High court upholds House redistricting plan
The state's highest court rejected an appeal from critics that the Republican-led redistricting of the New Hampshire House of Representatives was so politically drawn that it should be deemed unconstitutional.
In its unanimous 4-0 ruling the New Hampshire Supreme Court decided the maps for the 400 seats approved and signed into law in 2022 met the 'rational basis' test that courts hold for such legislative acts.
A group of 10 residents had brought the appeal that alleged the approved map had failed to provide enough towns and city wards with their own representation.
They had introduced a rival plan from a nonpartisan organization known as 'Map-A-Thon' that came up with a proposal that gave 15 more communities and city wards their own state rep compared to the House plan.
The justices noted that any lawsuit against redistricting faces a high bar because it's the actions of a separate and independent branch of government.
'This means that we will not hold the redistricting statute to be unconstitutional unless a clear and substantial conflict exists between it and the Constitution,' justices wrote.
'It also means that when doubts exist as to the constitutionality of a statute, those doubts must be resolved in favor of its constitutionality.'
Attorney General John Formella's legal team had countered that the redistricting plan (HB 50) was a 'political decision to be made by the Legislature based on policy considerations.'
Redistricting has favored GOP
State prosecutors maintained for the court to strike the plan down, justices would have to act as lawmakers and the court agreed with that logic.
'The plaintiffs have not persuaded us that the trade-offs the Legislature made in enacting RSA 662:5 (redistricting law) were unreasonable,' the justices wrote.
'Accordingly, we conclude that the plaintiffs have not met their burden of demonstrating that the Legislature had no rational or legitimate basis for enacting RSA 662:5.'
Formella issued a statement praising the decision and thanking his legal team for its defense.
'Today's decision reaffirms the court's prior precedent recognizing the Legislature's broad discretion in the area of redistricting and recognizes that the Legislature must balance complex constitutional requirements when determining the most appropriate map,' Formella said.
'We are delighted that the Supreme Court affirmed the lower court's finding that the Legislature acted within its constitutional authority …'
In November, the high court upheld redistricting maps for the 24-person state Senate and the five-person Executive Council.
Since all three maps were approved, Republicans have held onto the ruling majorities in the Legislature and on the council.
In 2022, Democratic Party critics noted that their candidates for Executive Council got the most votes across the state, but they won only one of the five seats.
That's because the redistricting made four of those council districts more Republican-leaning while the fifth became much more Democratic.
The fifth Supreme Court justice, Anna Barbara Hantz Marconi, is on administrative leave while she fights charges she illegally interfered in a criminal investigation into her husband, State Ports and Harbors Director Geno Marconi.
klandrigan@unionleader.com
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
USA Today
24 minutes ago
- USA Today
Will Trump's big bill kill people? Here's the truth about Medicaid cuts.
