logo
Here are the bills Youngkin signed, amended and vetoed

Here are the bills Youngkin signed, amended and vetoed

Yahoo25-03-2025

RICHMOND — After a flurry of legislative action late Monday, Gov. Glenn Youngkin ultimately signed nearly 600 bills sent to him from the General Assembly. He amended 159 and vetoed 158.
'Among the bills I have signed are proposals that will keep school lunches free from artificial dyes, cement Virginia as home of the world's first commercial nuclear fusion facility, expand rural electric co-ops ability to drive economic development, modernize school transportation to reverse chronic absenteeism, and give more students opportunities to take advanced math classes,' he said in a statement. 'I have vetoed bills that I think will take the Commonwealth backward by raising the cost of living, hurting our strong job growth, stifling innovation, undermining our All-American All-of-the-Above Power and Energy Plan or making our communities less safe.'
The governor has vetoed 400 bills during his four-year term, more than any governor in recent history.
The General Assembly will reconvene next week to vote on the recommendations, which can be accepted with a simple majority. With a slim majority in both the House and the Senate, it's unlikely Democrats will be able to muster the two-thirds majority required to overturn vetoes.
'It's a really bizarre style,' Senate Majority Leader Scott Surovell told reporters Tuesday. 'It's not conducive to finding compromise and getting good policy outcomes.'
____
Youngkin vetoed some familiar efforts the General Assembly passed last year, including legislation that would have raised the minimum wage to $15 an hour and established a Prescription Drug Affordability Board.
Youngkin vetoed legislation proposed by Del. Michael Feggans, D-Virginia Beach, that would have directed the Department of Energy to identify and develop training resources to advance workforce development in the offshore wind industry. The governor cited existing workforce development programs and, in general, what he categorized as rising costs and declining interest in offshore wind.
Youngkin moves to delay controversial law sealing criminal, court records from public view
All of Virginia's community colleges are ending diversity, equity and inclusion practices
Youngkin revives sanctuary city ban, gaming commission, school vouchers in budget amendments
Youngkin issues vetoes, rejects minimum wage increase and prescription drug review board
Youngkin signs new batch of bills ahead of Monday deadline, bringing total up to 365
He also vetoed a bill that would have amended Portsmouth's city charter to address disparities or discrimination in minority and women-owned businesses in receiving government contracts. Because Virginia is a Dillon Rule state, localities' charters can only be amended through the General Assembly. That bill passed the Senate 37 to 2 and the House 91 to 5. Youngkin said the policy would prioritize race and gender over qualifications
Youngkin also vetoed a bill that would have allowed localities under a court-ordered remedial election system to convert at-large members into single member districts. That legislation was sponsored by lawmakers from Virginia Beach, where legal challenges led to an overhaul of the city's electoral process.
Also on the chopping block were bills that would have established a retail cannabis market and permitted collective bargaining from public employees. Currently municipal workers can collectively bargain in Virginia only if they get permission from the city. Some Hampton Roads mayors are joining forces to oppose collective bargaining efforts.
____
Youngkin suggested two changes to a bill restricting police use of license plate readers and Flock Safety cameras: First, Youngkin said police should be allowed to store the amassed data for 30 days, up from 21 days in the bill. Second, the governor said a controversial expansion of Flock cameras to state roads — such as interstates and bridge-tunnels — should go into effect in July 2026 without a second vote by the General Assembly early next year.
The governor's recommendation for a regulation on prospective data centers makes the for noise and environmental impact studies optional for localities and includes a reenactment clause, which mean the General Assembly would have to pass the legislation again next year.
Like last year, Youngkin amended a bill that would require unconscious bias and cultural competency training for maternal health workers to be just two hours of training on populations with worse maternal health outcomes. That amendment did not pass last year, and the legislation was subsequently vetoed.
Youngkin also followed the same playbook for another repeat bill that would remove tax exemptions for Confederate organizations. His recommendations this year included a reenactment clause and a call for the Department of Taxation to review the impact of the exemptions and report their findings in November. When similar recommendations were not adopted last year, he vetoed the bill.
Meanwhile, legislation establishing a right to contraception, a legislative priority of Democrats this year, was recommended to include a provision that says physicians and employers can refuse to provide contraception based on religious or conscientious objection. Democrats said that was a gutting of the bill.
____
One bill that finally made it into law after years of effort, would close a campaign finance loophole. The legislation will ban Virginia political candidates from using campaign funds for personal use.
Legislation that will take effect this July included a law that will make it a Class 1 misdemeanor to knowingly let kids operate vehicles if doing so results in injury or death. Youngkin also signed a bill that will create a Class 4 felony for anyone operating a drone within a defense facility without authorization. And, as of July 1, the Virginia Lottery will be prohibited from disclosing the names of winners who have won at least $1 million without consent.
Peter Dujardin contributed to this report.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

