling.
The administration of President Donald Trump had sought to stop his release, deeming him to be a flight risk.
But US District Judge Waverly Crenshaw upheld a magistrate judge's earlier decision finding that Abrego Garcia was eligible to walk free.
However, in an unexpected twist, lawyers on both sides argued that, if Abrego Garcia were released, he risks being taken into the custody of Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) for a second deportation.
That would deprive Abrego Garcia of the chance to defend himself against the charges, which he has denied. And lawyers for the government argued that it would also scuttle their criminal case against him.
Judge Crenshaw noted in a written decision that, since it is the government's choice whether or not to deport Abrego Garcia, the situation appeared to be a case of the executive branch doing 'injury on itself'.
'If deported, the Government argues, the Department of Justice will be deprived of the opportunity to pursue its criminal charges against Abrego,' Crenshaw wrote.
But, he added, 'it is the Executive Branch's decision that places the Government in this predicament.'
Ultimately, it was decided that Abrego Garcia would remain in custody while lawyers sparred over whether they could prevent Abrego Garcia's deportation if he were released to await trial.
A high-profile case
Abrego Garcia appeared at the Wednesday hearing wearing an orange jail-issued T-shirt and a headset to listen to the proceedings through a Spanish interpreter.
It was the latest chapter in an ongoing fight between Abrego Garcia and the Trump administration over whether he would be allowed to stay in the US.
According to his lawyers, Abrego Garcia fled El Salvador as a teenager to avoid gang violence, arriving in the US around 2011. He has lived for more than a decade in Maryland, where he and his American wife are raising three children.
In 2019, a judge granted him a protection order that barred his removal from the US.
But on March 15, Abrego Garcia was swept up in the immigration raids being conducted as part of President Trump's mass deportation campaign.
He and more than 200 other Venezuelans and Salvadorans were accused of being gang members, and they were deported to El Salvador.
Many of the men were sent to the Centro de Confinamiento del Terrorismo, or CECOT, a maximum-security prison for those accused of terrorism. But advocates for the deported immigrants have argued that many of their clients had no criminal records and were in the process of seeking legal immigration status in the US.
Advocates have also pointed out that ICE has provided scant evidence against some of the deported individuals, in some cases appearing to arrest people based solely on their tattoos.
The Trump administration, however, has designated Latin American gangs like MS-13 and Tren de Aragua as 'foreign terrorist organisations' and sought to crack down on their presence in the US.
A number of legal challenges followed the deportation flights to El Salvador. In Abrego Garcia's case, the government acknowledged that his removal had been the result of an 'administrative error'.
But the Trump administration initially insisted he could not be brought back to the US even after the Supreme Court in April ordered the government to 'facilitate' his return.
A return to the US
That changed on June 7, when Abrego Garcia was returned to the US. The Trump administration justified the return as necessary to confront him with charges of smuggling undocumented migrants inside the US.
Those charges stem from a 2022 traffic stop for speeding in Tennessee. In a video recording of the stop, one of the police officers observed that Abrego Garcia was driving a vehicle with nine passengers and speculated he might be a smuggler. But no criminal charges were brought at the time.
In announcing Abrego Garcia's return to the US this month, the Trump administration revealed it had sought a criminal indictment in May of this year.
At the recent detention hearings, Homeland Security special agent Peter Joseph testified that he did not begin investigating Abrego Garcia until April.
Abrego Garcia pleaded not guilty to the smuggling charges on June 13, and his lawyers have characterised them as an attempt to justify his mistaken deportation.
On Sunday, US Magistrate Judge Barbara Holmes ruled that Abrego Garcia does not have to remain in jail before his criminal trial.
But she described that decision as 'little more than an academic exercise', given that it was likely Abrego Garcia would be taken back into custody by ICE if released.
How to prevent Abrego Garcia from being deported a second time became the focus of Wednesday's hearing.
A lawyer for Abrego Garcia, Sean Hecker, noted that witnesses cooperating with the Trump administration had been protected from possible deportation.
'The government has ensured witness cooperation by ensuring that people will not be deported,' Hecker said.
If the government could protect those witnesses from removal, Hecker asked why it could not do the same for Abrego Garcia.
Representing the government's case, meanwhile, was acting US Attorney Rob McGuire. He argued that the executive branch of the government was vast, and he had little control over every entity's actions.
Still, he added, he would ask the Department of Homeland Security for its cooperation in not deporting Abrego Garcia.
'That's a separate agency with separate leadership and separate directions,' McGuire said. 'I will coordinate, but I can't tell them what to do.'
Speaking at a news conference before the court hearing, Abrego Garcia's wife, Jennifer Vasquez Sura, noted that it had been 106 days since her husband had been 'abducted' by the government. She called for his safe return.
