Trump foreign aid freeze deals heavy blow to family planning efforts abroad
The Trump administration's 90-day freeze on foreign aid has impacted family planning resources used by hundreds of thousands of women, girls and couples abroad, causing a number of health clinics to shut down and hindering the supply chain for contraception.
In the first week after President Trump signed the executive order directing the pause on his first day in office, it caused more than 912,000 women and girls to be denied family planning care throughout the dozens of countries that receive U.S. aid, according to one analysis from the Guttmacher Institute, an abortion-rights research group.
That analysis also projected that at least 8,340 pregnant people would die as a result of the pause by the end of the 90-day period in April.
In many countries, the pause has caused clinics to reduce staff, according to reproductive rights advocacy group Population Action International, and has frozen a number of remaining aid workers in place amid the chaos and uncertainty that have surrounded the order.
The freeze has also caused kinks in family planning supply chains, according to Rachel Clement, the group's senior director of U.S. government affairs, in part because future procurements have been paused.
Contraception supplies purchased before the freeze are sitting unused because there aren't enough workers on the ground to distribute them or because remaining workers are unsure what they can legally do with them, Clement said.
Zambia, for example, receives a large amount of aid funds from the U.S. In 2023, the U.S. sent nearly $600 million in aid to the country, $10 million of which was used for family planning purposes, according to a federal data breakdown from the Guttmacher Institute shared with The Hill.
Now, piles of U.S-provided condoms are lying in warehouses unused, causing shortages in clinics around the country, according to Rachel Moynihan, an advocacy and communications specialist at the United Nations Population Fund. The Zambian government has stepped up and made a twentyfold increase in their own commitment to family planning products to help fill the gap from U.S. supplies. But in many other countries receiving aid, the gap left by the freeze remains unfilled.
'It's really the whole system that is being gunked up by this,' Clement said. 'And it's having a trickle-down effect where people are trying to make these tough decisions in a funding environment where there isn't a replacement.'
'There isn't another global donor that is able to step in at the level the U.S. government was funding these things at.'
The U.S. doles out tens of billions of dollars in congressionally approved foreign assistance each year, including spending by the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID), the State Department and other programs. It gave out $72 billion in total in 2023.
That funding included a budget of $607.5 million for USAID's designated family planning and reproductive health program, which the agency launched in 1965. In 2023, the program delivered 137.7 million male condoms to the countries it services, along with 29 million oral contraceptive pills and 19.2 million injectable contraceptives, according to agency data.
That year alone, the program helped provide 24.2 million women and couples with contraceptives and prevent 8.1 million accidental pregnancies across 41 countries, according to the agency, and to prevent 14,000 maternal deaths.
Some of the ways family planning helps prevent such fatalities, according to the agency, are by reducing the spread of HIV and AIDS through the use of condoms; decreasing unsafe abortion rates; and decreasing pregnancy and postpartum issues by enabling women to space out when they have children, which allows their bodies to fully recover from each pregnancy.
Family planning and reproductive health advocacy groups worry the number of people the program reaches is likely to drop significantly due to the pause and the Trump administration's efforts to put thousands of USAID workers on leave — if not cut the vast majority of the agency's workers or shut it down entirely.
Secretary of State Marco Rubio said late last month that 'life-saving humanitarian assistance' would be exempt from the pause.
Aid workers on the ground have been working in 'good faith' to understand what the waiver covers and what it does not, according to Moynihan of the United Nations Population Fund.
'In our mind, of course, family planning is life-saving, it's life changing,' said Moynihan. 'It allows people to be healthier when they can space out pregnancies.'
The Hill has reached out to the State Department for comment and more information.
Multiple federal judges have also ruled to block the administration's moves on foreign assistance funding and USAID.
Judge Amir H. Ali of the Federal District Court in Washington ordered that the freeze temporarily be lifted in a Thursday night ruling, writing that administration officials 'have not offered any explanation for why a blanket suspension of all congressionally appropriated foreign aid, which set off a shock wave and upended reliance interests for thousands of agreements with businesses, nonprofits and organizations around the country, was a rational precursor to reviewing programs.'
Other judges have blocked the Trump administration's plan to place thousands of USAID employees on leave while weighing whether a further pause is warranted and ordered the government to temporarily cease efforts to terminate foreign aid contracts and grants that were in place before Trump's inauguration.
A number of Democratic attorneys general and grant recipients have said the administration is not complying with court rulings blocking the administration's separate freeze on federal grants, however.
And, advocates say, the pause on foreign assistance has already caused potentially life-threatening damage to some.
'Even if we were able to switch that assistance back on, these are needs that you can't just pause,' said Clement of Population Action International. 'People who are pregnant can't pause their pregnancies.'
