logo
My neighbour's bamboo is costing me thousands... but he doesn't care - here's why

My neighbour's bamboo is costing me thousands... but he doesn't care - here's why

Daily Mail​10-05-2025

It was once late night noise or disputed planning permission that were top of the neighbour row list. But now, an entirely new threat is plaguing homeowners' safety and sanity: bamboo.
Historically the hottest garden plant on the planet, designed for privacy or even just to make mundane lawns look slightly more exotic, one Australian resident has now shared the true horrors of the 'disruptive' and 'out of control' plant.
Paul Wilkinson, based in New South Wales, told Yahoo News that he has spent almost $3,000 attempting to reverse the damage of a bamboo plant that he says his neighbour first planted five years ago.
In that time, he claims it has nearly doubled in size, standing at nine metres tall and entirely overshadowing his two-storey home.
The worst part is that despite pleading with his neighbour to manage the invasive plant, who he claims often leaves his property vacant given it is a holiday home, Mr Wilkinson insists that he simply 'doesn't seem to care'.
And, as the flora continues to rapidly grow, Mr Wilkinson has been forced to deal with an abundance of bamboo leaves continually falling onto his footpath.
He even spent up to $12,000 on 29 solar panels on his roof that the large plant is now blocking, 'significantly limiting' his desired power bill savings.
Speaking to the publication about his frustration, Mr Wilkinson said that he had hoped his neighbour would be 'reasonable' after his last power pill came to 'almost a thousand dollars.'
He added: 'I understand he seeks some level of privacy, but the majority of the foliage is on the top third of the plant, so when I actually sit on my veranda, I can look straight through the bamboo at the pool anyway.
'If this was cut down, it would be at eye level to provide privacy.'
Mr Wilkinson insists that he asked his neighbour in June if they could discuss the bamboo being reduced to an acceptable height and, despite assurances from the neighbour that they would discuss it the next time he was present at the property, Mr Wilkinson has not seen or heard from him since.
Having exhausted all other options, the Australian homeowner has now paid nearly $3,000 in legal fees to submit an application to the Land and Environment Court in a bid to get the plant forcibly cut back.
Not just an issue for existing homeowners, but also for prospective buyers too, Mr Wilkinson's neighbour horror story comes as MailOnline recently spoke to a woman, who chose to remain anonymous, that discovered 350 square metres of bamboo growing underground when purchasing a new home in rural England.
After further probing the sellers she discovered the garden had previously been invaded with ten-metre-high bamboo. While they had a local contractor remove the plant, it is a complicated procedure that had not been done properly.
Instead, the bamboo had started to regrow and spread next door, a problem the new owner felt was intentionally being passed onto her.
So, before buying the property she decided to have a bamboo surveyor provide a quote for how much it would cost to remove all of the plant.
With a ten year maintenance it ended up being an eye-watering £11k, that involved five days of work.
Sharing her suspicions with MailOnline, she said: 'The owners knew [about the bamboo] but I think their plan was to sell it with the bamboo and not do anything about it.
'In my job I deal with places that have Japanese knotweed so I know what to look for.'
Emily Grant from Environet, an invasive plants management company, also told MailOnline how bamboo is becoming a 'huge problem' within the UK, with a '900 per cent increase in demand for bamboo-related work in the last three years '.
What's more, Ms Grant explained that there is a lack of awareness in the UK concerning the 'problematic' dangers of bamboo, with many still opting to use it as a tactic to block out surrounding properties.
Instead, homeowners are preoccupied with another invasive species: Japanese knotweed, with 73 per cent of people believing it is more harmful than bamboo.
Further highlighting the extent of possible damage caused by bamboo, Callum Hurst, director of C H Enviro, specialising in invasive plant removal, said:
'When you're dealing with bamboo rhizomes, it's a lot more aggressive and it's a lot more hardy and it can cause a lot more damage to concrete and it can manipulate those cracks a lot faster than Japanese knotweed.
'I've been dealing with Japanese Knotweed for about 13 years and there's only been a couple of cases where I've seen it cause structural damage.
'But with bamboo, it will tear up patios, it will break its way through waste pipes and damage underground services it can get into the footings of a building and the cavities it can start growing up in between the wall cavities.
'I've seen it spread from one garden to two properties down, it tore up the whole patio, the waste pipes and it spread all through the lawn, that was about 10 metres of spread.'
Despite not being officially classified as an invasive species in the UK, bamboo can spread faster and further than the well-known Japanese knotweed.
Stronger than steel, the plant can even reach up to 28 thousand pounds per square inch off tensile strength. It is becoming a pressing issue as it approaches its 'lag period'.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Parenting in the climate crisis: how to raise kids who care about the environment
Parenting in the climate crisis: how to raise kids who care about the environment