'Kilmar should never have been taken away from us,' she said. 'This fight has been the hardest thing in my life.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Al Jazeera
4 hours ago
- Al Jazeera
Mamdani's New York victory boosts pro-Palestine politics in US
Mayoral candidate Zohran Mamdani has bold plans for New York City. He wants to establish city-owned grocery stores, build more homes, make buses free and freeze rents for subsidised tenants. But in the lead-up to the Democratic primary on Tuesday, his opponents and media outlets seemed more concerned by his views on the conflict between Israel and Palestine. He is a defender of Palestinian rights who has decried Israeli abuses and echoed the assessment of rights groups that Israel's assault on Gaza is a genocide. Mamdani did not back down from his positions, and he won, edging out former Governor Andrew Cuomo, who had more institutional support and was backed by record spending. Mamdani's supporters say his victory could be an inflection point in United States politics that shows the electoral viability of left-wing policies and support for Palestinian rights. 'It's monumental,' said Usamah Andrabi, spokesperson for the progressive group Justice Democrats. 'The sky is the limit for true progressives who are willing to unite the working class against billionaires and corporate super PACs while still refusing to compromise on issues as large as a genocide.' While the official results are not yet final, Mamdani leads Cuomo by more than seven percentage points with nearly every vote counted, all but securing the nomination. His lead is expected to grow with subsequent rounds of counting in the city's ranked-choice voting system. Cuomo has conceded defeat, and Mamdani has declared victory, putting him on the path to be the next mayor of the largest city in the US. New York is overwhelmingly Democratic, so as the party's nominee, he is likely to comfortably prevail in the general election in November — an outcome that seemed impossible when he was polling at 1 percent in February. 'He refused to back down' Savvy with digital media, charismatic and approachable, Mamdani — a 33-year-old state legislator — started to grow his base with viral videos and grassroots campaigning on the streets of New York. After the presidential election in November of last year, Mamdani spoke to Donald Trump's supporters and non-voters, who voiced frustration with status quo politics. He then presented them with his own platform. In a video segment he filmed, some of them said they would back him for mayor. Mamdani's supporters say he also excelled in amassing an army of thousands of volunteers, who knocked on doors to spread the word about his campaign. Heba Gowayed, a sociology professor at the City University of New York (CUNY), said many young people were drawn to Mamdani and got involved in his campaign because of his opposition to Israeli policies. 'The fact that he refused to back down from his position on Palestine is huge,' Gowayed told Al Jazeera. 'In an atmosphere where we've been told that holding that position is politically disqualifying, it was a movement that not only insisted on this position but was, in a sense, predicated on it.' She added that, if Mamdani had flipped to appease critics, he would have lost the support and enthusiasm that put him over the finish line. But Mamdani's support for Palestinian 'likely bolstered his campaign', she said. Mamdani faced seemingly insurmountable odds in his campaign for the Democratic nomination. Not only did he lack funding early on, but his name recognition was also low. Few voters seemed to know who he was, compared with the candidate he was running against: Cuomo, a former governor from a political dynasty in New York. Cuomo's father had also served as governor, and in the lead-up to Tuesday's race, he had amassed endorsements from key figures in the national Democratic Party, including former President Bill Clinton and lawmaker Jim Clyburn. Mamdani, meanwhile, was endorsed by the local branch of the Democratic Socialists of America (DSA). That is what makes Mamdani's win stunning for his supporters. It appeared to be a David and Goliath battle, a clash of the old guard and the new. 'The old guard personified was beaten by a democratic socialist, a young, pro-Palestinian brown Muslim kid who had 1 percent name recognition as of February,' Gowayed said. 'It is absolutely phenomenal and remarkable.' Born in Uganda to parents of Indian descent, Mamdani has been serving in the state assembly since 2021. Many viewed the face-off between Cuomo and Mamdani as a reflection of the years-long arm-wrestling between progressives and centrists in the Democratic Party. The debate over Palestinian rights and the US's unquestioning support for Israel has been a core issue in that fight. Cuomo's focus on Israel As a state legislator, Mamdani had been vocal in his opposition to Israel's military campaign in Gaza, which has killed at least 56,077 Palestinians. He even led a hunger strike outside the White House in November 2023 to demand an end to the war. But as he launched his campaign for mayor, his focus was on local issues. Still, Cuomo — who resigned as governor in 2021 over sexual harassment allegations — tried to make Mamdani's position on Israel and Palestine a central issue in the campaign. Earlier this month, the former governor suggested that calling out Israeli abuses contributes to attacks against Jewish Americans. The target of his message appeared to be Mamdani. 'Hate foments hate. The anti-Israel rhetoric of 'genocide,' 'war criminals,' and 'murderers' must stop. It is spreading like a cancer through the body politic,' Cuomo said in a social media post after a fire attack injured 15 people at a pro-Israel rally in Colorado. The former governor is part of the defence team representing Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, who is wanted by the International Criminal Court for war crimes charges in Gaza, including the use of starvation as a weapon of war. When Mamdani and some of his fellow candidates, including City Comptroller Brad Lander, campaigned jointly against Cuomo, the former governor invoked Israel. 