A $2.8 billion settlement will change college sports forever. Here's how.
A $2.8 billion settlement will change college sports forever. Here's how.

Boston Globe

timean hour ago

  • Boston Globe

A $2.8 billion settlement will change college sports forever. Here's how.

A: Grant House is a former Arizona State swimmer who sued the defendants (the NCAA and the five biggest athletic conferences in the nation). His lawsuit and two others were combined and over several years the dispute wound up with the settlement that ends a decades-old prohibition on schools cutting checks directly to athletes. Now, each school will be able to make payments to athletes for use of their name, image and likeness (NIL). For reference, there are nearly 200,000 athletes and 350 schools in Division I alone and 500,000 and 1,100 schools across the entire NCAA. Get Starting Point A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday. Enter Email Sign Up Q: How much will the schools pay the athletes and where will the money come from? Advertisement A: In Year 1, each school can share up to about $20.5 million with their athletes, a number that represents 22% of their revenue from things like media rights, ticket sales and sponsorships. Alabama athletic director Greg Byrne famously told Congress 'those are resources and revenues that don't exist.' Some of the money will come via ever-growing TV rights packages, especially for the College Football Playoff. But some schools are increasing costs to fans through 'talent fees,' concession price hikes and 'athletic fees' added to tuition costs. Q: What about scholarships? Wasn't that like paying the athletes? A: Scholarships and 'cost of attendance' have always been part of the deal for many Division I athletes and there is certainly value to that, especially if athletes get their degree. The NCAA says its member schools hand out nearly $4 billion in athletic scholarships every year. But athletes have long argued that it was hardly enough to compensate them for the millions in revenue they helped produce for the schools, which went to a lot of places, including multimillion-dollar coaches' salaries. They took those arguments to court and won. Advertisement Q: Haven't players been getting paid for a while now? A: Yes, since 2021. Facing losses in court and a growing number of state laws targeting its amateurism policies, the NCAA cleared the way for athletes to receive NIL money from third parties, including so-called donor-backed collectives that support various schools. Under House, the school can pay that money directly to athletes and the collectives are still in the game. Q: But will $20.5 million cover all the costs for the athletes? A: Probably not. But under terms of the settlement, third parties are still allowed to cut deals with the players. Some call it a workaround, but most simply view this as the new reality in college sports as schools battle to land top talent and then keep them on campus. Top quarterbacks are reportedly getting paid around $2 million a year, which would eat up about 10% of a typical school's NIL budget for all its athletes. Q: Are there any rules or is it a free-for-all? A: The defendant conferences (ACC, Big Ten, Big 12, SEC and Pac-12) are creating an enforcement arm that is essentially taking over for the NCAA, which used to police recruiting violations and the like. Among this new entity's biggest functions is to analyze third-party deals worth $600 or more to make sure they are paying players an appropriate 'market value' for the services being provided. The so-called College Sports Commission promises to be quicker and more efficient than the NCAA. Schools are being asked to sign a contract saying they will abide by the rules of this new structure, even if it means going against laws passed in their individual states. Advertisement Q: What about players who played before NIL was allowed? A: A key component of the settlement is the $2.7 billion in back pay going to athletes who competed between 2016-24 and were either fully or partially shut out from those payments under previous NCAA rules. That money will come from the NCAA and its conferences (but really from the schools, who will receive lower-than-normal payouts from things like March Madness). Q: Who will get most of the money? A: Since football and men's basketball are the primary revenue drivers at most schools, and that money helps fund all the other sports, it stands to reason that the football and basketball players will get most of the money. But that is one of the most difficult calculations for the schools to make. There could be Title IX equity concerns as well. Q: What about all the swimmers, gymnasts and other Olympic sports athletes? A: The settlement calls for roster limits that will reduce the number of players on all teams while making all of those players – not just a portion – eligible for full scholarships. This figures to have an outsize impact on Olympic-sport athletes, whose scholarships cost as much as that of a football player but whose sports don't produce revenue. There are concerns that the pipeline of college talent for Team USA will take a hit. Q: So, once this is finished, all of college sports' problems are solved, right? A: The new enforcement arm seems ripe for litigation. There are also the issues of collective bargaining and whether athletes should flat-out be considered employees, a notion the NCAA and schools are generally not interested in, despite Tennessee athletic director Danny White's suggestion that collective bargaining is a potential solution to a lot of headaches. NCAA President Charlie Baker has been pushing Congress for a limited antitrust exemption that would protect college sports from another series of lawsuits but so far nothing has emerged from Capitol Hill. Advertisement

