Some NI Water workers take part in strike action over pay
Some Northern Ireland Water workers are taking part in a one-day strike over pay.
They have accused management of 'failing to deliver a fair and equitable pay rise for 2023/2024'.
Advertisement
The trade union Nipsa said the workers are requesting an extra 1 per cent 'in line with the award given for 2023/2024 pay to other workers in the organisation and other public sector workers'.
NI Water has contended a 'small number' of workers are taking part in industrial action, and do not expect the action to affect services.
A spokesperson for Nipsa urged management to return to the negotiating table with a 'serious and fair offer'.
'The ballot result is a clear and unequivocal message: our members will not stand by while they are treated unfairly,' they said.
Advertisement
'Despite repeated efforts to engage constructively with management, no satisfactory offer has been made to address the pay disparity between this group of workers and others – whether that's senior management or other public sector employees who received a 5 per cent pay award for 2023/24.
'This situation has caused understandable anger and frustration among our members, who continue to deliver vital work under increasingly challenging conditions.
'It is unacceptable that while other employees received a higher settlement, this group has been left behind.
'There is no justification for treating our members differently when it comes to pay.
Advertisement
'The strong mandate for action reflects the determination of our members to achieve pay justice.
'We urge management to return to the negotiating table with a serious and fair offer for 2023/2024 pay that addresses the imbalance and respects the value of all staff equally.'
Rose Kelly, NI Water's director of people and learning, said they believe the pay offer was fair and equitable.
'As an arm's length organisation, NI Water operates a range of complex pay arrangements across its workforce.
Advertisement
'Over 95 per cent of our staff accepted the 2023/24 pay deal. However, Nipsa separately balloted a small number of employees who chose to remain on a legacy pay framework, and they have rejected the pay offer.
'The union has informed us that 29 of these staff out of a collective bargaining unit of almost 1,000 employees have voted to take industrial action, including a one-day strike on Thursday, 26th June.
'We firmly believe the total pay offer for 2023/24 is fair and equitable, as reflected in the overwhelming acceptance by our wider workforce. We remain committed to resolving this matter and ensuring these employees receive their pay settlement as soon as possible.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Rhyl Journal
39 minutes ago
- Rhyl Journal
Reynolds: Port Talbot plant does not meet US rules to get steel tariff exemption
The steel industry faces uncertainty over the US-UK trade deal finalised this month, which slashed tariffs on aerospace and auto sectors, but left levies on steel standing at 25% rather than falling to zero as originally agreed. Negotiations are ongoing to secure the outstanding tariff agreements. The executive order signed by Mr Trump suggests the US wants assurances on the supply chains for steel intended for export, as well as on the 'nature of ownership' of production facilities. Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer has insisted the ownership structure of the British Steel plant in Scunthorpe does not need to change to complete the deal with the US. 'The issue with the implementation of the steel agreement is the melt and pour rules, which is the US interpretation of rules of origin around steel,' Mr Reynolds told reporters. He said that applies to the Port Talbot plant, where semi-finished products come into the UK and then go to the mills for processing to keep the business going. 'That doesn't meet their existing implementation of that in the US.' The British Steel plant is controlled directly by the Government, but is still owned by Chinese firm Jingye. Asked if British Steel's ownership was part of US trade talks, he said it 'comes up in the context of the US (being) very supportive of what we did' to take control of the plant. 'On British Steel, we have to resolve issues of ownership separate to issues around US trade,' he said. The ownership is something that needs to be resolved 'regardless' of the US talks. The Government plans to class Britain's steel and energy sectors as 'nationally important' to UK security under new procurement rules.
South Wales Guardian
39 minutes ago
- South Wales Guardian
Reynolds: Port Talbot plant does not meet US rules to get steel tariff exemption
The steel industry faces uncertainty over the US-UK trade deal finalised this month, which slashed tariffs on aerospace and auto sectors, but left levies on steel standing at 25% rather than falling to zero as originally agreed. Negotiations are ongoing to secure the outstanding tariff agreements. The executive order signed by Mr Trump suggests the US wants assurances on the supply chains for steel intended for export, as well as on the 'nature of ownership' of production facilities. Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer has insisted the ownership structure of the British Steel plant in Scunthorpe does not need to change to complete the deal with the US. 'The issue with the implementation of the steel agreement is the melt and pour rules, which is the US interpretation of rules of origin around steel,' Mr Reynolds told reporters. He said that applies to the Port Talbot plant, where semi-finished products come into the UK and then go to the mills for processing to keep the business going. 'That doesn't meet their existing implementation of that in the US.' The British Steel plant is controlled directly by the Government, but is still owned by Chinese firm Jingye. Asked if British Steel's ownership was part of US trade talks, he said it 'comes up in the context of the US (being) very supportive of what we did' to take control of the plant. 'On British Steel, we have to resolve issues of ownership separate to issues around US trade,' he said. The ownership is something that needs to be resolved 'regardless' of the US talks. The Government plans to class Britain's steel and energy sectors as 'nationally important' to UK security under new procurement rules.
