logo
[Editorial] No retaliation in probes

[Editorial] No retaliation in probes

Korea Heralda day ago

Special counsels should be neutral figures to avoid suspicions of revenge, oppression
Three bills mandating special counsel probes into allegations involving the administration of former President Yoon Suk Yeol were enacted Tuesday following approval at a Cabinet meeting.
One of the bills requires special counsels to investigate insurrection and treason charges related to Yoon's failed declaration of martial law.
The second bill calls for a probe into allegations against Yoon's wife, Kim Keon Hee. She allegedly accepted luxury goods as bribes, manipulated stock prices and intervened illegally in the People Power Party's nomination of candidates for the National Assembly.
The third bill deals with the death of a Marine who drowned while searching for missing flood victims and the presidential office's alleged pressure on officials investigating his death.
The bills mark the first legislation for President Lee Jae-myung since taking office last week.
Their passage through the Assembly was led by the ruling Democratic Party of Korea.
Simultaneous special counsels investigating three cases against key figures from the previous administration and possibly lawmakers from the People Power Party are unprecedented.
In light of the seriousness of the allegations, the truth needs to be uncovered. But the investigations should be impartial and transparent. If not, they are likely to be caught up in suspicions of political retaliation.
Investigations of the allegations in question are either completed or ongoing. They were conducted separately by the prosecution, the police and the Corruption Investigation Office for High-ranking Officials.
The government and the ruling party say the legislation was intended to increase the efficiency of the investigations by integrating the separate probes and revealing the overall truth in all three cases, but there is concern about the scale of the investigation and how special counsels are appointed.
As many as 120 prosecutors will be assigned to three special counsel teams. This figure is more than half of the number of prosecutors at the Seoul Central District Prosecutors' Office, the nation's largest. Hundreds of investigation officers and assistants will also join.
Allocating so many resources to the special counsel probes could set back investigations into other cases affecting the lives of ordinary people.
Among other provisions, the bills give only the Democratic Party and the minor opposition Rebuilding Korea Party, which almost always stands by the now-ruling party, the exclusive right to recommend special counsels in the three cases. It is hard to dispel worries about the political neutrality of their investigations.
The appointment of special counsels is a supplementary system designed to keep those in power from pushing biased investigations. It should be used in exceptional circumstances and only as necessary.
But the Democratic Party unilaterally passed bills that expand the scope of special counsel probes and grant nominating authority exclusively to certain parties.
It is true that suspicions about the previous administration still need to be addressed, and some investigations have been criticized as insufficient. But in a situation where Lee and the Democratic Party are now in power, it is questionable whether special counsels are even necessary to investigate the previous administration instead of using the existing judicial system. It is difficult to erase suspicions of political motivations.
The opposition People Power Party has condemned the bills, arguing that the special counsels' "triple investigations" are political revenge.
If the investigations were used as a lever of power for political suppression, as the People Power Party worries, it would be a grave threat to democracy.
The special counsel investigations should not split the nation into "us versus them," either. People experienced deep division during the Moon Jae-in administration due to its drive to eliminate "the evils of the past," which led to claims of a political vendetta.
Lee vowed to base his government on "integration." If so, the special counsel probes should serve as a just means of revealing the truth and ultimately restoring the rule of law, not a means for retaliation and oppression. That begins with appointing special counsels who are politically unbiased and widely respected.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

[Robert J. Fouser] South Korea's deep political divide
[Robert J. Fouser] South Korea's deep political divide