Democrats eyeing a presidential bid scramble to un-woke themselves
Democrats eyeing a presidential bid scramble to un-woke themselves

Politico

timean hour ago

  • Politico

Democrats eyeing a presidential bid scramble to un-woke themselves

Ambitious Democrats with an eye on a presidential run are in the middle of a slow-motion Sister Souljah moment. Searching for a path out of the political wilderness, potential 2028 candidates, especially those hailing from blue states, are attempting to ratchet back a leftward lurch on social issues some in the party say cost them the November election. Maryland Gov. Wes Moore, who is Black, vetoed a bill that took steps toward reparations passed by his state legislature. California Gov. Gavin Newsom called it 'unfair' to allow transgender athletes to participate in female college and youth sports. And Rahm Emmanuel has urged his party to veer back to the center. 'Stop talking about bathrooms and locker rooms and start talking about the classroom,' said former Ambassador to Japan Rahm Emmanuel, the two-term Chicago mayor who said he is open to a 2028 presidential campaign. 'If one child is trying to figure out their pronoun, I accept that, but the rest of the class doesn't know what a pronoun is and can't even define it,' Each of these candidates are, either deliberately or tacitly, countering a perceived weakness in their own political record or party writ large—Emmanuel, for example, has called the Democratic Party 'weak and woke'; Sen. Elissa Slotkin (D-Mich.) has said the party needs more 'alpha energy'; others like Newsom are perhaps acknowledging a more socially liberal bent in the past. On diversity, equity, and inclusion, some in the party are also sending a signal they're no longer kowtowing to their left flank. Former Transportation Secretary Pete Buttigieg removed his pronouns from his social media bio months ago, and questioned how the party has communicated about it. 'Is it caring for people's different experiences and making sure no one is mistreated because of them, which I will always fight for?' he said in a forum at the University of Chicago earlier this year. 'Or is it making people sit through a training that looks like something out of 'Portlandia,' which I have also experienced,' Buttigieg said. Buttigieg added, 'And it is how Trump Republicans are made.' Moderate Democrats are having a moment and there is a cadre of consultants and strategists ready to support them. Ground zero for the party's great un-awokening was this week's WelcomeFest, the moderate Democrats' Coachella. There, hundreds of centrist elected officials, candidates and operatives gathered to commiserate over their 2024 losses and their party's penchant for purity tests. Panels on Wednesday featured Slotkin, Reps. Jared Golden (D-Maine) and Marie Gluesenkamp Perez (D-Wash.), described as 'legends of the moderate community,' and included a presentation by center-left data guru David Shor, who has urged Democrats to shed toxic positions like 'defund the police.' Adam Frisch, the former congressional candidate and director of electoral programs at Welcome PAC, said his party is 'out of touch culturally with a lot of people.' 'I think a lot of people are realizing, whether you're running for the House, the Senate, or the presidential, we better start getting on track with what I call the pro-normal party coalition,' Frisch said. 'You need to focus on normal stuff, and normal stuff is economic opportunity and prosperity, not necessarily micro-social issues.' Then there is Newsom, the liberal former mayor of San Francisco, who has also distanced himself from so-called woke terminology and stances. The governor claimed earlier this year that he had never used the word 'Latinx,' despite having repeatedly employed it just years earlier and once decrying Republicans who've sought to ban the gender-neutral term for Latinos. Newsom made the claim on his podcast episode with conservative firebrand Charlie Kirk — one of several MAGA personalities the governor has hosted on the platform in recent months. 