Will Trump's big bill kill people? Here's the truth about Medicaid cuts. | Opinion Republicans are doing what's right, morally and fiscally. They're requiring able-bodied adults to work as a condition of receiving Medicaid benefits. Show Caption Hide Caption Disabled protesters removed from House committee hearing Disabled demonstrators protesting a Republican proposal to cut benefits were forced to leave a House committee hearing and arrested. Perhaps you've heard: Republicans are about to kick millions of people off health insurance. That claim is all over the news media as Congress debates the One Big Beautiful Bill Act. Advocates on the left even say the proposed changes will kill people. Such claims have no basis in reality. The point is to frighten Republican lawmakers into giving up on necessary reforms. Instead, the GOP should double down. Congressional Budget Office is biased, and often wrong The source for this fearmongering is the Congressional Budget Office. As the Foundation for Government Accountability shows in our new research, CBO staff consists largely of registered Democrats and the agency is often wrong in its projections. Washington elites and their media allies like to hold up the CBO as an all-seeing oracle. In theory, it's a nonpartisan federal agency inside Congress that accurately predicts how legislation will play out in the real world. In reality, CBO is overwhelmingly staffed by Democrats and its findings are less than trustworthy. We painstakingly analyzed the voter registration of every CBO employee. Our finding: A staggering 79% of CBO staff are Democrats. A mere 12% are Republicans. That's actually worse than senior bureaucrats at the most liberal federal agencies, including Housing and Urban Development, the State Department and Health and Human Services. And when you look at key CBO departments, the liberal bias is even more stark. The Health Analysis Division is 93% Democrat and zero Republican. That's the department now driving the news about the dangers of the Republican bill. In other words, CBO may well be the most liberal government outfit in all of Washington. And surprise, surprise: It does Democrats' bidding. Tell us: Republicans want massive cuts to Medicaid. What do you want? | Forum Opinion That fact should persuade Republicans to ignore CBO's analysis of the One Big Beautiful Bill Act. In May, CBO asserted that about 10 million people would lose their Medicaid coverage by 2034 if the bill passed. CBO blames Republican reforms like Medicaid work requirements, more frequent eligibility checks and the removal of illegal immigrants from Medicaid. But think about what's really happening. A group of Democratic bureaucrats are criticizing Republican efforts to roll back Democratic priorities. This isn't nonpartisan policy analysis. It's political damage control. CBO projections were wrong on 'Obamacare' And wouldn't you know: The leftist CBO is frequently wrong. The agency has a long history of underestimating the benefits of Republican policies like tax cuts and health care reforms. The CBO also routinely minimizes the damage of Democratic policies, especially the soaring cost of government expansions. In 2010, when the Affordable Care Act passed, the CBO said only 13 million able-bodied adults would be covered under the law's Medicaid expansion in all 50 states. But within a decade, 50% more able-bodied adults had jumped onto Medicaid, even though only two-thirds of states had expanded the program. Opinion: GOP must cut Medicaid now. Or risk debt crisis and devastating cuts later. CBO's error made "Obamacare" look more affordable than it is, and taxpayers have spent tens of billions of additional dollars on able-bodied adults who push vulnerable Americans and individuals with disabilities back in line. For more than a decade, CBO has been consistently wrong on Medicaid expansion's real-world impact, underestimating enrollment and the cost to taxpayers. But when CBO analyzed the Republican repeal of Obamacare's individual mandate in 2017, it overestimated how many people would lose coverage. It said 4 million people would lose private health coverage and Medicaid in the first two years alone. But by 2020, about 13 million people had gained coverage. CBO could hardly have been more wrong. And the agency is still in charge of making predictions. Now, the CBO is once again warning about massive coverage losses, and their media allies are dutifully repeating the assertion. But congressional Republicans should see through the charade. Case in point: CBO's predictions about the One Big Beautiful Bill Act include 1.6 million people enrolled in Medicaid in multiple states. They won't lose coverage in the state where they live, but CBO still counts them among those losing coverage. In addition, 200,000 'losses' are people who aren't even on Medicaid. CBO just assumes they'll join in the years ahead. GOP is doing the right thing with Medicaid The truth is that Republicans are doing what's right, morally and fiscally. They're requiring able-bodied adults to work as a condition of receiving Medicaid benefits. That will allow states to focus on Medicaid's intended recipients such as individuals with disabilities. Republicans are also removing ineligible people and illegal immigrants from Medicaid rolls. CBO makes it sound like those coverage losses are wrong, but what's really wrong is letting millions of people take advantage of taxpayers. Republicans are looking out for Americans − taxpayers, individuals with disabilities and future generations. The Congressional Budget Office, on the other hand, is looking out for the Democratic agenda of growing government at any cost. Republicans in the Senate should ignore the fearmongering and move forward with the One Big Beautiful Bill Act as soon as possible. Hayden Dublois is data and analytics director at the Foundation for Government Accountability, where Addison Scherler is a data investigator.
