logo
St. Paul Mayor Melvin Carter's veto ups ante over trash with city council

St. Paul Mayor Melvin Carter's veto ups ante over trash with city council

Yahoo15-04-2025

Upping the ante in a zoning dispute involving the city council and St. Paul's designated new citywide trash hauler, Mayor Melvin Carter has vetoed the memorialization, or recording, of the March 19 council vote that blocked FCC Environmental from pursuing a trash truck maintenance, dispatch and refueling facility at 560 Randolph Ave.
The City Council voted 5-0 last month to support a zoning appeal filed by the West Seventh/Fort Road Federation, driven by neighborhood residents opposed to a new trash truck facility planned on Randolph Avenue, about two blocks off West Seventh Street. The zoning change effectively blocked FCC Environmental from situating 30 trash trucks at the former tow lot, though the company was able to do so anyway as a result of the mayor's declaration of a local 'state of emergency,' which the council this month agreed to extend by 90 days.
The result, for now, is that FCC Environmental has been able to pick up residential garbage from trash carts citywide, as long planned, though it leaves open the question what happens in 90 days. The company, based in Texas and Spain, is in the midst of seeking the city's site plan review for its proposed compressed natural gas station, to complement truck washing and maintenance at 560 Randolph Ave. Citywide collection began April 1.
The mayor's decision to veto the council's memorialization of its March 19 vote is intended to keep the appeal of a Planning Commission decision off the books, thereby rendering it invalid. It's unclear if the council has enough votes to override his veto.
'Our successful launch of the citywide partnership with FCC Environmental Services has now completed its second week of operations, delivering essential services to St. Paul households as planned under our seven-year contract agreement,' said Carter, in a four-page letter to the council dated Monday.
The council's decision to adopt 'the memorialization required by City Charter and State Statute … undermines our legal standing, contractual obligations, and long-term service stability,' Carter wrote. 'By reversing a valid zoning clarification without a proper legal basis, the Council risks disrupting trash hauling operations across St. Paul, exposing taxpayers to litigation, and sending a deeply troubling signal to future investors and developers.'
The zoning dispute hinged on whether 560 Randolph Ave., which is zoned for 'light industrial' uses, can legally sustain dozens of trash trucks serving the entire city and a compressed natural gas facility. The zoning code is silent on those particular uses, but city officials likened them to a Public Works yard, which is indeed allowed under 'light industrial' zoning.
The Planning Commission voted to support the interpretation that the proposed trash truck facility was 'substantially similar in character' to a Public Works yard, but the city council voted 5-0 to support the appeal filed by the West Seventh/Fort Federation, even with FCC Environmental scheduled to begin citywide collection less than two weeks later.
At the time of the council's March 19 vote, Council President Rebecca Noecker noted that the Planning Commission failed to review comparisons of how much traffic is generated by a garbage truck facility compared to a Public Works yard, whose trucks are generally lighter than garbage trucks.
'The impact on pedestrians, on traffic … is simply different,' she said at the time.
Noecker, who represents the neighborhood, also emphasized that the Randolph-West Seventh Street intersection is a designated 'neighborhood node' under the city's Comprehensive Plan, which highlights certain intersections as priorities for planning, transit, pedestrian safety and neighborhood amenities.
She noted that city staff failed to include 19 of 27 letters to the Planning Commission in commissioner packets before their public hearing, including key documents provided by the West Seventh/Fort Road Federation around site planning.
At Noecker's urging, the council voted 5-0 to support the appeal. Council Member Cheniqua Johnson was absent and the Ward 4 seat formerly held by Mitra Jalali was vacant at the time.
Neighborhood residents, taken off guard by FCC acquiring the Randolph Avenue tow lots, have brought up safety concerns around the proposed trash truck facility, noting large trucks would drive in and out for cleaning, maintenance and refueling on a near-constant basis. They've said the industrial use undermines longstanding efforts to create a better pedestrian path to the Mississippi River and add residential uses to and near the site, which sits in an industrial area near the former Schmidt Brewery.
Meanwhile, FCC Environmental has made no secret of its hopes to cement contracts with more cities in the Twin Cities, raising concerns with opponents that far more than 30 trucks may someday be situated at 560 Randolph Ave.
Carter, in his letter to the council this week, noted that Noecker and the council voted to support changing the site's zoning to 'light industrial' as recently as 2022. The mayor spelled out a legal basis to support FCC Environmental, which bought the site last summer.
'Minnesota courts have repeatedly instructed municipalities to interpret zoning ordinances in favor of property owners where ambiguity exists,' the mayor wrote. 'Because FCC's proposed facility is reasonably similar in function to permitted public works operations — such as the city's own facility at 899 Dale Street — it meets the legal threshold for approval. Even when alternative interpretations exist, a reasonable claim by the property owner must prevail.'
The mayor also noted that the city's 2040 Plan 'explicitly permits industrial uses within areas designated neighborhood nodes, particularly where those uses predate redevelopment. In fact, other industrial facilities—including City-owned ones—are already operating in neighborhood nodes all over St. Paul.'
Under FCC Environmental's seven-year contract with St. Paul, the company will employ about 60 workers and service 90% of the city's street and alley routes as of April 1, with St. Paul Public Works crews serving the rest.
Hearing more planes overhead? There's a runway project at MSP airport
St. Paul Midway Cub adds more than 100 shopping carts after dry spell
Letters: We need St. Paul councilors with business sense
Jurors convict man in fatal shootout that followed St. Paul funeral reception
St. Paul man convicted of fentanyl conspiracy

