King Charles Arrives in North America amid Ongoing Rift with Prince Harry
King Charles and Queen Camilla touched down in Ottawa as they begin a two-day royal visit
It is Charles' first trip to Canada as Sovereign since ascending the throne in 20222
The visit comes amid ongoing tensions with his son Prince Harry, who lives in CaliforniaKing Charles is kicking off his first visit to North America since becoming Sovereign amid lingering tensions with his son, Prince Harry.
The 76-year-old monarch and Queen Camilla, 77, arrived in Ottawa, Canada, on May 26 for a whirlwind visit lasting less than 24 hours as the monarch continues weekly cancer treatments.
Just as King Charles touched down on the same continent where his son lives, Harry quietly traveled to Shanghai, China, for a surprise appearance at a global travel and tourism conference. The Duke of Sussex, 40, lives in Montecito, California, with his wife, Meghan Markle, and their two children, Prince Archie, 6, and Princess Lilibet, 3.
Earlier this month, Harry spoke with BBC News just hours after losing a legal challenge over his downgraded U.K. security, which was reduced after he stepped back as a working royal in 2020.
"I would love reconciliation with my family. There's no point in continuing to fight anymore," the Duke of Sussex said.
"Life is precious. I don't know how much longer my father has," he added, referencing King Charles' cancer diagnosis. "He won't speak to me because of this security stuff, but it would be nice to reconcile."
Prince Harry has argued that as head of state, his father could help restore the security he is fighting for — a notion the palace has denied.
Unlike previous royal visits, Charles' trip to Canada will be brief. This marks King Charles' twentieth visit to Canada and Queen Camilla's sixth.
Given the short timing, Charles has plans to get right to work upon his arrival in Canada, starting with a community event where the couple will meet Canadians representing organizations from across the country.
Next, the King will hold an audience with Governor General Mary Simon before meeting with Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney. Later in the day, Queen Camilla was expected to be sworn in as a member of the Canadian Privy Council.
No royal visit would be complete without a symbolic tree planting. The couple is set to plant a commemorative tree at Rideau Hall, the official residence of the governor general, near the sugar maple they planted there in 2017.
The day concludes with a reception honoring Canada's 10 provincial lieutenant governors and three territorial commissioners.
The centerpiece of the visit comes on May 27, when Charles — Canada's Head of State — attends the State Opening of Parliament alongside Queen Camilla. He will then deliver the Speech from the Throne in the Senate Chamber.
This marks only the second time a Sovereign has opened Canada's Parliament — following his late mother, Queen Elizabeth, who did so in October 1957. The occasion is being viewed as 'a significant moment between the Head of State and the Canadian people,' as it will be just the third time in history that a King delivers the Speech from the Throne.
In doing so, Charles will draw on more than five decades of public service and diplomatic experience. As he delivers the Speech from the Throne, the King must reflect the policies and priorities of Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney—demonstrating his solidarity with the government and the people of the nation he serves as Head of State.
At the same time, Charles must carefully navigate diplomatic sensitivities to avoid straining the U.K.'s relationship with its other key North American ally — the United States.
Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney's recent election victory was widely seen as a rejection of President Donald Trump's agenda, particularly his push for higher tariffs and his controversial remarks suggesting Canada could become the '51st state.' Indeed, Carney has said that Canadians were not impressed by the U.K.'s invitation to President Trump for a second state visit, the BBC reported.
Can't get enough of PEOPLE's Royals coverage? to get the latest updates on Kate Middleton, Meghan Markle and more!
As part of their preparations for the visit, Charles and Camilla visited Canada House in London on May 20, with Charles receiving a key to the building similar to the one given to King George V when Canada House first opened in 1925.
