The Secret History of Trump's Private Cellphone
This article was featured in the One Story to Read Today newsletter. Sign up for it here.
Just before Election Day, a disturbing piece of information made its way to Donald Trump. Whenever he takes or makes calls on his personal cellphone, Trump learned, Chinese hackers could be listening and gathering intelligence.
Iranians had already hacked into his campaign's email system—which was not a problem for Trump personally, because he has never liked putting things in writing—and the Chinese had breached the emails of the Republican National Committee. But now the hackers had compromised the backbone of U.S. telecommunications networks, according to federal officials who publicly described the intrusion on October 25, which allowed them to eavesdrop on calls involving Trump; his running mate, J. D. Vance; and other political figures.
Some in the campaign took immediate action, abandoning longtime numbers, experimenting with burner phones, or switching to end-to-end encrypted applications, such as Signal, for voice calls so they would not route through central switching hubs.
But Trump appeared unperturbed by the news, two people familiar with the episode told us, on the condition of anonymity so they could speak frankly. For more than a decade, the once and future president had been warned of the enormous risks he took—as perhaps the top global target of foreign intelligence services—by using a personal iPhone with a broadly circulated number to keep in touch with dozens of friends and colleagues. His phone was a lifeline, though. He wasn't going to give it up.
Days later, when he won the presidency for the second time, his phone lit up, just as it had eight years earlier on Election Night 2016. 'You won't believe it,' Trump marveled in early-morning phone calls after the race was decided last year, according to an adviser. 'I've already had 20 world leaders call me. They all want to kiss my ass.'
[From the June 2025 Issue: 'I run the country and the world']
A little more than four months into his second term, the president's personal cellphone has become, in many ways, the most pivotal technological device in the federal government, directly linking Trump to the outside world. Lawmakers, friends, family members, corporate titans, celebrities, world leaders, and journalists regularly use it, knowing that, unminded by aides, Trump remains open to picking up the phone, even when he does not recognize the number.
'Who's calling?' Trump asked when he answered our call one morning in late March from the country club he owns in Bedminster, New Jersey. (It was a fair question; it could have been almost anyone.)
The draw of the phone is simple: Trump likes to call people. He likes to be called. Unknown numbers come with a thrill akin to putting a coin in a gumball machine and waiting to see which flavor rolls out. Surrendering the phone would be inconvenient, limiting, and so he keeps it. As for any efforts to control him and his cellphone use, 'I think people gave up on that years ago,' one adviser told us, adding that 'probably a ton' of people have Trump's personal number. A second ally estimated the number to be 'well over 100.'
Several aides told us Trump has two different devices, and at least one aide said they have seen him with three. (One of the phones, some aides suggested, is mainly devoted to his social-media use.) The lock screen of one, captured by a Reuters photographer Friday night, shows an image of Trump's own face, stern and commanding, with a finger pointing directly at the camera.
Trump has, at times, changed numbers; at least one number that he regularly answered as a presidential candidate in 2016 stopped working sometime during his first term. And another aide told us that Trump's phone had been given additional security features, though it is not clear what defense these would have offered against the Chinese hack, which targeted the back-end systems of telecom providers. 'He is not walking around with a run-of-the-mill iPhone off the shelf,' an adviser told us. The White House declined to explain more. 'We will not discuss or disclose security measures regarding the President, especially to The Atlantic,' White House Communications Director Steven Cheung told us in an emailed statement. Trump's obsession with keeping his personal phone is merely evidence that he is easy to reach and therefore 'the most transparent and accessible President in American history,' Cheung added.
[Read: Trump's cosplay cabinet]
Still, Ben Rhodes, President Barack Obama's former speechwriter and deputy national security adviser, told us that 'it's an obvious massive risk—especially given what we know about Chinese penetration of phones in recent years.' Hacking is hardly the only concern. Joel Brenner, a senior research fellow at MIT's Center for International Studies and former head of U.S. counterintelligence, pointed us to a recent Wall Street Journal scoop by Josh Dawsey that authorities are investigating an unknown individual impersonating White House Chief of Staff Susie Wiles in calls and texts. Security protocols—at times cumbersome—exist for a reason, he said, and Trump taking a call from a foreign leader without the proper preparation or staff present poses real dangers. 'We run the risk of interception, we run the risk of impersonation, and we run the risk of being unprepared,' Brenner told us.
What the president is doing is 'terribly dangerous,' he said, citing the possibility of Trump making major deals or concessions with other world leaders that his staff may be unaware of, leaving them to scramble.