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Voters could be given the option to vote on removing NYC mayors from office
Voters could be given the option to vote on removing NYC mayors from office

Yahoo

time11 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Voters could be given the option to vote on removing NYC mayors from office

The Brief A Charter Revision Commission recommended that voters be given the opportunity to vote on a new removal process for New York City mayors. As of today, there are two ways a New York City mayor can be removed. "Staff recommend that the Commission consider creating a process for mayoral removal beyond those currently available to the Governor or Committee on Mayoral Inability." NEW YORK CITY - New Yorkers could soon have the power to remove sitting New York City mayors over misconduct. What we know A Charter Revision Commission, the NYC Commission to Strengthen Local Democracy, recommended that voters be given the opportunity to vote on a new removal process for New York City mayors. For context, Charter Revision Commissions are temporarily appointed government bodies that review the New York City Charter, which is essentially the framework for how the city is governed. These commissions can propose changes to the charter that are then voted upon by the public in a general election. Click to open this PDF in a new window. The Commission to Strengthen Local Democracy met on June 6 – one of the changes proposed is granting the New York City Council the ability to begin the process of removing a mayor. "Staff recommend that the Commission consider creating a process for mayoral removal beyond those currently available to the Governor or Committee on Mayoral Inability," reads one portion of the Preliminary Staff Report released. The process in mind would allow the Council to file mayoral misconduct charges with a supermajority vote (over two-thirds), then hold a hearing for the mayor in question to respond to said misconduct charges. The findings would be decided upon by another supermajority vote – after that point, it would be in the hands of the voters. A ballot question on whether to remove the sitting mayor would be presented to the voters – only a majority, not a supermajority, would be required to remove the mayor. Read the entire updated list of recommendations, including the aforementioned process, here. As of today, there are two ways a New York City mayor can be removed. The New York governor is able to serve a NYC mayor with charges, after which said mayor would have a chance to defend themself – the governor would then decide personally whether to remove them. The alternative is a bit more complicated. The City Charter cites that a special committee can be assembled to remove a mayor: an inability committee. This committee would comprise the corporation counsel, the city comptroller and the speaker of the City Council, as well as the borough president who has served the most consecutive years in office and the deputy mayor. Four of the five members would have to vote to remove the mayor. Who they are This specific Charter Revision Commission (CRC) was created by the City Council in November 2024. It has 17 commissioners, nine of which are appointed by the Council speaker; the remaining commissioners are appointed by the mayor, public advocate, comptroller and the five borough presidents. The panel will hold hearings about its suggested recommendations, then issue a final report later on. The backstory New York Governor Kathy Hochul announced earlier this year that she would not use her authority to remove New York City Mayor Eric Adams from office – the calls for Adams' removal came after New York prosecutors were directed by the U.S. Department of Justice to "dismiss" federal criminal charges that had been made against Adams Adams had been accused of accepting luxury travel perks and illegal campaign contributions from foreign nationals in exchange for political favors, including helping Turkish officials resolve city approvals for a diplomatic building in Manhattan. The Source This article includes information from several New York City government offices and an updated list of recommendations made by the NYC Commission to Strengthen Local Democracy.

