logo
Lawyer found guilty of 17 counts of misconduct: Law Society of Manitoba

Lawyer found guilty of 17 counts of misconduct: Law Society of Manitoba

CTV News9 hours ago

A Manitoba lawyer has been found guilty of 17 counts of professional misconduct by the Law Society of Manitoba, with disciplinary measures to be decided at a later date.
The decision dated June 20, 2025, found Paul Sydney Vyamucharo-Shawa breached the Law Society of Manitoba's Code of Professional Conduct following hearings that spanned eight months.
A three-person panel found the 67-year-old sole practitioner guilty of offences such as breach of integrity, failure to treat the court with 'candour, courtesy and respect,' recording conversations with clients and other lawyers without their consent, and sending abusive or offensive correspondence.
'The panel cannot escape the very distinct impression that Mr. Vyamucharo-Shawa, to this day, lacks insight into the impact his behaviours and his words—spoken or written—have on others in the profession with whom he deals with on a daily basis,' reads part of the 78-page decision.
The charges come after three citations were filed against him between 2022 and 2024, pertaining to a fee dispute with a former client, a real estate transaction and a litigation matter.
Several of the charges pertain to letters he sent to a Court of King's Bench justice and the society, including asserting that the justice was 'continuing to hog and not doing the needful' and was engaging in 'needless improper interference with access to justice.'
Vyamucharo-Shawa was previously suspended from practising law for six months in 2019 after pleading guilty to five counts of professional misconduct, according to files with the Law Society of Manitoba.
In 2008, he also pled guilty to four charges of professional misconduct, and in 2000, he pled guilty to nine charges of professional misconduct—with multiple charges relating to misappropriation of nearly $20,000 from a trust account.
In 1999, he accepted a formal caution for breaching a trust condition.
The latest decision says the discipline committee administrator will be contacted to arrange a date for a hearing on sanctions.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Man in his 20s stabbed at Withrow Park, police seeking 4 suspects
Man in his 20s stabbed at Withrow Park, police seeking 4 suspects

CTV News

timean hour ago

  • CTV News

Man in his 20s stabbed at Withrow Park, police seeking 4 suspects

Toronto police say a man in his 20s was taken to hospital after a reported stabbing at Withrow Park early Saturday morning. In an email to officials say they responded to the call at around 12:47 a.m. and found the victim suffering from stab wounds. His injuries are considered 'non-life-threatening.' Investigators say four male suspects fled the area before they arrived. No arrests have been made but police note an investigation is ongoing.

Man in his 30s hospitalized after being struck by vehicle in Etobicoke
Man in his 30s hospitalized after being struck by vehicle in Etobicoke

CTV News

timean hour ago

  • CTV News

Man in his 30s hospitalized after being struck by vehicle in Etobicoke

Police investigating a collision that happened at around 12:35 a.m. near Dixon Road and Martin Grove Road in Etobicoke on Saturday June 28, 2025 (CP24 photo). A man in his 30s was taken to hospital after being struck by a vehicle early Saturday morning, Toronto police say. In an email to officials say the collision happened at around 12:35 a.m. near Dixon Road and Martin Grove Road in Etobicoke. Police say the driver remained at the scene and that the pedestrian's injuries are considered to be non-life-threatening. It's unclear if any charges were laid but an investigation is ongoing.

'Political expediency': Lawyer for IDF soldiers critical of war-crimes probe
'Political expediency': Lawyer for IDF soldiers critical of war-crimes probe

National Post

time2 hours ago

  • National Post

'Political expediency': Lawyer for IDF soldiers critical of war-crimes probe

There is a growing backlash after the RCMP announced this month it is investigating whether Canadian citizens involved with clashes in or around Israel were in contravention of this country's Crimes Against Humanity and War Crimes Act. Article content Amid outcry from Jewish groups, the force said it wasn't a criminal probe, but to 'collect, preserve and assess information' for potential future prosecutions. Article content Article content Article content Foreign governments, such as Belgium and Brazil, have also opened investigations into their own citizens who served with the Israel Defense Forces. Article content Article content Lt.-Col. (ret.) Maurice Hirsch, director of the Initiative for Palestinian Authority Accountability and Reform, at the Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs, suggests these are politically motivated probes. Article content He has been retained by IDF soldiers who have been questioned by foreign government representatives. Hirsch has previously served as senior legal analyst for Human Rights Voices in New York, lawyer for the Israel Defense Forces, director of the legal department for Palestinian Media Watch, senior military consultant for NGO Monitor, and adviser to the Israeli Ministry of Defense. Article content I can't tell you exactly as to what their motivation is, but I believe that it's somewhere in the realms of political expediency, and internal demographic politics. It requires these governments to almost change what they've been doing traditionally, even to the point of potentially abandoning allies. Article content Article content Their voter base has changed. And so now you have a situation where you need to almost pander, to cater, to a more fringe population. Article content Article content In May, U.K. government lawyers told the High Court that there was no evidence Israel was deliberately targeting civilians in Gaza, and that evidence exists of Israel making efforts to limit harm to civilians. If the government doesn't believe that war crimes are being committed, then obviously they won't then take that forward, and actively engage in an investigation of something that they don't believe is happening. Article content But if the government is so prejudiced, and predisposed, that war crimes are being committed, then obviously you launch an investigation. Article content Video footage, forensic analysis, operational logs — all impartially examined. What they have is so weak and poor, it's impossible to say it's 'evidence.' I think it's just so circumstantial and flimsy, even imagined.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store