USA Today
24 minutes ago
- USA Today
'Elon is going to get decimated:' How Trump's feud with the world's richest man might end
'Elon is going to get decimated:' How Trump's feud with the world's richest man might end Show Caption Hide Caption President Trump gives his thoughts on Elon Musk amid clash on bill President Donald Trump responded to Elon Musk's criticism of his "big, beautiful bill" with disappointment as Musk responded on X. WASHINGTON — If history is any guide, and there is a lot of history, the explosive new falling out between President Donald Trump and Elon Musk is not going to end well for the former White House advisor and world's richest man. The political battlefield is littered with the scorched remains of some of Trump's previous allies who picked a fight with him or were on the receiving end of one. Lawyer Michael Cohen. Political advisor Steve Bannon. Attorney General Jeff Sessions, Defense Secretary James Mattis and Secretary of State Rex Tillerson. John Bolton, John Kelly and Chris Christie, to name just a few. 'If what happened to me is any indication of how they handle these matters, then Elon is going to get decimated,' said Cohen, the former long-term Trump lawyer and fixer who once said he'd 'take a bullet' for his boss. Musk, he said, "just doesn't understand how to fight this type of political guerilla warfare." 'They're going to take his money, they're going to shutter his businesses and they're going to either incarcerate or deport him,' Cohen said of what he thinks Musk will suffer at the hands of Trump and his administration. 'He's probably got the White House working overtime already, as we speak, figuring out how to close his whole damn thing down.' Cohen had perhaps the most spectacular blow up, until now, with Trump. He served time in prison after Trump threw him under the bus by denying any knowledge of pre-election payments Cohen made to a porn actress to keep her alleged tryst with Trump quiet before the 2016 election. More: President Trump threatens Elon Musk's billions in government contracts as alliance craters Cohen felt so betrayed by Trump that he titled his memoir 'Disloyal,' but the Trump administration tried to block its publication. Cohen ultimately fought back, becoming a star witness for the government in the state 'hush money' case and helped get Trump convicted by a Manhattan jury. Some suffered similar legal attacks and other slings and arrows, including Trump taunts and his trademark nasty nicknames. Trump vilified others, casting them into the political wilderness with his MAGA base. When Sessions recused himself from the Justice Department's investigation of Russian meddling in the 2016 election, Trump savaged him, calling his appointment a 'mistake' and lobbing other epithets. Sessions resigned under pressure in 2018. When he tried to resurrect his political career by running for his old Senate seat in Alabama, Trump endorsed his opponent, who won the GOP primary. After firing Tillerson, Trump called the former ExxonMobil chief lazy and 'dumb as a rock.' Trump still taunts Christie, an early supporter and 2016 transition chief, especially about his weight. Trump also had a falling out with Bannon, who was instrumental in delivering his presidential victory in 2016 and then joined the White House as special advisor. 'Steve Bannon has nothing to do with me or my Presidency,' Trump said in 2018, a year after Bannon's ouster from the White House. 'When he was fired, he not only lost his job, he lost his mind.' Trump's Justice Department even indicted Bannon in 2020 for fraud, though the President pardoned him before leaving office. One of Trump's biggest feuds was with Bolton, whom he fired as his national security advisor in 2019. Trump used every means possible to prevent his book, 'The Room Where it Happened,' from being published, Bolton told USA TODAY on Thursday. That included having the U.S. government sue his publisher on the false premise that Bolton violated a nondisclosure agreement and was leaking classified information, Bolton said. Bolton said Musk is unlike most others who have crossed swords with Trump in that he has unlimited amounts of money and control of a powerful social media platform in X to help shape the narrative. Musk also has billions in government contracts that even a vindictive Trump will have a hard time killing, as he threatened to do on Thursday, without significant legal challenges. Even so, Bolton said, "It's going to end up like most mud fights do, with both of them worse off. The question is how much worse the country is going to be off."
Yahoo
24 minutes ago
- Yahoo
It's the last day of work for a leader of a tiny CT town. Public opinion forced her out.