Working hard or hardly working? Gen Z's brutally honest backlash over ‘out of touch' work-life balance ignites TikTok
Working hard or hardly working? Gen Z's brutally honest backlash over ‘out of touch' work-life balance ignites TikTok

Yahoo

time2 days ago

  • Yahoo

Working hard or hardly working? Gen Z's brutally honest backlash over ‘out of touch' work-life balance ignites TikTok

A millennial CEO called out Gen Z's work ethic — and got flamed for it. Lindsey Carter, founder of activewear company Set Active, said she wasn't prepared for the backlash she faced after critiquing Gen Z's take on work-life balance in a now-deleted TikTok video. 'Now all I see are people sprinting out of their offices at 5pm like it's a fire drill and then wondering why they feel so unfulfilled in their careers,' Carter posted last week. 'Balance is important, but balance without ambition. That's just coasting,' Carter continued. 'You don't build something great by just doing the bare minimum.' The backlash was fast — and furious. Critics slammed Carter, suggesting she was promoting unpaid work and ignoring burnout. 'Staying past 5pm working for a company I have no equity in doesn't sound like the path to fulfillment, ' one TikToker responded. 'How can I be active if I have to be strapped to my desk after 5pm?' another wrote. Carter quickly deleted the post — then blasted her critics on her Instagram story and claimed she'd been cancelled. 'What followed wasn't dialogue. It was a pile-on,' Carter wrote. 'It doesn't leave room for the thing we all say we believe in . . . growth.' She didn't stop there. 'I'm a millennial. I grew up in a culture where 'hard work pays off' wasn't just a phrase . . . it was a promise,' Carter said in a May 30 Substack essay defending her position. 'Two truths can coexist . . . we can honor ambition and protect our peace.' But for many online, that didn't cut it. Haters noted Set Active's negative Glassdoor reviews and Carter's 2023 decision to restructure her social media team, which some interpreted as layoffs. 'She just had a bad take and is out of touch,' one Reddit user wrote. 'That's consequences, not cancellation.' The controversy has since evolved into a larger debate over what ambition should look like in today's workforce and whether Gen Z is lazy — or simply redefining success on their own terms. Younger workers are no longer buying into the hustle mindset pushed by older generations, said Gabrielle Judge, an influencer known as the 'anti work girlboss.' 'Gen Z isn't unambitious,' Judge told The Post. 'We're just done sacrificing our mental health for companies that reward burnout with pizza parties. 'Logging off at 5 isn't laziness. It's a boundary.' Career strategist J.T. O'Donnell, founder of Work It Daily, said she understands both sides. Rather than trading hours for pay, younger workers are more focused on leveraging skills and knowledge in a changing economy. 'Working long hours is less productive,' said Celeste Headlee, author of 'Do Nothing: How to Break Away from Overworking, Overdoing, and Underliving.' 'I'm not irritated that Lindsey used the word 'coasting,' I have great empathy for her. She is still gripped by the delusion that work is what gives her life purpose and value.' Studies show Gen Z is noticeably less focused on work than young people were just five years ago, said psychologist Jean Twenge, author of 'Generations: The Real Differences between Gen Z, Millennials, Gen X, Boomers and Silents — and What They Mean for America's Future.' 'It's a rejection of the idea that work is the most important thing in life,' Twenge said.