Korea Herald

time2 hours ago

  • Korea Herald

[Robert J. Fouser] South Korea's deep political divide

Lee Jae-myung of the slightly center-left Democratic Party of Korea began his presidency with a whirlwind of activity after winning a decisive victory in the recent presidential election. Though only ten days have passed, the election seems like a distant event. As with other elections, the results offer insight into the current state and future direction of South Korean politics. This was the ninth election held since the 1987 democratic reforms that permitted the direct election of the president to a single five-year term. Since then, no party has won more than two presidential elections in a row, and power has shifted from center-right to center-left groups four times. Similar shifts between parties have occurred in National Assembly elections, which are held every four years. These shifts suggest that South Korean voters are evenly divided. Lee Jae-myung's recent victory underscores this pattern. Going into the election, most polls predicted he would win over 50 percent of the vote, but he ultimately won 49.4 percent. Park Geun-hye is the only presidential candidate since 1987 to win a majority of the vote, having won 51.6 percent in 2012. Left-wing candidate Kwon Young-guk got just under 1 percent of the vote. Combined with Lee's 49.4 percent, center-left candidates earned a total of 50.4 percent. Though this is a majority, it is only slightly above the 50.2 percent that center-left candidates earned in 2022. In contrast, Kim Moon-soo, the leading center-right candidate from the People Power Party, won only 41.2 percent of the vote. This is the second-lowest percentage for a candidate from the established center-right bloc since 1987. Only Hong Joon-pyo did worse in 2017, winning 24 percent of the vote. Controversial right-wing candidate Lee Jun-seok won 8.3 percent of the vote, bringing the total for center-right candidates to 49.5 percent. Though Lee Jae-myung had a large lead over second-place candidate Kim Moon-soo, the combined vote total of center-right candidates has remained close to 50 percent in every election since 1987. In 2022, center-right candidates, including election winner and now disgraced former president Yoon Suk Yeol, garnered 49.4 percent of the vote. In 2017, Moon Jae-in won the election with 40.1 percent, and center-right candidates received 52.2 percent of the vote. These statistics suggest that South Korea is evenly divided between center-right and center-left groups, each dominated by a large party with historical roots. This means elections are decided by a small shift in votes or division within one of the groups. Both occurred in the recent election, helping Lee Jae-myung open a large lead over Kim Moon-soo. The same thing helped Moon Jae-in win in 2017. A look at any map of recent election results explains why neither group can win by a large margin. The results of the 2025 election show the country divided evenly between east and west, with the People Power Party in red on the right and the Democratic Party in blue on the left. There are splashes of red in the Gangnam area of Seoul and in rural areas of North and South Chungcheong Provinces, but most of the area is blue. The Honam region, centered on Gwangju, is deep blue. The east is dominated by red, with the Yeongnam region, centered on Daegu and Busan, being heavily red. This sharp division between Honam and Yeongnam has been a constant in South Korean elections since 1987. Though this division has lessened slightly in recent years, it remains significant at all levels of politics. Democratic Party candidates show strength in Busan and Ulsan, which have attracted residents from around the country. However, People Power Party candidates rarely win anywhere in Honam. The problem for the Democratic Party is that Yeongnam's population is twice that of Honam. Nationally, voters in their 40s and 50s overwhelmingly supported Lee Jae-myung, offsetting Kim Moon-soo's strong support in Yeongnam. Meanwhile, Lee Joon-seok's anti-establishment rhetoric attracted male voters in their 20s and 30s, who supported him in large numbers, confirming the emergence of another generational divide that first appeared in the 2022 presidential election. Ultimately, the election was triggered by the successful impeachment of Yoon Suk-yeol for briefly imposing martial law in December 2024. Although polls showed that 60 percent of voters supported impeachment, Lee Jae-myung received just under 50 percent of the vote. This suggests that established regional and generational divides influenced voters more than the desire to repudiate Yoon by punishing the People Power Party at the ballot box. These deeply entrenched divides are likely to continue to influence South Korean politics for years to come. Robert J. Fouser, a former associate professor of Korean language education at Seoul National University, writes on Korea from Providence, Rhode Island. He can be reached at robertjfouser@ The views expressed here are the writer's own. -- Ed.

Korean border goes quiet, Trump overture — Is new breeze blowing?
Korean border goes quiet, Trump overture — Is new breeze blowing?

Korea Herald

time16 hours ago

  • Korea Herald

Korean border goes quiet, Trump overture — Is new breeze blowing?

Silence fell on the inter-Korean border for the first time in about a year, as North Korea abruptly halted its propaganda and noise broadcasts on Thursday — a day after Seoul preemptively paused its own loudspeaker broadcasts along the frontier. While it remains uncertain whether Pyongyang's pause will endure or signals a turning point, the mutual silence has raised cautious hopes at a time when inter-Korean relations are at their lowest ebb. South Korea's Joint Chiefs of Staff confirmed Thursday that 'there has been no noise since the last anti-South Korea broadcast was heard late last night on the western front." The South Korean military, however, said it 'is closely monitoring North Korea's movements' to see whether the halt to anti-South Korean propaganda broadcasts will continue. The liberal Lee Jae-myung administration took the proactive step of fully pausing loudspeaker broadcasts along the inter-Korean border as of 2 p.m. Wednesday. The presidential office explained that the move aimed at 'restoring confidence in inter-Korean relations and establishing peace on the Korean Peninsula.' The previous conservative Yoon Suk Yeol administration resumed propaganda broadcasts along the inter-Korean border in June 2024, for the first time in around six years, in response to North Korea's consecutive launches of trash-filled balloons. North Korea had responded to anti-South Korea broadcasts since July last year, transmitting sounds such as screeching metal, ghostly wails and animal noises, which had tormented residents in border areas for nearly a year. 'As North Korea responded to our government's pause of loudspeaker broadcasts toward the North, the suffering of residents in border areas has been alleviated,' a senior Unification Ministry official said on condition of anonymity on Thursday during a closed-door briefing. 'It is assessed that this has served as a meaningful opportunity to ease military tensions between the two Koreas and restore mutual confidence," the official added. The measure followed the Unification Ministry's public call on Monday for civic groups to stop sending anti-North Korea leaflets across the inter-Korean border, marking a shift from the previous policy under the Yoon administration. However, the Unification Ministry official confirmed that 'there are no official communication channels between South and North Korea.' North Korea has refused to answer regularly scheduled military-to-military calls from South Korea since April 7, 2023. The two Koreas are supposed to hold calls twice a day —in the morning and afternoon — via liaison and military hotlines. Pyongyang did not respond to Seoul's call through the liaison hotline Thursday morning, the official added. Inter-Korean relations have entered a prolonged downward spiral, including North Korea's designation of South Korea as an "enemy" state in its constitution. However, the inauguration of President Lee Jae-myung — who has vowed to restore inter-Korean communications and reduce tensions — along with the return of Trump, has raised hopes of a new diplomatic thaw on the Korean Peninsula. Karoline Leavitt, the White House spokesperson, said Wednesday that Trump "remains receptive to correspondence with Kim Jong-un, and he'd like to see the progress that was made at that summit in Singapore, which I know you covered in 2018 during his first term." The White House's response came after NK News, a Seoul-based media outlet specializing in North Korea issues, reported Wednesday that North Korean diplomats in New York had refused to accept a letter from Trump to Kim on multiple occasions, citing an unnamed informed source. Trump and Kim held three in-person summits between 2018 and 2019 and exchanged at least 27 personal letters, according to publicly disclosed records, as key means to build rapport between the two leaders. Lim Eul-chul, a professor at Kyungnam University's Institute for Far Eastern Studies, said North Korea's refusal to receive Trump's letter — if the media report is true — can be seen as Kim telling Trump to first take action. 'It is a message of pressure that preemptive measures — such as a substantive change to the US' hostile policy toward North Korea — must be taken in order to restore leader-to-leader relations and exchanges of personal letters, as in the past,' Lim said. Lim also noted that growing alignment between North Korea and Russia, and internal circumstances in North Korea — such as Kim's goal to inspire anti-South and anti-American sentiment for the regime's stability — could be reasons for its apparently cold response to Trump's letter. 'However, it is difficult to conclude that North Korea's position is fixed and unchanging in the mid-to-long term,' Lim added, pointing to various factors, including developments in the war in Ukraine and consequent changes in US–Russia relations.

