‘It's possible it was me': Australian accused in fatal mushroom lunch trial says after internet logs search for deadly fungi
SYDNEY, June 6 — An Australian woman accused of the murder of three elderly relatives of her estranged husband by feeding them poisonous mushrooms said it was possible she had searched for lethal death cap mushrooms on her computer, a court heard on Friday.
Erin Patterson, 50, is charged with the July 2023 murders of her mother-in-law Gail Patterson, father-in-law Donald Patterson and Gail's sister, Heather Wilkinson, along with the attempted murder of Ian Wilkinson, Heather's husband.
The prosecution accuses her of knowingly serving the guests the death caps as part of a Beef Wellington at her home in Leongatha, a town of about 6,000 people some 135 km (84 miles) from Melbourne.
She denies the charges, which carry a life sentence, with her defence calling the deaths a 'terrible accident'.
The accused, who began giving evidence for her own defence on Monday, was cross-examined for a second day by prosecution barrister Nanette Rogers on Friday.
Rogers said forensic evidence showed a person using a computer found in Erin Patterson's home had conducted searches for death cap mushrooms on iNaturalist, a website where enthusiasts log localised sightings of animals and plants.
'I suggest that that person was you. Correct or incorrect?' Rogers asked.
Patterson replied: 'I don't remember doing it. It's possible it was me', adding she did not know if it was possible that one of her two children had conducted the searches.
The defence's decision to call Erin Patterson as a witness has re-ignited interest in the trial that began in late April.
Podcasters, journalists and documentary-makers from local and international media have descended on the town of Morwell where the trial is being held, about two hours east of Melbourne.
State broadcaster ABC's daily podcast about the proceedings is currently Australia's most popular, while many domestic newspapers have run live blogs on trial developments.
The prosecution rested its case on Monday after a month of evidence from relatives and medical, forensic and mushroom experts.
The trial, expected to conclude this month, continues on Tuesday. — Reuters
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Malay Mail
11 hours ago
- Malay Mail
Disgraced movie mogul Weinstein concedes he acted ‘immorally' as jury deliberations pause
NEW YORK, June 7 — Disgraced Hollywood mogul Harvey Weinstein conceded that he acted 'immorally' but insisted he did nothing criminal as jury deliberations on his fate in his sex crimes retrial paused for the weekend yesterday. Jurors said after two days that they needed 'more time' to deliberate on a verdict for Weinstein. He is on trial again after a New York state appeals court threw out his 2020 convictions, citing irregularities in the original proceedings. The former movie industry titan's 23 year prison sentence for the initial conviction was thrown out, but he remains imprisoned for separate offenses. Although Weinstein did not take the stand, he spoke out in an interview aired by FOX5 television yesterday as the jury considered six weeks of testimony. 'I have regrets that I put my family through this, that I put my wife through this, and I acted immorally..., but never illegal, never criminal, never anything,' he said. Weinstein pointed to comments by his defence attorney Arthur Aidala who suggested the three women who testified against him at trial 'had four million reasons to testify, as in dollars.' Judge Curtis Farber issued initial instructions Thursday to jurors, one of whom had to be swapped out for an alternate after falling ill, before they retired to consider their verdict. He called on the panel to use 'common sense' for this 'very important decision' and reminded them that Weinstein was 'presumed innocent.' Yesterday, the jury panel of 12 heard a read back of emotional testimony from Weinstein's former assistant Miriam Haley. The jury must decide whether Weinstein — accused by dozens of women of being a sexual predator — is guilty of sexual assaults in 2006 on Haley and former model Kaja Sokola, and of rape in 2013 of then-aspiring actress Jessica Mann. 'Playground stuff' One juror came forward yesterday to report tensions between his fellow panellists, alleging 'people are being shunned. It's playground stuff.' He asked to resign as a juror, but Farber denied his request. Aidala requested that a mistrial be declared, but the judge denied his motion, and the jury will continue to deliberate Weinstein's fate Monday. On Wednesday, prosecutor Nicole Blumberg summarized the evidence of the three alleged victims of Weinstein who testified at the trial for jurors saying simply 'he raped three women, they all said no.' The Hollywood figure had 'all the power' and 'all the control' over the alleged victims, which is why jurors should find him guilty, she said. 