Why two German teens were turned away at the US border
According to the paper, Charlotte Pohl, 19, and Maria Lepere, 18, arrived in Honolulu without hotel reservations for their planned five-week stay on the island.
Although both travelers had approval to travel to the U.S. from the Electronic System for Travel Authorization (ESTA), that does not guarantee entry into the country.
Customs and Border Protection said officials acted properly based on the situation.
"These travelers were denied entry after attempting to enter the U.S. under false pretenses. One used a Visitor visa, the other the Visa Waiver Program," CBP Assistant Commissioner Hilton Beckham said in a statement. "Both claimed they were touring California but later admitted they intended to work - something strictly prohibited under U.S. immigration laws for these visas."
It's not unusual for arriving visitors, or even permanent U.S. residents or citizens, to have to attest to their accommodations at the border. Other countries similarly require proof of lodging, or at least an address, on entry paperwork at the border.
Pohl and Lepere said they were handcuffed and given prison uniforms during their detention. They were reportedly held in a deportation detention facility in Hawaii overnight before being deported to Tokyo.
"It was all like a fever dream," Lepere told Ostsee-Zeitung. "We had already noticed a little bit of what was going on in the U.S. But at the time, we didn't think it was happening to Germans. That was perhaps very naive. We felt so small and powerless."
Germany is among the countries that recently updated its guidance for citizens planning to visit the U.S., advising them to be prepared for questioning at the border.
Zach Wichter is a travel reporter and writes the Cruising Altitude column for USA TODAY. He is based in New York and you can reach him at zwichter@usatoday.com.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Herald Scotland
19 hours ago
- The Herald Scotland
Trump's new travel ban begins with travelers largely unaware
About a dozen people in the terminal's arrivals area told USA TODAY they were unfamiliar with the updated travel ban, which adds new limitations on visas and entry from almost 20 countries, part of the administration's continued efforts to tighten U.S. borders. The updated restrictions primarily target nationals from a select list of countries, but critics say the move sends a chilling message to immigrants and foreign visitors more broadly. "It's scary. It makes me worried. It affects my decisions to go home to visit my family," said Randy Wicaksana, 33, who has lived in the U.S. for about three years. Wicaksana, an Indonesian national, said he is preparing to return home later this month to renew his visa but is increasingly uncertain about what might await him when he comes to the U.S. again. There were no visible signs or announcements in the terminal to alert travelers to the new rules. The administration said the changes are meant to "combat terrorism" and "strengthen our borders." For travelers like Wicaksana, however, the law feels increasingly unpredictable. Which nationals are barred from entering the US? The full travel ban applies to nationals of the following 12 countries: Afghanistan Burma (Myanmar) Chad Republic of the Congo Equatorial Guinea Eritrea Haiti Iran Libya Somalia Sudan Yemen Additionally, partial restrictions are imposed on nationals from: Burundi Cuba Laos Sierra Leone Togo Turkmenistan Venezuela What happens to travelers from these countries when they arrive at an airport? Travelers from the fully banned countries who attempt to enter the U.S. after the ban takes effect will likely be denied boarding by airlines or turned away upon arrival in the U.S. Those from partially restricted countries may face additional scrutiny, delays, or denial of entry, depending on their visa type and purpose of travel. What will happen to those with tickets already? Individuals from the affected countries who have already purchased tickets to travel to the U.S. should consult with their airlines and the nearest U.S. embassy or consulate. While some exceptions exist, most travelers from the fully banned countries are expected to be denied entry. Those from partially restricted countries may still be allowed to travel, subject to additional screening and requirements. Travelers are advised to review the latest guidance from the U.S. Department of State and consult with immigration attorneys if they have concerns about their eligibility to enter the U.S. under the new proclamation. Zach Wichter is a travel reporter and writes the Cruising Altitude column for USA TODAY. He is based in New York and you can reach him at zwichter@
Time Out
a day ago
- Time Out
JFK customs will look a little different on your next trip—here's what to know