'I just didn't even know where it came from. What are we talking about?' Newsom told Kirk. The governor, who gained national notoriety in 2004 for defying state law and issuing marriage licenses to same-sex couples in San Francisco, has also pivoted on some LGBTQ+ issues. Newsom broke with Democrats this spring when he said, in the same podcast episode with Kirk, that he opposes allowing transgender women and girls to participate in female college and youth sports. 'I think it's an issue of fairness, I completely agree with you on that. It is an issue of fairness — it's deeply unfair,' Newsom said, a comment that was panned by many of his longtime LGBTQ+ supporters and progressive allies. Newsom for months has also muted his tone on immigration issues, avoiding using the word 'sanctuary' to describe a state law that limits police cooperation with federal immigration authorities even as he defends the legality of the policy. The governor is proposing steep cuts to a free health care program for undocumented immigrants, which comes as California faces a $12 billion budget deficit. In recent days, however, he joined a chorus of California Democrats criticizing Trump administration immigration efforts in his state. Moore, who recently trekked to South Carolina, vetoed legislation that would launch a study of reparations for the descendants of slaves from the Democratic-controlled legislature. Moore urged Democrats not get bogged down by bureaucratic malaise and pointed to the Republican Party as the reason why. 'Donald Trump doesn't need a study to dismantle democracy. Donald Trump doesn't need a study to use the Constitution like it's a suggestion box,' he told a packed dinner of party power players. 'Donald Trump doesn't need a white paper to start arbitrary trade wars that will raise the cost of virtually everything in our lives,' Moore said. There are some notable exceptions to the party's border pivot to the center. Govs. Andy Beshear of Kentucky, JB Pritzker of Illinois and Tim Walz of Minnesota haven't shied away from social issues. Beshear, who has vetoed several anti-LGBTQ+ bills, including during his own reelection year, attacked Newsom for inviting conservative provocateurs Steve Bannon and Charlie Kirk onto his podcast. He also drew a distinction with Newsom on transgender athletes playing in youth sports, arguing that 'our different leagues have more than the ability to make' sports 'fair,' he told reporters in March. 'Surely, we can see some humanity and some different perspectives in this overall debate's that going on right now,' Beshear added. The Kentucky governor said his stance is rooted in faith — 'all children are children of God,' he often says. Walz called it 'a mistake' to abandon transgender people. 'We need to tell people your cost of eggs, your health care being denied, your homeowner's insurance, your lack of getting warning on tornadoes coming has nothing to do with someone's gender,' he told The Independent last month. Pritzker, too, recently said that it's 'vile and inhumane to go after the smallest minority and attack them.' This spring, Pritzker declared March 31 as Illinois' Transgender Day of Visibility. 'Walz, [Sen. Chris] Murphy, Pritzker, Beshear — they're not going around talking about it all the time, but they're also not running away from their values,' said one adviser to a potential 2028 candidate granted anonymity to discuss the issue candidly. 'They're in the both-and lane.' The party's reckoning with social issues is far from over. In 2021, then-Pennsylvania Attorney General Josh Shapiro vocally opposed a GOP bill that aimed to ban trans athletes from participating in women's school sports, calling it 'cruel' and 'designed to discriminate against transgender youth who just want to play sports like their peers.' This year, as the state's Republican-controlled Senate has passed a similar bill with the support of a handful of Democrats, Shapiro has remained mum on the legislation. It's not likely to come up for a vote in the state's Democratic-held House, so he may be able to punt — at least a while. As Emmanuel sees it, his party has a long way to go to over-correct for what he paints as the excesses of the last few years. 'The core crux over the years of President [Joe] Biden's tenure is the party on a whole set of cultural issues looked like they were off on a set of tangential issues,' Emmanuel said. Dasha Burns, Dustin Gardner, Holly Otterbein, and Brakkton Booker contributed to this report.

