The truth behind the video of white crosses shown during Ramaphosa's meeting with Trump
JOHANNESBURG - A viral video taken from a helicopter showing hundreds of white crosses along a rural road in South Africa was the focus during Wednesday's meeting between President Cyril Ramaphosa and Donald Trump.
The video formed part of a compilation shown in the White House during an official visit to the US by Ramaphosa ahead of talks to reset strained relations between the two countries.
The meeting falls on the back of claims that there is a white genocide against farmers in South Africa, specifically targeting Afrikaaners, who were recently granted refugee status in America.
READ: [WATCH] Tshidi Madia does a wrap of the Trump-Ramaphosa meeting
A video showing 500 white crosses lining either side of a rural road and hundreds of vehicles participating in a peaceful protest was the focus during Wednesday's meeting between presidents Donald Trump and Cyril Ramaphosa in the White House.
Trump: "It's a terrible sight, I've never seen anything like it. Both sides of the road, you have crosses. Those people were all killed."
Ramaphosa: "Have they told you where that is, Mr President?"
Trump: "No."
Ramaphosa: "I'd like to know where that is."
The video was taken on Saturday, 5 September in 2020 during a peaceful protest in Normandien, Newcastle in northern KwaZulu-Natal.
It followed the double murder of Normandien farmers, Glen and Vida Rafferty, who were killed on their farm by intruders - three of whom were subsequently arrested and sentenced between 2021 and 2022.
Three days after the murders, former Police Minister Bheki Cele visited the Rafferty family to prioritise the case and engage with locals.
"We are having about seven farmers since last year who have been killed, including the house breaking and it looks like we have made good progress."
The protest was held by local farmers in the region six days after the Raffertys were murdered, to raise awareness of farm murders.
There is no evidence to suggest the crosses in the video were in honour of specific farmers.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
IOL News
5 hours ago
- IOL News
Malatji: Ramaphosa should be SA's last 'pensioner' President
ANC Youth League President Collen Malatji delivers a fiery speech during Youth Month, calling for younger leadership in government. Image: Facebook/ANC Northern Cape ANC Youth League President Collen Malatji has made a bold statement, saying President Cyril Ramaphosa should be the last 'pensioner' to lead the country. Malatji made the remarks on Wednesday, at the Mmabatho Convention Centre in the North West as part of the Youth Month commemorations. He argued that older leaders must make way for younger people in key positions of power, especially given the country's high youth unemployment rate, which is sitting at 32.9% and the social struggles faced by young South Africans. 'They (referring to the youth) are dispossessed, they are on drugs, they are on alcohol, they are abused by their husbands every day of their marriage, they are in problems,' Malatji said. 'Even your dignity is stripped when you are deprived of your own economy.' He called for a revival of youth political consciousness similar to that of the 1976 generation, who famously rose up against apartheid. 'That spirit must be revived in your hearts and souls. It must burn until the structure of the economy is changed, until the youth of this country run this country,' he said. Malatji criticised what he sees as contradictions in government policy regarding age and retirement. 'You can't say people aged 65 must go to pension, but the one who makes the laws, aged 65, is still working,' he said. 'Even those in Parliament must go home when they are 65. President Ramaphosa must be the last president who is a pensioner.' Ramaphosa, who is 72-years-old, has announced a National Dialogue aimed at reshaping South Africa's future amid worsening inequality, unemployment, crime, and corruption. The dialogue will culminate in a National Convention on August 15, bringing together political, civil, religious, traditional, and business leaders. It will conclude with a second convention in early 2026. Malatji lambasted the process, claiming it lacks meaningful youth representation and direction. 'Everything important in this country must be run by the youth,' he said. 'We can't have a high level of youth unemployment while pensioners are still working.' He also took aim at the recently announced Eminent Persons Group tasked with overseeing the dialogue, which includes Bishop Barnabas Lekganyane of the Zion Christian Church, Bishop Grace Engenas Lekganyane of the St. Engenas Zion Christian Church, former COSATU general secretary Bheki Ntshalintshali, and Springbok captain Siya Kolisi. On Wednesday, IOL News reported that notable absentees from the list include Ramaphosa's predecessors and leaders of legacy foundations such as those named after Nelson Mandela, Thabo Mbeki, and Ahmed Kathrada, all of which have been critical of the current administration. 'Because that national dialogue will have no direction if it is not directed by the youth of this country,' Malatji said. 'We cannot have a task team for the youth dialogue without youth (representatives).'
