logo
Oliver Jackson-Cohen And Ella Lily Hyland On Agatha Christie's ‘Towards Zero' and The Success Of Whodunit Mysteries

Oliver Jackson-Cohen And Ella Lily Hyland On Agatha Christie's ‘Towards Zero' and The Success Of Whodunit Mysteries

Forbes25-04-2025

'Towards Zero'
Britbox
Towards Zero is the latest Agatha Christie's novel to be adapted as a miniseries and you can now stream it on Britbox. Created by Rachel Bennette and directed by Sam Yates, Towards Zero stars legendary actress Anjelica Huston, Matthew Rhys, Oliver Jackson-Cohen, Ella Lily Hyland, Anjana Vasan and Mimi Keene.
The story takes place in England, in 1936. British tennis star Nevile Strange (Oliver Jackson-Cohen) who just went through a scandalous divorce, decides to spend the summer with his ex-wife and his new fiancée at Gull's Point, his childhood home. There, Nevile's aunt, Lady Tressilian (Angelica Huston) makes it a point to settle some unfinished businesses with her nephew and the rest of her guests (whether they were welcome in the house, or not.) Tensions keep growing as secrets and lies unfold, which will lead to a tragic murder.
I spoke with the stars of the three-part drama, Oliver Jackson-Cohen and Ella Lily Hyland about this new Agatha Christie's adaptation. I asked them if they felt like reading the book before reading the script would generally be helpful in the understanding of their characters.
Jackson-Cohen said, 'It's quite an interesting thing with an adaptation because sometimes, the book can be incredibly useful, sometimes it can put ideas in your head that are not necessarily in the adaptation. So I always start reading the book and then decide if it's actually useful to continue.'
He added: 'But for the script, the adaptation that we were sent, they changed a lot of things when they were filming, there were a lot of rewrites coming in, so by the time we started filming, we knew where the story went but not exactly how they were gonna get to that point. And with a story like this one, everything is sort of intricate you kind of just had to buckle in and see where they are going to take it. But the payoff and how you get to the pay off in the end is a fascinating journey.'
Oliver Jackson-Cohen and Ella Lily Hyland
Britbox-JAMES PARDON
For the two actors, the secret of a well-crafted murder mystery resides in the filming and the editing process and they explained that it can take the audience on a complete different trajectory. Jackson-Cohen said, 'It's so interesting with a whodunnit, because so much of it is in the construction of the thing and in the editing, you know? Who you linger on, for how long, and they're constantly telling the audience what they should think or feel. So it's fascinating to see where other people get led and what other people think or assume.'
Hyland added: 'There's such a question of morals as well, it's all really about desire, power and relationships. So something that someone believe is morally wrong, it might lead them to think about a culprit.'
These past few years, whodunits have been on the rise with multiple adaptations of Hercule Poirot's investigations for the big screen and the adaptation of many other Agatha Christie's novels, such as Why Didn't They Ask Evans? or Ordeal by Innocence for the small screen. With the success of the series of movies Knives Out or the highly popular TV show Only Murders in the Building, it is safe to say that whodunits have a singular way to draw the audience in.
Jackson-Cohen explained, 'Everyone has a motif and a reason, that's the exciting part of watching it and it is why whodunit are successful and beloved, because you're an active part, you're involved in the show, as a viewer. There's something delicious about that, the payoff of it.'
I asked Hyland if she could detect the clues while reading the script, or if the director and writer were holding back these little indications that might help the audience guess who the murderer is. Hyland said, 'It was very cleverly done by Sam because it might be depicted in an ambivalent kind of way, but he would give you a really clear motive that made sense for your character at that time.'
She added: 'Everyone has a killer instinct that comes out in many different ways. So it's probably in the way it's shot as well. But it's interesting sometimes when you make things obvious and the audience is very clever and will be like 'Oh they're making hit too obvious.''

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Prince Harry Accused Of 'Directly Insulting' The Royal Family By Considering Changing His Last Name
Prince Harry Accused Of 'Directly Insulting' The Royal Family By Considering Changing His Last Name

Yahoo

time43 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Prince Harry Accused Of 'Directly Insulting' The Royal Family By Considering Changing His Last Name