The Guardian
41 minutes ago
- The Guardian
EU leaders to direct European Commission on response to US tariffs
European leaders will tell the European Commission later on Thursday whether they want a quick trade deal with the US, or favour a tough response to Donald Trump's tariff threats. The European Commission president, Ursula von der Leyen, is expected to update EU leaders over dinner on Thursday on trade talks with the US ahead of a looming 9 July deadline. The commission is responsible for trade on behalf of the EU's 27 member states, but is seeking a steer on how to approach the economically critical talks with the White House. Trump has threatened to impose 50% tariffs on all EU goods from 9 July unless the two sides reach a deal. Most EU goods already face a 10% tariff, with levies of 25% on cars and car parts, and 50% on steel and aluminium. Arriving at the EU summit in Brussels, German chancellor Friedrich Merz said he supported the commission 'in all its endeavours to reach a trade agreement with the USA quickly'. Ireland's prime minister, Micheál Martin, said: 'Getting a deal is important for certainty so that we know the landscape ahead of us and that industry knows the landscape ahead of it, so that we can protect jobs, which is our number one priority.' Striking a more outspoken note, Spain's prime minister, Pedro Sánchez, said Trump's tariff threat was 'doubly unfair', because his country runs a trade deficit with the US. He was responding after Trump said Spain would 'pay twice as much', after Sánchez refused to commit to the 5% Nato spending target. Diplomats are increasingly pessimistic about negotiating away the 10% baseline tariffs. As this reality sinks in, two approaches are emerging: a quick deal that would mean certainty for business, or retaliation to press for something better. 'Do we go into aggressive retaliation mode or are we less vocal and do a quick deal,' said one source. The US has shown little obvious interest in the EU's offer of a 'zero-for-zero' free-trade zone on industrial goods, while continuing to attack the bloc's tech regulation and VAT rules. Earlier this week, von der Leyen reiterated that changes to the EU's Digital Markets Act – regulation affecting US tech companies – was off the table. 'Of course we discuss tariff lines, we discuss non-tariff barriers like standards and norms … but where it is the sovereign decision making process in the European Union and its member states that is affected this is too far.' Belgium's prime minister, Bart De Wever, said tariffs should be avoided at all costs. 'So we will not allow ourselves to be provoked, we will remain calm, we will negotiate and we hope to reach an agreement. If this is not the case, we will naturally adopt countermeasures, but these will be appropriate countermeasures,' he said. The EU has suspended levies on €21bn US goods until mid July to allow more time for negotiations. The bloc is consulting on further retaliatory tariffs targeting €95bn US goods, although the final total is likely to be smaller, if approved. The EU previously dropped plans to target American bourbon, after protests from France and Ireland, who feared retaliation against French cognac and Irish whiskey. Merz, under heavy pressure from German industry to strike a quick deal, criticised the EU's approach as too complicated at an industry conference in Berlin on Monday. He also suggested the EU should concentrate on negotiating in five sectors including the automotive and steel industries, which have been already been hit with tariffs, and pharmaceuticals, which remain in Trump's crosshairs. Sign up to Business Today Get set for the working day – we'll point you to all the business news and analysis you need every morning after newsletter promotion Peter Leibinger, president of the German Federation of Industries (BDI) said at the same conference that he [Merz] needed to 'carry the pain' being felt by German manufacturers to the Brussels bubble. The BDI said the tariffs would cost the German economy approximately 0.3 percentage points of growth, depressing an economy 'where industrial production remains significantly below the pre-crisis level of 2019'. The EU's chief trade negotiator, Maroš Šefčovič, said: 'The car industry of Europe, it's clearly bleeding. And really to have tariffs at the level of 27.5% which is a scary state, it is clearly unsustainable.' Carmakers face a 25% tariff, in addition to the 2.5% that pre-dated Trump's second term. Šefčovič said his 'one wish' was unity in the EU's approach. He was 'ready to fight tooth and nail' for the EU's interests, telling German business leaders to 'talk to us, criticise us, but support us'. He also revealed he was seeking an insurance clause in any deal: 'I think it would be clearly desirable … that we would have some kind of stand still clause, which would kind of prevent a surprise with sudden spikes [in tariffs] and volatility.'