Read the original article on People
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
26 minutes ago
- Yahoo
BBC bosses draw up plans to win over Reform UK voters
BBC bosses have drawn up plans to win over Reform UK voters, according to editorial meeting minutes. Minutes from a meeting of the broadcaster's editorial guidelines and standards committee from March show that BBC News CEO Deborah Turness gave a presentation in which she discussed plans to alter "story selection" and "other types of output, such as drama" to win the trust of Reform voters. The minutes, which were reported by The Byline Times, also show the committee identified "the importance of local BBC teams" to their plan to win over supporters of Nigel Farage. There is reportedly a belief that the corporation's news and drama output is creating "low trust issues" with Farage backers. The minutes states: "The CEO, News and Current Affairs provided the Committee with a presentation on plans to address low trust issues with Reform voters. READ MORE: "The committee discussed the presentation. Committee members recognised the importance of local BBC teams in the plan, given their closeness to audiences. "Directors discussed how story selection and other types of output, such as drama, also had a role to play. An update on progress would return to a future meeting." The committee includes former GB News executive Robbie Gibb, who is also a former director of communications at Number 10 and an outspoken Brexiteer. Gibb was appointed to the board by former Conservative Prime Minister Boris Johnson in 2021. He was identified by former BBC Newsnight presenter Emily Maitlis in 2022 as an 'active agent of the Conservative party'. Farage has repeatedly used his own GB News platform to attack the BBC, calling it a 'political actor' and threatening to boycott the corporation. In language also used by the BBC Editorial Committee, the Reform leader suggested that BBC editors were using 'story selection' in order to target his party. In an incident last year, Farage refused to appear on the BBC until the broadcaster apologised for allowing members of the public to ask him questions during a special episode of Question Time. READ MORE: Byline Times said BBC staffers it spoke to are concerned about the plan to win over Reform voters, due to the risk of increasing allegations of bias. The BBC has previously been criticised by some viewers for heavily featuring Reform UK politicians on its programmes, despite the party only having a handful of MPs. In July last year, sociology professor Tom Mills – author of The BBC: The Myth of a Public Service – claimed the BBC were giving such a platform to Farage because they are such a big part of a 'political establishment which has drifted to the right'. 'I think the simple answer to why they [the BBC] like Nigel Farage is they are much more comfortable with an anti-establishment figure on the right than the left. It's as simple as that," he said. 'He's on their political spectrum and the political spectrum for the BBC runs from the centrists out to Nigel Farage. 'They still see those guys [like Farage] as being rogue figures of the establishment, but they are just given legitimacy by the fact that there's lots of voices they [the BBC] see to be legitimate in these media organisations which speak from a similar sort of perspective.' The BBC has been approached for comment.
Axios
44 minutes ago
- Axios
How animal welfare became a GOP issue
Animal welfare is becoming part of the Trump health team's agenda, as officials press for changes to drug approvals and product evaluations and portray lab animal testing as a symptom of big-government bloat. Why it matters: The effort is the product of a more than decade-long push to elevate animal welfare issues with the political right that now features congressional oversight hearings and threats to cut off taxpayer funding. Case in point: The Food and Drug Administration is phasing out animal testing requirements for antibody therapies and other drugs and telling companies that use other methods that they may receive streamlined product reviews. Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. and the leaders of the FDA and National Institutes of Health urged Canadian food inspection officials last month to spare hundreds of ostriches infected with bird flu from a planned cull, saying there would be benefit in studying the birds' immune response. Congressional Republicans like Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) have also held hearings on " taxpayer funded animal abuse" and proposed measures that would close down federally funded labs that use animals. Trump had a mixed record on animal welfare issues in his first term. While he signed a federal law outlawing animal cruelty as well as animal fighting, his administration rolled back protections for certain at-risk animals, reversed rules restricting hunting on public lands and even deleted records of animal welfare violations. The FDA's new non-animal testing strategy could accelerate the process for bringing cures to market and give drug and biotech companies more flexibility — though it relies on some still-unproven alternatives like certain AI models. Between the lines: Among those driving the shift is the White Coat Waste Project, a libertarian-leaning group that is targeting what it calls "wasteful and secretive" taxpayer-funded experiments over its ethical concerns around animal testing. Founder Anthony Bellotti, a former Republican congressional staffer, told Axios the group adapted the playbook for cutting off federal funding for Planned Parenthood. Activists "went after the money source, because if you can fund a problem, you can defund it," Bellotti said. "And I said, 'Holy crap, animal testing is virtually all taxpayer-funded.'" The group has portrayed animal experiments as government waste, pointing to studies that show an 85% failure rate in studies that rely on animal models. The group has published controversial investigations of NIH-funded research, claiming taxpayers funded experiments where beagles were "bitten to death by flies" and that former National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases director Anthony Fauci wasted $1 million on painful experiments on the dogs. NIAID has disputed the findings. Zoom in: The shift in framing animal welfare so it appeals to conservatives, including linking it to causes like states' rights, has taken place over many years, said Republican lobbyist Marty Irby. "I use the term creation care a lot ... we have all these things that we talk about: taking care of people, health care, whatever the case may be. But you know, you can't just push animals to the side." Efforts to address factory farming not only overlap with the Make America Healthy Again movement's interest in food quality but with national security concerns, since one of the biggest pork producers, Smithfield Foods, is owned by a Chinese company, Irby pointed out. There also are attempts to tie animal testing back to conservative suspicion over the pandemic response, including subjecting hamsters, rabbits, monkeys and many other animals to infectious disease experiments without pain management. The issue polls highly among voters on both sides of the aisle, Irby said. The other side: Animal testing remains critical to understanding disease progression and evaluating the safety of drugs, vaccines, food additives and household products. Because they're susceptible to many of the same diseases and have shorter life spans, lab animals provide a window into disease processes across several generations. Experts say the solution in the near time likely will involve a combination of animal and non-animal testing. What's next: Bellotti said plans to phase out animal testing don't go far enough, and he's continuing to push for more lab closures. "There's a lot of rhetoric coming out of the NIH that doesn't match reality," he said. "Without a funding cut for animals and labs, without a timetable and a deadline and a commitment to phasing it out ... it's status quo."