The Guardian

time9 hours ago

  • The Guardian

Parenting in the climate crisis: how to raise kids who care about the environment

Although it's unfair, it's young people (and the generations to come) who will have to deal with fallout from the climate crisis. So how do you talk to young people about living sustainably and raise knowledgeable kids who care about the future of the planet? Here are some tips for engaging the next generation on the environment meaningfully. Damon Gameau, actor, film-maker and director of documentaries including 2040 and the upcoming Future Council, says we have built a system that doesn't value nature – and that needs to change. 'Very quickly, children aren't encouraged to care. They're encouraged to try and extract and conquer and win and compete.' Instilling care and empathy in children works in a similar way to teaching them most other things: through modelling, education and good conversations. Susy Lee, author of Raising Kids Who Care and an educator with 18 years' experience, says the first step is being intentional about what you're trying to teach. 'We need kids who know [that they] don't need to be suckered into buying more stuff [and] that generosity and compassion and helping others is actually what makes them happy.' Good conversations need two things, she says: curiosity and positivity. Don't lecture, be collaborative and be guided by questions. Listen more, talk less. Involving kids in age-appropriate discussions about what matters, then modelling good choices, leads to positive outcomes. Some starting points are: discussing where to donate money and time, whether to get an electric vehicle or petrol car, or visiting your local MP to raise issues important to your community. Gameau says adults can also help by acknowledging the size and scariness of the issues, and letting kids feel anger, sadness and fear. Young people already know about the threats, he says, pointing to an international survey that found nearly 60% of young people were either very or extremely worried about the environment. Then connect kids (and adults!) with the living world again: spend time in nature, get to know the bird varieties and tree species around you, have adventures outside. It's easier to care about things you know, see and experience. Take the time to stop, examine and discuss. Seek out joy, beauty and fun to counterbalance the gloom. Zena Burgess, CEO of the Australian Psychological Society, emphasises the importance of action and taking individual steps that build a community of people making positive progress. This is echoed by Lee and Gameau, and reflects Bob Brown's catchphrase: action is the antidote to despair. Start where your kids are. If they love the ocean, take them snorkelling, watch documentaries, pick up rubbish on the beach. Look for ways to reduce plastic in the home and community, join campaigns against single-use plastic. Follow the children's lead, show them hope and possibilities, and steer clear of overwhelm. It's not the kids' responsibility to fix things, it's ours. But we can support them, combining their ideas, creativity and passion with our knowledge and experience. This help ranges from having good conversations to dealing with emotions, arranging logistics, finding information and joining organisations. And it extends beyond our own children: we'll all be affected by the future we've created, and need to use our skills and connections to make a difference in any way we can. Look for ways to make it fun. Jump in the surf after you've cleaned the beach; revel in your results. You're joining a community of billions of people taking action across the world. Spread the hope and joy of these stories; seek out the positives. Make sure there's a clear link between doing good and feeling good and make it something others want to join. Make it cool to care. Raising kids who care is a matter of balancing the truth of where we are with the resilience of both the natural world and human endeavour. As Gameau says, 'There's something beautiful about the human spirit, particularly when its back is against the wall and innovation and creativity get unleashed. We're capable of doing extraordinary and wonderful things.'

I got a fence to block out my neighbour's garden – there's so much mess the fence FELL & then they angered me even more
I got a fence to block out my neighbour's garden – there's so much mess the fence FELL & then they angered me even more

Scottish Sun

time11 hours ago

  • Scottish Sun

I got a fence to block out my neighbour's garden – there's so much mess the fence FELL & then they angered me even more