Gen Z debate over work-life balance lights up TikTok
Gen Z debate over work-life balance lights up TikTok

New York Post

time2 days ago

  • New York Post

Gen Z debate over work-life balance lights up TikTok

A millennial CEO called out Gen Z's work ethic — and got flamed for it. Lindsey Carter, founder of activewear company Set Active, said she wasn't prepared for the backlash she faced after critiquing Gen Z's take on work-life balance in a now-deleted TikTok video. 'Now all I see are people sprinting out of their offices at 5pm like it's a fire drill and then wondering why they feel so unfulfilled in their careers,' Carter posted last week. 6 In a now-deleted TikTok, Set Active founder Lindsey Carter told viewers to 'stay late' if they want to succeed — a hot take that quickly lit up the internet with backlash. Obtained by the New York Post 'Balance is important, but balance without ambition. That's just coasting,' Carter continued. 'You don't build something great by just doing the bare minimum.' The backlash was fast — and furious. Critics slammed Carter, suggesting she was promoting unpaid work and ignoring burnout. 'Staying past 5pm working for a company I have no equity in doesn't sound like the path to fulfillment, ' one TikToker responded. 'How can I be active if I have to be strapped to my desk after 5pm?' another wrote. 6 TikTok users did not like Carter's take and accused Set Active of promoting a hustle-first mentality. Obtained by the New York Post Carter quickly deleted the post — then blasted her critics on her Instagram story and claimed she'd been cancelled. 'What followed wasn't dialogue. It was a pile-on,' Carter wrote. 'It doesn't leave room for the thing we all say we believe in . . . growth.' She didn't stop there. 6 Carter quickly deleted her TikTok post — then dismissed the criticism, claiming it was 'cancel culture.' Lindsey Carter/ Instagram 'I'm a millennial. I grew up in a culture where 'hard work pays off' wasn't just a phrase . . . it was a promise,' Carter said in a May 30 Substack essay defending her position. 'Two truths can coexist . . . we can honor ambition and protect our peace.' But for many online, that didn't cut it. Haters noted Set Active's negative Glassdoor reviews and Carter's 2023 decision to restructure her social media team, which some interpreted as layoffs. 6 Haters pointed to Set Active's negative Glassdoor reviews and Carter's 2023 decision to restructure her social media team, which some interpreted as layoffs. Helayne Seidman 'She just had a bad take and is out of touch,' one Reddit user wrote. 'That's consequences, not cancellation.' The controversy has since evolved into a larger debate over what ambition should look like in today's workforce and whether Gen Z is lazy — or simply redefining success on their own terms. Younger workers are no longer buying into the hustle mindset pushed by older generations, said Gabrielle Judge, an influencer known as the 'anti work girlboss.' 6 Lindsey Carter's take on work-life balance is 'out of touch,' her critics said on Reddit, accusing her of pushing a tired, toxic narrative in a wave of viral backlash across social media. Obtained by the New York Post 'Gen Z isn't unambitious,' Judge told The Post. 'We're just done sacrificing our mental health for companies that reward burnout with pizza parties. 'Logging off at 5 isn't laziness. It's a boundary.' Career strategist J.T. O'Donnell, founder of Work It Daily, said she understands both sides. Rather than trading hours for pay, younger workers are more focused on leveraging skills and knowledge in a changing economy. 'Working long hours is less productive,' said Celeste Headlee, author of 'Do Nothing: How to Break Away from Overworking, Overdoing, and Underliving.' 'I'm not irritated that Lindsey used the word 'coasting,' I have great empathy for her. She is still gripped by the delusion that work is what gives her life purpose and value.' 6 Lindsey Carter struck a nerve online after suggesting the 5 p.m. clock-out culture signals a lack of ambition — and the internet had receipts. Lindsey Carter/ Instagram Studies show Gen Z is noticeably less focused on work than young people were just five years ago, said psychologist Jean Twenge, author of 'Generations: The Real Differences between Gen Z, Millennials, Gen X, Boomers and Silents — and What They Mean for America's Future.' 'It's a rejection of the idea that work is the most important thing in life,' Twenge said.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store