logo
Wellington's Te Kāhui Auaha campus could close under proposal

Wellington's Te Kāhui Auaha campus could close under proposal

RNZ News26-05-2025

Tapere Nui theatre at Te Auaha.
Photo:
A question mark hangs over the fate of Te Kāhui Auaha campus in central Wellington, with a proposal that
may see it close
in the face of declining student numbers.
The creative campus on the corner of Cuba Street and Dixon Street opened in 2018, and its facilities include two theatres, a 55-seater cinema, an exhibition gallery and a performance studio.
News of a
potential closure
surfaced earlier this year, when Whitireia and WelTec - which are part of Te Pūkenga and run Te Kāhui Auaha - said the roll had dropped from 600 in 2018 to fewer than 200 in February.
Arts community leaders expressed concern it would remove an integral part of the area's creative and economic eco-system.
Now, documents seen by RNZ show the campus never reached its goal of 1000 students.
In fact, domestic and international full-time students are declining, and the polytech is running at a budgeted deficit of just over $12 million - a decrease on the previous year's deficit of nearly $19m in 2024.
Director of teaching and learning Dr Leanne Ivil wrote: "We may not be delivering teaching and learning in Te Kāhui Auaha in 2026, and there will be downsizing of our physical footprint at our Whitireia Porirua and Petone campuses."
Nearly a dozen programmes are proposed be cut by the end of 2026, including diplomas in drama, performing arts and dance, and certificates in mechanical engineering, hospitality, business administration and technology, and music.
The proposal said the nature of specialist space and equipment required to deliver performing arts delivery (dance, drama, and musical theatre) against the volume of students made the courses "no longer tenable".
Some of those could be transferred to community or private groups, and others would be relocated to Whitireia's Petone campus.
In a statement, Ivil told RNZ consultation on the changes would close next month, and the decision on the fate of the campus would be finalised by July.
She said no decision had been made on the future of the building or it's facilities and it was too early to estimate how much money would be saved by the move.
Ivil said the majority of students currently enrolled at the campus would complete their studies by the end of this year, but for those who did not, they would find out later this year where they would be completing their study.
Te Pūkenga declined RNZ's request for an interview, and directed questions to the Vocational education minister's office.
The Tertiary Education Union's Drew Mayhem said consultation - which began in 2022 over the future viability of music programmes - had marked the beginning of a "death spiral" for creativity programmes at the polytechnic.
"We told them at the time that music was the heart and soul of the creative campus and that losing that would be the beginning," Mayhem said.
Since then, the film and screen programmes had been "considerably diminished" by internal restructures, and last year, it lost its Pasifika performing arts programme, the only one of its kind in the country.
"It seems that the school of creativity within WelTec, Whitireia is going to cease to exist."
Mayhem placed responsibility for the cuts at the feet of government's decision to
dismantle Te Pūkenga
, and restructure the training organisations into a handful of separate entities once again.
"It's only because the minister has directed the individual institutions to try and stand alone, which is directly the cause of these cost cutting measures," Mayhem said.
Vocational education minister Penny Simmonds.
Photo:
RNZ / Angus Dreaver
Vocational education minister Penny Simmonds said the government was committed to replacing Te Pūkenga, and decisions regarding individual polytechnics would be made mid-year.
From next year, the government would introduce an "independent, industry-led work-based learning model" which "puts apprentices and trainees at the centre of all decisions made related to trades training and places industry back in the driver's seat", Simmonds said.
"As the minister, I am not privy to information regarding the operational decisions that polytechnics might contemplate.
"However, I would suggest that it is important for Whitireia and Weltec, as it is for all polytechnics, to be taking appropriate actions to ensure their overall viability and maintain their relationships, and it is my understanding that Te Kāhui Auaha campus is not financially viable," she said.
A Whitireia and WelTec staff member - who did not want to be named - described a meeting outlining the changes last week as "an absolute shambles", and said despite a month long consultation period, the presentation to staff made the move feel like "a forgone conclusion".
"Since 2019 they have cancelled or moved around 7-8 creative programmes which makes it even more unaffordable. It's been a death by 1000 cuts," they said.
"They keep talking about student numbers being low, but how can they be high or grow when you cut programmes or move them to other campuses to die?"
Wellington's mayor Tory Whanau.
Photo:
RNZ / Samuel Rillstone
Wellington's mayor Tory Whanau said in February she had sent Simmonds, and finance minister Nicola Willis, a letter outlining her concerns over the closure, describing it as "a blow felt across all the creative industries in Wellington's economy and cultural life at large".
"I urged them to consider how the government could support keeping Te Auaha open given its importance to students and our local arts and events scene," Whanau said.
"This was supported by 38 letters from Wellington arts organisations and Te Auaha graduates."
"Unfortunately, Minister Simmonds has declined to take any action to save Te Auaha. I am talking to local arts organisations about what else can be done to keep Te Auaha open," she said.
Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero
,
a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Pressue on Agriculture Minister to deliver on KiwiSaver promise
Pressue on Agriculture Minister to deliver on KiwiSaver promise