Prince Harry's rift with the royal family has reportedly worsened amid reports that the Duke of Sussex considered adopting the Spencer surname. The US-based royal is said to have discussed the idea with his late mother's brother, Earl Spencer, who advised against it. However, royal experts say the move by Prince Harry has deepened tensions within the monarchy, with King Charles and Prince William reportedly "hurt and dismayed." Harry reportedly discussed with his uncle, Earl Charles Spencer, the possibility of adopting his late mother Princess Diana's surname, which would symbolically sever his ties with the Mountbatten-Windsor name currently used by his children. According to the Daily Mail, Harry brought up the idea during a recent visit to the U.K., where he had a "very amicable conversation" with his uncle, the 9th Earl Spencer. While the discussion was friendly, sources revealed that Earl Spencer advised against "taking such a step." The proposal has since sparked concern within royal circles. Royal commentator Hilary Fordwich told Fox News Digital that Harry's inquiry alone has stirred unease. "Once again, Prince Harry has managed to make yet another deeply divisive and emotionally charged move, further fracturing his already tenuous relationship with the royal family," she said. Fordwich continued: "The overwhelming advice from within his own family, particularly from his Uncle Earl Spencer, is to abandon the ludicrous idea due to its legal and emotional consequences." She added: "Even his inquiry highlights the enduring complexities of Harry's relationship with his royal roots… It further thwarts any future reconciliation." The commentator further noted that the royal family is "hurt and dismayed" by the development, causing additional "damage to the already strained family relations." British broadcaster Helena Chard echoed the sentiment, describing the potential name change as having "an air of revenge." Speaking to Fox News Digital, she called the move "hurtful and vindictive" toward King Charles, emphasizing that it reflects Harry's ongoing bitterness. "It highlights Prince Harry's little to no regard for his family," Chard said. "A huge amount of bitterness and frustration bubbling away in Harry could have led to him feeling the Spencer name would help grow his Royal court." Chard also suggested that aligning more closely with the Spencer legacy could be a strategic move for Harry. "No doubt Prince Harry feels reinventing himself keeps him relevant," she remarked. "The world still has a love affair with the late Princess Diana. Harry and Meghan could take a cash grab of Princess Diana's legacy. [However], tarnishing Princess Diana's legacy would leave a bitter taste in the public's mouths." Royal analyst Richard Fitzwilliams also commented, warning that Charles would likely view the idea as a painful rejection of his paternal legacy. "For Harry to consider doing this, he must still feel very embittered," Fitzwilliams noted. "King Charles will regard this with great sadness… What will Harry think up next?" Fordwich also noted that the proposal is "viewed as a direct insult to his father, King Charles III, as well as his extended royal family." She explained: "Ironically, Harry was close to Prince Philip, who fought for the historical significance of the Mountbatten-Windsor name for his descendants. So it is a direct insult to him." According to Fordwich, Harry may see adopting the Spencer name as a way to honor his late mother, Princess Diana, "while distancing himself from the rest of the royal institution he feels alienated from." Fordwich noted that "there is also some speculation that Harry's wife, Meghan Markle, wants their children to be more closely associated with Diana's legacy, especially their daughter, Princess Lilibet, whose full name is Lilibet Diana Mountbatten-Windsor." Even so, Fordwich warned that tensions within the royal family remain high, and this new revelation only makes things worse. "King Charles III is hesitant to speak with Harry, and Prince William is disgusted that he keeps referencing their mother," Fordwich claimed. She concluded that "trust and communication are currently at an all-time low. Any hope of rapprochement is now said to be 'in tatters,' particularly given Harry's wish to change his surname, which is viewed as a final break from his royal roots." Meanwhile, royal commentator Ian Pelham Turner told the outlet that he wasn't surprised by Harry's reported interest in adopting the Spencer surname, noting the prince's enduring emotional connection to his mother's side of the family. "Prince Harry, at the time of this alleged conversation, was at a very low ebb," Turner explained. "He found tremendous support from Earl Spencer and Diana's two sisters, who rallied around [him]… The Spencer name is always a potential path for the beleaguered couple and their children. But at this stage, it's not on the horizon." Turner added that the "royal family and Harry are still seemingly at war with each other."

Sotheby's to Auction Original Hermès Bag That Belonged to Jane Birkin
Sotheby's to Auction Original Hermès Bag That Belonged to Jane Birkin