But Trump treats his direct line to the world as an enhancement of—not a risk to—his presidency. 'I've been on the phone with him before, and he's just said, 'I've got to go. I have someone from another country calling,'' an outside adviser told us. 'He doesn't even know which country. He just sees the number and thinks, This might be a foreign leader I want to talk to.'
The first time Trump's team truly understood he would have a different relationship with his cellphone than did presidents past was Election Night 2016, the eve of his improbable victory. 'He was answering every phone call,' the outside adviser marveled to us, nearly a decade later, noting that none of the numbers was in Trump's contacts. 'He just answers the phone. He doesn't want to miss phone calls.'
Presidents have long loved their phones. Rutherford B. Hayes was the first president to install a telephone at the White House, in 1877, and Herbert Hoover was the first to put a line in the Oval Office, in 1929. But Obama stands out in recent memory as the president most obstinate about wanting to bring a personal smartphone into the White House. Obama, famously addicted to his BlackBerry, argued to keep his after his 2008 victory and ultimately prevailed, albeit in a hard-fought compromise that involved limiting his contacts.
Only a small group of Obama's friends and top staff received his BlackBerry email address, and only after undergoing a briefing from the White House counsel's office on security concerns. His device, which included security enhancements and was approved by national-security officials, was also configured so that emails from the president could not be forwarded. Rhodes told us that Obama's BlackBerry did not have a phone number attached for incoming calls—which instead had to go through the White House switchboard to a landline.
[Read: Nobody's cellphone is really that secure]
For Trump, the first presidential candidate to personally harness the power of social media, his cellphone has long been his megaphone. It is as much a part of his curated image as his oversize red ties.
Trump is the ultimate Phone Guy. He wheeled and dealed in New York for decades from the landline in his Fifth Avenue office, even going so far as to impersonate a fictional spokesperson, John Barron, on the phone with reporters. Many advisers and friends told us they think the phone is Trump's best medium, the president at his most persuasive. In a different world, he's just 'Don from Queens,' calling in to talk radio to shoot the breeze and run through his gripes, about China ripping the country off and immigrants running amok.
During his first term, Trump often used the White House switchboard to make calls and screen incoming ones, but he just as frequently did not, in part because he assumed that nearly everyone in government was part of the 'deep state,' career bureaucrats working against him, and he worried that they would somehow listen in on his calls. To be fair, his concern was not without merit; transcripts and details from several of his official calls with world leaders leaked to the press, and one such call, with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky, ultimately led to Trump's first impeachment, after an intelligence analyst became alarmed by details of the exchange.
'His perspective was, 'I can't trust anyone on the White House staff, so I have to use my cellphone,'' a former Trump adviser told us.
Advisers tried to break his habit. John Kelly, the retired U.S. Marine Corps general who became Trump's second chief of staff in 2017, was particularly strict about operational security, several advisers, current and former, told us. Kelly repeatedly warned Trump about how vulnerable cellphones are—to hacking by the Russians and the Chinese, and also to the phones themselves being turned into listening devices by foreign or other bad actors. He and his deputies would regularly remove Trump's cellphone from the Oval Office, storing it in a padded box outside.
But Trump either didn't understand or didn't care. 'He'd just reject it and say, 'It's not true,'' one of the former advisers told us. 'He'd say, 'My phone is the best on the market.''
In Trump's second term, his advisers have given up trying to restrict his phone use, though they privately admit displeasure at his practice of taking calls from journalists and others without their knowledge. 'He calls people nonstop,' Trump's campaign adviser Chris LaCivita said in an interview with Politico during the Republican National Convention last year. 'I don't worry about it, because what are you going to do? Take his phone? Change his phone number? Tell him he can't make phone calls?'
[Jeffrey Goldberg: Read The Atlantic's interview with Donald Trump]
But just because Trump's aides have given up caring doesn't mean there aren't still major risks. Foreign adversaries could still gain access to Trump's private conversations—inside the Oval Office, on the golf course, in the residence. During his first term, advisers said they 'certainly assumed he was always being listened to.' The FBI described the 2024 Chinese attack on at least nine telecommunications companies as a 'broad and significant cyber espionage campaign' that included eavesdropping on 'a limited number of individuals who are primarily involved in government or political activity.' In addition to Trump and Vance, senior members of Kamala Harris's campaign were also informed that they were being targeted.
Joe Biden's national-security team later explained that the Chinese hack had given foreign spies the ability to 'geolocate millions of individuals, to record phone calls at will,' while as many as 100 targeted phones had likely had their texts and phone calls collected.
