What does the Senedd do?
Voters in Wales will head to the polls for the next Senedd election on 7 May 2026.
But what exactly is the Senedd, and what does it do?
Here's a brief guide.
First up - what's devolution?
Devolution refers to the transfer of powers from one level of decision-making to a level which is closer to the voter.
In 1997 people in Wales voted narrowly in favour of moving certain responsibilities from Westminster to Cardiff Bay through the establishment of the National Assembly for Wales, which opened in 1999.
Initially, the assembly's powers were fairly limited.
However, over the years further responsibilities have made their way down the M4 including full law-making powers in a number of areas such as health, education, transport, rural affairs, and the environment.
The ability to raise and vary certain taxes has also now been transferred to Cardiff, and the national assembly has been renamed as the Welsh Parliament or Senedd Cymru.
Other areas such as defence, benefits, foreign affairs and major rail infrastructure remain in Westminster.
Leaders of the Yes campaign celebrate the result of the 1997 referendum [BBC]
What's the difference between the Welsh government and the Welsh Parliament?
The Welsh government oversees the running of many public services in Wales, including health, education, and transport.
It also takes decisions with regard to rural affairs, the environment, and local councils.
The government consists of a team of cabinet secretaries and ministers led by the first minister.
Each cabinet secretary is responsible for a different policy area.
The government is usually formed by the party that won the most seats at the previous election.
Up to now, that party has always been Labour.
However, Labour has never managed to win more than half the 60 seats up for grabs and so the party has always had to strike a deal with another party in order to get its policies – and crucially, its budget - through.
Sometimes this has involved members of other parties joining the government to work alongside Welsh Labour ministers.
The Welsh Parliament, or Senedd Cymru, is made up of all the politicians elected to Cardiff Bay.
Its role is to scrutinise the Welsh government's work, including proposed new laws that ministers bring forward.
It is led by the presiding officer, also called the Llywydd, whose job it is to keep order during debates.
Before any new laws are passed, they must be voted through by a majority of Members of the Senedd (MS).
Welsh Parliament, or Senedd Cymru, is responsible for scrutinising the Welsh government's work [Getty Images]
What's the difference between an MS and an MP?
An MS - Member of the Senedd - sits in Cardiff Bay scrutinising the work of the Welsh government led by the first minister.
An MP - Member of Parliament - sits in the House of Commons in Westminster scrutinising the work of the UK government led by the prime minister.
Wales has 32 MPs.
How much money does the Welsh government spend?
The Welsh government's budget is worth around £26bn for 2025-26.
Most of that money - some £21bn - comes as a grant from the UK government.
The rest comes via taxes that the Welsh government itself raises.
The Welsh government also gets extra money - described as consequential funding - when the UK government decides to spend more money on areas such as health and education in England.
How are things changing in 2026?
The are big changes coming to way the Senedd is elected [Getty Images]
The number of MSs will increase at the next election - from 60 to 96.
The way they are elected and the number of constituencies will also change.
The reforms have been controversial.
Supporters say more politicians are needed to reflect the extra responsibilities the Senedd now has compared to when it was set up.
However, critics believe the changes are a waste of money which would be better spent on stretched public services, such as health, social services, and education.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
a day ago
- Yahoo
5mph speed limits: another bonkers Labour idea to make drivers' lives hell
The war on motorists grows more bizarre every day. Wales, long ruled by Labour, remains the source of the most bonkers ideas. Earlier this year, Jane Hutt MS, the Cabinet Secretary for Social Justice, appeared to be floating the idea of a speed limit of 5mph being appropriate 'in some circumstances'. That is roughly the speed of a horse-drawn carriage, so long as it was walking. A trotting horse would typically do double that speed, leaving Ms Hutt in the dust in her car, presumably before being promptly turned into glue for speeding, if the Senedd had its way. Perhaps we shouldn't be surprised. After all, this is the administration which famously withdrew support 'for all major road projects in Wales because of climate change', and pushed through the controversial 20mph blanket speed limit across all residential roads and busy pedestrian streets in 2023. Nearly two years since the imposition of the policy, Welsh drivers remain furious. And who can blame them? The speed limit is a stick with which to beat drivers into swapping their cars for bicycles and public transport. 'To suck every bit of joy out of driving and make life miserable for drivers,' as a friend once put it. He's picked up nine points, all for driving around 24 or 25 miles per hour, after struggling to rein in a life-long habit of driving at a slightly more reasonable and efficient pace. 'I spend the whole time looking at the speedometer,' another told me. 'The journey to work takes about 20 minutes longer, so I burn fuel for longer and pay more for it'. With a minimum fine of £100 and three penalty points for going over the limit and prosecutions starting at 26mph, the costs to motorists are considerable. The risk of loss of licence and even livelihoods for some is a real danger. There are also more cars on the road for longer, resulting in increased stop-and-go traffic, with frequent braking and accelerating also contributing towards greater fuel consumption and associated costs. Then there's the wider costs. The Welsh government's own research reportedly found that the 20mph policy could potentially cost the economy £4.5bn, though spread over 30 years. This analysis was signed off by the minister for climate change in January 2023 as 'a fair and reasonable view of the expected impact' of the policy, but – in line with the eco evangelism proudly adopted by her government – that she was 'satisfied that the benefits justify the likely costs'. But it's not only in Wales that drivers are being driven out of town. This side of the border motorists are being caught out by 'low traffic neighbourhoods' which not only imposed steep fines when the often imperceptible borders are innocently breached, but have been blamed for increasing pollution on major roads where poorer residents typically live. One scheme set up by Lambeth council in south London was deemed unlawful by the High Court after it ruled the authority had failed to properly listen to residents' concerns. Cash-strapped councils are raising ever-growing sums from parking permits and fines. Across Britain, local authorities have raised £360m from residential parking permits over the last five years, according to Cinch, the online car dealer. Top of the list was Wandsworth Borough Council, which collected £38m from residential permits between 2020 and 2024 alone. And that's before you add in fines from mistakes like driving in bus 'gates' and lanes as well as car parking charges. Back to Wales and its obsession with slow driving. Sense has prevailed in Wrexham at least, with some roads already returning to a 30mph limit. We must not let the age-old argument of safety hold back progress. An infamous New York Times article from 1928 raised concerns around 'horseless carriages' being driven without the added intelligence of a second creature. The answer was to improve safety, not to place restrictions that would make them less efficient than the horse-drawn carriages they were destined to replace. The same is true today, with technology gradually making cars safer. That's not to mention the improved air quality the advent of electric cars – over which I have other concerns, perhaps best discussed in another piece – will usher in at least in this country. As ever, families and businesses are left to pick up the price of government interference, through higher running costs and missed opportunities caused by delays, and in some cases, even the loss of livelihood. Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.
