It's the One Thing Holding Many People Together. Trump's Tariffs May Just Take It Away.
Sign up for the Slatest to get the most insightful analysis, criticism, and advice out there, delivered to your inbox daily.
It's no secret that much of this country's social contract rests on the ability to access little sweet treats to break up the painful slog of eking out a living. Look no further than the therapeutic objective of trinkets like Sonny Angels for young working women, or the popularization of festooned coffees among Gen Z and millennials as a form of self-care and escapism.
The fact of the matter is, many people in this country were made promises that were never realized; the idea that working hard equals making enough money to comfortably live a life that could not be found anywhere else in the world is about as true and reasonable as telling everyone that the tooth fairy runs a sweatshop inside your mouth. The cost of living has ballooned, salaries have not, and baby boomers are not retiring, making career and pay growth difficult for younger generations. At what point does continuing to stare down the abyss of this reality start to become self-flagellation? The only string tying many people's brains together is the promise of a small little expense to get them through the day.
Alexa, 28, who asked to only use her first name for privacy concerns, told Slate that she also fears for the viability of accessing her little treats, which include Thai takeout. Already in the past few weeks, she's seen the prices at her favorite Thai restaurant increase, while strawberries—one of her other favorite indulgences—are one of the fruits most likely to be most impacted by Trump's tariffs on Mexico.
'My sweet-treat consumption has scaled upward over the years because I make more money, but I would also say because I feel more cynical about the world,' she said. 'Climate disasters are more frequent and extreme, the microplastics are even more embedded in our brains than we previously realized, we just laid off the federal workers who were taking care of Florida's manatee refuge. I feel discouraged often these days and want to have a sweet treat on deck.'
An iced vanilla latte with oat milk. A fast-fashion skirt purchased online. A eucalyptus tea–scented candle. A collectible Labubu doll or Smiski blind box. A pain au chocolat from a nearby bakery.
'Sweet treat' has become a common diminutive phrase used to describe the small purchases (which are sometimes neither sweet, nor an edible treat) meant to help you feel something throughout the day. But as with so many of the positive things in life, the sweet-treat economy is under attack with the rollout of President Donald Trump's wide-ranging directives. The president's mass deportations have thrown the agriculture and restaurant industries into panic and uncertainty, as farmworkers and restaurant employees have feared returning to work due to nationwide Immigration and Customs Enforcement raids. Meanwhile, the oscillating rollout of Trump's proposed tariffs on Canada, Mexico, and China have affected companies scrambling to figure out how to mitigate anticipated cost increases. Temu and Shein loyalists in particular have already felt the brunt of Trump's levies against China, with delayed shipping and rising prices weighing down the dirt-cheap retailers and their legions of fans. Add on rising inflation and ballooning costs of living, and many people are worried that their sweet treats—already little luxuries—will soon become totally unaffordable.
Michelle, 27, said she's experienced fear over loss of her nearly daily sweet treat: a Sumo orange, which she described as 'the most juicy and easy-to-peel orange with the best orange flavor you've ever had.'
Sumo oranges, a seedless satsuma–mandarin orange hybrid, only began shipping to the United States a decade ago. The fruit originated in Japan but is now grown domestically in the San Joaquin Valley, which recently experienced disruptions to harvests amid the fear of ICE raids. Otherwise, they are only imported from Australia, where exports like steel and aluminum have also been targets of Trump tariffs, and other major exports like beef and dairy could be next. Otherwise, the Sumos haven't been immune to inflation—Delish reported that they cost north of $3 per pound in 2021, but today, they cost $10 for a 2-pound bag at Whole Foods.
With all of these factors, Michelle, who asked to remain anonymous for fear of her friends and family learning how much she consumes Sumo oranges, is worried that they will soon become out of her budget entirely. She said that she usually likes to keep at least one on hand at all times in case she has a rough day at work.
'If we didn't have Sumo oranges in the New York winter I would probably have to move out of New York,' Michelle said. 'It is the only thing I have to look forward to in the winter.'
It's possible that many of these common treats will soon come under the same kind of price attack as Sumo oranges and strawberries. Coffee and chocolate have experienced climate change–induced crises over the years, with cacao and coffee beans both facing record high prices and record low supply. Foods that are largely imported, like tomatoes, avocados, and bananas, are also at risk of tariff-induced increases. To consider these produce purchases as 'treats' in and of itself feels symptomatic of a larger trend: Everyday expenses like housing, groceries, and clothing have all experienced price hikes and quality decreases since the onset of the pandemic, turning them from basic purchases to special things. Meanwhile, the things we consider to already be 'treats,' like toys, concerts, vacations, or special occasion–wear, are slowly being priced out of our budgets altogether. China is still the biggest producer and exporter of textiles, electronics, and toys, and in light of Trump's 10 percent tariff for all Chinese imports that went into effect this month, prices for everything from clothes to phones to Squishmallows and Jellycats are likely to jump higher.