Boston Globe
an hour ago
- Boston Globe
As Trump's deportation push gains momentum, Canada proposes tougher border restrictions
Advertisement 'It's deeply discouraging and, frankly, scary to see the government going down this path,' Sande said. Carney's move comes in the wake of a recent US Supreme Court decision that Canada, and French-speaking Quebec in particular, has long been an attractive choice for members of Greater Boston's large Haitian community. And after the high court cleared the way for the Trump administration to deport them, many were considering relocating to Canada, according to Jeff Thielman, chief executive of the International Institute of New England. The actions on either side of the border leave them and other immigrants in a quandary. 'If our country isn't going to be welcoming, which is a travesty, then maybe Canada can be welcoming. And if Canada says no to them, then what do we do?' said Thielman, whose organization serves refugees and immigrants in Massachusetts and New Hampshire. 'Seriously, there's no place for them to go — and it's not fair to them.' Advertisement Since taking office, Trump has sought to end a variety of programs enabling citizens of certain countries to take refuge in the U.S., but lower courts have slowed his efforts. In May, the Supreme Court In a more recent decision, the Supreme Court Canadian officials have worried since Trump's election last year that the looming termination of these programs could lead to an influx of refugees to the north. During the first Trump administration, Advertisement A migrant was searched by a police officer after arriving at the Roxham Road border crossing in Roxham, Quebec, Canada, on March 2, 2023. SEBASTIEN ST-JEAN/AFP via Getty Images So far, evidence of a new surge in northbound migration is mixed. Nationwide, asylum applications processed by Canada so far this year are half those of last year, 14,557 through the first five months of 2024, compared to 31,244 in the same period in 2024, according to the Canada Border Services Agency. But at the Saint-Bernard-de-Lacolle port of entry, which connects Interstate 87 near the New York-Vermont border with Autoroute 15 in Quebec, officials clocked a dramatic uptick in activity this spring, doubling month-over-month in March and April. Year to date, asylum claims at that crossing — which this year account for more than one-third of such claims in Canada — are up by about 60 percent. The agency declined to provide similar figures for other ports of entry. Rebecca Purdy, a spokesperson for the Canada Border Services Agency, said the increase in claims at that location has not affected the crossing's operations. She said the government has plans in place to lease additional space in the area to process refugee claims if needed. The most common countries of origin of those claiming asylum at ports of entry this year are Haiti, Venezuela, and the U.S., according to Purdy. Canada's previous prime minister, Justin Trudeau, 'What Justin Trudeau said in 2017 really backfired against him,' Béland said. Pandemic-fueled inflation and a growing housing crisis as many refugees were coming to Canada 'led to a backlash,' he said. Advertisement So when Carney, a member of Trudeau's Liberal Party, campaigned to succeed him this spring, he tacked to the center on immigration. And on Tuesday, when Carney's government introduced its first bill, the message was clear. A truck crossed the Peace Bridge at the Canada-US border in Fort Erie, Ontario, Canada, on April 2. Laura Proctor/Bloomberg 'A strong border is essential to our national security, to foster safe communities and support our economy,' said Minister of Public Safety Gary Anandasangaree at a press conference in Ottawa. The 'It tries to kill at least two birds with one stone,' Béland said. Asked at Tuesday's press conference whether the bill was an attempt to 'appease' the Trump administration, Anandasangaree said he expected it to 'strengthen the relationship with the United States.' 'There are a number of elements in the bill that have been irritants for the U.S., so we are addressing some of those issues,' he said. 'But it's not exclusively about the United States.' Human rights activists have expressed alarm at provisions that would make it harder to seek refuge in Canada. It would prevent those who have been in the country for more than a year to claim asylum, and it would close a loophole Advertisement 'It's this massive expansion of state power that can be used for any purpose,' said Syed Hussan, a spokesperson for Canada's Migrant Rights Network. The Refugee Centre, a Montreal-based nonprofit serving new Canadians, is quick to feel the effects of immigration policy changes on either side of the border. Its clients are most commonly from Haiti and Venezuela at the moment, according to spokesperson Alina Murad, but it hasn't detected a surge in asylum-seekers relocating from the United States. Murad says she understands that citizens of Canada and the U.S. alike 'are hurting and feeling the effects' of inflation and the housing crunch. But she believes people from elsewhere 'are being used as scapegoats.' 'It's not fair to blame refugees and immigrants for bad policies in other areas,' she said. 'These are people who are just trying to get to safety.'