Today the clock starts ticking on finding an interim leader in a tiny Connecticut town. It's first selectwoman Paula Cofrancesco's last day on the job after resigning amid a scandal produced by an alleged child sex abuse case. Meanwhile, the remaining two members of the Board of Selectmen will be in charge: Democrat Gina Teixeira and Republican Robert H. Brinton, Jr. They are also responsible to take the first steps in finding an interim first selectman until November, when the regular election is held. Teixeira, who has a busy full-time job as a staff attorney for Disability Rights Connecticut in Hartford, said she is willing to handle town business in the meantime and she assumes so as Brinton, who couldn't be reached for comment. He is the town engineer in Orange. 'My plan is to be available as needed,' she said. 'It's a crisis situation.' Cofrancesco announced her resignation in May, effective June 6 at an annual town meeting after calls from residents for her to step down reached a feverish pitch. Cofrancesco came under fire in the wake of a report that blasted her handling of alleged child sex abuse by a town employee working with kids. That former employee, Anthony Mastrangelo, 25 at the time of his arrest, is facing sex assault and risk of injury to a minor charges. He has pleaded not guilty to the charges, and is free on bond. Now starts the task of finding a new first selectman. It could be fast or it could drag on until sometime in September. The process in this case gives Republicans an advantage because Cofrancesco is of that party. Cofrancesco could not be reached for comment. Since Bethany doesn't have a charter the town will follow the process outlined in state statute Sec. 9-222, 'Filling of vacancy in office of first selectman or selectman.' The statute says the remaining selectmen, in this case Teixeira and Brinton, can either take the position themselves or have 30 days to agree on a replacement. If the vacancy were not filled within 30 days the town clerk would within 10 days after have to notify the elective Republican town officers and they get to pick someone. It has to be within 30 days. If someone's not happy with the choice, a member of either party can petition for a special election for an interim replacement. For the petition to be successful they must have a number of electors at least equal to five percent of the names on the last-completed registry list, but not fewer than fifty electors. In this case if each step before a special election went out to the full 60 days , it would put a special election into about September. Regular Election Day is Nov. 4. Roger Senserrich, spokesman for the Secretary of State's office said that agency would become involved if there were a special election. To start the process Brinton and Teixeira are scheduled to meet Monday at Town Hall. If Monday's meeting were made public, the two selectmen would likely to go into executive, or private, session for part of it, if names are discussed. Cofrancesco has been under fire for about a year after the public, including irate parents, questioned her handling of allegations of sexual assault of girls by parks and recreation employee Anthony Mastrangelo, who was 25 at the time of his arrest. It is alleged he touched the girls during his employment. A fifth alleged child victim came forward after Mastrangelo babysat at her house. An investigation on the handling of the allegations revealed the State Police dropped the ball by not making an arrest sooner and that Cofrancesco failed to take action quickly to fire Mastrangelo and warn parents. The investigation also revealed a close friendship between Cofrancesco and the Mastrangelo family. It was so close they went on vacation together and Cofrancesco and Mastrangelo's mother planned meals together by email. When questioned about the vacation at a public meeting Cofrancesco told residents the meeting on vacation was by chance. Cofrancesco at first vowed she wouldn't resign, but residents didn't back down and began an appeal to the governor's office to have her ousted. Cofrancesco resigned effective June 6, saying although she didn't agree with the investigation report, the matter had become a 'distraction' to the town. Residents applauded when she resigned, but at the same time many were also further angered by what they read as a her continued lack of accepting responsibility. At the height of the demands for her to leave, those joining the list of residents calling for her resignation were state Sen. Jorge Cabrera, state Rep. Lezlye Zupkus, a Republican like Cofrancesco, the Bethany Democratic Town Committee, and Democratic Selectwoman Gina Teixeira, and the Republican Town Committee. The investigative report was based on a review of more than 125,000 electronic and paper documents — emails, text messages, town policies, and related attachments—and on interviews of 48 current and former town employees, elected officials, concerned citizens, and parents of the victims, according to the the law firm Pullman & Comley, LLC. She began her first term as first selectwoman in 2019.
