I Hated Smart Glasses, but Google's Android XR Let Me See a New Future
For 5 minutes on Tuesday, I felt like Benji in Mission: Impossible -- Rogue Nation. But instead of wearing smart glasses at the Vienna State Opera and hearing Tom Cruise's voice, I was standing in a 5-by-5-foot wooden shed at the Google's I/O developer conference with Gemini AI in my ear.
I got to test out a pair of Android XR glasses that look like something Poindexter from Revenge of the Nerds would wear. In the right lens, there's tiny white text displaying the time and weather: 2:24 p.m., 73 degrees.
If this were all that smart glasses could do, I'd be happy. But that was just the home screen.
Next, I used the prototype frames to take a photo and view a full-color preview, right on one of the lenses. It was wild to simultaneously see a picture and then the actual world through it. The futuristic frames are a very early prototype of the Android XR glasses that Google is making in partnership with Samsung and Qualcomm.
In nearly every way, these frames look like normal prescription glasses. In fact, Google announced it'll work with Warby Parker (my go-to glasses brand for years) and swanky South Korean eyeglass brand Gentle Monster (Beyoncé and Rihanna wear them) for actual frame designs when they ship.
Unlike regular glasses, these frames are loaded with tech. There's a microphone and speaker that can be used to dictate prompts for Gemini and listen to the responses. On the top edge of the temple, there's a physical camera shutter button. You can interact with the sides of the frames. And the glasses are packed with sensors that interpret your movements as input, so that Google Maps, for instance, show you directions, no matter which direction you're looking.
Until now, I've shrugged off other smart glasses like an annoying invite to a friend's improv comedy show. They don't seem worth the effort and price. However, these may be the turning point. Google is striving to make Android XR frames stir up interest beyond just early adopters looking for an alternative to Meta's Ray-ban smart glasses. During my brief encounter, I left thinking that there's definitely potential for wider appeal here, especially if Google can get more people to try them. The controls seemed intuitive like a natural extension of an Android phone" target="_blank. Years from now, I envision going to the eye doctor and being asked if you want the optional Android XR and Gemini addition -- in much the way we are now asked if we want a coating for blue light.
The standout feature to me is the tiny display on the right lens of Google's glasses. But describing how the display works on these frames approaches Defcon 1 levels of technical mastery, so I enlisted some help. As Luke Skywalker has Yoda, I have CNET's Scott Stein, who's seen it all when it comes to AR and VR glasses and headsets. Turns out he got to try a similar prototype of these glasses last year.
"These glasses have a single display in the right lens, projected in via a Micro LED chip on the arm onto etched waveguides on a small square patch on the lens glass," Stein told me.
This display is where the magic happens. Not only can it show an Android XR interface and animations, but it does so in color -- even with the few photos that I got to take. Also I was impressed with how the UI disappeared when I wasn't directly using it. Google's Gemini is built into XR, so I can ask my glasses to give me more information on whatever I'm looking at. In the Lilliputian-size demo shed, I asked Gemini about a couple of paintings on the wall. I could hear responses via the speaker that's nestled in the glasses' temple, but those around me couldn't hear anything. It definitely made me feel like a spy.
Then I got to try Google Maps. I never knew getting directions could be so enjoyable. I saw a circular map with street names and an arrow pointing in the direction I should go. As I moved, the little map rotated. It felt a bit like moving the camera in a video game with a controller to get a better view.
And that was it. Any initial skepticism I had for smart glasses was wiped away. But I do have questions. How long does a pair of these glasses last on a single charge? Am I supposed to use these as my everyday frames? Should I have a second regular pair of glasses to wear when I charge them so that I can see? And how much is a pair going to cost me? Will there be a rise in people walking into walls because they're distracted by whatever they're interacting with on their lenses? Google doesn't have much to share with me yet, so I guess we'll find out more in the coming months and years.
