Reports say Manchester aldermen already have 'significant authority' over school budget
New reports from the Manchester city clerk and solicitor's offices suggest making the local school district a city department wouldn't give the mayor or aldermen much more power over the school budget then they already have.
The reports appear as an agenda item for Tuesday's meeting of the Board of Mayor and Aldermen, scheduled for 7 p.m. at City Hall.
An effort to ask Manchester voters if they support making the school district a department of the city, a topic debated on and off for decades, was given new life recently when Mayor Jay Ruais broke a 7-7 tie to send a request to look at either making the Manchester School District a city department or granting the mayor the power to set the district's budget to the aldermen for study, ahead of possible placement on the November election ballot.
While the school district isn't a city department, aldermen must approve its budget.
For the matter to appear on a municipal ballot this November, aldermen need to take a final vote on the matter by Tuesday, June 3.
City Clerk Matt Normand and City Solicitor Emily Rice were asked to research the topic ahead of a vote on the matter, with the understanding that the goal was to give the mayor more say over the school budget, including line-item veto power.
In her report, Rice writes that she investigated the issue through the lens of establishing authority of the aldermen over the budget of the Manchester School District.
'It is the opinion of this office that the Mayor and the Board of Mayor and Aldermen (BMA) possess significant authority in this regard under both the current charter and applicable state law,' Rice writes.
Rice points out the mayor has 'extensive authority over the form, procedure and adoption of the city's annual budget,' and the school district budget is subject to the approval of the BMA.
'If the BMA rejects the budget as submitted, the school committee is required to 'submit a revised budget which shall not exceed the maximum dollar amount established by the board of mayor and aldermen,'" Rice writes, quoting the city's Charter. 'The Charter contains no language which would, after rejection by the BMA, permit the submission of (a) school department budget which exceeds the maximum amount established by the BMA.
'It does not appear that seeking to amend the Charter to make the school district a department of city government would be an effective means of attempting to add to the city's significant existing authority over the school district budget.'
Rice adds any such amendment would be subject to numerous controlling state statutes and administrative rules governing the authority and responsibilities of local school boards, school districts and superintendents.
In a report on his on findings, Normand writes he was asked to present to the board a comparison of charter sections related to the school district within the current City Charter (known as the 1997 Charter) and the previous City Charter (known as the 1983 Charter), to the extent that the district had previously been considered a department.
Normand also reviewed the 1996 Charter Commission minutes.
'It is clear that the commission was very deliberate in maintaining the same level of authority for both the district and the BMA outlined in the 1983 City Charter while making minor changes they believed would clarify responsibilities of each,' Normand writes. 'In summary, there is no appreciable difference between the two charters as it relates to the school district. There is no section of the 1983 City Charter that represents the district as a department; in fact, the 1997 City Charter expanded the seats on the Board of School Committee from twelve members to fourteen members (at-large positions), reiterated that the school district budget shall constitute a single line item, yet gave future mayors the ability to veto all acts of the aldermen including actions related to the entire budget or any line item thereof, for the first time.'