Floor leaders of DP, PPP step down amid changes in party leadership
Floor leaders of DP, PPP step down amid changes in party leadership

Korea Herald

time16 hours ago

  • Korea Herald

Floor leaders of DP, PPP step down amid changes in party leadership

The floor leaders of the country's two major parties officially stepped down Thursday as the parties gear up for a leadership change. The press conferences for ruling Democratic Party of Korea Rep. Park Chan-dae and People Power Party Rep. Kweon Seong-dong, which were held within hours of each other, came a week after President Lee Jae-myung took office after winning the early election triggered by former President Yoon Suk Yeol's impeachment. As Park wrapped up his year-long term as floor leader, he revealed plans to run for the leader of the ruling party and called his experience 'a glorious journey' with the South Korean people. The three-term lawmaker and a close aide of Lee had assumed the role of floor leader in May 2024. He also assumed the role of acting chair after Lee stepped down as party leader in April to run for president. 'The Democratic Party of Korea has become a responsible ruling party which has President Lee Jae-myung on our side,' Park said during a press conference held at the National Assembly, a day before his term as floor leader was to expire. The Democratic Party currently holds the majority of 171 of the total 300 seats in the Assembly. 'We must walk towards completing the national task of ending the insurrection, recovering the livelihoods of the people, economic recovery and unity of the people, together with our great people who succeeded in protecting South Korea once again,' he added. Park lauded the three contentious special counsel investigation bills railroaded by the Democratic Party, passed in the Assembly and endorsed by Lee, to probe several allegations against Yoon, his wife Kim Keon Hee and the previous administration. All three bills were reintroduced after being vetoed by Yoon when he was president. 'Weren't the special counsel investigation bills continuously pursued by the Democratic Party the biggest threat to the Yoon Suk Yeol administration?' Park said. 'President Lee Jae-myung has finally promulgated the three special counsel investigations, which are the insurrection probe, Kim Keon Hee probe and the investigation into the death of a Marine — it's an outcome of a long struggle that has continued from last year.' The Democratic Party is scheduled to elect its new floor leader Friday. Meanwhile, Kweon, who announced his resignation earlier in June following former People Power Party presidential candidate Kim Moon-soo's election loss, denounced Yoon's failed Dec. 3 martial law bid and expressed hopes that his party would 'move beyond' the current internal rift. 'President Yoon Suk Yeol's martial law bid was illegal and a terribly wrong political decision,' Kweon said at the Assembly. 'I still cannot understand why (Yoon) declared martial law.' While Kweon was viewed as a supporter of Yoon within the party, Kweon declined to be labeled as such. 'I played a noticeable part in the launch of the Yoon Suk Yeol administration and the labels of 'pro-Yoon' and an 'aide of Yoon' have always followed me — but I have never flattered the president nor received any special treatment.' Kweon wrapped up the conference by saying that he hopes the 'People Power Party would now move beyond the swamp of division and each and every one of its lawmakers would become elites who would (work for) the party.' Kweon was elected as floor leader in December. This marked the second time Kweon served as the People Power Party's floor leader. Previously, he served from April to September 2022.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store