Although there have been efforts to excise Chinese hackers from the telecommunications infrastructure and harden the systems, there is still a risk of future attacks. Before leaving office, Biden's team asked the Federal Communications Commission to begin a rule-making process to require telecommunications companies to upgrade their network security, because the voluntary industry guidelines issued by the government had failed to protect the country. Trade groups representing the wireless, telecom, and broadband industries oppose new security mandates, arguing that they would impose 'onerous network-wide duties.'
'It is likely that the systems may be compromised again,' one cybersecurity expert who was part of the Biden review told us. This person said the vulnerability of the telecom foundation means that even White House landline phone calls could be compromised. 'The White House systems use American phone lines. If the core is compromised, it doesn't matter who is on the end' of a call, this person said.
In a video posted on X in late May, the Dilbert creator Scott Adams described seeing a call from a Florida number he didn't recognize and sending it to voicemail. When he listened to the message, he heard Trump's voice: 'This is your favorite president.'
'I thought to myself, No, did I just send the most important person in the world to voicemail?' Adams recounted, laughing and leaning back in his chair. 'And it turns out that I had. It was Trump, and he was just calling to check in.' Before the call, Adams had recently shared publicly that he has 'the same cancer that Joe Biden has,' and that he expects to die in the coming months.
In his video, Adams explained that Trump left 'a semi-lengthy little voicemail,' saying that Adams could call him back on this number. 'Now obviously I don't call him back, right, because that would just be ridiculous,' Adams continued.
Trump's habit of leaving lengthy voicemails is by design—not just because he's a phone guy but because he relishes giving people something they can play for friends and family. 'Who doesn't like to get a voicemail message from the president of the United States?' one adviser said. When Trump finally gets ahold of someone after having left a voicemail, he will sometimes ask recipients whether they have played his voicemail for others, the person said.
[Jeffrey Goldberg: The Trump Administration accidentally texted me its war plans]
Hours after Adams missed his call from Trump, his phone rang again, and once again a Florida number blinked onto the screen. This time, the cartoonist knew enough to answer. 'No fucking way,' Adams remembered thinking. 'There's no way he's calling me again. And I answer it, and it's Trump. And apparently he had heard my situation, and he had lots of questions.' The call ended with Trump telling Adams to just ask if he needed anything, and he would make it happen.
As accessible as Trump is, even some who have his number are reticent about using it—or are at least strategic about it. One of the advisers we talked with told us they always try to find the best moment to call. 'If I call him, nine times out of 10, I've talked to somebody there and said, 'Tell me when to call,' and they've said, 'He just left dinner and just walked into the residence,'' this person told us. 'And I know multiple people who do the same thing, who game-plan it out and talk to the people around him and say, 'Tell me when it's a good time.''
The outside ally told us they are careful about how frequently they call Trump. 'I rarely call unless I'm asked to call. He's the president of the United States.' This person added that they've witnessed Trump pick up his phone and scroll through the list of chief executives and wealthy supplicants who have called, poking fun at their eagerness. 'That's why I'm really reluctant to call,' the ally explained. 'You don't want to be the guy who's the butt of the joke, who he's laughing at: 'Can you believe this guy is calling?''
Others give little thought to the timing of their calls. Trump's phone could be heard ringing during a recent press conference in which he discussed a proposed 50 percent tariff on Apple. The familiar sound of the default 'Reflection' ringtone—you know the one, the synthesized waterfall of xylophone tones—was a reminder that the tariffs targeted the company that makes his beloved device.
Before the press entered the Oval Office, the president had placed the phone on the Resolute desk, next to his two secure White House landline phones. 'It's a phone call, do you mind?' he joked when the ringing started, before looking at the screen and telling reporters, 'It's only a congressman.' Seconds later, the phone rang again. 'It's a different congressman,' he joked, as he struggled to silence his portal to the wider world.
Jonathan Lemire contributed reporting.
Illustration by The Atlantic. Sources: Mannie Garcia / Bloomberg / Getty; Sipa / AP / Getty; Alex Brandon / AP; Evan Vucci / AP; Rich Graessle / Icon Sportswire / AP; Matt Rourke / AP.
