logo
Southport man gets jail time, probation for weapon charges

Southport man gets jail time, probation for weapon charges

Yahoo27-01-2025

ELMIRA, N.Y. (WETM) — A Southport man was sentenced to jail time and probation for having illegal weapons.
Chase Hartke, 25, was sentenced to six months of incarceration and five years of probation, according to the Chemung County District Attorney's Office. Hartke will get credit for an unspecified amount of time he has already served in the Chemung County Jail.
Hartke's sentence stems from a February 2024 weapon arrest. He was initially charged with 11 counts of third-degree criminal possession of a weapon and two counts of second-degree criminal possession of a weapon.
Original story: Southport man arrested on multiple weapons charges
Members of the Elmira Police Department and the New York State Police searched Hartke's Southport home on Feb. 17, 2024, and found a loaded AR-15 rifle, a loaded AeroPrecision M5, high-capacity ammunition magazines, ammunition in multiple calibers, and 3D-printed ghost gun parts. A picture of the weapons police found can be seen below:
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

East Bay teacher's aide charged with child pornography possession
East Bay teacher's aide charged with child pornography possession

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

East Bay teacher's aide charged with child pornography possession

(KRON) — An East Bay middle school teacher's aide has been charged with possessing child sexual abuse material, the Contra Costa County Sheriff's Office announced Wednesday. The Contra Costa County District Attorney's Office filed 20 counts against Dominic Vannucci, 25, of Discovery Bay, for possession of child pornography and annoying or molesting a child. Vannucci is employed at Excelsior Middle School in Byron, the sheriff's office said. Detectives notified the school and are working with administrators in the investigation. Livermore man arrested by ICE agents as family, protestors demand action A search warrant was executed Wednesday morning at Vannucci's residence on the 2200 block of Breaker Court in Discovery Bay, according to authorities. The county's Internet Crimes Against Children task force said electronic devices that contained child pornography were seized. Vannucci is being held on a $800,000 bail. Anyone with information in the case is asked to contact the Contra Costa County Sheriff's Office Investigation Division at 925-313-2600. Tips can be sent to tips@ and anonymous voice messages can be left at 866-846-3592. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

Supreme Court Ruling in Mexico Gun Case Fails to Absolve the US
Supreme Court Ruling in Mexico Gun Case Fails to Absolve the US

Bloomberg

timean hour ago

  • Bloomberg

Supreme Court Ruling in Mexico Gun Case Fails to Absolve the US

A few days ago, it was shaping up as a bad week for gun manufacturers at the US Supreme Court. On Monday, the justices refused — for the moment, at least — to entertain challenges to state laws banning the AR-15 and other semiautomatic rifles. But on Thursday, the court unanimously tossed a lawsuit by the government of Mexico seeking damages from multiple US firearm manufacturers for the harm their guns have caused within its borders. First, a quick word about the lawsuits that the justices announced this week they would not hear. In a pair of landmark decisions in 2008 and 2010, the Supreme Court ruled that the Second Amendment protects the right to own firearms 'in common use' — in those cases, handguns. The decisions have been controversial, but they're the law of the land, so gun control advocates have since shifted their attention to semiautomatic weapons. About 10 states ban or tightly restrict possession of the AR-15, which happens to be the most widely owned rifle in the country. The lower courts have upheld the ban. The Supreme Court declined to hear the appeals, although I think Justice Brett Kavanaugh was correct when he wrote that the court will be forced to revisit the question in the next term or two.

Supreme Court blocks Mexico's $10B lawsuit alleging US gunmakers have fueled cartel violence
Supreme Court blocks Mexico's $10B lawsuit alleging US gunmakers have fueled cartel violence

Yahoo

time5 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Supreme Court blocks Mexico's $10B lawsuit alleging US gunmakers have fueled cartel violence

WASHINGTON (AP) — The Supreme Court on Thursday blocked a $10 billion lawsuit Mexico filed against top firearm manufacturers in the U.S. alleging the companies' business practices have fueled tremendous cartel violence and bloodshed. The unanimous ruling tossed out the case under U.S. laws that largely shield gunmakers from liability when their firearms are used in crime. Big-name manufacturers like Smith & Wesson had appealed to the justices after a lower court let the suit go forward under an exception for situations in which the companies themselves are accused of violating the law. But the justices found that Mexico hadn't made a plausible argument that the companies had knowingly allowed guns to be trafficked into the country. 'It does not pinpoint, as most aiding-and-abetting claims do, any specific criminal transactions that the defendants (allegedly) assisted,' Justice Elena Kagan wrote in the court's opinion. Mexico had asked the justices to let the case play out, saying it was still in its early stages. The case began in 2021, when the Mexican government filed a blockbuster suit against some of the biggest gun companies, including Smith & Wesson, Beretta, Colt and Glock. Mexico has strict gun laws and has just one store where people can legally buy firearms. But thousands of guns are smuggled in by the country's powerful drug cartels every year. The Mexican government says at least 70% of those weapons come from the United States. The lawsuit claims that companies knew weapons were being sold to traffickers who smuggled them into Mexico and decided to cash in on that market. The companies reject Mexico's allegations, arguing the country's lawsuit comes nowhere close to showing they're responsible for a relatively few people using their products to commit violence. A federal judge tossed out the lawsuit under a 2005 law that protects gun companies from most civil lawsuits, but an appeals court revived it. The 1st U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Boston found it fell under an exception to the shield law for situations in which firearm companies are accused of knowingly breaking laws in their business practices. That exception has come up in other cases, including in lawsuits stemming from mass shootings. Families of victims of the 2012 mass shooting at Sandy Hook Elementary School in Newtown, Connecticut, for example, argued it applied to their lawsuit because the gunmaker had violated state law in the marketing of the AR-15 rifle used in the shooting, in which 20 first graders and six educators were killed. The families eventually secured a landmark $73 million settlement with Remington, the maker of the rifle. ___ Follow the AP's coverage of the U.S. Supreme Court at

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store