Efforts to bring city schools under the umbrella of city government have fallen short over the past 20 years.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Q1 Earnings Highlights: Charter (NASDAQ:CHTR) Vs The Rest Of The Wireless, Cable and Satellite Stocks
Quarterly earnings results are a good time to check in on a company's progress, especially compared to its peers in the same sector. Today we are looking at Charter (NASDAQ:CHTR) and the best and worst performers in the wireless, cable and satellite industry. The massive physical footprints of cell phone towers, fiber in the ground, or satellites in space make it challenging for companies in this industry to adjust to shifting consumer habits. Over the last decade-plus, consumers have 'cut the cord' to their landlines and traditional cable subscriptions in favor of wireless communications and streaming video. These trends do mean that more households need cell phone plans and high-speed internet. Companies that successfully serve customers can enjoy high retention rates and pricing power since the options for mobile and internet connectivity in any geography are usually limited. The 8 wireless, cable and satellite stocks we track reported a mixed Q1. As a group, revenues were in line with analysts' consensus estimates while next quarter's revenue guidance was 0.7% below. Amidst this news, share prices of the companies have had a rough stretch. On average, they are down 5.2% since the latest earnings results. Operating as Spectrum, Charter (NASDAQ:CHTR) is a leading telecommunications company offering cable television, high-speed internet, and voice services across the United States. Charter reported revenues of $13.74 billion, flat year on year. This print was in line with analysts' expectations, but overall, it was a mixed quarter for the company with a decent beat of analysts' EBITDA estimates but a miss of analysts' EPS estimates. "We continue to execute on our long-held strategy of delivering the best network and products, at the best value, combined with unmatched service," said Chris Winfrey, President and CEO of Charter. The stock is up 17% since reporting and currently trades at $391.75. Is now the time to buy Charter? Access our full analysis of the earnings results here, it's free. Formerly known as American Cable Systems, Comcast (NASDAQ:CMCSA) is a multinational telecommunications company offering a wide range of services. Comcast reported revenues of $29.89 billion, flat year on year, in line with analysts' expectations. The business had a satisfactory quarter with a decent beat of analysts' EPS estimates but a miss of analysts' domestic broadband customers estimates. However, the results were likely priced into the stock as it's traded sideways since reporting. Shares currently sit at $34.66. Is now the time to buy Comcast? Access our full analysis of the earnings results here, it's free. Based in Long Island City, Altice USA (NYSE:ATUS) is a telecommunications company offering cable, internet, telephone, and television services across the United States. Altice reported revenues of $2.15 billion, down 4.4% year on year, in line with analysts' expectations. It was a slower quarter as it posted a significant miss of analysts' EPS and adjusted operating income estimates. As expected, the stock is down 14.4% since the results and currently trades at $2.26. Read our full analysis of Altice's results here. Founded in 1986, Cable One (NYSE:CABO) provides high-speed internet, cable television, and telephone services, primarily in smaller markets across the United States. Cable One reported revenues of $380.6 million, down 5.9% year on year. This result lagged analysts' expectations by 1.5%. It was a slower quarter as it also recorded a miss of analysts' adjusted operating income and residential video subscribers estimates. Cable One had the weakest performance against analyst estimates among its peers. The stock is down 45% since reporting and currently trades at $144.56. Read our full, actionable report on Cable One here, it's free. Known for its commercial-free music channels, Sirius XM (NASDAQ:SIRI) is a broadcasting company that provides satellite radio and online radio services across North America. Sirius XM reported revenues of $2.07 billion, down 4.3% year on year. This print missed analysts' expectations by 0.6%. Aside from that, it was a mixed quarter as it also logged a decent beat of analysts' EBITDA estimates. The stock is up 1.2% since reporting and currently trades at $21.65. Read our full, actionable report on Sirius XM here, it's free. In response to the Fed's rate hikes in 2022 and 2023, inflation has been gradually trending down from its post-pandemic peak, trending closer to the Fed's 2% target. Despite higher borrowing costs, the economy has avoided flashing recessionary signals. This is the much-desired soft landing that many investors hoped for. The recent rate cuts (0.5% in September and 0.25% in November 2024) have bolstered the stock market, making 2024 a strong year for equities. Donald Trump's presidential win in November sparked additional market gains, sending indices to record highs in the days following his victory. However, debates continue over possible tariffs and corporate tax adjustments, raising questions about economic stability in 2025. Want to invest in winners with rock-solid fundamentals? Check out our Top 6 Stocks and add them to your watchlist. These companies are poised for growth regardless of the political or macroeconomic climate. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
How does ranked choice voting work?