'The defendant thought the rules did not apply to him, now it is the time to let him know that the rules apply to him. 'There is no reasonable doubt; tell the defendant what he already knows — that he is guilty of the three crimes.' Weinstein's defence attorney insisted the sexual encounters were consensual, pointing to a 'casting couch' dynamic between the movie mogul and the women. Weinstein, the producer of box office hits Pulp Fiction and Shakespeare in Love, has never acknowledged wrongdoing. The cinema magnate, whose downfall in 2017 sparked the global #MeToo movement, has been on trial since April 15 in a scruffy Manhattan courtroom. He is already serving a 16-year prison sentence after being convicted in California in a separate for raping and assaulting a European actress more than a decade ago. — AFP
Malay Mail
11 hours ago
- Malay Mail
French mayor to face trial for alleged sex tape blackmail of political rival
LYON, June 7 — A French mayor accused of using a sex tape to blackmail a political rival is set to go on trial in September after a court yesterday ordered him to face criminal proceedings. Gael Perdriau, who leads the city of Saint-Etienne in central France, is accused of orchestrating the plot in 2015, using footage of his deputy with a male escort. The two magistrates investigating the case ordered that Perdriau, 52, be tried for blackmail, theft, embezzlement of public funds by a public official and participation in a criminal association, Lyon's chief prosecutor Thierry Dran said in a statement. The case, triggered by a whistleblower in 2022, involves a 2015 video of former deputy mayor Gilles Artigues receiving a massage from a male escort in a Paris hotel. Perdriau allegedly demanded political loyalty and electoral concessions from Artigues in return for keeping the compromising video private, according to court documents seen by AFP. Despite being ousted from the conservative Republicans party and under pressure to resign, Perdriau has maintained his innocence and continues to hold office—even hinting at a 2026 re-election bid. The trial is set to take place between September 22 and 26, pending any appeals, the prosecutor added. Perdriau declined to comment when contacted by AFP on Friday, while his lawyers could not be reached for comment. — AFP
Malay Mail
a day ago
- Malay Mail
Arson attacks on UK PM Starmer's properties: Trial for three men with Ukraine links set for April 2026
Three men linked to Ukraine face arson charges Trial set for April 27 next year Counter-terrorism police lead investigation LONDON, June 6 — Three men all linked to Ukraine will go on trial next April accused of involvement in a series of arson attacks on houses and a vehicle in London connected to British Prime Minister Keir Starmer, a London court heard on Friday. Over five days last month, police were called to fires at a house in north London owned by Starmer, another at a property nearby where he used to live, and to a blaze involving a car that also used to belong to the British leader. Ukrainian Roman Lavrynovych, 21, is charged with three counts of arson with intent to endanger life. Fellow Ukrainian Petro Pochynok, 34, and Romanian national Stanislav Carpiuc, 26, who was born in Ukraine, are accused of conspiracy to commit arson. Lavrynovych and Carpiuc appeared by video-link at London's Old Bailey court on Friday where Judge Bobbie Cheema-Grubb set the trial for April 27 next year. Pochynok was not present for the hearing. In earlier hearings, prosecutors said the motive for the arsons was unclear. The men will enter formal pleas at a hearing in October, but the lawyers for Carpiuc and Pochynok said their clients denied involvement. Counter-terrorism police have led the investigation but none of the men have been charged with offences under terrorism laws or the new National Security Act, which was brought in to target hostile state activity. Police said the first fire involved a Toyota RAV4 car that Starmer used to own and sold to a neighbour. Days later, there was a blaze at a property where Starmer previously resided and the following day there was an attack on a house in north London that he still owns. Starmer, who has lived at his official 10 Downing Street residence in central London since becoming prime minister last July, has called the incidents 'an attack on all of us, on our democracy and the values we stand for'. Earlier this week a fourth man, aged 48, who had been arrested at London Stansted Airport in connection with the arson, was released on police bail. — Reuters