I spent about 5 minutes in the frames, but if you want to know more, check out this more in-depth look at Android XR by CNET's resident smart glasses expert, Scott Stein.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
20 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Ekinops completes the acquisition of Olfeo and becomes a network cybersecurity player
PARIS, June 2, 2025 /PRNewswire/ -- EKINOPS (Euronext Paris: FR0011466069) (Euronext Paris: EKI), leading supplier of telecommunications solutions for telecom operators and enterprises, announces the completion of the acquisition of 100% of the share capital of Olfeo, a French provider of SSE (Security Service Edge) cybersecurity software. The transaction, which was subject to customary closing conditions, was announced in a press release on May 15, 2025[1]. This combination creates a leading European player in the network cybersecurity market, in the fast-growing segments of SSE (Security Service Edge) and SASE (Secure Access Service Edge), bringing French expertise to the European and global stage. Final terms of the transaction On 30 May 2025, Ekinops acquired 100% of Olfeo's share capital through its holding company, Oscar SAS, from its founding shareholders, financial investors and employee shareholders. This acquisition was fully financed in cash, using Ekinops' own funds and the syndicated credit line dedicated to external growth, provided by its banking partners. Olfeo's management team is fully committed to this merger. In this context, Alexandre Souillé, founder and CEO of Olfeo, along with his team, will continue to develop the cybersecurity activity within Ekinops. Olfeo is consolidated in Ekinops' accounts from 1 June 2025. Olfeo, a French leader in SSE and enterprise web security Founded in 2003 and based in Paris, Olfeo is a cybersecurity software company that protects enterprise information systems from cyberattacks and risks related to employee Internet usage. Olfeo's web security gateway solutions are offered through a subscription model, either as SaaS (Software as a Service) or on-premises. Olfeo is one of the leading European players in SSE and offers a web security solution that combines multiple layers of security (SWG, CASB, DNS, DLP, etc.)[2] to protect enterprise information systems. With a team of 60 employees, half of whom are dedicated to R&D, Olfeo secures network and web access of over 500 customers and partners (businesses, local authorities, healthcare institutions, French governmental service and infrastructure operators, etc.). Olfeo generated €6.3m in recurring revenue (ARR - Annual Recurring Revenue) in 2024, with an EBITDA[3] margin of over 20%. Ekinops becomes a European market leader in Secure Access Service Edge (SASE) The convergence of network connectivity and cybersecurity challenges is at the heart of today's digital transformation for businesses. Operators are very much on the look for single-vendor network cybersecurity solutions that are sovereign, immediately available, and combining performance, security, ease of deployment and regulatory compliance. The SASE for networks cybersecurity market is estimated at over $9bn by 2025, with an average annual growth rate of +13% over the next few years[4]. By 2026, Ekinops aims to position itself in the "Unified SASE" segment, with a fully integrated solution specifically designed for mid-sized companies (SMB and SME). Ekinops intends to address this segment by leveraging its installed customer base with major telecom operators. The "Unified SASE" market is estimated to exceed $600m by 2025, with an average annual growth rate of over +27% over the next few years. Together, Ekinops and Olfeo will be able to meet the growing needs of public and private organizations for secure cloud access and agile network infrastructures, offering a high-performing and responsible European technology. For more information, refer to the press release dated 15 May 2025:Ekinops announces the acquisition of Olfeo, a cybersecurity software provider for businesses EKINOPS ContactDidier Brédy, Chairman and CEOcontact@ Omnes, Investor relationTel.: +33 (0)1 53 67 36 92momnes@ Dugast, Press relationTel.: +33 (0)1 53 67 36 74adugast@ [1] Press release dated 15 May 2025: Ekinops announces the acquisition of Olfeo, a cybersecurity software provider for businesses[2] SWG: Secure Web GatewayCASB: Cloud Access Security BrokerDNS: Domain Name SystemDLP: Data Loss Prevention[3] EBITDA (Earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization) corresponds to current operating income restated for (i) amortization, depreciation and provisions and (ii) income and expenses linked to share-based payments.[4] Source: Dell'Oro Group Photo: View original content to download multimedia: SOURCE Ekinops


Axios
28 minutes ago
- Axios
AI leaves web in the lurch
