
Lebanon minister denies Beirut port is being used for smuggling arms
This August 4, 2020, photo is the scene of an explosion that hit the port of Beirut, Lebanon. 220 killed, 7000 injured and 300, 000 became homeless after 2,750 Tonnes of Ammonium Nitrate that were stored there by Hezbollah for 7 years exploded. Hezbollah reportedly stored the chemicals for its ally, Bashar al-Assad for use in barrel bombs against Syrian civilians. (AP Photo/Hussein Malla, Beirut, Lebanon(Photo by Anwar Amro/AFP)
Lebanon denied reports on Wednesday that weapons are being smuggled through Beirut's seaport, stressing that the port is 'firmly under control.'
Addressing a news conference in Beirut, Minister of Public Works and Transport Fayez Rasamny said there is no evidence about smuggling weapons through the port.
'I have requested enhanced and tightened surveillance at the Beirut port,' Rasamny said.
He said that smuggling may have occurred in another place, but without elaborating.
The Lebanese minister said that the same security measures applied at Beirut Airport are enforced at the seaport.
On Tuesday, Al-Arabiya television, citing an unnamed source, said that the Hezbollah group shifted its focus to Beirut port as its primary means of smuggling weaponry, instead of land routes following the fall of the Bashar al-Assad regime in Syria.
Al-Arabiya claimed that the Al-Quds Force of the Iranian Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) is overseeing the maritime smuggling operations, either directly to Lebanon or through intermediary countries. It quoted a Western security source as saying that Hezbollah has 're-imposed its control over Beirut's port,' following the 2020 blast, and is receiving arms and cash through the port.
Hezbollah denies
Hezbollah's MP Hassan Fadlallah denied Thursday that Hezbollah is smuggling arms through the port of Beirut. As usual, he described the claims as 'lies'.
Hezbollah also denied in 2020 that it used the Beirut port to store the chemicals that exploded on Aug 4, 2020, and devastated the Lebanese capital, refused to allow an international investigation of the explosion, and has been obstructing the Lebanese investigation for the past 5 years
AA/ YL
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Nahar Net
2 hours ago
- Nahar Net
Reports: US, Israel mulling end to UNIFIL's presence
by Naharnet Newsdesk 09 June 2025, 13:18 U.S. officials are considering pulling American support from UNIFIL, the United Nations peacekeeping force in southern Lebanon, in a bid to cut costs associated with its operations, the Israel Hayom newspaper reported Sunday evening, with US sources later confirming to The Times of Israel that the option was on the table. Should the U.S. move ahead with its decision to pull support from the U.N. body, Israel will back the decision, Israel Hayom reported, both out of a desire to align itself with the administration of U.S. President Donald Trump and in light of the Israeli security establishment's 'cooperation with the Lebanese army since the ceasefire in November,' the Times of Israel said. According to Israel Hayom, the presence of the Lebanese Armed Forces in southern Lebanon has proven relatively effective in 'beating back the threat of Hezbollah' and keeping the group from rearming itself, making 'redundant' much of UNIFIL's operations in the region. Sources familiar with the matter told The Times of Israel that the U.S. has not yet made up its mind regarding its future support for UNIFIL, but that it wants to see major reforms, which could mean pulling support. As UNIFIL's mandate is granted through a U.N. Security Council resolution each year, the U.S. could simply veto the next resolution, due to be put forward in August. UNIFIL has been operating in southern Lebanon since 1978, when it was created to oversee the withdrawal of Israeli troops from the area following the end of Israel's first invasion of south Lebanon. The U.N. peacekeeping force expanded its mission following the 2006 war between Israel and Hezbollah, allowing peacekeepers to deploy along the Israeli border to help the Lebanese military extend its authority into the country's south for the first time in decades. Aimed at ending the 2006 war, Resolution 1701 also called for a full cessation of Israeli-Hezbollah hostilities and the disarmament of Hezbollah. UNIFIL's mandate has been renewed annually ever since, although critics have questioned the efficacy of the force. Following the ceasefire between Israel and Lebanon, which put an end to more than a year of hostilities with Hezbollah, including two months of all-out war, the Lebanese Army moved into southern Lebanon to enforce the terms of the ceasefire, which itself is based on Resolution 1701. The resolution requires Hezbollah to withdraw its fighters north of the Litani River — about 30 kilometers (19 miles) from the border — and dismantle all military infrastructure in southern Lebanon. Prime Minister Nawaf Salam told the Wall Street Journal last month that his government had achieved 80 percent of its objectives regarding the disarmament of Hezbollah and other militias in the country's south. At the same time, the Israeli army has continued to launch strikes on Hezbollah operatives and infrastructure, alleging violations of the truce agreement. According to the Israeli army, over 180 Hezbollah operatives have been killed since the truce came into effect.