Article originally published at The Atlantic
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Hill
20 minutes ago
- The Hill
A quiet Tiananmen Square anniversary displays China's ability to suppress history
BEIJING (AP) — For most Chinese, the 36th anniversary of a bloody crackdown that ended pro-democracy protests in China passed like any other weekday. And that's just how the ruling Communist Party wants it. Security was tight Wednesday around Beijing's Tiananmen Square, where weeks of student-led protests shook the party in 1989. Under then-leader Deng Xiaoping, the military was sent in to end the protest on the night of June 3-4. Using live ammunition, soldiers forced their way through crowds on the streets that tried to block them from reaching the square. Hundreds and possibly thousands of people were killed, including dozens of soldiers. The party has tried, with some success, to erase what it calls the 'political turmoil' of 1989 from the collective memory. It bans any public commemoration or mention of the June 4th crackdown, scrubbing references from the internet. In recent years, that ban has been extended to Hong Kong, where a once-massive annual candlelight vigil is no longer permitted. A former district council member, Chan Kim-kam, said customs officers questioned her at her shop on the eve of June 4 after she advertised small white candles for sale in an Instagram post titled, 'June, we don't forget.' It is only in Taiwan, a self-governing island that is claimed by China but runs its own affairs, that large June 4 gatherings can still take place. Tiananmen Square is a vast open space in the center of Beijing with monumental, communist-era buildings along two of its sides and the mausoleum of Mao Zedong, who founded the communist era in 1949, on the south end. University students occupied this symbolically important site in the spring of 1989. Their calls for freedoms divided the party leadership. In retrospect, the decision to send in the troops marked a decisive turning point in the evolution of modern China, keeping the party firmly in control as it loosened economic restrictions. Chinese officials have said the country's rapid economic development since then proves the decisions made at the time were correct. 'On the political turmoil that happened in the late 1980s, the Chinese government has already reached a clear conclusion,' Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesperson Lin Jian said Wednesday. He added that China would continue along its current path of what it calls 'socialism with Chinese characteristics.' Tiananmen Mothers, a group formed by relatives of the victims, made an annual online appeal to the government. Signed by 108 members, it called for an independent investigation into what happened on June 4, 1989, including a list of all who died. The group also demanded compensation for the families and a legal case against those responsible for the deaths. The British and German Embassies in Beijing posted videos commemorating the anniversary on Weibo, a Chinese social media platform, but they were later taken down, presumably by censors. The Canadian and German Embassies displayed images of a single lit candle on large screens facing the main street. In Hong Kong, a carnival showcasing Chinese food and products was held in Victoria Park, where tens of thousands of people used to gather in the evening for a candlelight vigil to mark the anniversary. Hong Kong authorities first shut down the vigil during the COVID-19 pandemic and arrested the organizers in 2021. The moves were part of a broader crackdown on dissent following monthslong anti-government protests in 2019 that turned violent and paralyzed parts of the city. 'You know, Hong Kongers have become silent lambs after 2019,' said King Ng, who was at the park on Wednesday. Police were out in force to try to prevent any protest. Activist Lui Yuk-lin was stopped at a subway station in Causeway Bay and brought to a police van. It wasn't clear if she had been arrested. Jailed vigil organizer Chow Hang-tung said she would go on a 36-hour hunger strike to remember the events of the day. The British and Canadian consulates posted social media messages about not forgetting June 4. Hong Kong was a British colony until 1997. The American consulate posted a message from U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio on its website. 'The CCP actively tries to censor the facts,' Rubio said, referring to China's Communist Party. 'But the world will never forget.' Taiwan's President Lai Ching-te used the anniversary to position the island he leads on the frontline of defending democracy against authoritarianism. In a Facebook post, he drew a distinction between Taiwan's multiparty democracy and China's one-party rule. 'Authoritarian governments often choose to remain silent and forget about history, while democratic societies choose to preserve the truth and refuse to forget those who have contributed to the ideals of human rights and the dreams they embrace,' Lai wrote. Taiwan transitioned from authoritarianism to democracy in a process that began in the late 1980s. It relies on support principally from the U.S., along with other democratic partners, to deter China from an invasion. The Communist Party says it favors peaceful reunification but doesn't renounce the use of force. A commemoration and candlelight vigil remembering June 4 was planned for Wednesday evening. ___ The year in which British colonial rule ended in Hong Kong has been corrected in this story to 1997. ___ Leung reported from Hong Kong.