There doesn't seem to be much relief coming in the near future. Despite Trump employing splashy branding for ideas like the $1 billion egg-price reduction plan, the reality is that things are getting more expensive—and that could be the end of sweet treats for even the most dedicated. Alexa said she feels that if prices continue to rise, there will be a time when she has to stop buying both her beloved strawberries and takeout. 'I'm afraid of the disappointment of paying $6 for a tiny clamshell of strawberries only for them to taste like a bland Hello Kitty eraser,' she said. 'I will still shell out an indecent amount of money for some Thai takeout, but if prices keep going up I don't know how financially or emotionally sustainable that is. If I had to put a hard number on it, I would say that more than $16 for a pad see ew really wounds me.'
At some point, though, when the sweet treats run dry, all you have left is the uncomfortable truth of how acutely everyone is suffering. Michelle said that the loss of her treat of choice—Sumo oranges—'could radicalize me further. I'm not sure, but this winter has been so fucked up politically, and outside is so cold, I think anything could happen.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
15 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump, Musk trade barbs as spending bill dispute continues
WASHINGTON (NewsNation) — President Donald Trump hit back at criticism from former adviser Elon Musk on Thursday, saying Musk knew what was in his 'big, beautiful' spending bill and only stopped supporting it once he learned of cuts related to electric vehicle funding. While meeting with new German Chancellor Friedrich Merz, Trump said he was 'very disappointed' with Musk after the billionaire former supporter and adviser turned on the Republican-backed spending bill. 'I've helped Elon a lot,' Trump said. Musk, whose company Tesla is the nation's largest electric vehicle manufacturer, has called the bill a 'disgusting abomination.' 'We have a deal,' Trump says, after trade talks with China's Xi Trump said he was unsure if he would continue to have a great relationship with Musk, a powerful ally who has led efforts to reduce government spending. He suggested Musk misses being in the White House and has 'Trump derangement syndrome.' Trump said Musk hasn't said anything 'bad' about him but predicts 'that'll be next.' As Trump was speaking from the Oval Office, Musk posted to his social platform, X, 'Slim Beautiful Bill for the win.' Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Yahoo
16 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Musk Escalates Trump Feud, Says President Was in Epstein Files and He'd Have Lost Election Without Him: ‘Have a Nice Day, DJT!'
Tesla CEO and former special government employee Elon Musk dropped a 'really big bomb' on his relationship with Donald Trump on Thursday, alleging that the president is directly implicated in documents related to Jeffrey Epstein's crimes and is keeping those documents a secret for that reason. Musk also complained that Trump is being 'ungrateful' and would not have won the 2024 presidential election without his help. The rapidly disintegrating friendship between the two men appeared to completely fall apart Thursday morning when Trump acknowledged Musk's repeated criticisms of his Big, Beautiful Bill. 'Elon and I had a great relationship. I don't know if we will anymore,' Trump told White House reporters. 'I'm very disappointed in Elon. I've helped Elon a lot.' The president also insisted that he would have easily won the state of Pennsylvania and, therefore, last year's election even without Musk's endorsement and help. In response to a video of Trump's remarks, Musk tweeted, 'Without me, Trump would have lost the election, Dems would control the House and the Republicans would be 51-49 in the Senate.' In an additional tweet, the billionaire accused Trump of expressing 'such ingratitude.' Earlier Thursday, Trump suggested that Musk was opposing his spending bill because of its proposed cutting of the federal electric vehicle tax credit. 'Elon knew the inner workings of this bill better than almost anybody sitting here,' Trump said of Musk. 'He only developed [a] problem when he found out that we're going to have to cut the EV mandate.' In the same press conference, Trump noted that Musk has not yet said anything bad about him personally, but remarked, 'I'm sure that'll be next.' Musk has disputed Trump's claims about both his knowledge of the spending bill's details and his purported, self-interested reasons for opposing it. 'This bill was never shown to me even once and was passed in the dead of night so fast that almost no one in Congress could even read it!' Musk wrote in one tweet. The billionaire spent part of Thursday morning retweeting and quote-tweeting 12 and 13-year-old tweets from Trump, in which he criticized the national debt and deficit under President Obama. Musk even created a poll on X asking users, 'Is it time to create a new political party in America that actually represents the 80% in the middle?' In response to a tweet from far-right personality Laura Loomer asking whether Republican officials will choose to side with Trump or Musk, the latter also replied, 'Some food for thought as they ponder this question: Trump has 3.5 years left as President, but I will be around for 40+ years…' For his part, Trump indirectly addressed on Truth Social Musk's latest tweets. 'Elon was 'wearing thin,' I asked him to leave, I took away his EV Mandate that forced everyone to buy Electric Cars that nobody else wanted (that he knew for months I was going to do!), and he just went CRAZY!,' Trump posted. The president further threatened, 'The easiest way to save money in our Budget, Billions and Billions of Dollars, is to terminate Elon's Governmental Subsidies and Contracts. I was always surprised that Biden didn't do it!' The post Musk Escalates Trump Feud, Says President Was in Epstein Files and He'd Have Lost Election Without Him: 'Have a Nice Day, DJT!' appeared first on TheWrap.