The AI-fixated tech industry is rapidly dismantling the old web, with no game plan for how to replace it. State of play: Chatbots have already begun to intercept web traffic and drain publishers' revenue. Now tech giants and startups aim to remodel the devices and browsers we use to access web pages, using AI to summarize or pre-empt the content that people and publishers post online. Driving the news: Tech circles were abuzz over the past week with news from the normally sedate browser world — the software category that has been shaping access to digital information since the '90s. Firefox last week debuted an experimental browser tool that provides AI summaries when users hover over links. Also last week, the Browser Company, maker of the Arc browser that's beloved by some power users, announced it was pivoting to focus on a new AI-powered browser called Dia. OpenAI has long been rumored to be working on its own browser, but has yet to ship anything. Over the last two years Google, which customarily casts itself as champion of the open web, has steadily increased the prominence of its AI summaries in every aspect of search. At Google's I/O developer conference last year it announced the U.S.-wide rollout of the AI summaries, which sit on top of search results and allow users to get their answers without clicking through to source pages (while also sometimes providing made-up facts). At this year's I/O, the company said that AI Mode, which turns a user's search into an AI chat conversation, would now be a standard feature — although some early reviews have found its information unreliable. Meanwhile, OpenAI made headlines with its announcement that it was purchasing Apple designer Jony Ive's AI device startup. Ive will now spearhead OpenAI's plan to sell new, non-smartphone gadgets that could bring generative AI answers more thoroughly into users' everyday lives. At Microsoft's recent Build developer conference the company introduced a new open project called NLweb, aimed at letting websites build their own chatbots to help site visitors access content. What they're saying: "Increasingly, web pages — apps, articles, and files — will become tool calls with AI chat interfaces," Browser Company CEO Josh Miller wrote to explain why his firm was stopping further work on Arc. Yes, but: As tech goes all in on rebuilding our web experiences with AI, there's no guarantee that the web will still be there when that job is done. With chatbots becoming users' default way to find out what's happening in the world, their makers pretend they can plaster this new interface layer over the internet without disrupting the data sources that feed it. But some media observers believe an AI-first web will choke off the money and attention that motivates web creators to keep extending the common knowledge pool. Many publishers are already seeing significant traffic and income declines from the shift toward AI search, though Google disputes there's a connection. And creative artists fear their work is being stolen or devalued. This is everyone's problem. Of course the businesses and people that have built their work around the web are afraid — but AI makers should be worried, too. The web's vast treasury (and cesspool) of human creative work has accumulated since the 1990s because people wanted to share what they know either for financial or reputational gain, or just to advance a cause or do some good. That setup gave us everything from Wikipedia and YouTube tutorials to blogs and Reddit. Nearly all of the old-school web has already been fed into AI training databases for regurgitation by bots like ChatGPT. From now on, valuable new contributions are likely to sit behind subscription paywalls or depend on unsteady alternate means of support (membership programs, nonprofit grants, government funding). If AI undermines the incentives for human beings to update the web with their news, opinions and arguments, it will also cut off its own future. The intrigue: Some in the web avant-garde are already anticipating a world in which the most ambitious or meaningful creative work takes place in what they're calling a "dark forest" web. They imagine creative communities that are purposefully isolated from the Silicon Valley bazaar, generating "anti-memes" and critical ideas without participating in social media's algorithmic competition or AI's sloppy reductivism. The other side: AI firms have introduced modest efforts to feed money back to content providers. OpenAI, for instance, has made multiple deals with online publishers (including Axios). But it's hard to see how that kind of arrangement replaces the search traffic and ad revenue that's been the sustaining anchor for so many web publishers for the past decade. When it looked like Facebook's rise was threatening to hobble news publishers, the social media giant announced multiple programs to funnel them cash. But that support was fickle and fleeting, and site owners and creators know they can't sustain their businesses purely on tech largesse. What's next: Advertising in AI chats is still in its infancy, but OpenAI has said it's going to build ads into ChatGPT, and its competitors won't be far behind. Everyone assumes this business will evolve rapidly, building on the performance-based model and personalization techniques that emerged in the search and social media eras. That can only further undermine the remnants of the web publishing industry, unless AI makers choose to share this new income with information providers. But they're spending billions on data centers, and their investors are expecting astronomical revenue growth, so no one should be surprised if they want to hold onto the lion's share. The bottom line: Google shaped a search-based web on which independent publishers and individual contributors could survive, if not always thrive. Now AI is ready to turn that entire ecosystem into a legacy product.

