logo
Review: Gilbert and Sullivan's ‘Pirates,' Now in Jazzy New Orleans

Review: Gilbert and Sullivan's ‘Pirates,' Now in Jazzy New Orleans

New York Times25-04-2025

W.S. Gilbert and Arthur Sullivan, the operetta kings of 19th-century Britain, had a hit in America with 'H.M.S. Pinafore,' but they reaped no American fortune from it. Instead, lacking U.S. copyright protection, their glorious piffle spread in the States like spring colds, causing fits of laughter but returning no royalties. By the time the team from London arrived in Manhattan in late 1878, bringing the real thing with them, 15 pirate productions were already running.
Is it any wonder that their next operetta, in 1879, was called, with a wink, 'The Pirates of Penzance'? And that they opened it in New York instead of London to avoid the financial fate of 'Pinafore'? Gilbert and Sullivan were sharp satirists but also savvy businessmen.
More than any of their 13 other so-called Savoy operas, 'Pirates' has borne that out, returning to Broadway regularly ever since. (The Public Theater's 1981 revival, starring Kevin Kline and Linda Ronstadt, ran longer than any previous production anywhere.) For a work so old, in such a seemingly passé genre, whose touchstones and targets are literally Victorian, that's astonishing: a tribute to the resilience of Gilbert's words, the delight of Sullivan's music and our willingness to make common cause with the past.
Though jolly enough, the latest Broadway incarnation, which opened on Thursday at the Todd Haimes Theater, trusts neither the material nor us as much as it might. Clumsily but accurately retitled 'Pirates! The Penzance Musical,' and transported to post-Reconstruction New Orleans, it is also significantly altered in tone. Except for the central performance by David Hyde Pierce, marvelously underplaying the tongue-twisting Major-General, the production has a sweaty quality, bordering on frenzy, that's hopelessly at odds with the cool wit of the original.
Perhaps the sweat is a nod to the story's steamy new location, or a sign of the effort it took to get it there. As adapted by Rupert Holmes, and directed by Scott Ellis, 'Pirates' now takes place in a French Quarter theater — a clever touch, given Louisiana's historic proximity to actual piracy, but one that requires laborious workarounds and, apparently, an uplifting lesson.
Piffle is better light than heavy, and preferably without a moral. Indeed, there is something essentially dry about the original operetta, whose tricky, twitty humor marks the beginning of a line that extends to Monty Python and beyond. The pirates score no plunder because their king (Ramin Karimloo) is sentimental about orphans, being one himself, and 'word has gotten around.' (Their intended victims are all mysteriously parentless.) The craven police are less than heartened when Mabel (Samantha Williams), the comeliest of the Major-General's daughters, sings them rousingly into battle: 'Go ye heroes, go and die!'
Such nonsense isn't just decorative, it's structural, turning the plot. As a child, Frederic (Nicholas Barasch) was supposed to be apprenticed to a pilot until his 21st birthday, but his nurse, Ruth (Jinkx Monsoon), misheard the instruction, apprenticing him instead to a pirate.
Years later, on the last day of his indenture, anticipating his marriage to Mabel, he receives bad news from the jealous Ruth. Having been born, she says, in a leap year, on Feb. 29, he has celebrated only five birthdays. A self-described slave to duty, he resolves to remain with the pirates as specified, asking Mabel if she'd mind waiting the 60-some years to wed him.