Yahoo
2 days ago
- Yahoo
Ex-Tory MP among 15 in court to face betting charges
Fifteen people, including former Tory MP Craig Williams, have appeared in court charged with betting offences linked to the timing of last year's general election. It follows an investigation by the Gambling Commission into alleged betting on the date of the election. Appearing at Westminster Magistrates Court on Friday, Williams was among three defendants who gave no indication of a plea at this stage. Twelve others, including Russell George, a former Conservative now independent member of the Welsh Senedd, indicated they would deny the charges. The defendants will appear again at Southwark Crown Court on July 11. On 22 May 2024, Rishi Sunak announced the general election would be held on 4 July that year, overturning previous expectations of an autumn poll. Prosecuting on behalf of the Gambling Commission, Sam Stein KC said Sunak was among those to have given a witness statement in the case. Mr Stein told the court the commission's investigation was launched into "politicians and employees of the Conservative Party, and a former police officer... who had placed bets on the date of the 2024 general election with the benefit of confidential or insider information as to when that date might be". "The prosecution says that placing bets with inside information is a criminal offence, namely cheating," he added. Before the election was called, Williams was the MP for Montgomeryshire and a parliamentary aide to Sunak. He was previously MP for Cardiff North between 2015 and 2017, before he lost his seat to Labour in the election that year. Along with Williams, former police officer Jeremy Hunt, 55, of Horne in Surrey, and Jacob Willmer, 39, from Richmond, west London, did not indicate a plea. Along with George, those indicating a not guilty plea included Laura Saunders, the former Conservative parliamentary candidate in Bristol North West, and her partner Anthony Lee. The others indicating they would deny the charges included Simon Chatfield, 51, from Farnham, Surrey, Amy Hind, 34, of Loughton, Essex, Anthony Hind, 36, of Loughton, Essex, Thomas James, 38, Charlotte Lang, 36, Iain Makepeace, 47, from Newcastle Upon Tyne, Nick Mason, 51, Paul Place, 54, from Hammersmith, west London and James Ward, 40, of Leeds.
Yahoo
2 days ago
- Yahoo
I gave Welsh government what it wanted, says chancellor
Rachel Reeves has defended the UK government's spending plans for Wales, telling BBC Wales she delivered what the Welsh government had asked for. Opposition parties have been critical of the chancellor's spending review, calling the money earmarked for the railways a "drop in the ocean" compared to what the country needs. The chancellor said the plan to spend £445m on Welsh railways was a "significant package" and defended the £118m earmarked for coal tips, which is short of estimates previously made by the Welsh government. Reeves denied the spending review had left Wales short changed and said Wales was getting a "record" amount of cash. New stations in £445m 10-year Wales rail plan Spending review sets scene for Senedd election Spending review could mean cuts in Wales - experts Rachel Reeves made the comments on a visit to the Taff's Well Transport for Wales depot on Friday. The Treasury is providing £300m for five new stations around Cardiff and Newport between 2026 and 2030, and a series of improvement works including measures to improve capacity in north Wales. Another £48m is going on the South Wales Metro, while £90m is being allocated over 10 years to work on future schemes. Speaking to BBC Wales, Reeves said: "This investment delivers the five train stations from the Burns review in south Wales, improvements to the core valley network as well as the level crossing improvements in north Wales to link people to the jobs that are available. "This is significant investment that the Welsh government asked for. A Labour government in Westminster working with the Labour government here in Wales to deliver for people in Wales. "At the same time there's the record devolution settlement for the Welsh government and, on top of that as well, the £118m for coal tips to keep those safe in Wales." When it was put to her that it was far short of the up to £600m previously estimated to be needed for coaltips, Reeves said: "No, the £118m is what the Welsh government asked for from the UK government and we've delivered that in full. "And we are also delivering in full the requests for investments for the Burns review stations for example." Asked if Wales was being short changed by the 0.9% cut to Welsh government capital spending, she said: "No, we're investing in the transport infrastructure, in the coal tips and a record devolution settlement."