Plus, everything you need to know about the £20k garden fence fine NEIGHBOUR WARS I got a fence to block out my neighbour's garden – there's so much mess the fence FELL & then they angered me even more A WOMAN has declared a ''neighbour war'' after her neighbour's garden was so full of rubbish it caused her fence to collapse. Furious social media user @hughesrachy took to TikTok to rant after the mess in the neighbour's garden caused her wooden fence to crumble - and eventually fall down. Advertisement 2 One outraged woman took to TikTok to rant about her neighbour Credit: TIKTOK/@hughesrachy 2 The TikToker has since declared 'neighbour wars' Credit: TIKTOK/@hughesrachy According to the woman, the person living next door had accumulated a pile of items which the man stored outside. A recent video posted online also revealed ''the state'' of the garden, jampacked with full bin bags, plastic storage boxes, wires and even what appeared to be an old washing machine. There also seemed to be old tech, a canopy with no cover on top, a string of garden lights, a swing frame with no swings and more. The TikToker claimed that they ''had a fence in front of this'' - but that the neighbours ''had put all kinds of stuff inbetween the two fences''. Advertisement This, she claimed in the video, caused her fence to fall down and the TikToker was left with a ''crumbled fence behind''. After approaching the neighbours and asking to go halves to cover the cost of a new fence, the woman said they ''refused'' to chip in. Eventually, the neighbour's fence collapsed entirely and fell down into her garden, revealing a huge mess on the other side. The woman went on: ''So had it removed was it wasn't safe.'' Advertisement Unfortunately for the TikTok user, it didn't end there. Not only is she now left with no fence and privacy whatsoever, she claimed the neighbour ''won't pay and is waiting for her ''to pay to get a new one''. I hate my new build garden being overlooked so found a 5 METRE privacy fence to block out nosy neighbours for under £30 ''How is this ok?'' she was outraged, declaring the start of ''neighbour wars'' in the caption. Since being posted online, the clip has taken the internet by storm, amassing close to 460k views in just 16 hours. Advertisement It also has over 2,200 likes and 345 shares - however, the TikToker has turned commenting off. How to create privacy in your garden CREATING privacy in your garden can be achieved in a number of ways depending on your budget, and the size of your space. Here are some effective ways to enhance privacy in your garden: 1. Fencing Install a tall, solid wooden or vinyl fence. This is one of the most straightforward ways to gain immediate privacy. Or use lattice panels, trellis, or slatted fencing to add a decorative touch while still offering privacy. 2. Hedges and Plants Fast-growing evergreen shrubs or trees like Leylandii, Thuja, or Bamboo along the boundary of your garden can help with privacy. Grow a dense hedge using plants like Boxwood, Privet, or Laurel. It may take time to grow, but it provides a natural and green privacy screen. Use climbers like Ivy, Clematis, or Wisteria on fences or trellises to create a lush, green privacy barrier. 3. Outdoor Curtains Hang outdoor curtains around pergolas, gazebos, or patios for an easy-to-adjust privacy solution. 4. Sound Barriers A water fountain or small waterfall can help drown out noise, adding to the sense of privacy. Or install fencing designed to reduce noise if privacy from sound is also a concern. £20,000 garden fence fine UK boundary rules mean your humble garden fence could turn into a legal nightmare if you get it wrong. Whether you're upgrading panels or building from scratch, the regulations are clear and local councils aren't afraid to crack down. New rules which came in last week under the The Town and Country Planning (General Permitted Development) (England) Order 2015 outline what homeowners can build without needing full planning permission. Advertisement Gurpreet Chhokar, Which? Legal Expert, said: "If you're thinking of putting up a new garden fence this summer, there are a few important things to bear in mind to make sure you don't break any laws and find yourself landed with a fine." Back garden fence For a back garden fence, you're allowed a fence up to two metres high (that's about six foot six) without needing planning permission. Gurpreet said: " if you don't have planning permission then your fence can't be any higher than two metres from the ground." Go any higher, even with a decorative trellis, and you'll need to get approval first. Advertisement Skip this step and you could be forced to tear it down, or even worse – face enforcement action. Front fence At the front of your property, things get stricter. Fences can't go above one metre if you live next to a footpath, road or public space. That's just over three feet tall. Advertisement It's designed to help visibility for drivers and pedestrians but plenty of homeowners are caught out. Breaching planning rules can lead to an enforcement notice and, in some cases, fines. If your fence causes a statutory nuisance, such as flooding or blocked drains, you could face penalties of up to £5,000 or £20,000 for a business under environmental regulations. Ignore it, and things can escalate to court. Advertisement Neighbour disputes are the most common property complaint in the UK and they often boil down to where the boundary actually is. Before building, measure up carefully and chat things through with your neighbour. Snapping a few photos and getting a handshake agreement could save you a legal headache down the line.

Homeowners at war with council over 45ft high 'Jack and the Beanstalk' oak tree as bosses refuse demands to cut it down despite fears it's a 'danger to life'
Homeowners at war with council over 45ft high 'Jack and the Beanstalk' oak tree as bosses refuse demands to cut it down despite fears it's a 'danger to life'

Daily Mail​

time12 hours ago

  • Daily Mail​

Homeowners at war with council over 45ft high 'Jack and the Beanstalk' oak tree as bosses refuse demands to cut it down despite fears it's a 'danger to life'