NEW YORK (PIX11) – In primary elections, New York City voters can rank their top five choices for mayor, public advocate, comptroller, borough president and City Council, rather than selecting a single candidate. It's a system called ranked-choice voting, which was added to the City Charter back in 2019, according to the Board of Elections. Here's what you need to know about ranked choice voting and how it works: More News: NY Elections Primary ballots will include a chart with a row of candidate names and numbered columns. You will fill in the No. 1 oval next to your favorite candidate, followed by your next favorite candidates in order. You can rank as many as five candidates, or as few as you want. You cannot rank a singular candidate multiple times or give several candidates the same ranking, according to NYC Votes. The Board of Elections starts by counting first-choice candidates, and if a candidate has over 50% of those votes, they automatically get the nomination. If no candidate receives more than 50% of the first-choice votes, then the Board of Elections keeps counting. Voting continues in rounds and candidates are eliminated one by one. If your first pick is eliminated, then that vote is counted for your second choice, and so on. To see a simulation of how ranked choice votes are counted, click here. The Board of Elections expects unofficial election results at the time when the polls close on Election Day. Election results won't be certified until all ballots are counted, according to officials. Erin Pflaumer is a digital content producer from Long Island who has covered both local and national news since 2018. She joined PIX11 in 2023. See more of her work here. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Newsweek
7 hours ago
- Newsweek
Man About To Enter Job Interview—Horror As He Looks Down at His Pants
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. It is normal to feel nervous ahead of a job interview, but one man's feelings were heightened when he looked down at his pants. Reddit user u/He_Who_Quiets shared an image of his ripped jeans near the zipper on June 2, and it went viral, racking up more than 53,000 upvotes. Despite this outfit mishap, the man told Newsweek: "The interview went surprisingly well—the interviewer did notice, but only joked at the end of the interview that I could start tomorrow as long as I promised to wear different pants." In the comments, he added that it would have been hard for the interviewer to miss the rip, as they were sitting on plastic chairs without a table between them. The viral photo of the man's ripped jeans. The viral photo of the man's ripped jeans. Reddit/He_Who_Quiets He wrote: "The guy interviewing me was chill as hell, just seemed to find it funny." The man has since updated the post: "I got the job anyway. I think they would have hired literally anyone to wash dishes at this restaurant." Newsweek discussed the post with HR expert David Rice, who said that accidents happen. He added: "Don't panic, these things happen. Everyone has spilled something on themselves, sat in something, not noticed a stain. It's part of life." Rice said: "Give yourself some cushion around the time you arrive at the interview so you can handle these types of things. If you're in a hurry and you're trying to fix something, it's going to compound matters." Rice suggested bringing a backup outfit for interviews to help ease some of the stress. He said: "Someone at the coffee shop spills their iced latte and it gets on you? You can pull out the backup clothes and get changed in the bathroom. You probably won't need the extra clothes, but the peace of mind will keep you focused on the task at hand instead of panicking about how you look." A Harris Poll conducted online for the American Staffing Association in October 2022, which involved 2,019 U.S. adults, found that there were notable gender differences in how men and women approach job interview preparation. Women were more likely than men to consider various prep strategies important, such as researching the company (73 percent versus 66 percent); choosing an interview outfit (72 percent versus 60 percent); and preparing questions to ask (66 percent versus 56 percent). Rice, who lives in Atlanta and is the senior editor for the People Managing People podcast, which is aimed at managers and culture creators who want to lead better, said: "It depends on the culture of the organization. If it's a well-accepted norm in their culture that business attire isn't the norm, it may not be a big deal, but you never want to assume that. You should always look presentable because it helps people take you seriously and respect the approach you're taking to the process of finding a job. "That doesn't mean you have to wear a suit or a dress, but you should be presentable in the same way you would be for a nice dinner. This tells them you're serious about getting the job and, if nothing else, you're capable of meeting dress code requirements if there are any related to the job." Reddit Reacts As of now, the post has over 3,700 comments—with many users highlighting the shadow in the image that makes it look like a urine stain. "Peeing your pants is cool," commented one user, and another wrote: "The first issue is that you're wearing jeans to a job interview." "Congrats on the job. You'll be able to buy some new pants soon," posted a third commenter. Have you had a workplace dilemma? Let us know via life@ We can ask experts for advice, and your story could be featured on Newsweek.