Business of Fashion

time44 minutes ago

  • Business of Fashion

Sotheby's to Auction Original Hermès Bag That Belonged to Jane Birkin

Sotheby's will soon auction the original Hermès Birkin bag that once belonged to the late singer Jane Birkin, one of the most coveted designs in the fashion industry. The famed black leather handbag will be put up for sale in Paris on July 10, the auction house said in a statement Thursday. The original Birkin was commissioned in 1984 exclusively for and in collaboration with Jane Birkin by Hermès International SCA's then Chief Executive Officer Jean-Louis Dumas. Birkin recalled in interviews how she bumped into Dumas on a flight and complained about the lack of an Hermès handbag that suited her needs. The British-French singer retold how she sketched a model on a 'vomit bag' and shortly after Dumas presented her with the original Birkin which the brand commercialised under her name. Jane Birkin sold her bag in 1994 to raise funds for an AIDS charity. It was auctioned again in 2000, and has since belonged to the collector who goes by the name 'Catherine B' on Instagram. Her account biography on the platform says she's the 'proud owner of the first Hermès Birkin bag.' A Sotheby's representative confirmed that the collector is the seller. Hermès bags often fetch higher prices at resale than they cost in boutiques due to long waiting lists. The record for a bag sold at auction is held by an Hermès Kelly known as Himalaya, made in crocodile skin and carrying a diamond, which fetched 4 million Hong Kong dollars in 2021 ($510,000) when it was auctioned by Christie's. ByAngelina Rascouet Learn more: Hermès Responds to 'Walmart Birkin', Dupe Culture CEO Axel Dumas called fakes 'detestable' while acknowledging the grey area surrounding many copycat products.

Katie Boulter vs Madison Keys start time: When is French Open match?
Katie Boulter vs Madison Keys start time: When is French Open match?

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Katie Boulter vs Madison Keys start time: When is French Open match?

Katie Boulter will play Madison Keys in the second round of the French Open (Getty) Katie Boulter takes on Madison Keys at the French Open as the British No 1 looks to build on her first main draw win at Roland Garros. Boulter claimed her first victory on the Paris clay as she defeated Carole Monnet 6-7 6-1 6-1 and said it was a victory she 'would not forget'. Advertisement 'Sometimes I find it really difficult on this surface,' Boulter said, 'I persevered and tried my hardest to bring some good tennis and obviously my first Roland Garros win, you never forget those ones.' Up next for the British No 1 is a date with Australian Open champion Keys, who is a former semi-finalist at the French Open with that result coming in 2022. It will be the first time the players have met, and the second-round match has been given top billing after it was scheduled on Court Philippe-Chatrier. What time is Katie Boulter vs Madison Keys The second round match has been scheduled third on Court Philippe-Chatrier, following the matches between Jessica Pegula and Ann Li and men's No 1 Jannik Sinner and retiring French favourite Richard Gasquet. Advertisement With play starting at 11am UK time, Keys and Boulter could expect to get onto court at around 3pm UK time, but it may be slightly earlier or later depending on the previous matches. Is it on TV and how can I watch? Yes, the match will be on TV, like every other match during the grand slam on TNT Sports and discovery+. Viewers can watch a live stream on the app through mobile devices. French Open order of play (Thursday 29 May) all times BST Court Philippe-Chatrier (start 11:00) Ann Li (USA) vs. Jessica Pegula (USA) [3] Jannik Sinner (ITA) [1] vs. Richard Gasquet (FRA) Madison Keys (USA) [7] vs. Katie Boulter (GBR) Advertisement Night session, not before 19:15 Gaël Monfils (FRA) vs. Jack Draper (GBR) [5] Court Suzanne-Lenglen (start 10:00) Jaume Munar (ESP) vs. Arthur Fils (FRA) [14] Tereza Valentova (CZE) vs. Coco Gauff (USA) [2] Corentin Moutet (FRA) vs. Novak Djokovic (SRB) [6] Daria Kasatkina (AUS) [17] vs. Leolia Jeanjean (FRA) Court Simonne-Mathieu (start 10:00) Mirra Andreeva [6] vs. Ashlyn Krueger (USA) Alexander Zverev (GER) [3] vs. Jesper de Jong (NED) Elena-Gabriela Ruse (ROU) vs. Paula Badosa (ESP) [10] Jacob Fearnley (GBR) vs. Ugo Humbert (FRA) [22] Court 14 (start 10:00) Alex de Minaur (AUS) [9] vs. Alexander Bublik (KAZ) Advertisement Barbora Krejcikova (CZE) [15] vs. Veronika Kudermetova João Fonseca (BRA) vs. Pierre-Hugues Herbert (FRA) Victoria Azarenka vs. Sofia Kenin (USA) [31] Court 7 (start 10:00) Henrique Rocha (POR) vs. Jakub Mensik (CZE) [19] Andrey Rublev [17] vs. Adam Walton (AUS) Anhelina Kalinina (UKR) vs. Lois Boisson (FRA) Alycia Parks (USA) vs. Elsa Jacquemot (FRA) Court 6 (start 10:00) Magdalena Frech (POL) [25] vs. Marketa Vondrousova (CZE) Elisabetta Cocciaretto (ITA) vs. Ekaterina Alexandrova [20] Flavio Cobolli (ITA) vs. Matteo Arnaldi (ITA) Denis Shapovalov (CAN) [27] vs. Filip Misolic (AUT)

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store