Homeowners living on a historic road are in a row with the council over a 'Jack and the Beanstalk' oak tree they say is a danger to them. Residents living in the terraced properties in Winchester are surrounded by the 45 foot high tree and have branded the decision to issue a preservation order as 'grotesquely irresponsible'. They claim the oak - which is still relatively young and grew six feet last year - was planted around 50 years ago by a previous resident who thought it was a 'good idea at the time'. But it has continued to rapidly grow to the point that it is now 'out of proportion' to the surrounding properties and totally dominates the small garden it sits in. The current homeowners Orla Williams, 40, and her partner moved into the terraced Grade II Listed home on Canon Street two years ago and applied to have the tree felled. However, the Winchester County Council put a preliminary protection order on it and cited that it was 'appreciated' by the residents on a neighbouring street. The decision has been slammed by neighbours - who live on one of Winchester's 'most prestigious roads' - who said that they are not the ones who will be forced to deal with the repercussions if it were to topple over. The street, where the average house price is more than £600,000, is just yards from Kingsgate Street, and was where Admiral Nelson's mistress Lady Hamilton once lived. The doctor said that after moving in, she was approached by several neighbours who raised concerns about the tree. The mother-of-two said: 'They were concerned that it is getting very large and that it could cause damage to their properties and potentially harm to people if it gets any larger, so they wanted it to be taken down. 'We applied to the council to have it removed and someone came to look at it. '[The tree officer] said that they want to put a tree protection order on it.' The homeowner said that an 'awful lot of detritus' falls from the oak in the autumn and winter, and she is concerned about the droppings which fall down from wildlife like pigeons and squirrels. She added: 'We appreciate that the tree is beautiful but it's the wrong tree in the wrong place. 'It is quite sad to remove something like that but it is only going to get bigger and potentially cause damage to lots of properties which is the main concern. 'The council said they were concerned about removing it because it's one of the only trees in the area. 'All of the local residents seem to be of the opinion that unfortunately, it's the wrong tree in the wrong place.' According to a council report, the tree officer visited Ms Williams' address after receiving notice from the couple that it was due to be felled. After visiting, he found that that tree met the criteria for a provisional protection order, which was issued in February of this year. A Winchester County Council meeting will take place next week to confirm whether or not the order will remain in place. In total nine residents objected to the order. They all live in the centre of the cathedral city on roads which sit just yards away from Winchester College - the country's oldest public school and Rishi Sunak's alma mater. Mark Pocock, a retired resident living on Canon Street, branded the council's decision to protect the tree as 'ludicrous'. 'As trees grow older they become more brittle,' he said. 'If it were to fall and damage properties or persons, I would say the responsibility would be entirely with the council - not the owners of those properties. 'I think putting a tree protection order on is grotesquely irresponsible of the council. 'It could be a danger to property and life.' Nick Goff, 80, moved into his property on the road adjacent to Canon Street just over a year ago. The retired British Airways pilot said he is worried that if the tree continues to go, the roots underneath will damage a medieval wall in his garden, which was built in the Tudor era. Mr Goff said: 'The issue is that in 10 years' time, that will be double the height and double the width. 'It put on six feet last year it it's going to put on another six feet this year.' The homeowner commissioned an independent report from a tree consultancy business who found the oak is still a 'teenager'. The report found that while the tree is in 'good physiological condition', it is 'a large sized tree in a very small area' and so the tree protection order is 'unjustified'. It also said that 'the possibility of longer term damage to the retaining walls and footings of the adjacent properties as entirely foreseeable'. 'Some guy planted this as something to do 40 years ago,' Mr Goff continued. 'Now, we have got Jack and the Beanstalk. It's not a historic tree, it's a silly mistake.' The council report issued ahead of next week's meeting stated that the tree officer believed the concerns raised over the tree were 'speculative'. It said that while it is 'not historic', the tree 'contributes meaningfully to local biodiversity and visual amenity'. The report also stated that it is 'clearly visible' from residents living on a neighbouring private road, where it is 'appreciated'. It added: 'It is also the last significant tree in an area of land between Canon Street and St Swithun's Street, enhancing the character of the conservation area.' Retired resident Graham Rule, 62, said the decision by the local authority was 'irresponsible'. He said: 'We all love trees but that shouldn't be there. 'The people who want the protection order, they don't live here - its totally irresponsible.' Mr Rule said the tree was planted in the early 70s by a former resident. He added: 'Like a lot of things, it seemed like a good idea at the time. 'I'm a huge fan of trees but at the end of the day that tree shouldn't be there.' The conclusion of the tree officer's report stated that if the provisional TPO is not confirmed at the council meeting, it will be 'left vulnerable to being removed'. The report added: 'The removal of this tree will have a detrimental impact on the biodiversity and also character of the conservation area.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store