'It seems so long,' she sings.
Those jokes still work, but not everything survives the long journey from the original setting on the sleepy Cornwall coast. In particular, Gilbert's primary satire, of the English gentry, is unsalvageable. Only in Britain could his resolution make sense, when it is revealed that the pirates are 'all noblemen who have gone wrong': 'With all their faults, they love their queen.'
Instead, taking cues from the Creole culture of New Orleans, Holmes steers the plot toward an uplifting if unconvincing new finale invoking the idea of America as 'a patchwork, scratchwork nation' of immigrants. That nifty phrase notwithstanding, his lyrics, supplanting perhaps half the originals, are rarely as neat and thus rarely as funny as Gilbert's.
Sullivan fares better. Though his style is typically formal and foursquare — we get a hit of his hymn 'Onward, Christian Soldiers' at the start — music is inherently more flexible than words. Flexible enough to make Sullivan swing, though?
Well, yes. The heavy rejiggering of the 'Pirates' songs (as well as borrowings from 'Pinafore,' 'The Mikado' and 'Iolanthe') has been exceptionally well managed to honor the city's melting pot of influences. Scents of jazz, blues, Dixieland, boogie-woogie, soft-shoe, calypso, rag and rumba waft by in catchy new arrangements. (The music director is Joseph Joubert; he and Daryl Waters devised the orchestrations.) I was too sonically satisfied to mind the unlikeliness, in a quasi-classical work, of a finale featuring an orchestra of washboards.
It is not a non sequitur to mention here Karimloo's athletic performance, hanging off a galleon and leaping over barrels (sets by David Rockwell) in abs-baring costumes by Linda Cho. Monsoon's Ruth, enhanced with an unnecessary second-act number from 'The Mikado,' is more saloon wench than nursemaid, but her turn is rowdy camp fun nonetheless. Williams's Mabel is as fetching and beamish as Donald Holder's colorful lighting, and the ensemble, especially when performing Warren Carlyle's choreography, is very hard-working.
That's fine, if not very operetta. I wish Ellis's direction had taken more direction from Pierce's pickled deadpan; with his absurd facial hair (by Charles G. LaPointe) and rum-blossom nose, he needs little else to get his laughs. Really, the less he does the funnier it is, because his stillness helps us focus on the words, which are otherwise too often difficult to discern in this production. For once, that can't be blamed on the sound design, which Mikaal Sulaiman has mercifully kept at moderate volume. The problem is that the musical-theater style of the adaptation is not ideally suited to the density of Gilbert's verse.
Despite such mismatches between the original and the remake, 'Pirates!' is still a feather in the tricorn of the Roundabout Theater Company, which produced and nurtured it. Operettas don't last 146 years just because they're good. (I love Gilbert and Sullivan's 'Ruddigore' too, but have never seen it except at camp.) Longevity like that requires faith not only in the past but also in the future.
So if 'Pirates!' finds a forever home, or even just a temporary one, in New Orleans — celebrating 'the land of the clean slate, the blank canvas, the new beginning,' as the Major-General declares in his new peroration — so be it. Even those savvy Savoyards might approve.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Best tennis match ever? Carlos Alcaraz's French Open win ushers in new rivalry
Best tennis match ever? Carlos Alcaraz's French Open win ushers in new rivalry