'How does … a Brad Lander support Zohran Mamdani, support his positions on Israel, support his statements on Israel?' Cuomo said. Lander, who is Jewish, went on to cross-endorse Mamdani, and the two candidates encouraged their supporters to rank them both highly on their ballots. A pro-Cuomo election group, known as a super PAC, has also focused on Mamdani's positions on the Israel-Palestine conflict. Dubbed Fix the City, the super PAC received $500,000 from pro-Israel billionaire and Trump supporter Bill Ackman. Former New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg, another staunch Israel supporter, contributed a whopping $8m to the group. Media outlets also scrutinised Mamdani's view on Israel. He was repeatedly asked about foreign policy, including whether Israel has a right to exist as a Jewish state and whether he would visit Israel as mayor. 'A turning point' Beth Miller, the political director of the advocacy group Jewish Voice for Peace (JVP) Action, said Cuomo miscalculated by trying to make the race about Mamdani's views on the Middle East conflict. The Democratic base has been increasingly moving away from unconditional support for Israel, especially amid the atrocities in Gaza. A Pew Research Center survey in April showed that 69 percent of Democratic respondents indicated unfavourable views towards Israel. 'Cuomo is part of an old dinosaur way of thinking about politics,' Miller told Al Jazeera. JVP Action endorsed Mamdani at the outset of his campaign. Miller said that, while his campaign was rooted in making New York affordable, his progressive politics are based on upholding the humanity of all people, including Palestinians. 'Cuomo was counting on the idea that Zohran's support for Palestinian rights would be a liability for him, but what last night showed was that that's not true,' Miller said. 'And in fact, what I witnessed and what I saw was that his support for Palestinian rights was an asset to his campaign. It mobilised young voters. It mobilised a lot of progressive Jewish voters and Muslim voters and many, many others.' In recent years, pro-Israel groups, including the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC), have poured record amounts of money into Democratic primaries to defeat progressives. In the last election cycle, they managed to help oust two Democratic Congress members who were critical of Israel: Jamaal Bowman and Cori Bush. Progressive advocates say they hope that Mamdani's win will help turn the tide in their favour. 'We are finally seeing a turning point,' said Andrabi of Justice Democrats. 'AIPAC likes to say supporting Israel is good policy and good politics. I think what has become extremely clear at this point is that supporting apartheid Israel is bad policy and bad politics.'
Al Jazeera
4 hours ago
- Al Jazeera
Could Zohran Mamdani be NYC'S first Muslim and Indian American mayor?
Could Zohran Mamdani be NYC'S first Muslim and Indian American mayor? NewsFeed Zohran Mamdani's surprising win in New York City's Democratic mayoral primary over ex-Governor Andrew Cuomo has rocked city politics. But can he turn progressive momentum into victory this November — and become mayor of America's biggest city? Video Duration 00 minutes 36 seconds 00:36 Video Duration 00 minutes 50 seconds 00:50 Video Duration 02 minutes 40 seconds 02:40 Video Duration 02 minutes 23 seconds 02:23 Video Duration 02 minutes 56 seconds 02:56 Video Duration 02 minutes 22 seconds 02:22 Video Duration 02 minutes 02 seconds 02:02
Al Jazeera
5 hours ago
- Al Jazeera
US sanctions Mexican banks, alleging connections to cartel money laundering
The United States has imposed sanctions on three Mexican banks, alleging they had been used to launder money for drug cartels. On Wednesday, the US Department of the Treasury tied the banks – CIBanco, Intercam Banco and Vector Casa de Bolsa – to the cross-border trafficking of the deadly synthetic drug fentanyl. It accused them of playing 'a longstanding and vital role in laundering millions of dollars on behalf of Mexico-based cartels and facilitating payments for the procurement of precursor chemicals needed to produce fentanyl'. The sanctions are part of a wider pressure campaign by the administration of US President Donald Trump against Latin American gangs, criminal networks and drug traffickers. That campaign has included designating several groups as 'foreign terrorist organisations' and using tariffs to pressure Mexico's government to increase enforcement of irregular traffic across the border. In a statement, the Treasury Department said the banks were the first to be targeted under new pieces of legislation – the Fentanyl Sanctions Act and the FEND Off Fentanyl Act – passed to expand its ability to target money laundering related to opioid trafficking. The sanctions would block transfers between the targeted Mexican banks and US banks, although it was not immediately clear how far-reaching the limits would be. In a statement, Secretary of the Treasury Scott Bessent accused the banks of 'enabling the poisoning of countless Americans by moving money on behalf of cartels, making them vital cogs in the fentanyl supply chain'. But Mexico's Secretariat of Finance and Public Credit responded to the sanctions by saying it had yet to receive conclusive evidence justifying them. 'We want to be clear: If we have conclusive information proving illicit activities by these three financial institutions, we will act to the fullest extent of the law,' the Finance Ministry said. 'However, to date, we have no information in this regard.' CIBanco did not immediately respond to the allegations. The US Treasury Department accused it of being connected to money laundering by the Beltran-Leyva Cartel, the Jalisco New Generation Cartel (CJNG) and the Gulf Cartel. Intercam, which is also accused of having connections to the CJNG cartel, also did not respond. Meanwhile, the brokerage firm Vector, which was linked to money laundering by the Sinaloa Cartel and Gulf Cartel, said the US claims tying its operations to drug traffickers were false. 'Vector categorically rejects any accusation that compromises its institutional integrity,' the company said in a statement, adding that it would cooperate to clarify the situation.