IOL News
8 hours ago
- IOL News
The fallout from Trump's Afrikaner project on Ramaphosa's National Dialogue agenda
President Cyril Ramaphosa has defended BEE as an engine of growth. Image: GCIS President Cyril Ramaphosa's upcoming national dialogue aims to tackle critical issues facing the country, including the divisions sparked by US President Donald Trump's controversial offer of resettlement to white Afrikaners, alongside pressing concerns regarding unemployment and poor governance. On Wednesday, Ramaphosa announced the appointment of an 'eminent persons group,' comprising 31 South Africans, who will spearhead the National Dialogue scheduled for August 15. One of the eminent persons, who requested anonymity, said the dialogue can be seen as a response to concerns, aiming to address the country's challenges and promote national building. 'The issue should definitely come up, although everybody has a choice to leave the country. "We are way beyond the colour lines now and should focus on nation building with the people who are in the country, instead of dwelling in the past. 'Sure, it's a bone of contention but we do have bigger problems," she said. However, not all are on board with Ramaphosa's dialogue initiative. The uMkhonto weSizwe Party has rejected the dialogue as an "elitist farce," saying it is a "staged theatre for the political elite". In a statement its spokesperson, Nhlamulo Ndhlela, asked why there were no ordinary South Africans, such as shack dwellers, represented? 'The so-called Eminent Persons Group, handpicked by the very same ruling class responsible for mass unemployment, deepening poverty, collapsing infrastructure and the ongoing betrayal of the Freedom Charter, is a mockery of the suffering endured daily by millions of destitute and despondent South African,' Ndhlela wrote. The EFF has also expressed skepticism, questioning the government's motives and the selection process for the Eminent Persons Group. "The challenges Ramaphosa's National Dialogue seek to address are not a product of triumph of human sacrifice against evil, which require collective national reconstruction, but are a product of man-made destruction and corruption of which he and the party he leads have been at the centre of," the EFF said in a statement. The DA's national spokesperson, Willie Aucamp, welcomed the National Dialogue saying his party would embrace the opportunity. 'I think it's high time that we as a nation get together and discuss collectively what we see as a road forward for this country,' he said. Build One South Africa (BOSA) described the announcement as a positive and necessary step forward for the country at a time of great political uncertainty, public anxiety, and economic malaise. The GOOD Party's general secretary Brett Herron said it was long overdue as the wait had been frustrating.
The Citizen
8 hours ago
- The Citizen
‘Bring all to dialogue': Experts insist national dialogue must be people-driven
Political analysts stress the need for land restitution and broad participation to ensure a meaningful and effective national dialogue. Experts say the envisaged national dialogue must not be a top-down process, but people-driven and discuss contentious issues like land and racial polarisation. But more importantly, said one expert, the dialogue required full commitment from various actors to find a collective solution to the country's myriad problems. Political analyst and scholar Dominic Maphaka from North-West University said the dialogue was necessary to unite the diverse and divided country. National dialogue necessary to unite country He said, as outlined by President Cyril Ramaphosa, stakeholders, including business, labour, civil society, communities, youth and people with disabilities, should form part of the dialogue to chart the way forward. 'But the dialogue will require a commitment from various actors to form part of a collective solution to the myriad problems faced by the country,' Maphaka said. ALSO READ: Thandiswa Mazwai says she would've accepted invite to national dialogue had Ramaphosa sent it He alluded to the fact that, due to the vibrant civil society, nonstate actors were often at loggerheads with government and opposing its development policies. 'Despite having divergent ideologies, it is not far-fetched that South Africans share common problems in many areas. I therefore think that ideologies should not take precedence in the dialogue; instead, stakeholders should deliberate and find common policy solutions to address common policy problems,' Maphaka said. Ramaphosa yesterday said he would call a National Convention on 15 August, which would set the agenda for the National Dialogue. National Convention to set agenda A follow-up convention would be held early next year. He said the convention would be a representative gathering, bringing together government, political parties, civil society, business, labour, traditional leaders, religious leaders, cultural workers, sports organisations, women, youth and community voices. Some experts believed people and civil society, not government and political parties, should lead the planned dialogue process, including the convention. ALSO READ: Ramaphosa urges caution as floods claims lives in Eastern Cape Political analyst Lesiba Teffo said the national dialogue was not supposed to be driven by the state because that was where the seeds of its failure lay. 'It was contested from inception and some of the initiators are now in the periphery. A reasonable modality would be to start in the provinces whose reports would feed into the national convention. Otherwise, you are likely to end up with another voluminous, glossy and expensive National Development Plan 0.2 Vision 2040,' Teffo said. The need for an all-inclusive national dialogue was first proposed by former president Thabo Mbeki. Mbeki, assisted by Jacob Zuma, was the ANC's first chief negotiator at the pre-1994 Convention for a Democratic South Africa (Codesa) talks before they were replaced by Ramaphosa and Mohammed Valli Moosa. Need for national dialogue first proposed by Mbeki There seemed to be a common view that dialogue should involve various roleplayers – from civil society, to state, business, trade unions and political parties. It is understood that the struggle stalwarts' foundations were involved in consultations to kick off the process, while Nedlac was identified to play a role as one of the facilitators due to its composite nature with business, trade unions, community and government. ALSO READ: 'A meaningless publicity stunt by a limping president': EFF slams Ramaphosa's national dialogue call Political and heritage analyst George Tsibani, who supports the idea of a national dialogue, said such a gathering should address the question of land in its proper perspective. He said democratic South Africa was a result of a negotiated settlement that was underpinned by Sunset Clauses that were a compromise and did not address the land question. 'If we pretend that there was no compromise, it would take the focus away from the land issue. The land redistribution and restitution must form the cornerstone of national dialogue,' Tsibani said. Previous Codesa process failed The previous Codesa process failed to address many issues due to the Sunset Clause that allowed for the continuation of white control of the state. 'So Codesa 2 must address the land issue in its totality, meaning there must be a deliberate restitution of land for the people who lost their land during the colonial and slavery periods,' Tsibani said. NOW READ: Ramaphosa, Chief Justice mourn passing of Judge Temba Sangoni