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Chicago Tribune
8 minutes ago
- Chicago Tribune
President Donald Trump tax bill will add $2.4 trillion to the deficit and leave 10.9 million more uninsured, CBO says
WASHINGTON — President Donald Trump's big bill making its way through Congress will cut taxes by $3.75 trillion but also increase deficits by $2.4 trillion over the next decade, according to an analysis released Wednesday by the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office. The CBO also estimates an increase of 10.9 million people without health insurance under the bill by 2034, including 1.4 million who are in the United States without legal status in state-funded programs. The package would reduce federal outlays, or spending, by nearly $1.3 trillion over that period, the budget office said. What is the CBO? A look at the small office inflaming debate over Trump's tax bill'In the words of Elon Musk, this bill is a 'disgusting abomination,'' said Rep. Brendan Boyle of Pennsylvania, the top Democrat on the House Budget Committee, reviving the billionaire former Trump aide's criticism of the package. House Speaker Mike Johnson said he called Musk late Tuesday to discuss the criticism but had not heard back. 'I hope he comes around,' Johnson told reporters. The analysis comes at a crucial moment in the legislative process as Trump is pushing Congress to have the final product on his desk to sign into law by the Fourth of July. The work of the CBO, which for decades has served as the official scorekeeper of legislation in Congress, will be weighed by lawmakers and others seeking to understand the budgetary impacts of the sprawling 1,000-page-plus package. Ahead of the CBO's release, the White House and Republican leaders criticized the budget office in a preemptive campaign designed to sow doubt in its findings. White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said the CBO has been 'historically wrong,' and Senate Majority Leader John Thune said the CBO was 'flat wrong' because it underestimated the potential revenue growth from Trump's first round of tax breaks in 2017. The CBO last year said receipts were $1.5 trillion, or 5.6% greater than predicted, in large part because of the 'burst of high inflation' during the COVID-19 pandemic in 2021. White House Budget Director Russ Vought said when you adjust for 'current policy' — which means not counting some $4.5 trillion in existing tax breaks that are simply being extended for the next decade — the overall package actually doesn't pile onto the deficit. He argued the spending cuts alone in fact help reduce deficits by $1.4 trillion over the decade. Democrats and even some Republicans call that 'current policy' accounting move a gimmick, but it's the approach Senate Republicans intend to use during their consideration of the package to try to show it does not add to the nation's deficits. Vought argued that the CBO is the one using a 'gimmick' by tallying the costs of continuing those tax breaks that would otherwise expire. Leavitt also suggested that the CBO's employees are biased, even though certain budget office workers face strict ethical rules — including restrictions on campaign donations and political activity — to ensure objectivity and impartiality. 'When it comes time to make prognostications on economic growth, they've always been wrong,' House Majority Leader Steve Scalise, R-La., said at a press conference. Asked if it's time to get rid of the CBO, Scalise did not dismiss the idea, saying it's valid to raise concerns. Alongside the costs of the bill, the CBO had previously estimated that nearly 4 million fewer people would have food stamps each month due to the legislation's proposed changes to the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, known as SNAP. The bill, called the One Big Beautiful Bill Act after the president's own catch phrase, is grinding its way through Congress, as the top priority of Republicans, who control both the House and the Senate — and face stiff opposition from Democrats, who call it Trump's 'big, ugly bill.' All told, the package seeks to extend the individual income tax breaks that had been approved in 2017 but that will expire in December if Congress fails to act, while adding new ones, including no taxes on tips. It also includes a massive buildup of $350 billion for border security, deportations and national security. To help cover the lost revenue, Republicans want to slash some federal spending. They propose phasing out green energy tax breaks put in place during Democrat Joe Biden's presidency. New work requirements for some adults up to age 65 on Medicaid and SNAP would begin in December 2026 and are expected to result in less spending on those programs. Republicans argue their proposals are intended to make Medicaid and other programs stronger by rooting out waste, fraud and abuse. They want the federal funding to go those who most need health care and other services, often citing women and children. But Senate Democratic Leader Chuck Schumer said those claims are bogus and are simply part of long-running GOP efforts to repeal and replace the Affordable Care Act, or Obamacare, as most states have expanded Medicaid to serve more people under the program. 'They just want to strangle health care,' Schumer said. The package also would provide a $4 trillion increase to the nation's debt limit, which is now $36 trillion, to allow more borrowing. The Treasury Department projects the debt limit will need to be raised this summer to pay the nation's already accrued bills. Now in its 50th year, the CBO was established by law after Congress sought to assert its control, as outlined in the Constitution, over the budget process, in part by setting up the new office as an alternative to the White House's Office of Management and Budget. Staffed by some 275 economists, analysts and other employees, the CBO says it seeks to provide Congress with objective, impartial information about budgetary and economic issues. Its current director, Phillip Swagel, a former Treasury official in Republican President George W. Bush's administration, was reappointed to a four-year term in 2023.