Business Insider
an hour ago
- Business Insider
3 members of the 'Tesla mafia' share what they learned from Elon Musk's company
Tesla makes EVs, batteries, robots, and startups. A steady stream of employees — the "Tesla mafia" — have left to found companies in everything from EVs and batteries to robotics and electric boats. Electric car startup Lucid was founded by former Tesla executives back in 2007, and the ex-Tesla founders of British EV startup Longbow previously told Business Insider they aimed to deliver a Roadster sports car before Elon Musk's company. Former senior employees who then raised large amounts for their own startups include former senior vice president of energy Drew Baglino, whose energy firm Heron Power reportedly raised a Series A round of over $30 million in April. Automotive tech startup Tekion, founded by Tesla's former chief information officer Jay Vijayan, is now valued at over $4 billion. "The success rate of former Tesla employees starting their own companies, building hard things, is exceptionally high," Chris Walti, Tesla's former Optimus lead, told BI. BI spoke to Walti and two other former Tesla employees about why so many of its former employees have gone on to startup success. 'It's not a Google-like culture, and it's not a 9-to-5 experience' Gene Berdichevsky, CEO of Sila Nanotechnologies and Tesla's seventh ever employee, said what sets working at the company apart is the sense of "radical self-reliance." "It's kind of the belief that when you're doing new things, there are no experts to ask, there are no suppliers who have done it before. If there are, you're probably not doing something particularly novel," said Berdichevsky, who left the company in 2008. Walti, who left the company in 2022 after seven years to start robotics firm Mytra, told BI that Tesla gave engineers unprecedented freedom and responsibility to tackle "really big problems." "You can solve problems without requiring 20 product managers and five VPs for approval. Here's the problem: go figure it out, go solve it, go talk to whoever you need to get it done," Walti said. While Tesla's lack of bureaucracy may be liberating, the company is also known for its intense work culture. Musk and other senior figures have previously slept on the factory floor during crises, and employees are expected to work long hours to meet the billionaires' tight deadlines. "Tesla is not an easy place to work, but it was never intended to be. It's not a Google-like culture, and it's not a 9-to-5 experience," said Berdichevsky. Walti said Tesla employees used to jokingly warn each other not to "fly too close to the sun," with Musk having little tolerance for failure. "Elon has a short fuse. It doesn't matter how many successful projects you've delivered," he said. "You screw up once and you might be out." Walti added that the intensity of working with Musk led some people to "burn out," and said that working in a system where employees had little say over product direction could be frustrating. "If you're not too close to the sun, it's a wonderful place to work because you get to work on really meaty problems. You get the innovation, the scale, the tech risk, and you're surrounded by a bunch of really innovative people," he said. "On the flip side, it doesn't give you a lot of agency over why you're building things. You'll be told ' make the Cybertruck float,' and at no point is there a debate on why; it was like, just go do it," Walti added. Leaving Tesla Tobias Kahnert, who founded powertrain startup EFT Mobility, said that starting a new company is often more attractive than taking a job at a rival for Tesla employees. "We used to call it internally 'the Mount Everest syndrome'," said Tobias Kahnert, who was a senior software engineer at Tesla from 2014 to 2017. Kahnert joined Tesla right out of college and worked there through the "production hell" of ramping the Model 3 mass-market EV. The idea of founding his own company felt like a natural next move, he said. "I couldn't see a more exciting company in the world at that point" than Tesla, he said. "The option was either I stay with that company until retirement, which is a long time away, or I start something myself," he said. Kahnert said the most valuable lesson he learned at Tesla was how to innovate quickly without losing track of the need to scale a product. "The stretch between these two worlds is something you learn quite quickly at Tesla. You need this spirit of challenging the norms, seeing what's possible, and figuring out ways to get it done without being bogged down too much in processes," said Kahnert. "But you also actually need to get on the level of working with the process and alongside regulations to even have a product that you can bring into the market," he added. Walti said Tesla offered a unique experience within engineering of building hard things at scale on a tight timeline, which he called a "trifecta" of speed, scale, and innovation. "Usually, you have to pick two of the three. At places like Boeing or Lockheed, you're building hard things with innovation, but the timelines are, like, 10 years," said Walti. "Tesla is a unique place because of the scale. Startups are fast and innovative, but not yet scaled. Innovating with speed at scale is an interesting nexus that really accelerates learning," he added.