Al Manar
4 hours ago
- Al Manar
E3, US Misusing I.A.E.A. to Achieve Own Political Objectives: Iran
Foreign Ministry spokesperson Esmaeil Baqaei has criticized the United States and three European countries – namely France, Britain, and Germany – for misusing the International Atomic Energy Agency (I.A.E.A.) for their own political gains. During his weekly press briefing on Monday, Baqaei responded to a question raised about the West's push for an anti-Iran resolution at the I.A.E.A.'s Board of Governors meeting in Vienna this week. He said that the Islamic Republic had taken steps in the past one or two years in cooperation with the U.N. nuclear watchdog but the three European countries and the United States often abused the agency for their own political purposes. According to the spokesperson, the I.A.E.A. decided to first prepare a report under the political pressure and influence from the Western countries, and subsequently the same countries abused that report. He underlined that Iran's interactions with the agency, from the very beginning, had been based on its commitments arising from the Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT) and the Comprehensive Safeguards Agreement. France, Britain, and Germany, and the United States are reportedly seeking a draft resolution that accuses Iran of 'non-compliance' with safeguards obligations for the first time in almost 20 years, an issue that was declared closed within the framework of the 2015 deal, known as the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA). Tehran has already warned that any such move will be met with a serious and decisive response. Enrichment a non-negotiable issue Regarding the issue of Iran's continued uranium enrichment, Baqaei said that the Islamic Republic did not need licenses in this regard and would not allow others to impose their will on Iran's right to enrichment. He pointed that enriching uranium does not necessarily mean having a weapons program, arguing that many countries, including some close allies of the United States, are enriching without having a weapons program. Enrichment is an integral part of the nuclear fuel cycle, which has been developed after decades of effort and dedication of Iranian scientists, he said, adding that 'This right is explicitly recognized for member states and is non-negotiable under Article 4 of the NPT.' Iran's nuclear program is peaceful Referring to a recent I.A.E.A. report, Baqaei said that the agency did not mention any non-compliance or deviation in Iran's nuclear program from the peaceful path. He stated that the report itself has several problems as it was drafted with political goals and in order to make excuses for Iran's nuclear program, but there is no mention of Iran's program being non-peaceful. The spokesperson said the position of the Islamic Republic is quite clear that the country, as a responsible member of the NPT, remains committed to continuing the peaceful path. He also touched on Israeli propaganda against Iran's nuclear program, saying that the issue has been affected by the hype created by the regime. He said that Iran's nuclear program has been under the most stringent monitoring mechanisms of the I.A.E.A. Baqaei accused European countries of piling up pressure under the pretext of lack of transparency simply following Israeli narratives. 'If you look at the history of the issue, as I mentioned before, the Zionist regime first claimed in 1984 that Iran was seeking to produce nuclear weapons. Now 40 years have passed since then and the status of the JCPOA is also clear to everyone.' U.S. proposal for Iran Addressing a question related to the U.S. proposal that was conveyed to Iran by Oman on May 31, the Foreign Ministry spokesperson did not give the details but said the proposal neither had the characteristics of active and bilateral negotiations nor was it the outcome of the indirect Iran-U.S. talks held so far. Baqaei emphasized that any plan that does not take into account the rights and interests of the Iranian nation, whether in the field of nuclear energy or with regard to ensuring the effective lifting of oppressive sanctions, is unacceptable to the country and shows a lack of seriousness in the negotiations. He noted that Iran will present its own reasonable, logical, and balanced proposal to the other side through Oman once it is finalized. Europe deviated from diplomatic path Referring to anti-Iran stance and rhetoric by some European countries, the Foreign Ministry spokesperson said that 'the confrontation with European countries cannot in any way create an incentive for cooperation.' He underlined that Iran had clearly stated from the beginning that it is ready to resolve outstanding issues through talks but the European parties not only failed to present constructive proposals, but also withdrew from the diplomatic process for other reasons. According to the spokesperson, a destructive and unconstructive approach was seen when European countries called for the I.A.E.A. report and then drafted a resolution to push during the agency's Board of Governors this week. He warned that the Western countries would be responsible for the consequences of their actions as Iran would take proportionate and reciprocal steps. Referring to activating the 'snapback' mechanism, Baqaei said that the issue should not be exaggerated too much as Iran's nuclear program is completely peaceful and there is no excuse or legal basis to put the Iranian nuclear issue on the Security Council's agenda. Slamming ban on Iranians entering the U.S. Addressing President Donald Trump's executive order to ban citizens of certain countries, including Iran, from entering the U.S., Baqaei said that the move is discriminatory and racist and is completely condemnable both from the perspective of human rights and moral obligations. He said that since the majority of the population affected by this regulation is Muslim, Trump's decision is based on the nationality and religion of individuals. 'Countries and governments are not allowed to enact laws based on the nationality, race, religion or ethnicity of individuals as such policies violate the fundamental principles of equality and justice and represent an inhumane and illegal approach,' he added. Genocide amid international silence The Foreign Ministry spokesperson, once gain deplored the ongoing Israeli genocide against Palestinians in the besieged Gaza Strip. Unfortunately, the silence and inaction of international institutions, including the United Nations Security Council (U.N.S.C.), has emboldened the regime to continue massacring people in Gaza and the West Bank, he said. Referring to the U.S. veto of a U.N.S.C. resolution demanding an immediate ceasefire in Gaza last week, Baqaei pointed that Washington's stance once again proved its backing for Israel and granting its officials impunity for gross human rights violations. He called on the international community to take serious and urgent action to stop the sad and horrific situation the Palestinians are going through for the past two years.


Al Manar
5 hours ago
- Al Manar
Israeli Enemy Violates Lebanese Sovereignty Again
The Israeli enemy continued on Monday its continuous violations of the Lebanese sovereignty and the ceasefire agreement based on the UN Resolution 1701. In this regard, Israeli gliders threw two bombs on Ras Al-Naqoura and Ramya in South Lebanon with no injuries recorded, according to Al-Manar reporter. Israeli soldiers, deployed at the newly established occupation site in Hamams inside the Lebanese territory, opened fire at farms in the Khiam plain. Moreover, an Israeli drone flew in the morning at a low altitude over Beirut's Dahieh. An Israeli drone raid on a motorcycle on the Shehabiyeh-Kfardounin highway in south Lebanon on Sunday left one martyr.