USA Today

time3 hours ago

  • USA Today

Best tennis match ever? Carlos Alcaraz's French Open win ushers in new rivalry

Best tennis match ever? Carlos Alcaraz's French Open win ushers in new rivalry Show Caption Hide Caption Jessica Pagula on accomplished Coco Gauff, Emma Navarro, Madison Keys Tennis player Jessica Pegula discusses how amazing it is to have other amazing American women in tennis dominating the sport. Sports Seriously So, tennis fans, how'd you like another decade or so of that? After Sunday's French Open men's final – a 5-hour, 29-minute epic that somehow ended with Carlos Alcaraz holding up the trophy for a second consecutive year – we can now officially close the book on the so-called Big Three era. There's a new game in town. And it's as spectacular to watch as anything tennis has ever seen. Yes, Alcaraz's improbable comeback to beat Jannik Sinner 4-6, 6-7 (4-7), 6-4, 7-6 (7-3), 7-6 (10-2) is the story of the day. Not only did Alcaraz win his fifth Grand Slam title at just one month into his 22nd year of life – an absurd accomplishment on its own – but he did it by summoning a competitive aura only the all-time greats possess. He is, already, a legend. And that might have been the greatest match in the history of the sport. But the best part of Sunday's match is that it's not the end of the story. In many ways, it's just the beginning. HIGHLIGHTS: Alcaraz outlasts Sinner in epic French Open final The first Slam final between Alcaraz and Sinner not only exceeded every possible expectation, it sets an entirely new narrative for the sport. As Roger Federer and Rafael Nadal faded into retirement – most likely followed by Novak Djokovic in the next year or two – there was deep concern about what would come next after a 1½-decade battle between arguably the three best to ever hold a racket. Now we know definitively. Tennis is in the safest of hands. And barring something unforeseen, these two spectacular athletes are going to be doing battle in Grand Slam finals for many, many years to come. If you managed to watch the whole thing, or even just the last couple sets, it was easy to understand why that's such a tantalizing possibility. Let's start with the level of play. In a word, spectacular. Though Sinner and Alcaraz are each elite individually, combining to win the last six Grand Slam titles, the greatness they manage to draw out of each other is unique. Though different players stylistically and tactically, they have now twice played matches that could be considered among the best in the history of the sport in terms of ballstriking, endurance and the high standard it took to win a single point. When they played a US Open quarterfinal deep into the night in 2022, with Alcaraz emerging after 5 hours, 15 minutes, it showed the possibility of a friendly rivalry between two generational talents that had stretched back to childhood. It has widely been considered the best match of the decade, not just for the length of the match but the drama and the quality they both laid on the line. It only took three years to exceed that standard. Which leads to the second element of this ongoing story. What it took for Alcaraz to win that match – to beat Sinner on this particular day – was a sustained effort that few players in history could have managed. Maybe Djokovic. Maybe Nadal. Maybe. Because even though the all-time greats have all come back from two sets down and saved match points on the way to Grand Slam titles, few have had so little help from an opponent. Sure, there may be a shot or two that Sinner would want back after failing to convert three match points in the fourth set, then failing to serve out the tournament in the next game. But mostly, from that point until the final winner came off Alcaraz's racket, it was mostly about his greatness and his relentless shotmaking. Even in the fifth set, with Sinner clearly tiring more quickly than his opponent, he summoned enough energy to erase Alcaraz's early break of serve and send the match to a final tiebreak where – guess what – Alcaraz continued to pound clean winners off impossible angles. Sinner did not lose this match. Alcaraz just got up off the clay and stole it. We can debate where this final ranks among the 2008 Wimbledon final between Nadal and Federer or the 1980 Wimbledon final between John McEnroe and Bjorn Borg when you factor in all the intangibles. But if we're just talking about the quality of tennis played by two men over that length of time? It would be difficult to say there's ever been a better match. If the world was watching Sunday, it had to love what it saw. And when you realize what's ahead between them – more finals, more trophies, more history – this one felt like a moment to mark in time. One chapter of tennis closes, another begins. And it's going to be as entertaining as any we've seen.

Route 66: The Arizona Sidewinder, wild burros and a living statue
Route 66: The Arizona Sidewinder, wild burros and a living statue