If you're landing at JFK this summer and are able to breeze through customs like a VIP, don't thank your lucky stars—thank your face. American Airlines and U.S. Customs and Border Protection have rolled out a new facial recognition system at JFK's Terminal 8, making it the latest major airport to join the Enhanced Passenger Processing (EPP) club. The system is designed to speed up reentry for U.S. citizens by verifying identities in seconds, not minutes, all without so much as pulling out your passport. Here's how it works: A live image of your face is snapped and instantly matched to your passport photo stored in a government database. If it checks out, you're cleared for reentry before you even reach a CBP officer. The whole thing is contactless, pre-enrollment-free, and very sci-fi, but in a 'Jetsons meets JFK' kind of way. Roughly 45-percent of travelers at Terminal 8 are U.S. citizens, QNS reports, and they're the only ones currently eligible for the biometric shortcut. While it's separate from Global Entry, EPP promises a similar time-saving benefit without the hassle of interviews or membership fees. American Airlines is the first (and so far, only) carrier at the airport to implement the system, but officials say it's part of a larger shift toward contactless travel. 'EPP has already had an impact on the overall customer journey,' Sylvia Rodriguez, managing director of JFK Operations for American Airlines, told the outlet. Translation: Shorter lines, faster exits and fewer sighs of airport despair. But it's not all smooth flying. Privacy advocates, including the ACLU, have raised eyebrows about facial recognition at ports of entry—especially when deployed alongside agencies like ICE. CBP insists that photos of U.S. citizens are deleted within 12 hours and that the data won't be used beyond customs, but critics are calling for more transparency and guardrails. Still, JFK now joins the ranks of other major hubs like LAX, ATL and ORD in betting big on biometrics. As air travel booms back post-pandemic, airport tech is racing to keep up and this touchless check-in may be just the beginning. Opting out? You still can! Traditional passport lines remain open for those who prefer the analog experience. But for everyone else, it turns out the fastest way through JFK might just be a smile.
Daily Mirror
4 days ago
- Daily Mirror
Spanish island 'sounds alarm' over tourist issue and it doesn't involve Brits
The Alcudia and Can Picafort hoteliers association has sounded the alarm that bookings on the island are down on last year, particularly among holidaymakers from Germany Germans are abandoning a beautiful holiday island beloved by Brits. Brits and Germans have long been among the biggest forces in European travel, both sharing similar tastes in sunshine resorts on the coast. It seems that our neighbours on the Continent are now growing a little tired of a well-worn holiday classic - Majorca. The Alcudia and Can Picafort hoteliers association has sounded the alarm that bookings on the island are down on last year, especially among travellers from Germany, their principal markets. Bar and restaurant takings were down by between 15 and 20 percent compared to last year, which is a significant blow for an industry already struggling. The president of the Association, Pablo Riera-Marsa, said: "We are seeing how the German market, traditionally our number one market, is the one that has slowed down the most. In addition, we are detecting that this season, last-minute bookings are once again becoming more popular, with tourists waiting for special offers and promotions before making their purchase decisions." The travel chief warned that the "Champagne effect" which followed the coronavirus pandemic, when many tourist destinations enjoyed long periods of high demand as pent-up travellers sought holidays following the lockdowns, is now over. "It is essential to continue to focus on quality, sustainability and differentiation, especially in a context in which the market is once again stabilising and last-minute bookings are becoming increasingly important," Mr Riera-Marsa added, the Majorca Daily Bulletin reported. Dwindling demand from some markets is not the only issue facing holidaymakers at the moment. Workers in a popular Spanish holiday destination are threatening to strike during the peak season. READ MORE: Magaluf hotel pool rules ditched as 'towel warriors' cause sunbeds chaos Hotel bosses in Tenerife are facing a stark threat from union leaders: agree to a pay rise within the next fortnight or brace for strike action in the peak of summer. Hospitality chiefs were hit with an ultimatum last week by the General Union of Workers, the UGT, announcing to employers: "You have 15 days to raise wages or there will be a strike in the summer." Sindicalistas de Base, the leading union on the bargaining committee, has warned that failure to reach a deal by June 13 will result in a call to action with strikes during July and August. The unions demanded an unconditional salary hike retroactive to January 2025 as a precondition to discussing the rest of the items. The impending strikes could be an echo of the walkouts experienced during Easter Thursday and Friday, after protracted negotiations failed to lead to a deal. The rallying cry of the workers is for a 6.5% wage hike – an additional 4.5% atop the 2% already sanctioned by the collective agreement.
