Four men ‘torched Ukrainian-owned firm in UK on behalf of Russia's Wagner Group'
FOUR men accused of torching a Ukrainian-owned firm in the UK did so on behalf of Russia's Wagner Group, a court has heard.
Goods including Starlink satellite equipment were being sent out to Kyiv from the targeted industrial estate unit.
Around £1million in damage was caused when it was set alight in Leyton, East London, in March last year.
Paul English, 61, Nii Kojo Mensah, 23, Jakeem Barrington Rose, 23, and Ugnius Asmena, 20, are said to have started the blaze.
The Old Bailey was told that CCTV placed them driving to the scene in English's Kia Picanto.
Jurors heard Rose and Mensah were seen climbing a wall to approach the warehouse, while Mensah also livestreamed the arson.
Prosecutor Duncan Penny, KC, said they were paid agents motivated by 'good old-fashioned greed'.
He added: 'They did not act alone . . . they were recruited by and directed by two others who have since admitted their role in the aggravated arson.
'This was deliberate and calculated criminality at the behest of foreign influence.'
Vladimir Putin -controlled Wagner Group.
The four deny aggravated arson.
The trial continues.
Full devastation of Op Spiderweb revealed as new pics show Putin's jets in RUINS after drone blitz
1
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
BBC News
39 minutes ago
- BBC News
Security increase after vandalism at Wakefield bus station
Security is to be increased at a city's main bus station in an effort to tackle anti-social behaviour, an MP has action comes following incidents of vandalism and reports from passengers who said they felt unsafe using Wakefield Bus initiative would involve police and station security staff working in partnership to provide a visible deterrent to criminals and reassurance to station users and staff, according to Simon Lightwood Labour MP for Wakefield and Rothwell and minister for local transport, said disabled passengers had been unable to access toilets at the site following vandalism, adding that "everybody should feel safe using Wakefield Bus Station". "It's the gateway for people to visit our city centre, spend money in our local businesses and visit local attractions," he to the Local Democracy Reporting Service, Lightwood said the government had made tackling anti-social behaviour and crime a top priority."That includes making sure our public transport networks and transport hubs are safe for everyone to use." Insp Paul Fraser, of Wakefield central neighbourhood policing team, said the action at the bus station was part of measures being put in place to reduce crime across the city and Wakefield Council had set up a new anti-social behaviour task force in a bid to increase visitor numbers which had involved additional city centre neighbourhood police and council enforcement officer patrols, he were also in place to review public space protection orders so more powers could be available to tackle aggressive begging, substance misuse and anti-social Morley, Wakefield Council's cabinet member for planning and highways, said the increased prescence at the bus station would "help deter crime and anti-social behaviour in and around one of our major travel hubs"."That's why this new regular contact point sits alongside work our new Wakefield city anti-social behaviour task force is doing to crackdown on issues affecting people in our city centre," he Hoare, area director for bus operator Arriva, said the firm would continue to work with police and the MP to help make the bus station a more "welcoming and safer place". Listen to highlights from West Yorkshire on BBC Sounds, catch up with the latest episode of Look North.
The Independent
an hour ago
- The Independent
Regulators tackle influencers promoting ‘rouge' financial products as legal action begins
Global regulators, including the UK's Financial Conduct Authority (FCA), have launched a coordinated effort to shield social media users from misleading promotions by financial influencers, or "finfluencers." The international crackdown, which began on 2 June, involves regulators from Australia, Canada, Hong Kong, Italy, and the United Arab Emirates. In the UK, the FCA has issued 50 warning alerts, which the regulator said will result in more than 650 take down requests on social media platforms and more than 50 websites operated by unauthorised finfluencers. Additionally, the FCA has sent seven "cease and desist" letters and invited four finfluencers for interviews. The FCA, supported by the City of London Police, has also made three arrests and initiated criminal proceedings against three individuals. Finfluencers are social media personalities who promote financial products and share advice with their followers. This international action aims to ensure they operate within regulatory boundaries, protecting consumers from potential financial harm. Many are acting legitimately and not breaking any laws – but others may tout products or services illegally and without authorisation through online videos and posts, where they use the pretence of a lavish lifestyle, often falsely, to promote success, the regulator said. The FCA said it has also made thee arrests with the support of the City of London Police and authorised criminal proceedings against three people. Steve Smart, joint executive director of enforcement and market oversight at the FCA, said: 'Our message to finfluencers is loud and clear. They must act responsibly and only promote financial products where they are authorised to do so – or face the consequences.' Meanwhile, the Treasury Committee said it had sent a letter to Meta, owners of Facebook and Instagram, asking for information on its approach to financial influencers. The committee said the correspondence follows evidence from FCA officials to the committee in April that it had taken Meta up to six weeks to act on alerts on individual influencers. The committee has asked Meta to set out to it why 'it has taken you on occasion up to six weeks to respond to a takedown request from the Financial Conduct Authority?' It has also asked Meta in the letter to set out the number of days allowed to elapse in which posts that the FCA requested to be taken down have remained online. The request covers the past 12 months and the committee has asked for a reply by June 20 2025. The FCA said that consumers should check its warning list before making any decision about how to invest their money. Its InvestSmart page contains information to help people make investment decisions. Sam Richardson, deputy editor of Which? Money, said: 'With more people turning to social media for investment advice, so-called finfluencers can be the deciding factor in make-or-break financial decisions for many people. 'They can be based anywhere in the world, so it's good to see the FCA working with other regulators on this crackdown.' He added: 'We highly recommend that anyone looking for information before investing includes well-established and reputable sources in their research, and if seeking financial advice they obtain it from professionals or companies that are regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority.'