Chicago Tribune

time3 hours ago

  • Chicago Tribune

Route 66: The Arizona Sidewinder, wild burros and a living statue

KINGMAN, Arizona — There is a roughly 8-mile section of Route 66 at the western edge of this state that is considered to be one of the most scenic and white-knuckled drives this country has to offer. It's known as the Arizona Sidewinder, or to locals, simply, The Sidewinder. Eastbound Route 66 leaves California and crosses the Colorado River into Arizona, where it unfurls like a ribbon of pavement approaching the Black Mountains. A Mojave County worker in a small plow truck cleaned debris from the previous night's storm as the two-lane road ascended 2,700 feet to Oatman. Local lore says the town was named in honor of Olive Oatman, an Illinois woman whose family was killed by a Native American tribe in the area and who, the story goes, was eventually adopted and raised by a different tribe. Gold brought the miners who eventually created Oatman, and those miners brought burros to haul rock, water and supplies. When the mines closed, the animals were released into the wild. Several decades later, they've become a popular attraction in town. Shops sell approved pellets and warn visitors against feeding them carrots. On the outskirts, they can bring traffic to a standstill by congregating in the roadway and approaching the open windows of tourists hoping for a photo. People meandered down Oatman's main drag lined with shops selling T-shirts, Arizona honey and 'real American turquoise.' At the center of the road, a group of maybe 50 converged to watch two men recreate a gunfight between 'Outlaw Willie' and 'Patton.' The outlaw lost — his second defeat of the day (the first being when his wireless microphone kept cutting out). Willie (real name Rod Hall, 80) and Patton (Chris Marshman, 70) live in nearby Fort Mojave and have been performing for visitors for 31 years and 25 years, respectively. The gunfight, they say, raises money for Shriners International. Exiting Oatman, Route 66 morphs into The Sidewinder. This serpentine portion of the road is reported to contain nearly 200 curves, many of them perched precariously on cliff edges absent guardrails. Travelers are warned not to attempt to navigate them in vehicles longer than 40 feet. As the road climbed to Sitgreaves Pass, elevation 3,586 feet, the views from a scenic overlook were made more profound by the discovery of a make-shift cemetery with dozens of memorials to deceased loved ones whose cremations were scattered at the site. Ginny died at the age of 95. Jeremy at 14. About 25 miles east of Sitgreaves sits the city of Kingman, population 35,000. Outside the city's railroad museum along its vibrant Route 66 corridor is a bronze statue to Jim Hinckley, an author, historian, tour guide, podcaster, consultant and raconteur. 'I wish they would have waited until I was dead,' joked Hinckley, 68, his face flushed with embarrassment under his wide-brimed cowboy hat. 'It's like attending my own funeral every time I come down here.' Born on the North Carolina coast, Hinckley said his dad, a Navy and Coast Guard veteran, moved the family outside Kingman after throwing a dart at a paper map he folded to ensure it would land nowhere near water. A professional path as winding as The Sidewinder — he's been a rancher, a miner, a rodeo cowboy, a repo man, a truck driver and a mechanic — led him to writing, first about American automobile history and then Route 66. Hinckley helped curate a self-guided walking tour of the city's historic district and provides audio narrations of the sites via a QR code on plaques. One tells the story of a former rodeo grounds on the route where, before the road was designated Route 66, the Chicago Cubs played two exhibition games: One in 1917 against a local team and the second in 1924 against the Pittsburgh Pirates. 'Pretty much everything in my life is tied to this road,' he said. 'I learned to ride a bicycle, learned to drive on this. My early ranch work was on this road. Courting my wife was tied to this road. It's the American experience made manifest. For me, it's just the evolution of myself as well as this country.'

Sean Wotherspoon Links With Zellerfeld for 3D-Printed Footwear Line
Sean Wotherspoon Links With Zellerfeld for 3D-Printed Footwear Line

Hypebeast

time4 hours ago

  • Hypebeast

Sean Wotherspoon Links With Zellerfeld for 3D-Printed Footwear Line

American sneaker designer, vintage collector, store owner, and digital creatorSean Wotherspoonis celebrated for his pace-setting portfolio in sneaker culture and beyond. Following big-ticket collabs with the likes of adidas, Gap, and Porsche, the footwear aficionado is now launching Sean Double U, an all-new collection with 3D-printed shoe-makerZellerfeld. The line features two silhouettes: a sneaker made for movement, and a mule designed for ease.'Sean Double Uis about the different sides we all have,' saidWotherspoon. 'The sneaker is for motion. The mule is for slowing down. I wanted pieces that move with every version of you.' Both the sneaker and the mule are printed from a single recyclable material without glue, stitching, or factories; and to push the boundaries even further, each pair is custom-fitted through a straightforward foot scan. 'Most companies tell you what you cannot do,'Wotherspoonsaid. 'Zellerfeld built a stack where you design what you want, when you want. We could tweak a design in the morning and hold a prototype by the afternoon. That speed changes everything, not just for me, but for every designer who has ideas and nowhere to take them.' The Sean Double U Sneaker ($189 USD) and Sean Double U Mule ($149 USD) are now available to shop on Zellerfeld'swebstore. Each unit is made to order for each customer. See the designs in the gallery above.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store