RNZ News

time17 minutes ago

  • RNZ News

Pressue on Agriculture Minister to deliver on KiwiSaver promise

The heat is on the agriculture minister to deliver this term on a pre-election promise to unlock KiwiSaver so it can be used to buy a first farm, and not just a house. At the moment if you have been contributing to KiwiSaver for three years you can withdraw almost all the money to buy a first home to live in, although there a few exceptions. Federated Farmers has launched a petition urging the government to losen the rules for accessing the retirement scheme saying it will turbo charge the next generation of farmers and deliver on a committment that Todd Mclay made during a meeting in Morrinsville. Agriculture Minister Todd McClay spoke to Lisa Owen. Tags: To embed this content on your own webpage, cut and paste the following: See terms of use.

Marlborough residents speak against council's preferred water plan
Marlborough residents speak against council's preferred water plan

RNZ News

time2 hours ago

  • RNZ News

Marlborough residents speak against council's preferred water plan

By Kira Carrington, Local Democracy Reporter Brendan Kearney speaks at the Marlborough District Council's Local Water Done Well hearing. Photo: LDR/Kira Carrington Residents have spoken against the Marlborough District Council's preferred water services model at a Local Water Done Well hearing on Monday. The Government requires councils to choose from five water service delivery options ‒ a modified status quo (an in-house council department), a single council-controlled organisation, a multi-council-controlled organisation, and two types of trusts. The Marlborough District Council's preferred option is to create a standalone Water Services Organisation owned and controlled by the council. The council said it would find greater efficiencies to deliver better service at a lower cost, and have more borrowing capacity to maintain and improve the region's water infrastructure. But Marlborough residents aren't convinced. Of about 45 submissions made, 58 percent wanted to keep water services in-house, compared to 13 percent who preferred the standalone organisation. The remainder did not indicate a preference. Five people spoke on their submissions at a hearing in the council chamber on Monday, and they were all opposed to a standalone organisation. Brendan Kearney, who used to be chief executive of a council-controlled organisation in Canterbury, said there was no proof that a separate organisation would be more efficient, and setting up and funding a separate entity could cost ratepayers more. It would "inevitably duplicate some overhead costs", Kearney said. He said he saw no reason for water services to be removed from a council that had maintained its water systems relatively well. "[Water] assets are in good or very good condition. That's a credit to the current council and past councils as well. Council also has low debt relative to its peers. "This is compelling evidence, in my view, that the council has performed well and will continue to do so." To create a separate organisation, Kearney said the council would need to appoint directors, manage a new relationship with the organisation, and manage the organisation's own agenda. "A standalone company is no guarantee of good governance." Kearney said there also needed to be balance in who footed the water infrastructure bill between the ratepayers of today and of tomorrow. "It's unfair to gift hundreds of millions of dollars ... to the next generations completely debt free. That means the past generations paid too much. "On the other hand, it's unfair to get those assets, billions of dollars of assets, fully debt funded ... it's unfair on future generations. "Something in between those two extremes needs to happen." Submitter Lauchy Hynd said that creating a separate organisation to take on debt outside the council books was not sustainable. "What happens when we default?" Hynd said. "We're leveraging [water assets] by three to five times to borrow money against them. "This looks to me like Three Waters from the back door. "You can kick the can down the road and borrow recklessly, but I appeal to you to act boldly on behalf of the people." Submitters also voiced concerns about allowing an unelected and "unaccountable" organisation to take control of water services. "How do we maintain the ownership and the status of [water] assets in the hands of the people of Marlborough, when we're divesting them to an unelected group?" Hynd said. Submitter Bob Watson said he was worried about the potential to more easily privatise a separate organisation, pointing how the United Kingdom's water management became privatised. Ten regional water authorities were formed in 1974, which the UK government then sold to the private sector in 1989. "I think that the potential for private ownership ... basically our water utilities to be sold off to another entity, and for us to lose the democratic voice, would be terrible," Watson said. "I like the idea that [we're] here with people that have represented the community who can speak for us." The coalition Government had previously said that privatisation of water services was not on the table. The council would make its final decision on water services delivery on June 26, and submit its plan to the Government for approval by 3 September . LDR is local body journalism co-funded by RNZ and NZ On Air.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store