Vance: Musk attacks on Trump ‘huge mistake'
Vance: Musk attacks on Trump ‘huge mistake'

The Hill

timean hour ago

  • The Hill

Vance: Musk attacks on Trump ‘huge mistake'

Vice President Vance in a recent interview came to President Trump's defense in response to the recent spat between the president and tech billionaire Elon Musk. The squabble, which spilled out into the public arena via social media on Thursday, has been dubbed as a 'national divorce.' Vance called Musk's comments — including tying Trump to disgraced financier Jeffrey Epstein and signaling support for impeachment — a 'huge mistake.' 'I think it's a huge mistake for him to go after the president like that. And I think that if he and the president are in some blood feud,' Vance told 'The Past Weekend' podcast team earlier this week. The episode was published on Saturday. 'Most importantly, it's going to be bad for the country, but I think it's going to be … I don't think it's going to be good for Elon either,' Vance added. The vice president also pushed back on the alleged connection between Trump and Epstein. Musk has since removed the post from his social platform X account. 'First of all, like, absolutely not — Donald Trump didn't do anything wrong with Jeffrey Epstein,' Vance told host and comedian Theo Von. 'Like … the guy is whatever the Democrats and the media says about him. That's totally BS.' The back-and-forth between the two men began after Musk voiced opposition to Trump's 'big, beautiful bill.' The sprawling legislation includes most of the president's legislative agenda. The tech mogul's criticism of the bill — which he called a 'disgusting abomination' — is focused primarily on increases to deficit spending. The Tesla and SpaceX CEO also argued the legislation lacks necessary spending cuts. Trump, during comments from the White House on Thursday, said that while he and Musk had a 'great' relationship in the beginning of his second term, 'I don't know if we will anymore.' The tech billionaire later lashed out at the president, suggesting he wouldn't have won the 2024 presidential election without his support and calling for a third party to rise up. In response, Trump threatened to cut off all federal contracts with Musk's companies. Vance in the interview said his loyalty will always lie with Trump. Still, he praised Musk's business acumen and commended his work at the helm of the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE). 'And look, man, I'm always going to be loyal to the President, and I hope that eventually Elon kind of comes back into the fold,' the vice president said. 'Maybe that's not possible now, because he's gone so nuclear.' He also suggested part of Musk's outburst comes from his dissatisfaction with the GOP's megabill and as his businesses face scrutiny following the billionaire's foray into politics. 'Elon's new to politics, right? So his businesses are being attacked non-stop. They're literally, like, fire bombing some of his cars,' Vance told Von, referring to Tesla vandalism that cropped up amid protests over DOGE's influence on federal workforce cuts. 'And by the way, we're looking into a lot of this stuff. I mean, some of that stuff we're looking into is an act of terrorism, at the Department of Justice, because I think it is an act of terrorism,' he added. 'So I think part of it is this guy got into politics and has suffered a lot for it.' Vance acknowledged Musk's frustration with the reconciliation package but said 'it's a good bill, it's not a perfect bill.' 'If you're a business leader, you probably get frustrated with that process because it's more bureaucratic, it's more slow-moving,' the vice president added.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store