The Guardian
an hour ago
- The Guardian
Demise of TGP Europe leaves Premier League clubs with income gap to fill
Barely anyone outside the gambling world and the sports marketing industry had heard of TGP Europe (The Gaming Platform) before the Great Britain Gambling Commission announced last month that the Isle of Man-based company, which was threatened with a £3.3m fine for multiple violations of anti-money laundering regulations, had chosen to surrender all of its licences and exit the British market. Yet the aftershock of this apparently inconsequential event was immediately felt throughout the football world, and nowhere more so than within the Premier League. For more than a decade, TGP Europe had been the discreet conduit through which tens of millions of pounds of sponsorship enriched almost all Premier League clubs, with very few or no questions asked; money which came directly from some of the most controversial online sports betting operators, opaque brands which target almost exclusively the illegal Asian market, and mainland China in particular. In 2024-25, no fewer than 13 Premier League clubs had commercial partnerships in place with clients of TGP, 11 of which operated almost exclusively in jurisdictions where betting on private online platforms is illegal and even criminalised. This was made possible through the exploitation of a loophole in the UK gambling regulations. TGP Europe, as a so-called white label provider (provision of services under one company), took care of everything. As it was licensed in the UK, it could register . domain names for its customers. This is how Kaiyun, for example, was able to display its name on the fronts of Nottingham Forest's shirts and the sleeves of Crystal Palace's jerseys despite it not having any working British operation. Its . website remained 'under construction' until it disappeared for good last month. It didn't matter; what mattered was that the Chinese and Asian customers of Kaiyun saw its brand name publicly displayed on the fields of the world's most popular football club competition. This brought them exposure in their primary market, where gambling advertising is prohibited, and a degree of legitimacy as they could claim – incorrectly – that they were 'licensed' through TGP Europe by the Great Britain Gambling Commission (GBGC). TGP is not the only British-registered company to have used this loophole, but what made them stand out is that they had been set up by one of Macau's biggest junkets (casino groups), SunCity, which was owned and run by gambling tycoon Alvin Chau until a Macau court found him guilty of running a criminal organisation and sentenced him to 18 years in prison in January 2023. The links between TGP and Chau's SunCity were first publicised when sports betting firm SBTech announced a strategic partnership with the Isle of Man-based company in 2014. Yet TGP and its clients were allowed to prosper on the back of their lucrative relationships with Premier League clubs, despite a growing number of media reports highlighting the problematic nature of their business. At least two Asian-facing betting partners of English clubs – BK8, formerly associated with Aston Villa and Burnley, and 8XBet, partners of Manchester City, Chelsea, Bournemouth, Leicester and Ipswich – have been accused of running their operations from compounds in Cambodia and Myanmar, countries where the United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime estimates that at least 200,000 people have been trafficked and enslaved to service the gambling and scamming industries, all of which are intimately connected. BK8 and 8XBet, whose ultimate beneficial owners are unknown, have never responded to these allegations. Yet TGP was allowed to carry on – until now. A first fine of £316,250 for non-compliance with anti-money laundering regulations was imposed by the GBGC in February 2023. This time, further investigation into the company's affairs, which claims to operate from a minuscule and apparently abandoned office, 'revealed failures to carry out effective due diligence on each entity involved in the ownership of the third party, carry out due diligence on the source of funds for business arrangement, sufficiently consider money laundering risks, [and] sufficiently consider any activity by a third party that is illegal, in either GB or the territory in which it is conducted'. TGP Europe has not responded to a request for comment. The clubs have not broken any regulations but the GBGC sent a letter to some – but not all – of the Premier League clubs who, during the 2024-25 season, had unlicensed partners. This was courtesy of TGP warning 'of the risks of promoting unlicensed gambling websites' and 'that club officers may be liable to prosecution and, if convicted, face a fine, imprisonment or both if they promote unlicensed gambling businesses that transact with consumers in Great Britain'. Sign up to Football Daily Kick off your evenings with the Guardian's take on the world of football after newsletter promotion The clubs were Bournemouth (sponsored by BJ88), Fulham FC (SBOTOP), Newcastle ( and FUN88), Wolves (DEBET) and promoted Burnley ( Leicester (partner of among others) and Everton (Stake) had already been warned. Aston Villa, who have partnered with Nova88, were not contacted, as the bookmaker in question does not have a UK incarnation. While campaigners and regulators will hail a victory over illegal gambling, Premier League clubs will be wondering how to make up for the financial shortfall TGP's disappearance from the British market will cause. It is unlikely that another white label company will step into the breach, especially since the Premier League ban on front-of-shirt betting sponsorship is only one season away. It is not just that sports betting brands, especially Asian-facing ones, pay a premium of 20-40% above the usual rate for their partnerships, the fear within football is that an entire income stream which cannot be replaced may have gone. This is not necessarily the case, however. Spain imposed a far stricter ban on sports betting advertising at the start of the 2021-22 season. Asian-facing betting operators disappeared from the stadiums of La Liga but they didn't leave Spanish football altogether, as the Spanish regulators only concerned themselves with Spanish gamblers. So while people in Spain can't see the advertising, Real Madrid, for example, is taking Kaiyun's money with a partnership outside the country. 'We will be carrying out checks without further notice to ensure these sites remain blocked,' the GBGC said in its statement on TGP. 'We will also conduct ongoing spot checks as necessary to ensure they are not accessible to consumers in Great Britain by any means. Should any of these sites be available to GB consumers, we will take appropriate action.' This, however, only addresses the visible part of the problem. It fails to deal with the global dimension of football's toxic relationship with illegal betting operators.