Yahoo
20 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Musk calls Trump's tax bill a 'disgusting abomination'
Elon Musk has hit out at President Donald Trump's signature tax and spending bill, describing it as a "disgusting abomination", in a widening rift between the two. The tech billionaire posted on X that the bill would add to the US budget deficit and saddle Americans with "crushing" debt. The budget, which includes huge tax breaks and more defence spending, was passed by the House of Representatives last month and is now being considered by senators. "Shame on those who voted for it," said Musk, hinting that he may try to unseat the politicians responsible at next year's midterm elections. The bill has the backing of President Donald Trump and would be the legislative linchpin of his second-term agenda if it passes Congress. Musk left the administration abruptly last week after 129 days working to cut costs with his team, known as Doge. The comments mark his first public disagreement with Trump since leaving government, after having previously called the plan "disappointing". The South African-born tech billionaire's time in the Trump administration came to an end on 31 May, although Trump said that "he will, always, be with us, helping all the way". In its current form, the bill - which Trump refers to as the "big beautiful bill" - has been estimated to increase the budget deficit - the difference between what the government spends and the revenue it receives - by about $600bn (£444bn) in the next fiscal year. It's Musk's last day - what has he achieved at the White House? In a series of posts on X on Tuesday, Musk said that the "outrageous, pork-filled" spending bill will "massively increase the already gigantic budget deficit to $2.5 trillion (!!!) and burden America [sic] citizens with crushingly unsustainable debt". In American politics "pork" refers to spending on projects in lawmakers' constituencies. Musk has previously vowed to fund campaign challenges against any Republican that votes against Trump's agenda. But on Tuesday he fired a warning to those who backed the bill. "In November next year, we fire all politicians who betrayed the American people," he wrote. Asked about Musk's comments soon after the first post, White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said "the President already knows where Elon Musk stood on this bill". "This is one, big, beautiful bill," she added. "And he's sticking to it." The legislation also pledges to extend soon-to-expire tax cuts passed during the first Trump administration in 2017, as well as an influx of funds for defence spending and to fund the administration's mass deportations of undocumented immigrants. To the dismay of fiscal conservatives, it would lift the limit on the amount of money the government can borrow, known as the debt ceiling, to $4tn. The comments from Musk reflect wider tensions among Republicans over the plan, which faced stiff opposition from different wings of the party as it worked its way through the House. The Senate has now taken it up, and divisions are already emerging in that chamber, which is also narrowly controlled by Republicans. Kentucky Senator Rand Paul has said over the last few days he will not support the bill if it raises the debt ceiling. "The GOP [the Republican Party] will own the debt once they vote for this," he told CBS News, the BBC's US partner, over the weekend. Trump responded to Paul with a series of social media posts, accusing him of having "very little understanding of the bill" and saying that the "people of Kentucky can't stand him". "His ideas are actually crazy," Trump wrote. Republican lawmakers pushed back on Musk's comments, with Senate majority leader John Thune telling reporters the party plans to "proceed full speed ahead" despite "a difference of opinion". "We have an agenda that everybody campaigned on, most notably the president," he said. Mike Johnson - the Republican Speaker who has ushered the legislation through the House - told reporters on Capitol Hill that "my friend Elon is terribly wrong". "It's a very important first start. Elon is missing it," Johnson said. Johnson said he had a 20-minute phone call with the tycoon about the bill on Monday, adding that its phasing out of electric vehicle tax credits could "have an effect" on Tesla, Musk's firm. "I lament that," Johnson said, expressing surprise that Musk criticised the bill despite their call. "I just deeply regret he's made this mistake.' Among the issues that upset Musk involved air traffic control at the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), according to Axios. Musk was hoping it would be run on his Starlink satellite system, but he was denied because of issues relating to the technology and the appearance of a conflict of interest, the political outlet reported. Some Democrats welcomed Musk's comments despite their previous criticism of him and the work of Doge. "Even Elon Musk, who's been part of the whole process, and is one of Trump's buddies, said the bill is bad," Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer said. "We can imagine how bad this bill is." Trump and Republicans in Congress have set a deadline of 4 July to get the measure passed and signed into law. Musk supported Trump in last year's November election with donations of more than $250m. To make peace with spending hawks, Trump is also asking Congress to pass a plan that would reduce current spending by $9.4bn, a figure derived from Doge's work. It would mainly slash funding for foreign aid, the United States Agency for International Development (USAID) and for broadcasters NPR and PBS. It's Musk's last day - what has he achieved at the White House? Elon Musk plans to cut back political spending Musk 'disappointed' by Trump's tax and spending bill Follow the twists and turns of Trump's second term with North America correspondent Anthony Zurcher's weekly US Politics Unspun newsletter. Readers in the UK can sign up here. Those outside the UK can sign up here.

Wall Street Journal
25 minutes ago
- Wall Street Journal
Podcast: U.S. Doubles Steel and Aluminum Tariffs to 50%
President Trump's tariffs on steel and aluminum imports jumped to 50% overnight. Industry players have warned the move could result in price increases and shortages. 🎧 Listen here to this What's News podcast, which also covers the Federal Reserve's move to lift the cap on Wells Fargo's assets.