Boston Globe
16 minutes ago
- Boston Globe
What is the Congressional Budget Office? And why is it a target of Trump?
The budget office also projected that by 2034, 10.9 million more people would be uninsured, due to proposed spending cuts to Medicaid and the Affordable Care Act. Related : The bill now Advertisement In the weeks ahead of the CBO's analysis, the White House and Republican leaders have criticized the budget office in an effort to sow doubt in its findings. Get Starting Point A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday. Enter Email Sign Up Here's what to know about the nonpartisan agency and what the Trump administration has said about it: What is the CBO? The CBO is a nonpartisan agency that helps lawmakers estimate the cost of proposed legislation and provides reports on federal spending. It's led by a director appointed by Congress to a four-year term, with the selection alternating between the House and Senate Budget Committee chairs. The CBO emphasizes that political affiliation plays no role in its hiring process, stating it selects candidates 'solely on the basis of his or her fitness to perform the duties of the position.' Advertisement Is the CBO partisan? CBO hires analysts based on their expertise, not political affiliation. Staff is expected to maintain objectivity and avoid political influence. In evaluating potential employees, the CBO says that for most positions it looks at whether that person would be perceived to be free from political bias. Like other federal employees, the CBO's staff is also prohibited from making political contributions to members of Congress. The CBO's director, Phillip Swagel, served in former Republican President George W. Bush's administration as an economic adviser and as an assistant secretary at the Treasury Department. What has the CBO said in the past about Trump policy? The budget office said in April 2018, during Trump's first term, that tax receipts would reach $27 trillion from fiscal years 2018 to 2024. However, receipts came in about $1.5 trillion higher than the CBO projected and Republican lawmakers have seized on that discrepancy since then. The CBO later reported that revenues were higher than expected because of the 'burst of inflation' during the COVID-19 pandemic in 2021. There was also an increase in economic activity in 'the later years of the period' adding $700 billion. Also, new tariffs added about $250 billion, with other legislation partially offsetting those factors. What Trump and his allies have said about the agency Ahead of the CBO's analysis, Trump slammed the agency in a 'The Democrat inspired and 'controlled' Congressional Budget Office (CBO) purposefully gave us an EXTREMELY LOW level of Growth, 1.8% over 10 years,' Trump wrote. 'I predict we will do 3, 4, or even 5 times the amount they purposefully 'allotted' to us (1.8 percent) and, with just our minimum expected 3 percent growth, we will more than offset our tax cuts (which will, in actuality, cost us no money!),' Trump added. Advertisement In an 'The CBO sometimes gets projections correct, but they're always off every single time when they project economic growth,' Johnson told NBC News. '[The CBO] always underestimate the growth that will be brought about by tax cuts and reduction in regulations,' Johnson added. At a Alyssa Vega can be reached at

Yahoo
26 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump administration ends emergency abortion requirement for hospitals
The Trump administration has rescinded Biden-era guidance requiring hospitals to provide emergency abortions when necessary to stabilize a patient's health - even in states that ban the procedure. The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services announced the change Tuesday, saying the now-defunct guidance did not 'reflect the policy of this Administration.' Subscribe to The Post Most newsletter for the most important and interesting stories from The Washington Post. The Biden administration had issued the guidance in July 2022, weeks after the Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade, ending the national right to abortion, to clarify that a federal law guaranteeing emergency care for patients in peril took precedence over state abortion bans. It later sued Idaho in federal court to enforce penalties against hospitals that disregarded the federal policy to adhere to the state's strict abortion ban. The Trump administration's decision is not unexpected, but will likely make health care providers feel uneasy, especially if they practice in states with severe abortion bans, said Kelly Gillespie, director of the Center for Health Law Studies at St. Louis University. The Biden-era guidance was intended not only to protect pregnant patients but also to provide clarity to health care providers in states with strict abortion laws. 'The providers are only human,' she said. 'It's very natural for them to avoid anything that could lead them into serious legal jeopardy.' When the Department of Health and Human Services issued the guidance in 2022, it was intended to reinforce that health care providers could terminate a pregnancy in emergent situations amid a new patchwork of state abortion bans. The law at hand, the Emergency Medical Treatment & Labor Act - known as EMTALA - was enacted in 1986 and requires federally funded hospitals to stabilize or transfer patients needing emergency care. In a statement Tuesday, CMS said it would continue enforcing EMTALA, including 'for identified emergency medical conditions that place the health of a pregnant woman or her unborn child in serious jeopardy.' The agency added that it would 'work to rectify any perceived legal confusion and instability created by the former administration's actions.' Related Content Some advice from LGBTQ elders as WorldPride kicks off amid fears Black Democrats fume over 2024 while 'searching for a leader' in 2028 Joy, tension collide as WorldPride arrives in Trump's Washington