Yahoo
16 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump confirms China trip after 'very good' call with Xi
Donald Trump has said he will visit China after speaking to its leader Xi Jinping over the phone. The US president said he had reciprocated with an invite to the White House during the "very good talk" - though such a trip has not been confirmed by either side. Thursday's call is the first time the two leaders have spoken since Trump launched a trade war with Beijing in February. Chinese state media reported that the call happened at the White House's request. Trump wrote on social media that the hour-and-a-half conversation was primarily focused on trade and had "resulted in a very positive conclusion for both countries". China says US has 'severely violated' tariffs truce China hits back after Trump claims it is 'violating' tariff truce "He invited me to China and I invited him here," Trump said of the call with Xi while meeting German Chancellor Friedrich Merz in the Oval Office. "We both accepted, so I will be going there with the first lady at a certain point and he will be coming here hopefully with the first lady of China." The Chinese readout of the conversation mentioned the its invitation but not the reciprocal one to the White House. According to Chinese state news agency Xinhua, Xi reportedly told Trump that the US should "withdraw the negative measures it has taken against China". The Chinese leader was also said to have told Trump that China always kept its promises and since a consensus had been reached, both sides should abide by it - a reference to a recent deal between the two nations struck in Geneva. Both sides have accused the other of breaching the deal aimed at dramatically reducing trade tariffs - a deal Trump touted as a "total reset". It came after Trump raised tariffs on imports from a number of countries, but reserved the highest rates for China. Beijing responded with its own higher rates on US imports, sparking tit-for-tat increases that peaked at 145%. The tentative truce struck in May brought that US tariff on Chinese products down to 30%, while Beijing slashed levies on US imports to 10% and promised to lift barriers on critical mineral exports. The agreement gave both sides a 90-day deadline to try to reach a trade deal. But since then, talks have seemed to grind to a halt amid claims on both sides that the deal had been breached. The US has accused China of failing to restart shipments of critical minerals and rare earth magnets vital to car and computer industries. The Chinese Ministry of Commerce has denied the claims and accused the US of undermining the deal by introducing new restrictions on computer chips. Trump introduced new export restrictions on semiconductor design software and announced it would revoke the visas of Chinese students. The US president said following the call that "there should no longer be any questions respecting the complexity of Rare Earth products". He told reporters in the White House: "Chinese students can come, no problem, no problem - its an honour to have them frankly. But we want to check them." Chinese state media reported that Xi warned Washington that it should handle Taiwan "with caution" to avoid conflict, just days after US Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth said China posed an "imminent" threat to the self-governed island. Hegseth told the Shangri-la Dialogue in Singaport that Beijing was "credibly preparing to potentially use military force to alter the balance of power". China sees Taiwan as a breakaway province that will eventually be reunified, and has not ruled out the use of force to achieve this. The US supports Taiwan militarily but does not officially recognise it due to the "One China" policy. According to the readout of Thursday's call given to Chinese media, Xi stressed that the US should handle the "Taiwan issue prudently to prevent a small number of Taiwan Independence separatists from dragging China and the US into a dangerous situation of conflict and confrontation". The call between Trump and Xi is long awaited and comes after months of silence between the two leaders. The White House has touted the possibility they might talk from week one of Trump's presidency - and earlier this week he finally vented his frustration on social media. Trump wrote: "I like President Xi of China, always have, and always will, but he is VERY TOUGH, AND EXTREMELY HARD TO MAKE A DEAL WITH!" Trump has made it clear that he likes to be involved in negotiations. But this is not the way China does business. Beijing prefers to appoint a negotiating team led by a trusted official. Any calls or meeting between heads of state are usually thoroughly planned and highly choreographed. The Chinese will also not want to be seen to bend to Washington's demands. US and China struggle for dominance as officials meet for Shangri-La Dialogue